Connect with us

Published

on

Inside a sprawling lab at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California, hundreds of server racks hum across several aisles, performing tasks far less ubiquitous than running the world’s dominant search engine or executing workloads for Google Cloud’s millions of customers.

Instead, they’re running tests on Google’s own microchips, called Tensor Processing Units, or TPUs.

Originally trained for internal workloads, Google’s TPUs have been available to cloud customers since 2018. In July, Apple revealed it uses TPUs to train AI models underpinning Apple Intelligence. Google also relies on TPUs to train and run its Gemini chatbot.

“The world sort of has this fundamental belief that all AI, large language models, are being trained on Nvidia, and of course Nvidia has the lion’s share of training volume. But Google took its own path here,” said Futurum Group CEO Daniel Newman. He’s been covering Google’s custom cloud chips since they launched in 2015.

Google was the first cloud provider to make custom AI chips. Three years later, Amazon Web Services announced its first cloud AI chip, Inferentia. Microsoft‘s first custom AI chip, Maia, wasn’t announced until the end of 2023. 

But being first in AI chips hasn’t translated to a top spot in the overall rat race of generative AI. Google’s faced criticism for botched product releases, and Gemini came out more than a year after OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Google Cloud, however, has gained momentum due in part to AI offerings. Google parent company Alphabet reported cloud revenue rose 29% in the most recent quarter, surpassing $10 billion in quarterly revenues for the first time.

“The AI cloud era has completely reordered the way companies are seen, and this silicon differentiation, the TPU itself, may be one of the biggest reasons that Google went from the third cloud to being seen truly on parity, and in some eyes, maybe even ahead of the other two clouds for its AI prowess,” Newman said.

‘A simple but powerful thought experiment’

In July, CNBC got the first on-camera tour of Google’s chip lab and sat down with the head of custom cloud chips, Amin Vahdat. He was already at Google when it first toyed with the idea of making chips in 2014. 

Amin Vahdat, VP of Machine Learning, Systems and Cloud AI at Google, holds up TPU Version 4 at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California, on July 23, 2024.

Marc Ganley

“It all started with a simple but powerful thought experiment,” Vahdat said. “A number of leads at the company asked the question: What would happen if Google users wanted to interact with Google via voice for just 30 seconds a day? And how much compute power would we need to support our users?”

The group determined Google would need to double the number of computers in its data centers. So they looked for a better solution.

“We realized that we could build custom hardware, not general purpose hardware, but custom hardware — Tensor Processing Units in this case — to support that much, much more efficiently. In fact, a factor of 100 more efficiently than it would have been otherwise,” Vahdat said.

Google data centers still rely on general-purpose central processing units, or CPUs, and Nvidia’s graphics processing units, or GPUs. Google’s TPUs are a different type of chip called an application-specific integrated circuit, or ASIC, which are custom-built for specific purposes. The TPU is focused on AI. Google makes another ASIC focused on video called a Video Coding Unit. 

Google also makes custom chips for its devices, similar to Apple’s custom silicon strategy. The Tensor G4 powers Google’s new AI-enabled Pixel 9, and its new A1 chip powers Pixel Buds Pro 2. 

The TPU, however, is what set Google apart. It was the first of its kind when it launched in 2015. Google TPUs still dominate among custom cloud AI accelerators, with 58% of the market share, according to The Futurum Group.

Google coined the term based on the algebraic term “tensor,” referring to the large-scale matrix multiplications that happen rapidly for advanced AI applications.

With the second TPU release in 2018, Google expanded the focus from inference to training and made them available for its cloud customers to run workloads, alongside market-leading chips such as Nvidia’s GPUs.

“If you’re using GPUs, they’re more programmable, they’re more flexible. But they’ve been in tight supply,” said Stacy Rasgon, senior analyst covering semiconductors at Bernstein Research.

The AI boom has sent Nvidia’s stock through the roof, catapulting the chipmaker to a $3 trillion market cap in June, surpassing Alphabet and jockeying with Apple and Microsoft for position as the world’s most valuable public company.

“Being candid, these specialty AI accelerators aren’t nearly as flexible or as powerful as Nvidia’s platform, and that is what the market is also waiting to see: Can anyone play in that space?” Newman said.

Now that we know Apple’s using Google’s TPUs to train its AI models, the real test will come as those full AI features roll out on iPhones and Macs next year.

