Connect with us

Published

on

Getty Images

Twenty years ago, as Morgan Stanley banker Michael Grimes was helping lead the public offering for the young company behind the Google search engine, one of the most anticipated IPOs of the decade, he was among the first people offered a new email service. He had his pick of any identifier he wanted, so he asked for michael@gmail.com.

Sergey Brin, Google’s co-founder, chimed in. Grimes remembers Brin telling him, “Oh no, you don’t want that. Gmail is going to be big. You’ll be spammed forever.” 

Grimes told CNBC he does regret passing up the email address. But the IPO helped cement his reputation as “Wall Street’s Silicon Valley whisperer,” just as the tech industry began to reshape investing globally.  

He calls the IPO of Google, which has increased by 7,600% over the last two decades, “momentous.” 

The cumulative market value of companies Grimes has taken public is in the trillions of dollars. Some were more tumultuous, like Facebook‘s IPO in 2012, and some pioneered innovative new structures, like Spotify‘s direct listing in 2018. But Google’s was groundbreaking.

“It was the start of the next era,” Grimes said. “Google [and other megacaps that followed] changed the way that we work, live and play. They did it in bigger ways than we all thought and now these are trillion-dollar companies right up at the top.”

Big Tech: too big to split

Now operating under parent Alphabet, the company is worth more than $2 trillion. No longer just search and advertising, the tech giant counts YouTube, Pixel smartphones, cloud computing, self-driving cars and generative artificial intelligence among its many business units. It’s a technology company so expansive that the Department of Justice may be looking to split it up.

Alphabet wasn’t immediately available to comment.

At the time of Google’s IPO 20 years ago, the tech industry was still reeling from the dot-com burst of the early 2000s and investors were cautious. Rather than going with a traditional offering, Google decided on a process called a Dutch auction, intended to democratize the IPO process by allowing a broader range of investors to participate. 

The founders’ IPO letter began: “Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one.” It also introduced Google’s “don’t be evil” philosophy.

Grimes said Brin and Larry Page wanted a level playing field for their IPO: “Their point of view was: Wait, if a young engineer sold some of her vested stock from Cisco or wherever and she wants to put $10,000 into Google, why should she get told she only gets $500 worth or none? Especially if she’s willing to pay one dollar more than the institution.” 

“The auction allocations,” Grimes said, “would be determined by price and size. Not by who you are, and that was the fun. That was the fundamental breakthrough.” 

Grimes added that some banks and institutions cautioned Google’s co-founders against the unusual process and told them it wasn’t the way things were done. But others, like his team, said they’d build with them. 

Winning the coveted “left lead” on the IPO was and still is a competitive race. The Morgan Stanley team embraced the format, built a prototype and tested for a billion bids. 

For the road show,  they split into three different teams. Co-founders Brin and Page each led their own, and CEO Eric Schmidt led the third. 

By most accounts, the IPO was successful. Google overcame a weak IPO market and an unproven offering model to generate a solid first-day return and a market capitalization of over $27 billion. From there, the stock kept appreciating.

But it would take more than a decade for the principles behind Google’s IPO to take off. Consumer technology brands like Facebook (now Meta), Twitter (now X) and LinkedIn (now owned by Microsoft) would go the traditional IPO route. But several of the high-profile listings between 2019 and 2021 did incorporate elements that aligned with Google’s democratizing intent. Airbnb offered hosts the opportunity to buy shares at the IPO price. Uber and Lyft made shares available to its drivers, and Robinhood gave customers access to its IPO.

Assessing the impact of Google’s “don’t be evil” credo — and how it’s aged — is more complicated. Grimes declined to reflect on the Google of today, saying he can’t talk about clients.

Google now stands accused of stifling innovation by U.S. and European regulators, and although the company is at the forefront of the generative AI platform shift, search and advertising — still its bread and butter — is facing its biggest existential threat in decades.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Technology

CNBC Daily Open: Capex is the number to look at amid Big Tech earnings

Published

on

By

CNBC Daily Open: Capex is the number to look at amid Big Tech earnings

Signage at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California, US, on Thursday, Oct. 23, 2025.

Benjamin Fanjoy | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The news is coming in fast and thick. Strap in.

First, interest rates.

The U.S. Federal Reserve lowered rates by 25 basis points, as expected by traders. But Chair Jerome Powell cautioned that another cut in December, which the market had been pricing in with more than 90% certainty, “is not a foregone conclusion.”

His statement threw cold water on the markets, sending most stocks lower and Treasury yields higher.

Next, Big Tech earnings.

Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft reported earnings that beat analyst expectations on the top and bottom lines. Notably, Alphabet’s quarterly revenue topped $100 billion for the first time.

And finally capital expenditure.

Capex is really the big story here. Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft are saying they are going to spend much more money.

