Connect with us

Published

on

A judge has postponed the sentencing of Donald Trump in his hush money case until after the 5 November presidential election.

Trump, the Republican nominee for president, had been due to be sentenced in the criminal case on 18 September.

However, Manhattan Judge Juan M Merchan has now postponed that date to 26 November, writing that he wanted to avoid the unwarranted perception of a political motive.

“The imposition of sentence will be adjourned to avoid any appearance – however unwarranted – that the proceeding has been affected by or seeks to affect the approaching presidential election in which the defendant is a candidate,” he wrote.

“The court is a fair, impartial and apolitical institution.”

The former president was convicted in May of falsifying business records, becoming the first former US president to be criminally convicted.

He was found guilty of covering up his then lawyer’s $130,000 (£99,000) payment to porn star Stormy Daniels for her silence before the 2016 election about a sexual encounter she says she had with Mr Trump a decade earlier.

FILE - Stormy Daniels arrives at an event in Berlin, on Oct. 11, 2018. Witness testimony in Donald Trump's hush money trial is set to move forward again and all eyes are on who will be called next. An attorney for Stormy Daniels says the porn actor is expected to appear as a witness on Tuesday.  File pic: AP
Image:
Stormy Daniels in 2018. Pic: Reuters

Trump, 77, denies the encounter and has vowed to appeal the verdict once he is sentenced.

Falsifying business records is punishable by up to four years in prison, although punishments such as fines or probation are more common.

His lawyers had pushed for the delay arguing that sentencing him in the final weeks of his campaign to retake the White House would amount to election interference.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How the US election system works

They also argued there would not be enough time before the planned sentencing date for the defence to potentially appeal the judge’s forthcoming ruling on their request to overturn the criminal conviction following the US Supreme Court‘s landmark presidential immunity ruling.

The Supreme Court found that presidents cannot be criminally prosecuted for their official acts in relation to a separate case Trump faces over his role in the 6 January riots in 2021.

Judge Merchan said he now plans to rule on that motion on 12 November – another delay from a previous 16 September date.

Responding to the judge’s ruling, Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung insisted the case should be dismissed altogether.

“There should be no sentencing in the Manhattan DA’s Election Interference Witch Hunt,” Mr Cheung said in a statement.

Read more:
Trump threatens to imprison Zuckerburg for ‘rest of life’
Rust belt town embraces Trump despite broken promises
Cemetery official ‘pushed’ in Trump staff clash

The decision to delay came as Trump left the campaign trail to attend a separate court hearing on Friday.

The hearing saw his lawyer urge an appeals court to throw out a $5m (£3.8m) verdict finding him liable for sexually abusing the writer E Jean Carroll in a department store in New York in the mid-1990s.

He was also found liable for defaming her after she wrote about the incident.

His lawyer John Sauer argued at the Second US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan that the original trial judge should not have taken evidence from other women who claimed the Republican presidential nominee sexually mistreated them decades ago.

Mr Sauer called it “a quintessential ‘he said, she said’ case” brought by a woman with a political motive to hurt Trump, referring to the fact that Ms Carroll is a Democrat.

At a news conference at Trump Tower after the hearing, Trump told reporters he was appealing a “ridiculous verdict”, insisting he had “never met” Ms Carroll.

In a separate judgement, which he is also appealing, Trump was ordered to pay Ms Carroll $18.3m (£14.4m) in compensation and $65m (£51m) in punitive damages.

On Thursday, Trump denied revised charges relating to his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election.

Next week Mr Trump will face Democrat nominee Kamala Harris in their first presidential TV debate in Philadelphia.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

The upcoming debates are seen as potentially pivotal. The race for the White House is tight after Democrat support surged following President Joe Biden’s decision to quit the contest in favour of Ms Harris in July.

Some polls have even put the Democrat ahead. She would become the first female president as well as the first woman of black and South Asian descent to hold the Oval Office if she won.

Continue Reading

US

AB Hernandez: 16-year-old transgender athlete wins two golds and a silver as participation sparks controversy

Published

on

By

AB Hernandez: 16-year-old transgender athlete wins two golds and a silver as participation sparks controversy

A 16-year-old transgender athlete who is the focus of a US sports row has won two golds and a silver at the California high school track and field championship.

AB Hernandez was born a boy but has transitioned and now competes against girls.

And the teenager’s inclusion in the girls category in the high jump, long jump and triple jump became a national conversation.