Broadcom and TSMC

It’s no small feat to develop alternatives to Nvidia’s AI engines. Google’s sixth generation TPU, called Trillium, is set to come out later this year.

Google showed CNBC the sixth version of its TPU, Trillium, in Mountain View, California, on July 23, 2024. Trillium is set to come out later in 2024.

Marc Ganley

“It’s expensive. You need a lot of scale,” Rasgon said. “And so it’s not something that everybody can do. But these hyperscalers, they’ve got the scale and the money and the resources to go down that path.”

The process is so complex and costly that even the hyperscalers can’t do it alone. Since the first TPU, Google’s partnered with Broadcom, a chip developer that also helps Meta design its AI chips. Broadcom says it’s spent more than $3 billion to make these partnerships happen.  

“AI chips — they’re very complex. There’s lots of things on there. So Google brings the compute,” Rasgon said. “Broadcom does all the peripheral stuff. They do the I/O and the SerDes, all of the different pieces that go around that compute. They also do the packaging.”

Then the final design is sent off for manufacturing at a fabrication plant, or fab — primarily those owned by the world’s largest chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, which makes 92% of the world’s most advanced semiconductors.

When asked if Google has any safeguards in place should the worst happen in the geopolitical sphere between China and Taiwan, Vahdat said, “It’s certainly something that we prepare for and we think about as well, but we’re hopeful that actually it’s not something that we’re going to have to trigger.”

Protecting against those risks is the primary reason the White House is handing out $52 billion in CHIPS Act funding to companies building fabs in the U.S. — with the biggest portions going to Intel, TSMC, and Samsung to date.

Processors and power

Google showed CNBC its new Axion CPU,

Marc Ganley

“Now we’re able to bring in that last piece of the puzzle, the CPU,” Vahdat said. “And so a lot of our internal services, whether it’s BigQuery, whether it’s Spanner, YouTube advertising and more are running on Axion.”

Google is late to the CPU game. Amazon launched its Graviton processor in 2018. Alibaba launched its server chip in 2021. Microsoft announced its CPU in November.

When asked why Google didn’t make a CPU sooner, Vahdat said, “Our focus has been on where we can deliver the most value for our customers, and there it has been starting with the TPU, our video coding units, our networking. We really thought that the time was now.”

All these processors from non-chipmakers, including Google’s, are made possible by Arm chip architecture — a more customizable, power-efficient alternative that’s gaining traction over the traditional x86 model from Intel and AMD. Power efficiency is crucial because, by 2027, AI servers are projected to use up as much power every year as a country like Argentina. Google’s latest environmental report showed emissions rose nearly 50% from 2019 to 2023 partly due to data center growth for powering AI.

“Without having the efficiency of these chips, the numbers could have wound up in a very different place,” Vahdat said. “We remain committed to actually driving these numbers in terms of carbon emissions from our infrastructure, 24/7, driving it toward zero.”

It takes a massive amount of water to cool the servers that train and run AI. That’s why Google’s third-generation TPU started using direct-to-chip cooling, which uses far less water. That’s also how Nvidia’s cooling its latest Blackwell GPUs.

Despite challenges, from geopolitics to power and water, Google is committed to its generative AI tools and making its own chips. 

“I’ve never seen anything like this and no sign of it slowing down quite yet,” Vahdat said. “And hardware is going to play a really important part there.”

Continue Reading

Technology

Tesla must pay portion of $329 million in damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says

Published

on

By

Tesla must pay portion of 9 million in damages after fatal Autopilot crash, jury says

A jury in Miami has determined that Tesla should be held partly liable for a fatal 2019 Autopilot crash, and must compensate the family of the deceased and an injured survivor a portion of $329 million in damages.

Tesla’s payout is based on $129 million in compensatory damages, and $200 million in punitive damages against the company.

The jury determined Tesla should be held 33% responsible for the fatal crash. That means the automaker would be responsible for about $42.5 million in compensatory damages. In cases like these, punitive damages are typically capped at three times compensatory damages.

The plaintiffs’ attorneys told CNBC on Friday that because punitive damages were only assessed against Tesla, they expect the automaker to pay the full $200 million, bringing total payments to around $242.5 million.

Tesla said it plans to appeal the decision.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs had asked the jury to award damages based on $345 million in total damages. The trial in the Southern District of Florida started on July 14.

The suit centered around who shouldered the blame for the deadly crash in Key Largo, Florida. A Tesla owner named George McGee was driving his Model S electric sedan while using the company’s Enhanced Autopilot, a partially automated driving system.

