Connect with us

Published

on

Most parents would take herculean steps to protect their children. But many overlook a relatively simple way to help shore up a child’s financial security: freezing the minor’s credit. 

This could be especially important in the wake of a major breach in which the Social Security numbers of myriad Americans might be for sale on the dark web. While locking their credit won’t solve all cybersecurity issues related to stolen Social Security numbers, it’s one extra layer of protection parents can implement.

The credit-locking process involves contacting each of the three major credit bureaus — Experian, Equifax and TransUnion — and providing required documentation including the child’s birth certificate, Social Security card, proof of address and parent identification. The bureau then creates a credit report for the child and then locks it, so loans or credit cards can’t be issued using the child’s personal information. The freeze remains in place until the parent, or in some cases, the child, requests that it be lifted, temporarily or permanently.

Parents can take these steps proactively even if there’s nothing to suggest a minor’s credit has been compromised such as unexpected credit card solicitations or bills received in the minor’s name.

It can take some time and effort to lock a child’s credit, but the outlay is minimal compared with what can be a lengthy and emotional credit restoration process. “As an adult, if our credit is stolen, it makes us angry, but we do what needs to be done and we move forward,” said Kim Cole, community engagement manager at Navicore Solutions, nonprofit credit and housing counseling agency. But for children, the emotional impact is much greater, she said. “It can take years to get wind of a problem, and meanwhile the damage can continue to grow.”

Identity theft against children — especially very young ones — often slips under the radar until they are older teens or young adults applying for their first credit card, trying to finance a car or seeking student loans, said Loretta Roney, president and chief executive of InCharge Debt Solutions, a nonprofit provider of credit counseling and other services.

Yet, identity theft for children under age 19 is a growing issue, with this demographic accounting for 3% of all identity theft reports for the first half of 2024, according to Federal Trade Commission data. By comparison, this demographic accounted for 2% of identity fraud reports each year between 2021 and 2023. 

Thieves might use a child’s Social Security number, name and address, or date of birth to do things like apply for government benefits, like health care coverage or nutrition assistance, open a bank or credit card account, apply for a loan, sign up for a utility service or rent a place to live, according to the FTC. Locking a child’s credit won’t protect against all of these, but it’s a solid step in the right direction, financial professionals said.

It’s not just strangers committing fraud against children. Cole offers the example of a friend whose uncle had destroyed his credit and started using his niece’s name and Social Security number to open credit cards and max them out. He had the bills sent to his house, and the young woman only discovered the fraud about four years later, when she went to buy a small fixer-upper and realized she had nearly $50,000 of debt in her name and a credit score in the low 500s.  

The niece filed a police report, a complaint with the FTC and disputed the items with the credit bureaus, but it took time to resolve. She applied for a secured credit card in the interim, since her score was too low to qualify for a traditional card, and the situation pushed back her home-buying by a few years, ultimately costing her more, Cole said.

Check to see if the child has a credit report 

Before locking a child’s credit, it’s good practice to check with each of the three major credit bureaus to see if a report exists. Generally, this will only be the case if someone has fraudulently taken out credit in the minor’s name, or if the child has been named an authorized user on an adult’s credit card. 

To check to see if their child has a credit report, parents can mail a letter with their request to each of the credit bureaus. They should be sure to include a copy of the child’s birth certificate, Social Security card or document from the Social Security Administration showing this number and a copy of the parent’s driver’s license or government-issued identification, with current address. Legal guardians may have to give the credit bureaus a copy of documents authenticating their status.

If something amiss pops up on the report, contact the companies where the fraud occurred as well as the three major credit bureaus. Also report the child identity theft to the FTC, including as many details as possible.

If the report comes back clean, the next step is to actually lock the child’s credit.