Alphabet not only raised its capex estimate for fiscal year 2025 to a “a range of $91 billion to $93 billion” from its earlier forecast of $75 billion to $85 billion, but is now expecting “a significant increase” in capex for 2026, according to finance chief Anat Ashkenazi.

Meta hiked the low end of its capex guidance for the year to $70 billion from $66 billion. “Being able to make a significantly larger investment here is very likely to be a profitable thing” CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in the earnings call.

And Microsoft’s Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood said capex in the firm’s fiscal first quarter came in at $34.9 billion — higher than the $30 billion figure estimated in July. The capex growth rate for fiscal 2026 will also surpass that in 2025, Hood added.

The crux is that spending on artificial intelligence isn’t going to slow down, at least for the next year, thanks to increasing demand for AI services. Fears of a bubble can be deferred for now.

That’s it for the day. We all can take a breather — at least until headlines emerge from U.S. President Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping’s meeting later in the day.

What you need to know today

And finally…

Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump

Sergey Bobylev | Kent Nishimura | Reuters

Trump-Xi meeting nears with high stakes and hopes, but few details

A high-stakes meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping could yield a breakthrough in the trade relationship between the two economic superpowers.

But while both the Trump administration and Beijing are projecting optimism ahead of the sit-down, specifics about the summit remain unclear — and some experts are skeptical of the White House’s confidence on achieving a favorable outcome.

— Kevin Breuninger

Continue Reading

Technology

Wall Street hates Meta’s AI spending guidance raise. We don’t

Published

on

By

Wall Street hates Meta's AI spending guidance raise. We don't

Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung’s third-quarter profit more than doubles, beating estimates as chip recovery gathers pace

Published

on

By

Samsung’s third-quarter profit more than doubles, beating estimates as chip recovery gathers pace

Headquarters of Samsung in Mountain View, California, on October 28, 2018.

Smith Collection/gado | Archive Photos | Getty Images

Samsung Electronics reported a rebound in earnings on Thursday, with operating profit more than doubling from the previous quarter on strength from its chip business. 

Here are Samsung’s third-quarter results compared with LSEG SmartEstimate, which is weighted toward forecasts from analysts who are more consistently accurate:

  • Revenue: 86.1 trillion Korean won ($60.5 billion) vs. 85.93 trillion won 
  • Operating profit: 12.2 trillion won vs. 11.25 trillion won

The South Korean technology giant’s quarterly revenue was up 8.85% from a year earlier, while its first-quarter operating profit climbed 32.9% year-over-year. 

Samsung shares popped nearly 4% in early trading in Asia.

The earnings represent a bounce back from the June quarter, which had been weighed down by a massive slump in Samsung’s chip business. Operating profit increased by 160% compared to June, while revenue increased by 15.5% over the same period. 

Samsung Electronics, South Korea’s largest company by market capitalization, is a leading provider of memory chips, semiconductor foundry services and smartphones.

Samsung’s chip business reported a 19% increase in sales from the June quarter, with its memory business setting an all-time high for quarterly sales, driven by strong demand from artificial intelligence.

The third-quarter operating profit also beat Samsung’s own guidance of around 12.1 trillion Korean won. 

Chip Business 

Samsung Electronics’ chip business posted an operating profit of 7.0 trillion Korean won in the third quarter, up 81% from the same period last year, and an over tenfold increase from last quarter. 

Chip revenue increased to 33.1 trillion won, up 13% from last year.

Also known as its Device Solutions division, Samsung’s chip business encompasses memory chips, semiconductor design and its foundry units.

The unit benefited from a favorable price environment, while quarterly revenues reached a record high on expanded sales of its high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips — a type of memory used in artificial intelligence computing.

Samsung has found itself lagging behind memory rival SK Hynix in the HBM market, after it was slow to secure major contracts with leading AI chip Nvidia. However, in a positive sign for the company, it reportedly passed Nvidia’s qualification tests for an advanced HBM chip last month.

A report from Counterpoint Research earlier this month found that Samsung had reclaimed the top spot in the memory market ahead of SK Hynix in the third quarter after falling behind its competitor for the first time the quarter prior. 

MS Hwang, research director at Counterpoint Research, told CNBC that Samsung’s third-quarter performance was a clear result of a broader “memory market boom,” as well as rising prices for general-purpose memory.

Heading into 2026, Samsung said its memory business will focus on the mass production of its next-generation HBM technology, HBM4.

Smartphones 

Samsung’s mobile experience and network businesses, tasked with developing and selling smartphones, tablets, wearables and other devices, reported a rise in both sales and profit.

The unit posted an operating profit of 3.6 trillion won in the third quarter, up about 28% from the same period last year. 

The company said earnings were driven by robust flagship smartphone sales, including the launch of its Galaxy Z Fold7 device.

Samsung forecasted that the rapid growth of the AI industry would open up new market opportunities for both its devices and chip businesses in the current quarter.

Continue Reading

Trending