Connect with us

Published

on

A DECADE AGO, just after a 40-6 loss to Clemson in the Russell Athletic Bowl, Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops called longtime assistant Cale Gundy. Stoops asked Gundy if he could meet at Bison Witches in downtown Norman. There, Stoops told Gundy he was going to fire his offensive coordinator, Josh Heupel.

The Sooners had just suffered through their worst season under Stoops. TCU and Kansas State upset them. Baylor blew them out. And Oklahoma State, propelled by Tyreek Hill’s punt return, rallied to win a Bedlam overtime thriller.

Then, in the bowl game, Brent Venables’ Clemson defense shut down the Sooners in a humiliating defeat.

“Bob had to make a change,” Gundy recalled. “I don’t know, it was tough. … it wasn’t just struggles on the offensive side. But Bob had to make that decision. An unbelievably tough call.”

Heupel was — and remains — OU royalty. In 2000, he quarterbacked the Sooners to their seventh national championship; OU hasn’t won a title since.

Heupel later proved to be a valued assistant during the Sooners’ prolific run through the 2000s. He mentored Heisman Trophy-winning quarterbacks Jason White and Sam Bradford. In 2011, Heupel became offensive coordinator, and over the next four seasons, OU averaged 475 yards per game, 10th-best in college football during that span.

But in 2014, Stoops realized that his Sooners needed a spark. And so, shortly after meeting Gundy, Stoops fired Heupel, later calling it the “worst day” in his 18 years as OU’s coach.

“I have this deep appreciation for Josh, certainly first and foremost as a player,” said Venables, OU’s coach now and its co-defensive coordinator when Heupel starred for the Sooners. “I’ve always looked back and said, ‘Man, we couldn’t have done it without Heupel.’ His leadership, what he was able to do from a transformation standpoint to our locker room, the guts and the toughness that he played through. … I’ve always held him up here on this pedestal, from a player’s standpoint.”

Saturday, for the first time since the firing, Heupel returns to the stadium where he became a Sooners legend. In his fourth season at Tennessee, Heupel brings the surging sixth-ranked Volunteers to Norman for OU’s long-anticipated first conference game as a member of the SEC.

Heupel has downplayed the significance of the reunion. He has also avoided opening up about the firing. Heupel said Monday that he was “tremendously grateful” for the opportunity OU gave him, both as a quarterback and a coach.

“I wouldn’t be here,” he said, “if I didn’t have all those experiences.”

Those close to Heupel, however, know the firing hurt.

“I hope enough time [has gone by] that he still understands how much he means to this state, how much he means to the program,” Bradford said. “I hope that he gets a warm reception. I hope that he’s able to appreciate that and take that in before the game gets going.”


HEUPEL ARRIVED IN Norman in 1999, months after Stoops took over a struggling OU program that had reached a nadir. Since the end of World War II, the Sooners had boasted more victories (443) than any other school. But OU hadn’t enjoyed a winning season since 1993.

Stoops hired Air Raid guru Mike Leach from Kentucky to call plays. Immediately, Leach went searching for a quarterback. He ended up targeting an unknown left-handed junior college transfer from Snow College in Utah.

“I have no idea how Leach found Josh Heupel,” said Tulsa offensive coordinator Steve Spurrier Jr., son of legendary Florida coach Steve Spurrier and part of Stoops’ first OU staff. “But one of the really important variables for Leach when he recruited quarterbacks was, what kind of completion percentage did they have? He doesn’t have to hit deep balls. Doesn’t have to have a really strong arm. But he has to throw completions. That was always crucial in his offense. And that was always crucial in his evaluation of quarterbacks.”

Heupel didn’t have the rocket arm coveted by NFL scouts or other blue-blood college programs. He couldn’t run much, either. But Heupel could put the ball on the money. And, as a coach’s son, he knew where to go with it, too. That first year, Heupel spent much of his free time with Leach mastering the Air Raid, an offensive scheme designed to spread the field and attack the defense with quick passes.

“Josh was a QB rat. He wasn’t into going out and partying. He was a football junkie,” Gundy said. “That was perfect for Mike Leach, because obviously Mike liked to stay up late at night.”