If needed, freeze a child’s credit

The process for initiating a credit freeze varies slightly depending on the credit bureau and the age of the minor child. Be sure to follow the precise instructions for each credit bureau. For Equifax, in addition to required documentation, parents need to fill out a form online and submit it via postal mail; minors who are 16 or 17 may request their own security freeze by phone or by mail. The websites for Experian and TransUnion provide further details on their respective processes, which includes document requirements and mailing addresses. It can take a few weeks for the bureaus to process these requests. 

Keep good records for unlocking later in life

Parents need to keep safe the pin number they are provided when locking their child’s credit so it can be temporarily unlocked as needed, such as when the child turns 18 and wants to apply for a credit card, said Bruce McClary, senior vice president of membership and media relations at the nonprofit ​​​​​​​National Foundation for Credit Counseling.

The unlocking process isn’t necessarily seamless and can take time. Equifax, for instance, asks for these requests in writing, with required documentation for identity verification purposes. After age 18, Equifax allows for managing the security freeze online.

Educate children early on protection of personal information

Parents should talk to their children about best practices with respect to sharing personal information, McClary said. For instance, they should caution children to be careful about the kinds of information they provide to websites and apps and to keep their Social Security number close to the vest.

Parents may also want to consider credit or identity threat monitoring services or both. Certain providers may offer basic services for free, but family plans that include adults and children and offer a combination of credit and identity theft protection tend to be fee-based. These services — which can run around $24 or more per month — may offer more comprehensive protection, including identity theft insurance and fraud resolution services. Parents should weigh the options carefully to understand the choices and associated costs.

Continue Reading

Technology

Amazon was questioned by House China committee over ‘dangerous and unwise’ TikTok partnership

Published

on

By

Amazon was questioned by House China committee over 'dangerous and unwise' TikTok partnership

Amazon logo on a brick building exterior, San Francisco, California, August 20, 2024.

Smith Collection | Gado | Archive Photos | Getty Images

Amazon representatives met with the House China committee in recent months to discuss lawmaker concerns over the company’s partnership with TikTok, CNBC confirmed.

A spokesperson for the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party confirmed the meeting, which centered on a shopping deal between Amazon and TikTok announced in August. The agreement allows users of TikTok, owned by China’s ByteDance, to link their account with Amazon and make purchases from the site without leaving TikTok.

“The Select Committee conveyed to Amazon that it is dangerous and unwise for Amazon to partner with TikTok given the grave national security threat the app poses,” the spokesperson said. The parties met in September, according to Bloomberg, which first reported the news.

Representatives from Amazon and TikTok did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

TikTok’s future viability in the U.S. is uncertain. In April, President Joe Biden signed a law that requires ByteDance to sell TikTok by Jan. 19. If TikTok fails to cut ties with its parent company, app stores and internet hosting services would be prohibited from offering the app.

President-elect Donald Trump could rescue TikTok from a potential U.S. ban. He promised on the campaign trail that he would “save” TikTok, and said in a March interview with CNBC’s “Squawk Box” that “there’s a lot of good and there’s a lot of bad” with the app.

In his first administration, Trump had tried to implement a TikTok ban. He changed his stance around the time he met with billionaire Jeff Yass. The Republican megadonor’s trading firm, Susquehanna International Group, owns a 15% stake in ByteDance, while Yass has a 7% stake in the company, NBC and CNBC reported in March.

— CNBC’s Jonathan Vanian contributed to this report.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

TikTok is 'digital nicotine' for young people, says D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb

Continue Reading

Technology

Amazon launches fixed pricing for treatment of conditions such as hair loss. Hims & Hers stock drops 15%

Published

on

By

Amazon launches fixed pricing for treatment of conditions such as hair loss. Hims & Hers stock drops 15%

A worker delivers Amazon packages in San Francisco on Oct. 24, 2024.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Amazon on Thursday announced Prime members can access new fixed pricing for treatment of conditions like erectile dysfunction and men’s hair loss, its latest effort to compete with other direct-to-consumer marketplaces such as Hims & Hers Health and Ro.

Shares of Hims & Hers fell as much as 17% on Thursday, on pace for its worst day.