Critics, including parents, conservative activists and President Trump, had called for Hernandez to be barred from competing.

Who is AB Hernandez?

AB Hernandez poses with her medals. Pic: AP
Image:
AB Hernandez poses with her medals. Pic: AP

In the city of Clovis on Saturday, she took part under a new rule change brought in by the state’s interscholastic federation, under which an extra student was allowed to compete and win a medal in the events where Hernandez qualified.

And it meant there were two winners when she finished first.

Hernandez shared first place in the high jump with Jillene Wetteland and Lelani Laruelle.

All three cleared a height of 5ft 7in (1.7m), but Hernandez had no failed attempts, while the other two had each logged one failure.

Hernandez also had a first-place finish in the triple jump, sharing the top spot with Kira Gant Hatcher, who trailed her by more than half a metre.

AB Hernandez shares the first-place spot on the podium with Kira Gant Hatcher during the triple jump medal ceremony. Pic: AP
Image:
AB Hernandez shares the first-place spot on the podium with Kira Gant Hatcher during the triple jump medal ceremony. Pic: AP

Also, Hernandez came second in the long jump with Brooke White.

“Sharing the podium was nothing but an honour,” White said. “As a part of the queer community I want AB Hernandez to know we all have her back.”

Plane protest

During Hernandez’s qualifying events on Friday, a plane flew over the stadium trailing a banner, which read: “No boys in girls’ sports.” It was organised and paid for by two women’s advocacy groups.

A small protest also took place on the road outside. “Save girls’ sports,” one poster read. “XX does not equal XY,” read another.

A plane, paid for by women's advocacy groups, flies a banner over the stadium that reads: 'no boys in girls sports'
Image:
A plane, paid for by women’s advocacy groups, flew a banner over the stadium that read: ‘No boys in girls’ sports’

Transgender inclusion is a thorny issue but a vote winner for Donald Trump, who campaigned last year with a promise to “kick out men from women’s sport”.

He signed an executive order seeking to ban transgender women from female sports.

And Mr Trump has threatened to withdraw federal funding from California over Hernandez’s participation in this weekend’s athletics event.

AB Hernandez. Pic: AP
Image:
Pic: AP

‘Pilot entry process’

The California Interscholastic Federation had earlier said it was launching a “pilot entry process” to allow more girls to participate in the championship.

It only applied to the three events in which Hernandez competed.

Read more from Sky News:
How Musk’s mission to cut government spending fell flat
UK to build weapons factories in £6bn push to rearm

The rule change may be the first attempt nationally by a high school sports governing body to expand competition when trans athletes are participating.

If a transgender athlete wins a medal, their ranking would not displace a “biological female” student from also medalling, the federation confirmed, and it will be reflected in the records.

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

The federation said the rule opens the field to more “biological female” athletes.

The organisation did not specify how it defines “biological female” or how it would verify whether a competitor meets that definition.

Continue Reading

US

Trump to double tariffs on steel imports – as he threatens China

Published

on

By

Trump to double tariffs on steel imports - as he threatens China

Donald Trump said he plans to double tariffs on steel imports from next week, deepening his trade war which has hit global markets.

The US president told a rally of steel workers in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, on Friday that tariffs would be raised from 25% to 50%, “which will even further secure the steel industry in the United States”.

Mr Trump later said on Truth Social that the new levy – also affecting aluminium imports – would be in effect from Wednesday and that American “industries are coming back like never before”.

“This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum (sic) workers,” he added. “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

He then said: “We don’t want America’s future to be built with shoddy steel from Shanghai – we want it built with the strength and the pride of Pittsburgh!”

Donald Trump in front of an "American Steel" on a visit to US Steel Corporation–Irvin Works in West Mifflin, PA, 30/05/25. Pic: Reuters
Image:
The new levy will come into effect on Wednesday, the US president says. Pic: Reuters

Sky News understands that British steel exports are exempt from this rise after a UK-US trade agreement was signed earlier this month.

The agreement said at the time that the US “will promptly construct a quota at most favoured nation (MFN) rates” for British steel, aluminium and derivative products.

More on Donald Trump

Read more: Key details in the UK-US ‘historic’ trade deal

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How good is the UK-US deal?

Earlier, the US president claimed China had “totally violated” an agreement to mutually roll back tariffs and trade restrictions for critical minerals.

“So much for being Mr Nice Guy,” he said in a post on his social media platform.

In March, Mr Trump introduced a 25% tariff on all foreign steel and aluminium imports as a way to protect US manufacturing and bolster jobs by making foreign-made products less attractive.

The rates threaten to make the cost of products using steel and aluminium – such as cars or soft drink cans – more expensive for Americans.

He also previously threatened Canada with 50% levies on imports, while the provincial government of Ontario, in turn, threatened to charge 25% more for the electricity it supplies to the US.

Canada’s most populous province provides electricity to more than 1.5 million American homes and businesses in Minnesota, New York and Michigan.

At the time, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney called the proposed 50% tariffs an “attack” on Canadian workers, families and businesses.

Read more:
Musk appears with black eye at White House farewell
Trump tariffs can stay in place for now amid legal challenge
Trump furious over ‘TACO’ dig – what inspired the phrase?

Roughly a quarter of all steel used in the US is imported, with a majority coming from Mexico, Canada, Japan, South Korea and Germany.

In 2024, 6.6m tonnes of steel were imported by the US from Canada, while 3.5m tonnes were brought in from Mexico.

The US is also reliant on imports for aluminium, with 3.2m tonnes coming from Canada last year.

Continue Reading

US

Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk’s White House swan song

Published

on

By

Painfully soft and inane questions for Musk's White House swan song

It was billed by the president as a press conference..

But that was accurate only to the extent that there were a few select reporters asking questions in the Oval Office.

They were part of the ‘pool’, a chosen group of journalists on a rota to cover the president’s movements each day.

The rota used to be drawn up by the White House Correspondents Association on a rotating basis.

The Trump administration has changed that. They now compile the pool.

And today, as it happens, the media seemed particularly compliant.

The questions were soft. Painfully so.

Read more:
Musk appears with black eye at White House farewell

Elon Musk receives a golden key from US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

There was one on whether the president had any marital advice for his French counterpart – who appeared to be shoved by his wife the other day.

Another was about whether Mr Musk thought it was harder to colonise to Mars or reform government.

There were one or two about the pressing issues of the day, like Gaza, but nothing that could be described as probing or doing what we are supposed to be there to do – hold power to account.

And Musk, under Trump, has without question wielded immense power over the past few months; unprecedented for an unelected official.

He upended the workings of federal government, slashing thousands of jobs. He forced the closure of whole departments like USAID, changing America’s global footprint.

He did it all with a sense of enjoyment. The literal chainsaw to bureaucracy was memorable.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From February: Elon Musk shows off ‘chainsaw for bureaucracy’

There is little debate in America about the need to cut government bureaucracy or cut the debt.

America, more than any country I have lived in, is a place full of bloat and waste. Yet it was Mr Musk’s methods which caused so much unease among his many critics.

They argued that where a scalpel was definitely needed, Musk instead deployed a sledgehammer.

At times, his flamboyant style was a neat distraction from the substance of Trump’s sweeping policy changes.

But none of that was interrogated in this ‘press conference’.

Instead, the inane questions went on.

Mr Musk wore a T-shirt with "The Dogefather" written on it. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

Trump was asked if he would pardon Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs should he be convicted – he didn’t say ‘no’, but there was no follow up to examine why.

He was asked if he wished he’d become a judge given that they are blocking so much of his legislation. He laughed.

There was a moment when irony appeared to have died altogether.

In the same breath as trumpeting his success in cutting government waste – when he has, in fact, achieved a fraction of the $2 trillion savings he promised – Musk congratulated Trump for deploying so much gold around the Oval Office.

The presidential office has had an extensive, gaudy gold makeover costing undisclosed sums.

Elon Musk stands in the Oval Office - with more gold decor brought in by Donald Trump - 30/05/25. Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

One reporter did ask about Musk’s alleged drug use. But by attributing the story to the New York Times – who have made the allegations – Musk had an easy out.

“Why believe that fake news,” he essentially said.

Surely the obvious question was “Mr Musk, when was the last time you took ketamine or ecstasy?”

It never came.

Read more:
Trump furious over ‘TACO’ dig – what inspired the phrase?
Seven things you might not have known about Musk

We did get the answer to one burning question, trivial though it was, given what’s going on in the world.

But it took 41 minutes for any of the reporters to ask it: Why was Elon Musk sporting a shiner on his right eye?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Elon Musk asked about his black eye

His 4-year-old son, X, whacked him, he said.

Maybe young X has some sympathy for the thousands of federal workers – ordinary Americans – who Musk fired at his president’s pleasure.

Continue Reading

Trending