While driving, McGee dropped his mobile phone that he was using and scrambled to pick it up. He said during the trial that he believed Enhanced Autopilot would brake if an obstacle was in the way. His Model S accelerated through an intersection at just over 60 miles per hour, hitting a nearby empty parked car and its owners, who were standing on the other side of their vehicle.

Naibel Benavides, who was 22, died on the scene from injuries sustained in the crash. Her body was discovered about 75 feet away from the point of impact. Her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, survived but suffered multiple broken bones, a traumatic brain injury and psychological effects.

“Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans,” Brett Schreiber, counsel for the plaintiffs, said in an e-mailed statement on Friday. “Tesla’s lies turned our roads into test tracks for their fundamentally flawed technology, putting everyday Americans like Naibel Benavides and Dillon Angulo in harm’s way.”

Following the verdict, the plaintiffs’ families hugged each other and their lawyers, and Angulo was “visibly emotional” as he embraced his mother, according to NBC.

Here is Tesla’s response to CNBC:

“Today’s verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla’s and the entire industry’s efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology. We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.

Even though this jury found that the driver was overwhelmingly responsible for this tragic accident in 2019, the evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator – which overrode Autopilot – as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road. To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash.

This was never about Autopilot; it was a fiction concocted by plaintiffs’ lawyers blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.”

The verdict comes as Musk, Tesla’s CEO, is trying to persuade investors that his company can pivot into a leader in autonomous vehicles, and that its self-driving systems are safe enough to operate fleets of robotaxis on public roads in the U.S.

Tesla shares dipped 1.8% on Friday and are now down 25% for the year, the biggest drop among tech’s megacap companies.

The verdict could set a precedent for Autopilot-related suits against Tesla. About a dozen active cases are underway focused on similar claims involving incidents where Autopilot or Tesla’s FSD— Full Self-Driving (Supervised) — had been in use just before a fatal or injurious crash.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration initiated a probe in 2021 into possible safety defects in Tesla’s Autopilot systems. During the course of that investigation, Tesla made changes, including a number of over-the-air software updates.

The agency then opened a second probe, which is ongoing, evaluating whether Tesla’s “recall remedy” to resolve issues with the behavior of its Autopilot, especially around stationary first responder vehicles, had been effective.

The NHTSA has also warned Tesla that its social media posts may mislead drivers into thinking its cars are capable of functioning as robotaxis, even though owners manuals say the cars require hands-on steering and a driver attentive to steering and braking at all times.

A site that tracks Tesla-involved collisions, TeslaDeaths.com, has reported at least 58 deaths resulting from incidents where Tesla drivers had Autopilot engaged just before impact.

Read the jury’s verdict below.

Continue Reading

Technology

Crypto wobbles into August as Trump’s new tariffs trigger risk-off sentiment

Published

on

By

Crypto wobbles into August as Trump's new tariffs trigger risk-off sentiment

A screen showing the price of various cryptocurrencies against the US dollar displayed at a Crypto Panda cryptocurrency store in Hong Kong, China, on Monday, Feb. 3, 2025. 

Lam Yik | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The crypto market slid Friday after President Donald Trump unveiled his modified “reciprocal” tariffs on dozens of countries.

The price of bitcoin showed relative strength, hovering at the flat line while ether, XRP and Binance Coin fell 2% each. Overnight, bitcoin dropped to a low of $114,110.73.

The descent triggered a wave of long liquidations, which forces traders to sell their assets at market price to settle their debts, pushing prices lower. Bitcoin saw $172 million in liquidations across centralized exchanges in the past 24 hours, according to CoinGlass, and ether saw $210 million.

Crypto-linked stocks suffered deeper losses. Coinbase led the way, down 15% following its disappointing second-quarter earnings report. Circle fell 4%, Galaxy Digital lost 2%, and ether treasury company Bitmine Immersion was down 8%. Bitcoin proxy MicroStrategy was down by 5%.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

Bitcoin falls below $115,000

The stock moves came amid a new wave of risk off sentiment after President Trump issued new tariffs ranging between 10% and 41%, triggering worries about increasing inflation and the Federal Reserve’s ability to cut interest rates. In periods of broad based derisking, crypto tends to get hit as investors pull out of the most speculative and volatile assets. Technical resilience and institutional demand for bitcoin and ether are helping support their prices.

