Connect with us

Published

on

The economy could have crashed had the government not found savings by cutting winter fuel payments for pensioners, a minister has said.

Lucy Powell told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that the loss of the benefit, which will now be means tested, was necessary because of a “£22bn blackhole” left behind by the Conservatives.

Politics Live: Labour ‘stands by’ national insurance pledge

Labour claim this is a worse deficit than they had expected, requiring them to make difficult choices.

Asked why pensioners had been targeted in the cuts – when public sector workers are in line for an above-inflation pay rise – Ms Powell said: “Finding savings in the current year that you are in is very difficult indeed.

“And why we had to do that was because if we didn’t, we would have seen the markets losing confidence, potentially a run on the pound, the economy crashing, and the people who pay the heaviest price for that are not you and me, Trevor, the people who pay the heaviest price when the economy crashes are the poorest in society.”

She added the public sector pay awards “were on the desks of ministers before the election, and they chose not to budget for them”.

More on Budget

She said this along with “nearly £7bn underfunding on the asylum system” had left a blackhole of £22bn.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour MP wants winter payment rethink

They knew they had these things on their desk, and they put their head in the sand, and they didn’t take the difficult decisions that they needed to take because they knew they were going to lose the election and it was going to fall to us to do,” Ms Powell said.

“And that’s why we’ve had to make some of these really difficult decisions around means testing the winter payment so that the poorest pensioners continue to receive it but some of the wealthiest pensioners won’t.

Read more from Sky News:
243-question form to get winter payment

Are you still eligible for the payment?

The Conservatives have denied covering up the extent of the shortfall in the nation’s finances and say Labour is using that as a “smokescreen” for cuts they had always planned.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Who will be hit by the Budget?

The Tories and Liberal Democrats are pushing for a Commons vote to block the winter fuel payments change when parliament returns from summer recess tomorrow. Some Labour MPs have voiced opposition to the measure too.

A packed legislative agenda is on the cards, with bills on nationalising rail, renters rights and regulating water companies expected to be among the priorities of the new government.

The first budget is set to be announced in October, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously warned will be “painful” – though he said those with the “broadest shoulders should bear the heavier burden”.

Ms Powell, the leader of the House of Commons, would not be drawn on what this could mean, saying she is not part of those discussions.

Inheritance tax, capital gains tax and fuel duty have all been mooted as possible taxes that could go up.

Ms Powell said Labour will “stand by” its election promise not to raise national insurance, VAT or income tax.

Referencing a song by Oasis, which Ms Powell was able to get tickets to, she said: “I’m afraid we do look back in anger at what the last government left to this government in the economic inheritance and now we’re faced with some really challenging choices.”

Continue Reading

Politics

US lawmakers tap Saylor, Lee to advance Bitcoin reserve bill

Published

on

By

US lawmakers tap Saylor, Lee to advance Bitcoin reserve bill

US lawmakers tap Saylor, Lee to advance Bitcoin reserve bill

Strategy’s Michael Saylor and BitMine’s Tom Lee are among 18 industry leaders who will look at ways to pass the BITCOIN Act and enable budget-neutral ways to buy Bitcoin.

Continue Reading

Politics

Super PAC backing ‘pro-crypto candidates‘ raises $100M

Published

on

By

Super PAC backing ‘pro-crypto candidates‘ raises 0M

Super PAC backing ‘pro-crypto candidates‘ raises 0M

The Fellowship PAC, launched in August, said it had “over $100 million” from unnamed sources to support the White House’s digital asset strategy.

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer was aware of the risks of appointing the ‘Prince of Darkness’ as his man in Washington – to an extent

Published

on

By

Starmer was aware of the risks of appointing the 'Prince of Darkness' as his man in Washington - to an extent

It was a prescient and – as it turned out – incredibly optimistic sign off from Peter Mandelson after eight years as Chancellor of Manchester Metropolitan University.

“I hope I survive in my next job for at least half that period”, the Financial Times reported him as saying – with a smile.

As something of a serial sackee from government posts, we know Sir Keir Starmer was, to an extent, aware of the risks of appointing the ‘Prince of Darkness’ as his man in Washington.

Politics latest – follow live

But in his first interview since he gave the ambassador his marching orders, the prime minister said if he had “known then what I know now” then he would not have given him the job.

For many Labour MPs, this will do little to answer questions about the slips in political judgement that led Downing Street down this disastrous alleyway.

Like the rest of the world, Sir Keir Starmer did know of Lord Mandelson’s friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein when he sent him to Washington.

More on Peter Kyle

The business secretary spelt out the reasoning for that over the weekend saying that the government judged it “worth the risk”.

Keir Starmer welcomes Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte to Downing Street.
Pic: PA
Image:
Keir Starmer welcomes Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte to Downing Street.
Pic: PA

This is somewhat problematic.

As you now have a government which – after being elected on the promise to restore high standards – appears to be admitting that previous indiscretions can be overlooked if the cause is important enough.

Package that up with other scandals that have resulted in departures – Louise Haigh, Tulip Siddiq, Angela Rayner – and you start to get a stink that becomes hard to shift.

But more than that, the events of the last week again demonstrate an apparent lack of ability in government to see round corners and deal with crises before they start knocking lumps out of the Prime Minister.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Had I known then, what I know now, I’d have never appointed him’ Starmer said.

Remember, for many the cardinal sin here was not necessarily the original appointment of Mandelson (while eyebrows were raised at the time, there was nowhere near the scale of outrage we’ve had in the last week with many career diplomats even agreeing the with logic of the choice) but the fact that Sir Keir walked into PMQs and gave the ambassador his full throated backing when it was becoming clear to many around Westminster that he simply wouldn’t be able to stay in post.

The explanation from Downing Street is essentially that a process was playing out, and you shouldn’t sack an ambassador based on a media enquiry alone.

But good process doesn’t always align with good politics.

Something this barrister-turned-politician may now be finding out the hard way.

Continue Reading

Trending