The government has “no choice” but to cut winter fuel payments for the majority of pensioners, a minister has said ahead of MPs voting on the controversial plan.
The move – which will see around 10 million people lose the payment of up to £300 to help with energy costs – has been defended by Labour, who said “tough decisions” need to be made in light of the £22bn “black hole” in public finances.
Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds told Sky News: “We have no choice… We’re fixing the foundations [of the economy], and that’s a difficult message today.
“But it’s not just to correct the problem, it’s to make sure your house is better in future and the better future we want, more prosperity for everyone, comes through stability and responsibility.”
However, some MPs from Labour’s own side, as well as charities and opposition MPs, are calling for a U-turn, saying the policy will leave less well-off pensioners with “a heart-breaking choice between heating and eating this winter”.
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Ahead of the vote, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will deliver a speech to the Trades Union Congress (TUC) conference in Brighton, where many in the audience will be in vocal opposition to the policy.
He will attack the previous Conservative government for having “salted the earth of Britain’s future to serve themselves”, but appeal for partnership with the unions to fix it, telling them: “The crisis we have inherited means we must go deep into the marrow of our institutions, rewrite the rules of our economy and fix the foundations so we can build a new home.”
More on Benefits
Related Topics:
Sir Keir will add: “Economic rules written in the ink of partnership will be more durable and long-lasting – whoever is in power. So it is time to turn the page, business and unions, the private and public sector, united by a common cause to rebuild our public services and grow our economy in a new way.
“We will keep to the course of change, reject the snake oil of easy answers, fix the foundations of our economy and build a new Britain. More secure, more prosperous, more dynamic, and fairer. A country renewed and returned, calmly but with confidence, to the service of working people.”
Advertisement
The winter fuel payment was introduced in 1997 by then Labour chancellor Gordon Brown as a universal benefit, with all people above state pension age entitled to it.
However, the current Labour chancellor, Rachel Reeves, now wants the payment to be limited to those entitled to Pension Credit – around 1.5 million people – to save public money.
Making the announcement in July shortly after her party won the general election, Ms Reeves laid the blame at the door of the previous Conservative government, claiming they had made “commitment after commitment without knowing where the money was going to come from”.
While she said the decision to scrap the benefit was “difficult”, it was “necessary and urgent” to fix the money problems that had been left behind.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:57
Chancellor: Labour inherited £22bn black hole
The prime minister has continued to stand by the move, insisting additional “safeguards” are in place for pensioners already on benefits.
He added: “I am determined that we will take tough decisions because the change which is improved living standards, people feeling better off, better public services, dealing with crime and immigration and issues like that, that change will only happen if we fix the foundations now.”
Further potentially unpopular measures, including possible tax rises, are expected next month when Ms Reeves delivers her first Budget.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:50
PM: Budget will be ‘painful’
But Sky News understands as many as 30 MPs are unhappy with the winter fuel payment cut, though they are likely to abstain on the vote rather than go against the party – especially in light of Labour suspending seven of its MPs in July for six months after they rebelled over keeping the two-child benefit cap.
The general secretary of one of Labour’s major union backers, Unite, also accused the party of “picking the pockets of pensioners”.
Speaking to Sky News from the TUC conference, Sharon Graham said the country was “in crisis” and the new government needed to “make very, very different choices” – including introducing a wealth tax “on the biggest and richest 1% in society”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:21
Government ‘picking the pockets of pensioners’
The Conservatives are among the opposition parties putting forward their own motions to try and stop the cut – though with Labour’s large majority, the government is likely to win the vote.
Former prime minister and Tory leader Rishi Sunak reiterated his accusation that Sir Keir was choosing to “cut vital support for pensioners to fund an inflation-busting pay rise for train drivers”, calling it “unnecessary and wrong”.
He added: “The last Conservative government always made sure to protect our vulnerable pensioners, because we believe that those who have worked hard all their lives deserve security and peace of mind in retirement.
“But within weeks of coming into power Labour are cutting the winter fuel payments, with potentially devastating consequences.
“Labour MPs know this is indefensible – they must do the right thing and force the government to come clean about the impact this punishing cut will have.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
12:00
PMQS: Pair clash over winter fuel cuts
Also speaking ahead of the vote, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the government “should do the right thing and change course” as cutting the winter fuel payment would “put untold stress on pensioners, with many facing a heart-breaking choice between heating and eating this winter”.
Confirming his party would vote against the cut, he added: “While we understand the dire state the Conservatives left the public finances in, now is not the time to be cutting support to some of the most vulnerable people in our society.
“We cannot stand by and allow millions of pensioners to endure another winter in a cost of living crisis.”
The SNP’s Westminster leader, Stephen Flynn, also urged Scottish MPs on the Labour benches to follow his party’s lead and vote down the change in policy, saying: “The last UK government hammered the economy, public services and household incomes by imposing 14 years of cuts and Brexit.
“The last thing the UK needs now is more cuts from the Labour Party – and pensioners will face a bitter winter if these cuts go ahead.”
MP Mike Amesbury has pleaded guilty to assault by beating for punching a man in Cheshire.
The Runcorn and Helsby MP appeared at Chester Magistrates’ Court on Thursday morning where he admitted attacking 45-year-old Paul Fellows in Main Street, Frodsham, Cheshire, in October.
Speaking outside the court, he said his actions were “highly regrettable” and he was “sincerely sorry” to Mr Fellows and his family.
CCTV footage showed Amesbury, who has been an MP since 2017, punching Mr Fellows to the ground.
Other previously released videos from another angle show Amesbury punching Mr Fellows repeatedly after knocking him to the floor as members of the public intervened.
It was reported to police at 2.48pm on Saturday 26 October.
The court heard how Amesbury told Mr Fellows “you won’t threaten your MP again” after punching him in the head with enough force to knock him to the ground.
The 55-year-old politician is currently an independent MP after he was suspended by Labour at the end of October when the CCTV footage emerged.
After admitting assault, the Labour Party confirmed his suspension will continue and he will remain an independent MP.
Reform UK said Amesbury should “do the honourable thing and resign immediately so a by-election can be held”.
The PM’s official spokesperson declined to comment on whether the MP should resign.
Punch followed chat about bridge closure
The court heard Mr Fellows recognised Amesbury in the taxi rank in Frodsham town centre at about 2am on 26 October last year.
Both were alone and had been drinking.
Alison Storey, prosecuting, said Mr Fellows approached the MP to remonstrate about a bridge closure in the town and CCTV then shows they spoke for several minutes but there was no aggression or raised voices.
Mr Fellows then started to walk away but Amesbury re-engaged and was heard saying “what” a few times before shouting it.
The victim then put his hands in his pockets and turned towards the taxi queue and when he turned back Amesbury punched him in the head, knocking him to the ground.
He then punched Mr Fellows again, at least five times, Ms Storey said.
She told the court he was then heard saying “you won’t threaten your MP again will you”.
Amesbury was voluntarily interviewed under caution by Cheshire Police in October and was charged with common assault on 7 November.
At the time, Amesbury said what happened was “deeply regrettable” and that he was cooperating with police.
A Labour Party spokesman said: “It is right that Mike Amesbury has taken responsibility for his unacceptable actions.
“He was rightly suspended by the Labour Party following the announcement of the police investigation.
“We cannot comment further whilst legal proceedings are still ongoing.”
Amesbury is set to be sentenced next month. If he is sent to prison or given a suspended sentence, he could lose his seat in the Commons.
A sentence of less than a year, even if it is suspended, would leave him liable to the recall process, which would trigger a by-election if 10% of registered voters in his seat sign a petition calling for it.
A jail term of more than a year would mean he automatically loses his seat.