Connect with us

Published

on

Getty Images

Twenty years ago, as Morgan Stanley banker Michael Grimes was helping lead the public offering for the young company behind the Google search engine, one of the most anticipated IPOs of the decade, he was among the first people offered a new email service. He had his pick of any identifier he wanted, so he asked for michael@gmail.com.

Sergey Brin, Google’s co-founder, chimed in. Grimes remembers Brin telling him, “Oh no, you don’t want that. Gmail is going to be big. You’ll be spammed forever.” 

Grimes told CNBC he does regret passing up the email address. But the IPO helped cement his reputation as “Wall Street’s Silicon Valley whisperer,” just as the tech industry began to reshape investing globally.  

He calls the IPO of Google, which has increased by 7,600% over the last two decades, “momentous.” 

The cumulative market value of companies Grimes has taken public is in the trillions of dollars. Some were more tumultuous, like Facebook‘s IPO in 2012, and some pioneered innovative new structures, like Spotify‘s direct listing in 2018. But Google’s was groundbreaking.

“It was the start of the next era,” Grimes said. “Google [and other megacaps that followed] changed the way that we work, live and play. They did it in bigger ways than we all thought and now these are trillion-dollar companies right up at the top.”

Big Tech: too big to split

Now operating under parent Alphabet, the company is worth more than $2 trillion. No longer just search and advertising, the tech giant counts YouTube, Pixel smartphones, cloud computing, self-driving cars and generative artificial intelligence among its many business units. It’s a technology company so expansive that the Department of Justice may be looking to split it up.

Alphabet wasn’t immediately available to comment.

At the time of Google’s IPO 20 years ago, the tech industry was still reeling from the dot-com burst of the early 2000s and investors were cautious. Rather than going with a traditional offering, Google decided on a process called a Dutch auction, intended to democratize the IPO process by allowing a broader range of investors to participate. 

The founders’ IPO letter began: “Google is not a conventional company. We do not intend to become one.” It also introduced Google’s “don’t be evil” philosophy.

Grimes said Brin and Larry Page wanted a level playing field for their IPO: “Their point of view was: Wait, if a young engineer sold some of her vested stock from Cisco or wherever and she wants to put $10,000 into Google, why should she get told she only gets $500 worth or none? Especially if she’s willing to pay one dollar more than the institution.” 

“The auction allocations,” Grimes said, “would be determined by price and size. Not by who you are, and that was the fun. That was the fundamental breakthrough.” 

Grimes added that some banks and institutions cautioned Google’s co-founders against the unusual process and told them it wasn’t the way things were done. But others, like his team, said they’d build with them. 

Winning the coveted “left lead” on the IPO was and still is a competitive race. The Morgan Stanley team embraced the format, built a prototype and tested for a billion bids. 

For the road show,  they split into three different teams. Co-founders Brin and Page each led their own, and CEO Eric Schmidt led the third. 

By most accounts, the IPO was successful. Google overcame a weak IPO market and an unproven offering model to generate a solid first-day return and a market capitalization of over $27 billion. From there, the stock kept appreciating.

But it would take more than a decade for the principles behind Google’s IPO to take off. Consumer technology brands like Facebook (now Meta), Twitter (now X) and LinkedIn (now owned by Microsoft) would go the traditional IPO route. But several of the high-profile listings between 2019 and 2021 did incorporate elements that aligned with Google’s democratizing intent. Airbnb offered hosts the opportunity to buy shares at the IPO price. Uber and Lyft made shares available to its drivers, and Robinhood gave customers access to its IPO.

Assessing the impact of Google’s “don’t be evil” credo — and how it’s aged — is more complicated. Grimes declined to reflect on the Google of today, saying he can’t talk about clients.

Google now stands accused of stifling innovation by U.S. and European regulators, and although the company is at the forefront of the generative AI platform shift, search and advertising — still its bread and butter — is facing its biggest existential threat in decades.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

Continue Reading

Technology

OpenAI says U.S. needs more power to stay ahead of China in AI: ‘Electrons are the new oil’

Published

on

By

OpenAI says U.S. needs more power to stay ahead of China in AI: 'Electrons are the new oil'

Sam Altman, chief executive officer of OpenAI Inc., during a media tour of the Stargate AI data center in Abilene, Texas, US, on Tuesday, Sept. 23, 2025.

Kyle Grillot | Bloomberg | Getty Images

OpenAI on Monday said the U.S. needs to substantially ramp up its investment in new energy capacity if it wants to stay ahead of China in the race to develop artificial intelligence.

The startup has been inking deals for ambitious infrastructure buildouts in recent months that will require massive amounts of power. The sprawling data centers will push the boundaries of what is possible in the U.S. during a time when the electric grid is already under strain.

“Electricity is not simply a utility,” OpenAI said in a blog post Tuesday. “It’s a strategic asset that is critical to building the AI infrastructure that will secure our leadership on the most consequential technology since electricity itself.”

Read more CNBC tech news

OpenAI shared an 11-page submission with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, in which it encouraged the U.S. to commit to building 100 gigawatts of new energy capacity each year.

A gigawatt is a measure of power, and 10 gigawatts is roughly equivalent to the annual power consumption of 8 million U.S. households, according to a CNBC analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration.