That first season, for a program best known for Barry Switzer’s wishbone running attack, Heupel led all Power 5 quarterbacks with 310 completions, as Stoops’ Sooners showed promise.

“We had the players. We just had to get the right coaches, structure, discipline. … and the right quarterback,” said Rocky Calmus, an All-America linebacker for the Sooners then. “Josh would be the first to tell you he didn’t have the strongest arm, but he was accurate. He read it and he could put it where it needed to be.”

The Sooners were on the way up. Yet almost no one considered them national championship contenders heading into 2000. OU opened ranked 20th in the preseason polls. The night before their first preseason practice, Heupel addressed the team and told them they needed to aim higher.

“I wish somebody had recorded it. To this day, it’s the best speech I’ve ever heard,” said White, a redshirt freshman that year. “His whole point was, why not us? He kept saying it. Why can’t we win the Big 12? Why can’t we win a national championship?”

Gundy and Spurrier stood at the back of the room. When Heupel uttered “national championship,” they looked at each other in disbelief.

“We were not prepared for that. But Josh Heupel was,” Gundy said. “The belief that Josh Heupel had and what he portrayed while he was here got this whole team going. The belief that we could be better than everybody, that we could win every game — that came from Josh Heupel.”

Flying under the radar, the Sooners roared through a three-game stretch that OU fans would term “Red October.” The Sooners annihilated No. 11 Texas 63-14, then knocked off second-ranked Kansas State 41-31. That set up a showdown against top-ranked Nebraska. The vaunted Huskers quickly jumped to a 14-0 lead.

“We couldn’t have started off any worse,” said Torrance Marshall, OU’s other star linebacker then alongside Calmus. “But Josh didn’t blink an eye. He didn’t let that moment be too big for him and had the leadership to bring us back.”

With two Huskers in his face, Heupel lofted a 34-yard touchdown pass on third-and-14 to Curtis Fagan in stride to tie the game. The Sooners rolled the rest of the way to win 31-14 and claim the No. 1 ranking in the polls.

Like any other player, Heupel still had nerves. Calmus remembered him either throwing up or dry heaving in the locker room prior to every game. Calmus would wait for him to “get it out,” as the two captains usually took the field last. But Heupel’s demeanor while on the field helped give those Sooners a unique resiliency.

“He was remarkably calm in who he was,” Spurrier said. “A calm confidence about him that rubbed off on other people.”

The Sooners didn’t always win easily. But they remained calm in tight moments, especially in dramatic victories over Texas A&M, Oklahoma State and Kansas State again in the Big 12 championship game. The undefeated Sooners advanced to the Orange Bowl to face Florida State for the national title. The defending champion Seminoles, led by 28-year-old quarterback Chris Weinke, were double-digit favorites to repeat.

Before flying to Miami, the Sooners held a watch party at their team facility to see if Heupel won the Heisman Trophy. Instead, Weinke narrowly edged out Heupel in one of the closest Heisman votes in history.

“I felt that Josh got robbed,” Marshall said. “I was prepared to show [Weinke] why he shouldn’t have gotten it.”

Starting with the Orange Bowl coin toss.

“I told [Weinke], ‘You got my boy’s trophy,’ and he said, ‘No, I don’t.’ I said, ‘Yeah, you do — and we’re going to find out today,'” Marshall recalled. “And I meant it. I was dead serious about it. … We wanted to go out there and show them that we were the better team, we had the better quarterback, and you guys did make a mistake and didn’t give the right person the Heisman.”

The OU defense forced Weinke into three turnovers, including a Marshall interception, and didn’t allow the Seminoles offense to score. Heupel and the Sooners did enough offensively to win 13-2, capping off a magical season.

“We backed it up,” Calmus said. “It was perfect. We got the main trophy.”


HEUPEL CAME BACK to OU in 2004 as a graduate assistant, working with White and the other quarterbacks.

“I remember thinking to myself then, that dude’s going to be a great coach,” White said, “just because of how he’s handled me.”

