It turns out cyclists actually should roll through stop signs. Here’s why
When it comes to greening up our transportation systems and reducing the massive carbon footprint left by our daily commutes, there’s a much better solution than trying to get everyone into an electric car. Encouraging increased cycling, whether on electric bikes or good old-fashioned acoustic bikes, has the biggest impact on reduced emissions and the health and well-being of our society. But with safety at the top of the list of concerns for those switching to a two-wheeled commute, more studies are showing that the best way to protect cyclists at the most dangerous point on their rides is to simply let them blow through stop signs in what is commonly known as an “Idaho stop”.
The Idaho stop gets its name from the state that first enacted it into law back in the 1980s. In an Idaho stop, cyclists are permitted to treat stop signs as yield signs, meaning they slow down and look for traffic before continuing through, no full stop required. In many states, the Idaho stop goes further, not just letting cyclists treat stop signs as yield signs but also treating red lights as stop signs.
There are few things more frustrating to anti-cyclist drivers than seeing a bike rider roll through a stop sign or red light (perhaps seeing them zip past traffic by using the bike lane could be one of them?), but studies are now showing that using an Idaho stop is actually safer than requiring cyclists to come to a full stop at stop signs.
As Alvin Holbrook pointed out in Velo, a recent study by the University of Oregon that put cyclists and drivers in over a dozen “live interaction” four-way intersection scenarios revealed results that may surprise some drivers.
The study found that cyclists preferred the Idaho stop method (which is pretty obvious for a vehicle that works largely by maintaining momentum), but also that when drivers received an education about the rolling stop sign law for cyclists, they approached intersections slower than before and created fewer dangerous scenarios for the cyclists.
Alvin explained, “The main takeaway from the study is that a rolling stop law allowed people biking to do an action they preferred in treating a stop sign as a yield. And once drivers were educated, intersection interactions between people biking and driving were no more dangerous than before introducing the law.”
In other words, safety increased instead of decreasing when an Idaho stop was permitted and when drivers were informed of the law.
That’s just one example, but many studies have confirmed the result that Idaho stops, or rolling stop laws, either increase the safety of road users or have no impact (i.e. are no more dangerous to cyclists than requiring a full stop).
Alvin also pointed to a study from Delaware, one of eight states in the US that has an Idaho stop law on the books, which found a 23% decrease in car/bike crashes at intersections after the Idaho stop law was enacted.
Another study performed in Tampa Bay, Florida, (a state infamous for its questionable drivers) and commissioned by the Florida Department of Transportation, “found that dangerous street design and motorists are what put cyclists at risk, not cyclist behavior.” That study found a nearly 90% traffic law compliance among cyclists, which might surprise drivers who tend to remember the few cases they witness of cyclists breaking traffic law, then projecting that onto all riders. But as the study shows, cyclists are generally incentivized to follow traffic law more than drivers since the risks of not doing so are higher.
The least flattering study on Idaho stops comes from Illinois, where the researchers found no difference in the proportion of crashes after the Idaho stop law was enacted. However, they did find that the severity of those crashes decreased. The result was that cyclists were able to move around more efficiently without increasing the rate of crashes and while decreasing serious crashes.
Even the National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) highlights the fact that “there is no evidence showing bicyclist stop-as-yield laws have increased bike conflicts with other bikes or pedestrians.”
So why is it safer for cyclists to blow through stop signs or continue through a red light after stopping?
It likely comes down to a number of factors, but several of them lead back to the same underlying issue: intersections are the most dangerous location for cyclists since such intersections are designed for cars, not bikes. When stopped at an intersection, cyclists often disappear from the view of car drivers, blending into the background while drivers instinctively look for other cars. A moving bike is more visible to drivers due to millions of years of evolutionary pressure adapting humans to spot movement.
Rolling through stop signs also means cyclists ultimately spend less time in the most dangerous location for them, quickly moving out of intersections and back to the relative safety of bike lanes on straightaways.
