Connect with us

Published

on

The outlook for living standards for middle-income earners is “weak” beyond this financial year, according to an annual report by a thinktank released ahead of the Labour government’s first budget.

The Resolution Foundation warned that a slowdown in pay growth across the board would start to bite by the time of Sir Keir Starmer’s first anniversary in office, arguing that the pace of salary increases would soon be overtaken by rising housing costs.

Its findings, released just weeks after Labour’s landslide election win, were based on forecasts by both the Bank of England and Office for Budget Responsibility.

It said that the impact would be felt most by the worse off – especially if the Treasury decides not to U-turn on planned Conservative cuts to benefits – as a greater proportion of their incomes is spent on things like rents and energy.

The foundation said that 400,000 more children risked coming under the poverty line over the parliament without intervention as the cost of living crisis pivots, in part due to interest rates remaining high to combat inflation.

A reason why rates are not coming down at a faster pace is due to wage growth being seen as an inflationary risk.

The Bank wants salary increases to ease while, ideally, the government does not because it exposes more people to financial difficulty.

It marks a worrisome challenge for the Labour administration because it comes at a time when it claims to have inherited a £22bn “black hole” in the public finances from the Conservatives.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour MP wants winter payment rethink

The government blamed this void for its early decision to scrap winter fuel payments for the 10 million pensioners not in receipt of benefits.

Both Sir Keir and his chancellor Rachel Reeves have warned of further hard choices at the budget, due on 30 October, with the prime minister admitting earlier this week that tougher times lay ahead.

He stated those with the broadest shoulders would have to bear the brunt of the looming tax rises. The Tories have responded by arguing the budget will be a Halloween horror for the middle classes.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM: Budget will be ‘painful’

Labour has ruled out hikes to VAT, national insurance and Income tax.

The foundation’s Living Standards Outlook showed that incomes are expected to grow by 3% in 2024/25, but annual median income growth for non-pensioner households is forecast to tumble to 0.4% between 2024/25 and 2029/30.

This would leave annual average income growth over the whole parliament at 0.8% – or £1,400 per household.

The economists’ report suggested boosting real annual wage growth by one percentage point from 2025/26 onwards, to raise typical income growth for non-pensioner households to 8% by the end of the parliament – up from 5%.

It also said that scrapping the two-child limit on universal credit support and benefit cap, and raising the local housing allowance from 2025, could “lift 600,000 children out of poverty overnight” at a cost of £3.5bn.

The government has defied pressure from its own MPs for the two-child benefit cap to be dropped.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Chancellor quizzed over tax rises

A third proposal was to uprate working-age benefits in line with wages rather than prices from 2025.

The study said that would cost around £9bn a year by the end of the parliament but “would stabilise child poverty rates at a lower level than in the previous parliament”.

Economist Alex Clegg said: “Britain is currently experiencing a mini living standards recovery as inflation falls but wage rises remain high.

“But this isn’t set to last, with the majority of income growth projected over the parliament coming in this year alone.”

He added: “While the outlook for middle-income households is weak, it’s even worse for poor households, with 400,000 children at risk of falling below the poverty line.

“This troubling outlook highlights the need for the new government to beat the forecasts that they have inherited.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Wes Streeting ‘crossed the line’ by opposing assisted dying in public, says Labour peer Harriet Harman

Published

on

By

Wes Streeting 'crossed the line' by opposing assisted dying in public, says Labour peer Harriet Harman

Wes Streeting “crossed the line” by opposing assisted dying in public and the argument shouldn’t “come down to resources”, a Labour peer has said.

Speaking on Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Baroness Harriet Harman criticised the health secretary for revealing how he is going to vote on the matter when it comes before parliament later this month.

MPs are being given a free vote, meaning they can side with their conscience and not party lines, so the government is supposed to be staying neutral.

But Mr Streeting has made clear he will vote against legalising assisted dying, citing concerns end-of-life care is not good enough for people to make an informed choice, and that some could feel pressured into the decision to save the NHS money.

He has also ordered a review into the potential costs of changing the law, warning it could come at the expense of other NHS services if implemented.

Baroness Harman said Mr Streeting has “crossed the line in two ways”.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

“He should not have said how he was going to vote, because that breaches neutrality and sends a signal,” she said.

“And secondly… he’s said the problem is that it will cost money to bring in an assisted dying measure, and therefore he will have to cut other services.

“But paradoxically, he also said it would be a slippery slope because people will be forced to bring about their own death in order to save the NHS money. Well, it can’t be doing both things.

“It can’t be both costing the NHS money and saving the NHS money.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Review into assisted dying costs

Baroness Harman said the argument “should not come down to resources” as it is a “huge moral issue” affecting “only a tiny number of people”.

She added that people should not mistake Mr Streeting for being “a kind of proxy for Keir Starmer”.

“The government is genuinely neutral and all of those backbenchers, they can vote whichever way they want,” she added.

Read more on this story:
‘Fix care before assisted dying legislation’
Why assisted dying is controversial – and where it’s already legal

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously expressed support for assisted dying, but it is not clear how he intends to vote on the issue or if he will make his decision public ahead of time.

The cabinet has varying views on the topic, with the likes of Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood siding with Mr Streeting in her opposition but Energy Secretary Ed Miliband being for it.

Britain's Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero Ed Miliband walks on Downing Street on the day of the budget announcement, in London, Britain October 30, 2024. REUTERS/Maja Smiejkowska
Image:
Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband is said to support the bill. Pic: Reuters

Shabana Mahmood arrives 10 Downing Street.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has concerns. Pic: Reuters

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is being championed by Labour backbencher Kim Leadbeater, who wants to give people with six months left to live the choice to end their lives.

Under her proposals, two independent doctors must confirm a patient is eligible for assisted dying and a High Court judge must give their approval.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour MP Kim Leadbeater discusses End of Life Bill

The bill will also include punishments of up to 14 years in prison for those who break the law, including coercing someone into ending their own life.

MPs will debate and vote on the legislation on 29 November, in what will be the first Commons vote on assisted dying since 2015, when the proposal was defeated.

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC crypto cases will be ‘dismissed or settled’ under Trump: Consensys CEO

Published

on

By

SEC crypto cases will be ‘dismissed or settled’ under Trump: Consensys CEO

The crypto industry is “going to save hundreds of millions of dollars” with Donald Trump as president, Consensys CEO Joe Lubin forecasts.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Crypto Dad’ squashes rumors that he could replace Gensler as SEC Chair

Published

on

By

<div>'Crypto Dad' squashes rumors that he could replace Gensler as SEC Chair</div>

Former CFTC Acting Chair Chris Giancarlo said he’s “already cleaned up earlier Gary Gensler mess,” shooting down speculation he’d replace the SEC Chair.

Continue Reading

Trending