In 2006, after a short stint at Arizona, Heupel returned to OU to be its quarterbacks coach. That preseason, starting quarterback Rhett Bomar was dismissed from the team for accepting money from a local car dealership for work he didn’t do. On the fly, Heupel helped Paul Thompson adjust from receiver to playing quarterback again. Thompson wound up throwing for 22 touchdowns, as OU won another Big 12 title.

After every practice that season, Heupel spent a half hour individually working with Bradford, then a redshirting freshman manning the scout team. Two years later, in 2008, Bradford won the Heisman, leading a record-setting OU attack that scored 60-plus in five straight games.

“He was the single greatest influence in my football career,” said Bradford, taken by the Rams as the first overall pick in the 2010 draft. “He believed in me before I believed in myself. He saw something in me that I hadn’t quite seen in myself. And he figured out a way to bring it out of me.”

Heupel also recruited Landry Jones, who took over for Bradford and ended his career with 16,646 passing yards, the most of any Power 5 quarterback in college football history.

“He had a huge hand in all of it,” Jones said. “If you’re going to call any school Quarterback U now, you have to start with Oklahoma. And you think about the guys that he had, and just the quarterbacks at Oklahoma, it started with him.”

White even remembered stopping by OU workouts in 2018 and seeing Heisman winner Kyler Murray practicing the same footwork drills that Heupel had taught him back when he was a freshman almost two decades earlier.

“Josh really set the tone for what it was to play quarterback at the University of Oklahoma,” White said. “He set the standard.”

White, Bradford and others came to believe that Heupel was on track to potentially succeed Stoops as OU’s head coach. That all changed in 2014.

After firing Heupel, Stoops replaced him with East Carolina offensive coordinator Lincoln Riley, another Leach protégé out of Texas Tech. Three years later, Stoops retired and OU named Riley its head coach instead. Under Riley, OU advanced to the playoff in three consecutive years with three different quarterbacks: 2017 Heisman winner Baker Mayfield, Murray and Alabama transfer Jalen Hurts; all three are now NFL starters.

But in 2021, Riley stunningly bolted OU for USC.

“Regardless of why he got fired, we lost a guy that truly believed in Oklahoma football, and those are the guys you want,” White said of Heupel. “We lost a great coach with unlimited potential.”


HEUPEL’S POTENTIAL AS a head coach is finally being realized at Tennessee. A decade after being fired at Oklahoma, Heupel has reemerged with one of the hottest teams in college football. The Vols have won their first three games by an average margin of 59 points.

UNLV coach Barry Odom, an Oklahoma native, remembered facing Heupel while playing linebacker for Missouri in 1999. Odom relished talking trash to opposing quarterbacks. Heupel was the only quarterback who talked back.

“His competitive spirit is unmatched,” Odom said. “He carries a chip on his shoulder, but he uses it in a very productive way. … he’s a stone-cold killer. That’s the way he played, and that’s the way he coaches.”

When Odom got the head job at Missouri in 2016, he hired Heupel from Utah State. In his one year with the Aggies, Heupel had recruited and signed Jordan Love, who is now the starting quarterback for the Green Bay Packers.

Over Heupel’s two seasons as Missouri’s offensive coordinator, the Tigers ranked sixth nationally in both yards per dropback (8.01) and passing touchdowns (69).

Before the 2018 season, UCF athletic director Danny White gave Heupel his shot to be a head coach. Three years later, White brought Heupel with him to Tennessee.

“We were just really impressed with the level of knowledge of the offense,” White said, “going back to his time as a player at Oklahoma playing in it and then how he’s evolved it and adjusted it depending on the personnel — and the way he explained it was just next level.”

In Heupel’s second season in Knoxville, Tennessee went 11-2, including three straight wins over ranked opponents, which culminated with a thrilling 52-49 victory over No. 3 Alabama.

This year, headlined by electric freshman quarterback Nico Iamaleava, Heupel appears to have his best Tennessee team yet.

Stoops has declined to do any interviews this week about Heupel’s return, citing the “great respect” he has for Venables and for Heupel, whom he noted was “the catalyst” for OU’s return to prominence this millennium.

But Venables said he isn’t surprised how Heupel has bounced back, noting that “he’s always been a winner.” Gundy isn’t surprised, either.

“Instead of moping on it, dwelling on it, he kept his head up and found another place,” Gundy said. “He’s done nothing but run with it ever since.”

Marshall has remained close with Heupel, bonded by the national championship they won together. Marshall, who has attended a half-dozen Vols games, said he was “disappointed” when OU fired Heupel. But even though “that cut was deep,” Marshall pointed out “it led him to where he is” — leading the Vols.

“That just shows what type of character and what type of person he is,” Marshall said. “Lick your wounds and figure it out. He just went back to the drawing board. … put his head down and grinded it out.”

The grind has brought Heupel back to OU, albeit on the opposite sideline.

Marshall said it will be “emotional” for Heupel returning “to the place where it all started for him.” But he’s hoping Heupel can still “feel the love” from a program he once helped put back on the map.

Continue Reading

Sports

Florida minus top WR Wilson against Miss. St.

Published

on

By

Florida minus top WR Wilson against Miss. St.

GAINESVILLE, Fla. — Florida will be without leading receiver Eugene Wilson III against Mississippi State on Saturday.

The Gators (1-2, 0-1 Southeastern Conference) ruled Wilson out on Wednesday night, leaving coach Billy Napier scrambling for a replacement three games into the season.

Week 1 starter Kahleil Jackson (knee) is out for the season, and Florida won’t have senior Ja’Quavion Fraziars for the fourth consecutive game. Freshman Tank Hawkins is questionable, so Napier might have to turn to redshirt freshman Aidan Mizell, reserve Marcus Burke or former walk-on Taylor Spierto to play alongside starters Elijhah Badger and Chimere Dike.

“We’re definitely a better team with Tre Wilson for sure,” Napier said.

A sophomore from Tampa and the son of a two-time Super Bowl-winning safety, Wilson has a team-leading 13 receptions for 191 yards and a touchdown in two games.

He injured a knee in a 45-7 victory against Samford two weeks ago and was a game-time decision against Texas A&M. He warmed up before the game and then wasn’t in uniform when the Gators came out of the locker room for kickoff. The Gators lost 33-20.

Now, four days later and with the Gators seemingly on the verge of firing Napier, Wilson was ruled out during the initial release of the SEC’s availability report.

“He woke up the next day, and I think we’ve gotten to the bottom of what it is and all that,” Napier said. “So all good.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Golden Tate and one of college football’s most iconic celebrations

Published

on

By

Golden Tate and one of college football's most iconic celebrations

Golden Tate spent more than a decade as a receiver in the NFL. He won a Super Bowl. He appeared in a Pro Bowl. He made a winning touchdown catch in the playoffs.

For everything he did on a football field, it was an impromptu decision as a Notre Dame player 15 years ago on this day that might stand out from the rest.

“It’s something I’ll never be able to forget,” he said.

The internet will not let him.

“It pops up every year,” Tate said. “It’s one of the main highlights of all time, which I had no clue it was gonna happen.”

Tate, of course, is referring to a spectacular catch in the end zone to give Notre Dame a fourth-quarter lead at home against Michigan State on Sept. 29, 2009. But it’s not exactly the score that has been memorialized in college football history. After making the catch, Tate proceeded to leap — arms extended as if to motion for a touchdown — headfirst into the Spartan Marching Band in what can only be remembered as one of the most iconic spur-of-the-moment celebrations of all time.

In what was eventually Charlie Weis’ final season as the Irish head coach, Notre Dame had just suffered a disappointing upset loss to Michigan the previous week. Michigan State had also lost the previous week, against Central Michigan, and was led by a redshirt sophomore quarterback named Kirk Cousins, whose only win as a starter had come two weeks earlier against FCS Montana State.

For Weis, a loss to that Michigan State team would have been an irredeemable sin. It all added to the gravity of the moment when quarterback Jimmy Clausen dropped back to pass, trailing 29-26 with just over five minutes to play.

After more than 65 yards in the air, the ball dropped perfectly into Tate’s outstretched hands and the rest Tate can relive as if it happened in slow motion.

“I didn’t even realize the band was there,” he said. “I was able to catch it, get my feet in and then my body clock was telling me I had to be getting pretty close to the end of the end zone.”

A careful analysis of the footage shows Tate took about three steps before he encountered the wall of band members. Impact was unavoidable.

“I can’t remember what the little girl played — I don’t know if she had like a little trombone or a flute or a clarinet or something — I see this little girl like right in my line and I know I couldn’t stop, so I’m going to destroy her [if I kept going],” Tate said. “And I got on full on gear. So, quickly I think, ‘OK, well if I just jump and land on all of them, everyone wins.’ I don’t want to completely hit-stick this little girl who’s in the band.

“They catch me and it’s a win-win. And I probably looked really cool doing it.”

Except Tate’s plan had an undiagnosed flaw.

“Little did I know, this marching band skedaddled out of there so quickly and all that was left to land on were these plastic chairs,” he said.

The adrenaline staved off any physical pain, leaving Tate more concerned about how it might have looked to a national TV audience.

“I go from, ‘This is gonna be cool,’ to now, ‘I probably look like an idiot.’ I was gonna jump in the band and now I just landed on a bunch of chairs,” Tate said.

Somehow, all of this happened in less than four seconds.

“They could have probably hit me with their instruments,” Tate said. “Someone could have poured a beer on me and I would’ve never noticed, because I was so locked into the game and had tunnel vision. I would have never known.”

Weis didn’t see the leap as it happened, but later had one critique.

“It was the wrong band,” Weis said.

Tate doesn’t remember why the band was that close to the field in the first place, but the response was a predictable one for college football.

“Michigan State fans and alumni sent Notre Dame a bunch of emails of their disapproval of me jumping into their band,” Tate said. “Which I thought was kind of hilarious.”

Archived message board conversations have preserved the opposing fan overreaction, some of which painted the moment as some kind of overarching referendum on Tate and Notre Dame:

  • “It would be one thing to run into your own band, but what G. Tate did was unclassy.”

  • “It looked somewhat intentional to me. I hope [MSU coach Mark] Dantonio raises a stink about it.”

  • “The more I see of ND this season the less I respect them and Weis.”

The touchdown stood as the game-winner, and the bigger conversation after the game was more about what effect the result had on Weis’ job security.

“It’s a big win for Notre Dame, it’s not a big win for Charlie Weis,” Weis said after the game.

It was the first of a three-game winning streak that saw the Irish climb back into the AP Top 25 before falling apart late in the season. Weis was eventually fired two days after the season ended and replaced by Brian Kelly.

Fifteen years later, Tate’s leap is appreciated for the entertaining moment it was, and it holds a special place in Irish lore. It has been viewed hundreds of thousands of times on YouTube, and it continues to be discussed on online platforms. A few years ago, it was even memorialized in a Notre Dame children’s coloring book created to help Notre Dame fans help pass the time during remote schooling.

“Being a part of history from such a prestigious and traditional university is like pretty special,” Tate said. “It was my honor to represent the university for the years I was there and now to be just part of the history books. Not only for I guess my celebrations, but also for my play.

“Now that I think about these stories or retell these stories, they seem a lot better than they were back then because I guess that was just my life. And now it’s like, ‘Man, that was really cool.'”

Continue Reading

Sports

Way-too-early projections for the NHL’s 4 Nations Faceoff rosters

Published

on

By

Way-too-early projections for the NHL's 4 Nations Faceoff rosters

After hockey fans went many years without best-on-best international competition, the NHL’s 4 Nations Face-off will see the best players from Canada, Finland, Sweden and the United States compete in Montreal and Boston from Feb. 12-20.

Each nation has named six players to its roster, with the rest to be named closer to the tournament. All four teams have a plethora of talent, so for the first time in nearly a decade, fans will get to see the best players in the world compete against each other on the international stage.

Sidney Crosby, Nathan MacKinnon and Connor McDavid skating for Canada. Auston Matthews, Jack Eichel and the Tkachuk brothers for Team USA. The stacked blue line for Sweden, and two-way center depth for Finland.