And as studies show, cyclists generally don’t blow through stop signs in a dangerous fashion. They’re incentivized to slow down and check for traffic out of sheer self-preservation. They don’t have a 5,000 lb steel cocoon to protect them the way drivers do. This is despite there being a decent chance that the reader’s confirmation bias would argue differently, as it is easy to remember the last time we all saw a cyclist do something dangerous and forget the dozens of cyclists riding safely that we conveniently ignore every day.
But as Alvin points out, “The bottom line is every person on a bicycle has more to lose — and a greater incentive to yield — when entering an intersection than a driver does. A collision between a car and someone walking and biking will always be tilted against the person outside of the car.
Streets are safer when there is a common understanding of what to expect from everyone. Streets are safer when car drivers aren’t able to use stereotypes of cyclists breaking laws to threaten and harass them. And of course, streets are safer when people are biking.”
Even with strong demand up until the federal tax credit expired, Hyundai’s EV sales crashed last month. Hyundai, Ford, Kia, and Honda sold significantly fewer EVs in October.
Hyundai EV sales drop in October as the tax credit ends
Hyundai is still on pace for its third straight record sales year in the US. The South Korean automaker sold 70,118 vehicles in the US last month, 2% fewer than it did in October 2024.
Although Hyundai sold a record number of “electrified” vehicles, it was hybrids that carried the growth in October. Several hybrid models set new October sales records, including the Sonata HEV and Elentra HEV. The Palisade also had its best October with the new HEV version now rolling out.
“Hybrid vehicles led the way in October with a 41% increase, and electrified sales were up 8%,” said Hyundai Motor North America’s CEO, Randy Parker.
Fully electric vehicles, on the other hand, didn’t fare as well. Hyundai sold just 1,642 IONIQ 5s last month, down 63% from October 2024 and a stark contrast from the over 8,400 sold in September.
Sales of the IONIQ 6 fell 52% to 398, while Hyundai sold just 317 units of its three-row electric SUV, the IONIQ 9. Parker said that Hyundai saw “strong EV demand leading up to the expiration of the federal tax credits,” adding that the shift “has temporarily disrupted the market.”
Despite this, Hyundai’s momentum “remains strong,” and according to Parker, it’s still on pace for record retail and total sales in 2025. Parker said Hyundai is confident the EV market will reset following the policy changes.
Hyundai wasn’t the only brand with significantly lower EV sales following the expiration of the tax credits. Ford, Kia, and Honda all sold drastically fewer electric vehicles last month.
Although the tax credit expired, Hyundai is still offering big savings. After cutting prices on the 2026 IONIQ 5 by nearly $10,000 on some trims compared to the 2025 model, Hyundai’s electric SUV now starts at under $35,000.
Hyundai is also still offering the $7,500 credit for the 2025 IONIQ 5. So, why are EV sales collapsing? It’s likely due to the rush of buyers that flooded the market in the months leading up to the tax credit’s expiration.
Interested in trying out Hyundai’s electric vehicles for yourself? Tap the links below to find an IONIQ 5, IONIQ 6, or IONIQ 9 near you.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
![Leaked Hyundai EV interior reveals more than just a new screen [Images]](https://i0.wp.com/electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/03/Hyundai-new-Pleos-OS.jpeg?resize=1200,628&quality=82&strip=all&ssl=1)
The interior featured a new Tesla-like infotainment screen at the center. A closer look at the new Hyundai IONIQ 3 reveals much more than just a massive new screen.
Leaked images reveal new Hyundai IONIQ 3 EV interior
The IONIQ 3 is set to arrive as a smaller, more affordable sibling to the IONIQ 5 as Hyundai expands its EV lineup.
Despite its compact size at just 4,287 mm long, Hyundai said the IONIQ 3 will set the tone for its next chapter with a fresh look and advanced new tech.
It will be one of the first models to run on Hyundai’s new Pleos software and infotainment system. The next-gen infotainment system features a smartphone-like UI, similar to Tesla’s, with a large touchscreen at the center.
Hyundai’s new tech stack and software platform integrates everything under one roof, including the infotainment system and OS. The setup is not only easier to use but also unlocks new features such as autonomous driving and real-time data analysis.
