Government will not ‘water down’ winter fuel payment cut to 10 million pensioners, minister says
The government will not “water down” cuts to the winter fuel payment after it was voted through on Tuesday, a minister has said.
Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said removing the winter fuel payment from around 10 million pensioners is “the right decision to make” following backlash from MPs and charities after the policy was voted through on Tuesday.
He told Kay Burley on Sky News Breakfast: “We’re not going to water down that policy.
“We think it’s the right decision to make. It’s a decision we took with a heavy heart. None of us expected to do it.
“As you know, on taking office, we discovered £22bn of unfunded spending commitments. Those in-year unfunded spending pressures, they’re real.”
Only pensioners who claim pension credit will now receive the payment of up to £300 this winter to help with higher heating bills. Previously, all pensioners received it.
A total of 53 Labour MPs did not vote, while one Labour MP, Jon Trickett, voted against the government as he said he “could not in good conscience vote to make my constituents poorer”.
Those non-votes do not automatically equate to an abstention for each MP as they may have received permission to miss a vote.
Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook said the government was forced to make the cut
Shouts of “shame” could be heard in the House of Commons chamber as the result was announced.
Rachel Maskell was one Labour MP who abstained after saying pensioners will be “frightened” to turn on the lights in case they cannot pay their bills.
Sir Keir Starmer’s suspension of seven MPs who voted against the government on the two-child benefit cap in July may well have put Labour MPs off voting against the government entirely.
Conservative MPs hit out at the decision, with the shadow pensions secretary Mel Stride calling the policy “absurd”, saying it will “cause untold hardship to millions”.
Read more:
Starmer’s honeymoon is truly over
Iran is supplying Russia with ballistic missiles
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Vorderman demands apology from PM
Ministers have spent the past five weeks defending the decision after Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the cut at the end of July.
They have repeatedly said it is a “tough choice” and one they did not want to make, but the state the economy was left in by the Conservatives means they had to make cuts to stabilise it.
Mr Pennycook added that the government is “confident the support is in place for the most vulnerable pensioners who need help this winter”.
He said pension credit, the £150 warm home discount and an additional £421m into the Household Support Fund for councils to help the most vulnerable people will help over the winter.
Keeping the triple lock on pensions, where the state pension rises by whatever is highest out of 2.5%, inflation or average earnings growth, will also help all pensioners, he added.
UK
‘It was agony’: Survivors of rape and sexual assault waiting years for cases to be heard in court, charity says
Delays in the court system are leading to survivors of sexual violence experiencing suicidal thoughts and being diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, a new report has found.
The Criminal Bar Association says the backlog of criminal cases is on track to reach 80,000 by March 2025.
Survivors of rape and sexual violence are among those waiting the longest for their cases to be heard. On average, it takes them two years to get to trial from the moment of charge, according to the Criminal Bar Association.
Exactly half of the cases analysed by the charity Victim Support for their new report waited three years or more from the point of reporting to the police to the first court date.
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
The delay is prolonging distress for survivors, some of who have made suicide attempts whilst going through the court process.
But even once given a trial date, there’s no guarantee it will go ahead, with survivors telling Sky News often they would only find out the day before – or even on the day – that it was not going to be heard.
The charity found 47% of cases it assessed were adjourned, often with no explanation.
‘I ended up crying for four solid hours’
Emmy Hemmins had to wait five years and 11 months for her case to go to trial.
It was postponed eight times. She says the wait was traumatic.
“It was agony,” Ms Hemmins told Sky News. “It just got to the point where I kept saying to my court therapist, ‘I don’t want to do this anymore’ – and she kept saying, ‘give it a week and see if you still feel that way’.
“Leading up to each trial date, I’d be very anxious, constantly feeling nauseous, I wouldn’t have an appetite, I wouldn’t be sleeping very well and sometimes multiple times a day, I’d have panic attacks.”
The build-up of going back and forth to court took its toll on Ms Hemmins physically and mentally.
“On the days I thought it was going ahead, I’d really gotten ready for it, tried to hype myself up.
“I had all this adrenaline going, and then because it wouldn’t happen, it didn’t have anywhere else to go but turn into an anxiety attack, and I would just cry.
“I think it was the fifth time it was postponed – three days later, I had to go to the dentist and I ended up crying for a solid four hours without stopping because a few days beforehand it was meant to happen, but it didn’t.
“That was probably the longest I’ve ever cried. It was non-stop.”
‘I had all this adrenaline going, and then because it wouldn’t happen… I would just cry.’
Ms Hemmins credits her “patient and understanding” mother for the reason she didn’t give up on her case.
Her mother, the officer in her case and her court therapist stuck by her: “They always made the time to try and be positive for me because I felt like I couldn’t.”
Many survivors do walk away from prosecutions because of the delays.
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
‘Distressing and inordinate delay’
Ms Hemmins’ trial eventually went ahead at the beginning of the year. The accused was found not guilty.
Soon after, Ms Hemmins unusually received a letter from the judge in her case who acknowledged the prolonged wait for justice.
The letter, seen by Sky News, admits she “had to suffer [an] emotionally distressing and inordinate delay.”
Read more:
Girl, 12, in hospital after XL bully attack
Fugitive dad and children spotted in countryside
The delays to Ms Hemmins’ case, prompted the judge to “conduct a proper review of the ‘priority’ listing arrangements” at the local Crown Court.