Amazon said in a blog post that Prime members can see the cost of a telehealth visit and their desired treatment before they decide to proceed with care for five common issues. Patients can access treatment for anti-aging skin care starting at $10 a month; motion sickness for $2 per use; erectile dysfunction at $19 a month; eyelash growth at $43 a month, and men’s hair loss for $16 a month by using Amazon’s savings benefit Prime Rx at checkout.

Amazon acquired primary care provider One Medical for roughly $3.9 billion in July 2022, and Thursday’s announcement builds on its existing pay-per-visit telehealth offering. Video visits through the service cost $49, and messaging visits cost $29 where available. Users can get treatment for more than 30 common conditions, including sinus infection and pink eye.

Medications filled through Amazon Pharmacy are eligible for discounted pricing and will be delivered to patients’ doors in standard Amazon packaging. Prime members will pay for the consultation and medication, but there are no additional fees, the blog post said.

Amazon has been trying to break into the lucrative health-care sector for years. The company launched its own online pharmacy in 2020 following its acquisition of PillPack in 2018. Amazon introduced, and later shuttered, a telehealth service called Amazon Care, as well as a line of health and wellness devices.

The company has also discontinued a secretive effort to develop an at-home fertility tracker, CNBC reported Wednesday.

— CNBC’s Annie Palmer contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Technology

WikiLeaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning says censorship is still ‘a dominant threat’

Published

on

By

WikiLeaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning says censorship is still 'a dominant threat'

Chelsea Manning: Censorship still a dominant threat

Former U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning says censorship is still “a dominant threat,” advocating for a more decentralized internet to help better protect individuals online.

Her comments come amid ongoing tension linked to online safety rules, with some tech executives recently seeking to push back over content moderation concerns.

Speaking to CNBC’s Karen Tso at the Web Summit tech conference in Lisbon, Portugal, on Wednesday, Manning said that one way to ensure online privacy could be “decentralized identification,” which gives individuals the ability to control their own data.

“Censorship is a dominant threat. I think that it is a question of who’s doing the censoring, and what the purpose is — and also censorship in the 21st century is more about whether or not you’re boosted through like an algorithm, and how the fine-tuning of that seems to work,” Manning said.

“I think that social media and the monopolies of social media have sort of gotten us used to the fact that certain things that drive engagement will be attractive,” she added.

“One of the ways that we can sort of countervail that is to go back to the more decentralized and distribute the internet of the early ’90s, but make that available to more people.”

Nym Technologies Chief Security Officer Chelsea Manning at a press conference held with Nym Technologies CEO Harry Halpin in the Media Village to present NymVPN during the second day of Web Summit on November 13, 2024 in Lisbon, Portugal. 

Horacio Villalobos | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Asked how tech companies could make money in such a scenario, Manning said there would have to be “a better social contract” put in place to determine how information is shared and accessed.

“One of the things about distributed or decentralized identification is that through encryption you’re able to sort of check the box yourself, instead of having to depend on the company to provide you with a check box or an accept here, you’re making that decision from a technical perspective,” Manning said.

‘No longer secrecy versus transparency’

Manning, who works as a security consultant at Nym Technologies, a company that specializes in online privacy and security, was convicted of espionage and other charges at a court-martial in 2013 for leaking a trove of secret military files to online media publisher WikiLeaks.

She was sentenced to 35 years in prison, but was later released in 2017, when former U.S. President Barack Obama commuted her sentence.

Asked to what extent the environment has changed for whistleblowers today, Manning said, “We’re at an interesting time because information is everywhere. We have more information than ever.”

She added, “Countries and governments no longer seem to invest the same amount of time and effort in hiding information and keeping secrets. What countries seem to be doing now is they seem to be spending more time and energy spreading misinformation and disinformation.”

Manning said the challenge for whistleblowers now is to sort through the information to understand what is verifiable and authentic.

“It’s no longer secrecy versus transparency,” she added.

Continue Reading

Trending