“After running red hot in July, this is a healthy strategic cooldown. Markets aren’t reacting to a crisis, they’re responding to the lack of one,” said Ben Kurland, CEO at crypto research platform DYOR. “With no new macro catalyst on the horizon, capital is rotating out of speculative assets and into safer ground … it’s a calculated pause.”

Crypto is coming off a winning month but could soon hit the brakes amid the new macro uncertainty, and in a month usually characterized by lower trading volumes and increased volatility. Bitcoin gained 8% in July, according to Coin Metrics, while ether surged more than 49%.

Ether ETFs saw more than $5 billion in inflows in July alone (with just a single day of outflows of $1.8 million on July 2), bringing it’s total cumulative inflows to $9.64 to date. Bitcoin ETFs saw $114 million in outflows in the final trading session of July, bringing its monthly inflows to about $6 billion out of a cumulative $55 billion.

Don’t miss these cryptocurrency insights from CNBC Pro:

Continue Reading

Technology

Google has dropped more than 50 DEI-related organizations from its funding list

Published

on

By

Google has dropped more than 50 DEI-related organizations from its funding list

Google CEO Sundar Pichai gestures to the crowd during Google’s annual I/O developers conference in Mountain View, California, on May 20, 2025.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Google has purged more than 50 organizations related to diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, from a list of organizations that the tech company provides funding to, according to a new report.

The company has removed a total of 214 groups from its funding list while adding 101, according to a new report from tech watchdog organization The Tech Transparency Project. The watchdog group cites the most recent public list of organizations that receive the most substantial contributions from Google’s U.S. Government Affairs and Public Policy team.

The largest category of purged groups were DEI-related, with a total of 58 groups removed from Google’s funding list, TTP found. The dropped groups had mission statements that included the words “diversity, “equity,” “inclusion,” or “race,” “activism,” and “women.” Those are also terms the Trump administration officials have reportedly told federal agencies to limit or avoid.

In response to the report, Google spokesperson José Castañeda told CNBC that the list reflects contributions made in 2024 and that it does not reflect all contributions made by other teams within the company.

“We contribute to hundreds of groups from across the political spectrum that advocate for pro-innovation policies, and those groups change from year to year based on where our contributions will have the most impact,” Castañeda said in an email.

Organizations that were removed from Google’s list include the African American Community Service Agency, which seeks to “empower all Black and historically excluded communities”; the Latino Leadership Alliance, which is dedicated to “race equity affecting the Latino community”; and Enroot, which creates out-of-school experiences for immigrant kids. 

The organization funding purge is the latest to come as Google began backtracking some of its commitments to DEI over the last couple of years. That pull back came due to cost cutting to prioritize investments into artificial intelligence technology as well as the changing political and legal landscape amid increasing national anti-DEI policies.

Over the past decade, Silicon Valley and other industries used DEI programs to root out bias in hiring, promote fairness in the workplace and advance the careers of women and people of color — demographics that have historically been overlooked in the workplace.

However, the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 decision to end affirmative action at colleges led to additional backlash against DEI programs in conservative circles.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order upon taking office in January to end the government’s DEI programs and directed federal agencies to combat what the administration considers “illegal” private-sector DEI mandates, policies and programs. Shortly after, Google’s Chief People Officer Fiona Cicconi told employees that the company would end DEI-related hiring “aspirational goals” due to new federal requirements and Google’s categorization as a federal contractor.

Despite DEI becoming such a divisive term, many companies are continuing the work but using different language or rolling the efforts under less-charged terminology, like “learning” or “hiring.”

Even Google CEO Sundar Pichai maintained the importance diversity plays in its workforce at an all-hands meeting in March.

“We’re a global company, we have users around the world, and we think the best way to serve them well is by having a workforce that represents that diversity,” Pichai said at the time.

One of the groups dropped from Google’s contributions list is the National Network to End Domestic Violence, which provides training, assistance, and public awareness campaigns on the issue of violence against women, the TTP report found. The group had been on Google’s list of funded organizations for at least nine years and continues to name the company as one of its corporate partners.

Google said it still gave $75,000 to the National Network to End Domestic Violence in 2024 but did not say why the group was removed from the public contributions list.

WATCH: Alphabet’s valuation remains highly attractive, says Evercore ISI’s Mark Mahaney

Alphabet's valuation remains highly attractive, says Evercore ISI's Mark Mahaney

Continue Reading

Trending