The Ministry of Justice told us: “The government inherited a crisis in our criminal justice system and a Crown Court backlog at record levels.
“We are committed to addressing the backlog, with a particular focus on how we prioritise fast-tracking rape cases.”
Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK.
UK
Holly Newton murder: Logan MacPhail identified as 15-year-old’s killer after restrictions lifted over Hexham knife attack
The boy who stabbed 15-year-old Holly Newton to death in a frenzied attack in Northumberland has been named as Logan MacPhail.
The 17-year-old followed Holly through Hexham town centre before stabbing her 12 times and slashing her 19 times in just over a minute.
A boy who was with Holly at the time tried to help her and was also stabbed.
MacPhail was found guilty of murder and wounding with intent in August but couldn’t be identified because of his age.
However, a judge has now decided MacPhail – who turns 18 on 9 December – can be named.
It can also be reported that he had been in a relationship with Holly but she didn’t want it to continue.
Prosecutors said during the trial that he was “jealous” she was with a new boy.
Holly had been in a relationship with MacPhail but didn’t want it to continue. Pic: PA
Holly’s mother had been so concerned on the day of her murder, 27 January 2023, that she contacted police and arranged for her daughter to stay in school if MacPhail was hanging around.
Holly also told a friend that he was “basically stalking her”, the trial heard.
MacPhail followed Holly around the town centre for about 45 minutes as she visited shops with friends before attacking her.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
CCTV shows Holly Newton before stabbing
The knife appeared to have snapped in the attack. Pic: Northumbria Police
MacPhail seen leaving a bus in Hexham before killing Holly. Pic: Northumbria Police/PA
When Holly and the 16-year-old she was with went into a pizza shop, MacPhail waited at a bus stop, where he asked to speak to her, then lured her down an alleyway and attacked her.
He inflicted 36 knife wounds, including five “defensive” injuries in the early evening attack. Holly was taken to Newcastle’s Royal Victoria Infirmary but couldn’t be saved.
MacPhail also narrowly avoided killing Holly’s friend as he tried to save her, leaving him with injuries to his shoulder, arm, and thigh which needed surgery.
The killer – who has autism and low IQ – denied murder but admitted manslaughter, saying he couldn’t remember stabbing Holly or her friend.
He claimed his mind went blank that day and he had only intended to take his own life.
MacPhail’s sentencing takes place on 31 October and 1 November.
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
At the end of the August trial, Holly’s mother paid tribute to her daughter in a statement in court.
Micala Trussler called her a “funny and happy teenager who would do anything for anyone”, saying she had a “small tight-knit group of friends who were always there for each other”.
“There was nothing that Holly couldn’t do, she loved all types of sport and would give anything a go at least once,” she said.
“From a young age she fell in love with dancing, it gave her the opportunity to express herself and helped her self-confidence enormously, it genuinely made her feel fearless.”
Sir Keir Starmer has refused to rule out increases to national insurance for employers.
A key tenet of the Labour Party’s manifesto was promising to not raise national insurance, VAT and income tax.
But when asked by Conservative leader Rishi Sunak if the commitment on national insurance applies to both employer and employee contributions, Sir Keir dodged the question.
Rishi Sunak pressed Keir Starmer on tax and fiscal rules
During the first Prime Minister’s Questions in four weeks, Sir Keir also refused to answer whether he agreed with Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s comment that she was against changing the fiscal rules.
Asked by Mr Sunak whether national insurance will increase for employers, Sir Keir said: “We made an absolute commitment in relation to not raising tax on working people.”
Not satisfied with the prime minister’s answer, Mr Sunak said he did not think “even Lord Alli is buying any of that nonsense”, in reference to the Labour donor who has given tens of thousands of pounds in donations and gifts to Sir Keir and leading Labour MPs.
The former prime minister asked Sir Keir the same question on national insurance again, but he simply said: “We set out our promises in the manifesto.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Could chancellor ‘find’ more money?
National insurance contributions are the UK’s second-largest tax, and are expected to raise just under £170bn in 2024-25 – about a sixth of all tax revenue, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
They are paid by employees and the self-employed on their earnings, and by employers on the earnings of those they employ – at a higher rate than employees pay.
National insurance is not paid by employers on pension contributions they make to employees, which is what experts have said could be targeted.
Rachel Reeves said in November she would not ‘fiddle the figures to get different results’. Pic: PA
With the government’s first budget coming up on 30 October, all eyes are on whether Ms Reeves will change the fiscal rules – the restrictions governments put in place to constrain how much they can borrow to fund public spending.
A report by the centre-left Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), which carries significant influence in the Treasury, has called on Ms Reeves to target “public sector net worth” as her debt measure to unlock up to £57bn for investment.
Read more:
How fiscal rules are impeding investment
Is a Rachel Reeves U-turn coming?
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
Mr Sunak asked Sir Keir twice if he agreed with Ms Reeves’ previous comment that she was “not going to fiddle the figures or make something to get different results” when asked if she would consider changing the debt target, set by the Conservatives.
The prime minister would not directly answer as he deflected by criticising the Tory government’s record and saying he would fix the economy as he highlighted investment the Labour government has already secured.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports6 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports12 months agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Environment1 year agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway