Connect with us

Published

on

Tonight, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are ready to go head-to-head for the first – and likely only – time ahead of the US election.

At 2am on Wednesday, the former president and incumbent vice president will debate live on ABC News from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Polling shows the Republican and Democrat are neck-and-neck just two months out from voting, with a recent New York Times and Siena College poll putting Mr Trump ahead by one point at 48% to 47% for Ms Harris.

All the latest US election updates

Ms Harris has already arrived in the “City of Brotherly Love”, with our US partner network NBC News reporting she had spent the weekend in Pittsburgh preparing for the debate.

Meanwhile, Mr Trump has been packing out his schedule with campaign events, leaving his vice presidential nominee JD Vance to publicly bash the Democrat’s policies online.

Here are five things to look out for in the debate: You can watch live coverage from midnight tonight on Sky News on web and on mobile

Poking the bear

Team Harris talks about the value of getting under Donald Trump’s skin. “Poking the bear” would aim to unsettle a man prone to visible irritation.

“She should bait him,” said Hillary Clinton in a New York Times interview. “When I said he was a Russian puppet, he just sputtered onstage.”

Winding up Trump would be designed to discomfort him in the spotlight and craft the spectacle of an angry and ill-disciplined former president.

We saw it in the first presidential debate in 2020, where Trump was roundly criticised for repeatedly interrupting Joe Biden.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From 2020: Trump v Biden: First debate gets personal

On debate stages since, he has shown he has learned the lesson, but it won’t stop Harris from inviting him to roll back the rage – if he obliges, it could diminish him and enhance her.

‘Harris owns everything’

The Trump team laid down their debate strategy in an eve-of-event news conference.

As much as Kamala Harris wants to present herself as a candidate of change, they intend to place her firmly at the heart of the Biden White House.

Trump spokesman Jason Miller told journalists that Harris was currently running the country and that she “owns everything from this administration”.

They trailed Trump’s attack lines on immigration, crime, global instability and high prices.

Their view of success is in emphasising their view of Kamala Harris as a “radical liberal”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How does the US election work?

The moments

Millions will tune into the 90-minute debate and pore over every last detail. Millions also won’t.

For them, the event will be consumed via viral moments on a vertical screen.

There will be much strategising around the 10-second clips that fly on TikTok and Instagram, and which shape views on victory and defeat.

Think Donald Trump standing over Hillary Clinton in 2016 and glowering “you’d be in jail”, or Kamala Harris slapping down Mike Pence in 2020 with “I’m speaking”.

For all the talk of laying down policy and engaging on the politics of the presidency, there’s a heavy element of pantomime to all of this.

Read more:
Three challenges Harris must overcome
The key challenges for Donald Trump

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Who is more popular: Harris or Trump?

Stage dynamics

On stage, Harris and Trump will be coming face-to-face for the first time. They didn’t meet at the 2021 inauguration because Donald Trump didn’t attend.

The setting that has both candidates at lecterns should preclude a repeat of the way Trump stalked Hillary Clinton on stage in the 2016 debate.

However, the interaction between Trump and his female opponent will be no less interesting. This isn’t the old guy contest of Trump versus Biden, it’s more complicated than that.

Trump versus Harris puts gender at the centre of the stage dynamic. Donald Trump has a history of publicly denigrating women, including Kamala Harris.

He has been found liable for sexual abuse by a civil court. How that plays in the debate, and the mind of the viewer, will be a factor – particularly for the women voters he needs.

Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democrat who has been helping him prepare, told reporters: “President Trump respects women and doesn’t feel the need to be patronising or to speak to women in any other way than he would speak to a man.”

Read more from Sky News:
For Migrants, the election result could mean life or death
Your ultimate guide to the US election
Will Starmer meet Harris and Trump on US trip?

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

Success

The importance of the TV debate is well-documented. Ultimately, both candidates need to be convincingly presidential, in politics and personality – to enter and exit the stage exuding gravitas and authority.

Harris, in particular, needs to assert her presence because she is less familiar to American voters – 28% said they felt they needed to know more about her, according to a New York Times survey from earlier this week.

Familiarity was always going to be a challenge for her, with such a short run between selection and election.

She, and he, will seek to lay down policy ideas and underpin their credentials for office. How easy that will be in this political bear pit is anyone’s guess.

Experience suggests it will be a loosely structured discussion that is less of a debate and more of a political stand-up routine on both sides of the stage – played not for laughs, but for the presidency.

Continue Reading

US

Trump told to sack Pete Hegseth over reports of second war plans group chat

Published

on

By

Trump told to sack Pete Hegseth over reports of second war plans group chat

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has been linked to a second group chat about sensitive military operations, which he reportedly shared with his wife, brother and personal lawyer.

The messages sent via the Signal messaging app are again understood to have contained details of an attack on Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis in March.