OpenAI said that China added 429 gigawatts of new power capacity last year, while the U.S. added 51 gigawatts. The company said this disparity is creating an “electron gap” that is putting the U.S. at risk of falling behind.

“Electrons are the new oil,” OpenAI said.

WATCH: OpenAI begins to threaten software stocks

OpenAI begins to threaten software stocks

Continue Reading

Technology

Amazon to announce largest layoffs in company history, source says

Published

on

By

Amazon to announce largest layoffs in company history, source says

David Ryder | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Amazon is preparing to announce sweeping job cuts beginning Tuesday, CNBC has learned.

The layoffs will amount to the largest cuts to Amazon’s corporate workforce in the company’s history, spanning almost every business, according to a person familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because the details are confidential.

Amazon is expected to begin informing employees of the layoffs via email Tuesday morning, the person said.

The company plans to lay off as many as 30,000 staffers across its corporate workforce, according to Reuters, which first reported the news.

Amazon declined to comment.

Amazon is the nation’s second-largest private employer, with more than 1.54 million staffers globally as of the end of the second quarter. That figure is primarily made up of its warehouse workforce. It has roughly 350,000 corporate employees.

The planned layoffs would also represent the biggest job cuts across the tech industry since at least 2020, according to Layoffs.fyi. As of Monday, more than 200 tech companies have laid off approximately 98,000 employees since the start of the year, according to the site, which monitors job cuts in the tech sector.

Microsoft has laid off about 15,000 people so far this year, while Meta last week eliminated roughly 600 jobs within its artificial intelligence unit. Google cut more than 100 design-related roles in its cloud unit earlier this month, and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said in September the company laid off 4,000 customer support staffers, pointing to its increasing AI adoption as a catalyst behind the cuts. Intel‘s cuts this year totaled 22,000 jobs, the most of any listed by Layoffs.fyi.

The steepest year for job cuts in tech came in 2023, as the industry reckoned with soaring inflation and rising interest rates. Close to 1,200 tech companies slashed over 260,000 jobs, the site said.

Over the past year, companies across industries including tech, banking, auto and retail have also pointed to the rise of generative AI as a force that’s likely to or already changing size of their workforces.

Amazon has conducted rolling layoffs across the company since 2022, which has resulted in more than 27,000 employees being let go. Job reductions have continued this year, though at a smaller scale. Amazon’s cloud, stores, communications and devices divisions have been hit with layoffs in recent months.

The layoffs are part of a broader cost-cutting campaign by Amazon CEO Andy Jassy that began during the Covid-19 pandemic. Jassy has also moved to simplify Amazon’s corporate structure by having fewer managers in order to “remove layers and flatten organizations.”

Jassy said in June that Amazon’s workforce could shrink further as a result of the company embracing generative AI, telling staffers that the company “will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs.”

“It’s hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce,” Jassy said in the June memo to staff.

WATCH: Report: Amazon targets as many as 30,000 corporate job cuts beginning Tuesday

Report: Amazon targets as many as 30,000 corporate job cuts beginning Tuesday

Continue Reading

Technology

iRobot stock tumbles 30% after Roomba maker warns the search for a buyer has stalled

Published

on

By

iRobot stock tumbles 30% after Roomba maker warns the search for a buyer has stalled

Roomba robot vacuums made by iRobot are displayed on a shelf at a Bed Bath and Beyond store in Larkspur, California, on Aug. 5, 2022.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Shares of iRobot plunged more than 30% on Monday after the company warned its search for a buyer has hit a substantial roadblock and its financial condition remains dire.

The Roomba maker has been vying to sell itself since March, but last week, the only remaining potential buyer withdrew from the process following a “lengthy period of exclusive negotiations,” iRobot disclosed in a regulatory filing.

iRobot’s future has remained uncertain after Amazon abandoned its planned $1.7 billion acquisition of the company in January 2024, citing regulatory scrutiny.

Since then, iRobot has struggled to generate cash and pay off debts, and in March warned there’s “substantial doubt” about its ability to stay in business.

Amazon CEO Andy Jassy called regulators’ efforts to block the deal a “sad story,” arguing it would’ve allowed iRobot to scale and compete against rapidly growing rivals, such as China-based Anker, Ecovacs and Roborock.

Read more CNBC tech news

iRobot said Monday its last remaining bidder offered a price per share that was “significantly lower” than its stock price over recent months. Shares of iRobot are down more than 50% this year.

“We currently are not in advanced negotiations with any alternative counterparties to a potential sale or strategic transaction,” iRobot wrote in the filing. “As such, there remains no assurance that our review of strategic alternatives will result in any transaction or outcome.”

In July 2023, iRobot took a $200 million loan from the Carlyle Group to fund its operations as a stopgap until the Amazon deal closed. iRobot said in the filing that it extended the waiver period for certain financial obligations until Dec. 1, its sixth amendment to the credit agreement.

The filing warns that if lenders don’t provide additional funding or if it can’t secure other sources of capital in the near term, it “may be forced to significantly curtail or cease operations and would likely see bankruptcy protection.”

Amazon CEO on abandoning iRobot deal due to regulatory hurdles: It's a sad story
Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

iRobot year to date stock chart.

Continue Reading

Trending