We are finally getting a closer look at the new system after leaked photos surfaced online, revealing the IONIQ 3’s interior for the first time.
The images, courtesy of TheKoreanCarBlog (via SH Prohots), show the Tesla-like floating infotainment at the center of an otherwise minimalistic interior. Even the steering wheel resembles that of Tesla models.
Unlike Tesla, however, Hyundai still includes a driver display cluster and several physical buttons. Hyundai said the first vehicle with its new Pleos Connect infotainment system will arrive in Q2 2026, which is the same time the IONIQ 3 is expected to launch.
If you look at the vehicle displayed on the screen, it appears to be the updated Grandeur, Hyundai’s flagship sedan. Hyundai is expected to reveal the Grandeur facelift later this year or in early 2026.
Hyundai previewed the IONIQ 3 in September, unveiling the Concept THREE at the Munich Motor Show. The IONIQ 3 is Hyundai’s first compact model under its IONIQ EV series.
It features Hyundai’s new “Art of Steel” design, inspired by advanced steel technologies. According to Hyundai, the Aero Hatch profile is “a new typology that reimagines the compact EV silhouette.”
The concept featured a customizable, futuristic interior design with “hidden surprises” throughout, but it will look more like the images above when it arrives next year.
Hyundai will begin IONIQ 3 production at its manufacturing plant in Turkey in Q2 2026. It will sit between the Inster EV and Kona Electric in Hyundai’s European lineup.
At 4,287 mm long, 1,940 mm wide, and 1,428 mm tall, with a wheelbase of 2,722 mm, the Concept Three is about the size of the Volkswagen ID.3 and Kia EV3.
We will learn final specs and prices closer to launch, but the IONIQ 3 is expected to be available with 58.3 kWh and 81.4 kWh battery packs, like the Kia EV3. The former provides a WLTP range of 260 miles, while the latter is rated at 365 miles.
The Hyundai Kona Electric starts at £34,995 ($47,000) in the UK, so the IONIQ 3 is expected to be priced closer to £25,000 ($33,700).
How do you feel about the new interior design? Do you like the changes? Or should Hyundai stick with the dual 12.3″ screens on current EV models, like the IONIQ 5? Drop us a comment below and let us know your thoughts.
Source: TheKoreanCarBlog, SH Proshots
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Environment
Tesla (TSLA) reportedly secures massive $2.1 billion battery deal with Samsung SDI, but not for its cars
Tesla has reportedly secured another major battery supply partner, but it’s not for the product you might think.
According to a new report from the Korea Economic Daily, Tesla has reached a substantial agreement with Samsung SDI. The deal is said to be worth over 3 trillion won (approximately $2.1 billion) and will see the South Korean battery giant supply cells to Tesla over a three-year period.
But here’s the key part: This supply is reportedly for Tesla’s Energy Storage System (ESS) business.
That means these cells are destined for Megapack and possibly Powerwall products, not for Tesla’s electric vehicles.
The report, which cites an unnamed battery industry source, marks the first large-scale supply agreement between Samsung SDI and Tesla. For years, the two companies have been in talks, with most speculation centered on Samsung building 4680 cells, a cell format Tesla pioneered. While Samsung is indeed ramping up its own 46-series cell production, this new deal appears to be focused entirely on LFP cells for stationary energy storage.
When reached for comment, Samsung SDI officially stated that “nothing has been finalized yet,” which is a common response to such reports before a deal is formally announced. Tesla has not commented.
This new deal with Samsung SDI follows another massive ESS battery agreement Tesla signed with a different South Korean supplier, LG Energy Solution, for lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries. Currently, Tesla exclusively uses cells from CATL and BYD for its energy storage products, but the company recently noted a bed to diversify supply due to the tariffs put in place on Chinese products.
Tesla has also been working on deploying its own LFP battery cell manufacturing in the US to partially offset Chinese supply.
Electrek’s Take
The company’s energy storage division has been a silver lining amid two years of decline in its EV division.
The growth has been impressive despite increased competition.
It’s the only segment where Tesla is truly production constrained, and more specifically battery supply constrained rather than demand constrained.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024