The second chat group, initially reported by The New York Times, included about a dozen people. It revealed details of the schedule of the airstrikes, according to the Reuters news agency.

Two sources with knowledge of the matter told Sky News’ US partner network NBC News there were 13 people in the second chat group, and Mr Hegseth divulged the information despite an aide warning him about using an unsecure communications system.

Mr Hegseth’s wife, Jennifer, a former Fox News producer, has attended sensitive meetings with foreign military counterparts, while his brother was hired at the Pentagon as a Department of Homeland Security liaison and senior adviser.

Military details from the first chat group were revealed by a journalist from The Atlantic magazine who was accidentally added to the Signal app by national security adviser Mike Waltz.

Mr Hegseth then shared sensitive information with cabinet officials about last month’s airstrike on targets in Yemen, which was later leaked.

Read more from Sky News:
What is Signal?
Who is Pete Hegseth?

Serious questions are being asked of Mike Waltz (left) and Pete Hegseth (pictured in February). Pic: AP
Image:
Mike Waltz (left) and Pete Hegseth (right) have used Signal to discuss sensitive government matters. Pic: AP

‘A non-story,’ says White House

But the White House has consistently defended Mr Hegseth.

Donald Trump dismissed the original leak as “something that can happen”.

Responding to the latest chat group, White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said: “No matter how many times the legacy media tries to resurrect the same non-story, they can’t change the fact that no classified information was shared.

“Recently-fired ‘leakers’ are continuing to misrepresent the truth to soothe their shattered egos and undermine the President’s agenda, but the administration will continue to hold them accountable.”

The “leakers” referred to in the White House statement are four senior officials who were ousted from the Pentagon last week as part of an internal leak investigation.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Leaked war plans: ‘Fairly serious’

‘Hegseth put lives at risk’

The New York Times reported that the second chat – named “Defence | Team Huddle” – was created on Mr Hegseth’s private phone.

It detailed the same warplane launch times as the first chat.

Several former and current officials have said sharing those operational details before a strike would have certainly been classified, and their release could have put pilots in danger.

Democratic politicians have repeatedly called for Mr Hegseth to step down.

“We keep learning how Pete Hegseth put lives at risk,” Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said in a post on X.

“But [Donald] Trump is still too weak to fire him. Pete Hegseth must be fired.”

The latest claims about Mr Hegseth emerged as Yemen’s Houthi rebels reported another wave of US airstrikes on Sunday, including on the capital Sanaa.

The Houthis said at least 12 people had been killed, with 30 more injured.

The US says its bombing campaign is in response to Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping lanes.

Continue Reading

US

Trump100 Day 92: Is Trump’s deportation policy firm or cruel?

Published

on

By

Trump100 Day 92: Is Trump's deportation policy firm or cruel?

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

The row over the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador from the US in error in March, continues to rock Washington DC.

US correspondent Martha Kelner speaks to Ron Vitiello, Donald Trump’s former acting director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, about the case and if the president’s border policies are working as he planned.

If you’ve got a question you’d like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@sky.uk.

Don’t forget, you can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.

NB. This interview was recorded before Kilmar Abrego Garcia was moved from the CECOT prison – where terror suspects are held in severe conditions – to another detention centre in El Salvador.

Continue Reading

US

DHL suspends some shipments to US amid Trump tariff regime

Published

on

By

DHL suspends some shipments to US amid Trump tariff regime

DHL Express is suspending some shipments to the US as Donald Trump’s new tariff regime takes effect.

From 21 April, shipments worth more than $800 (£603) to US consumers from “any origin” will be temporarily suspended.

New rules that came into effect at the start of April made such shipments subject to increased customs checks.

“This change has caused a surge in formal customs clearances, which we are handling around the clock,” said the parcel delivery service.

Shipments going from business to business worth more than $800 aren’t affected by the suspension, but DHL warned they may also face delays.

Shipments under $800 to either businesses or consumers are not impacted, but one British cycle manufacturer suggested its US customers may need to split orders over $800 into “smaller shipments” to avoid the red tape.

Read more:
The art of doing a deal with Trump
Is there method to Trump’s madness?

More on Tariffs

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump: Tariffs are making US ‘rich’

Trump targeting ‘deceptive’ practices

From May, shipments from China and Hong Kong that are worth less than $800 “will be subject to all applicable duties”, according to the White House.

“President Trump is targeting deceptive shipping practices by Chinese-based shippers, many of whom hide illicit substances, including synthetic opioids, in low-value packages,” it said in a statement.

Until now, deliveries worth less than $800 didn’t incur any duties, which allowed low-cost companies Chinese like Shein and Temu to make inroads in the US.

Both have warned their prices will now rise because of the rule changes, starting on 25 April.

Continue Reading

Trending