Before the NHL season gets rolling, here is our projection of what each of the four rosters will look like:

United States

The national team development program has done a fantastic job of developing American superstars. The reigning Rocket Richard, Norris and Vezina Trophy winners and the best goaltending depth in the tournament is a good start. The Americans are well set up at every position to have success, while the other three teams have weaknesses in one position.

It really doesn’t matter which centers play the wing, but Matthews, Eichel and Dylan Larkin make the most sense to be permanent fixtures in the middle for the all-around game. The luxury of a 40-goal man (Brock Boeser) as a spare — should any of the American forwards falter — is quite something. The forwards are likely to come down to who is in the best form when it comes to decision time, as the U.S. could take any of Clayton Keller, Cole Caufield or Vincent Trocheck. The gap between those on the team and those who just missed is razor thin, and it is easy to see a scenario where any number of those players make the team due to performance or injury.

The defensemen were relatively easy to select, with the Norris Trophy winners expected to the lead the power play. Charlie McAvoy and Jaccob Slavin bring proven shutdown ability, which will be key in this tournament. Brock Faber was brilliant in his rookie season and should make the team if that performance continues into his sophomore year. Zach Werenski may or may not be healthy, potentially opening the door for Noah Hanifin or John Carlson to get in the lineup.

The toughest decision was in goal, where the Americans are loaded. To put it in perspective, one of Jake Oettinger, Thatcher Demko or Jeremy Swayman will be left off the team. Any one of those goaltenders would be better than any current Canadian option — the depth is tremendous. Demko is there now, but mystery surrounding his injury may see him lose his spot to Oettinger or Swayman if he doesn’t get healthy and perform well. Regardless of which three the Americans choose, all three are capable of stealing games, including reigning Vezina winner Connor Hellebuyck.


Canada

Canada is loaded up front with the three generational players in Crosby, McDavid and Connor Bedard. Bedard is not a lock in the eyes of Hockey Canada, but he should be on the team if he gets off to a strong start.

The toughest choice up front was Nick Suzuki over Mark Stone, with Steven Stamkos as the extra. Stone’s injuries are a factor, and he will get significant consideration if healthy. Suzuki brings a valuable two-way game, can play multiple roles and should fit nicely in Canada’s bottom six. Stamkos is the spare, but no one should be surprised if he takes a spot in the bottom six to boost the power play. Other players who likely will be considered up front are Travis Konecny and Wyatt Johnston.

Things get complicated on the blue line, with Canada having quite a few elite defensemen on the right side. Cale Makar and Devon Toews make sense as a natural top pairing. Noah Dobson had a fantastic 2023-24 season, is better defensively and has flown under the radar. Shea Theodore and Josh Morrissey make sense on the left side, with Owen Power and Morgan Rielly likely to get consideration.

Evan Bouchard is the most interesting debate, given his ascension to stardom last season. Having four members of the electric Oilers power play must be enticing, but Makar is likely to run the top unit. If Canada doesn’t see Bouchard running a power play, they may look to the likes of Alex Pietrangelo or Aaron Ekblad for their defensive game, with Bouchard as the spare. Shaping the defense will certainly be the toughest for Canada’s brain trust, given the plethora of talent available.

The goaltending is … not great. While Canada has an overabundance of talent in the skater category, they lack in goaltending. Jordan Binnington, Stuart Skinner and Adin Hill have demonstrated they are capable of winning high-pressure games. However, all three have had moments or long stretches of games where they cannot be trusted. Canada can ill afford to choose pedigree over which goaltender is playing the best given who they will face in this event. If Tristan Jarry and Joel Hofer play well to start the season, Canada will have no choice but to consider them here, as having a goalie in form is vital.


Sweden

Sweden has some interesting decisions to make all over their lineup. Elias Pettersson, Joel Eriksson Ek and Mikael Backlund represent strong two-way play with scoring prowess. If Gabriel Landeskog returns without setback, it is easy to see how Sweden would consider bringing him to the tournament. Rickard Rakell will get consideration if he plays well to start the season, and could take a spot from Gustav Nyquist, Lucas Raymond or Leo Carlsson.

Sweden has the option to go young or give veterans one last kick at international competition; a mix of both is likely the best route.

About that blue line: Victor Hedman, Gustav Forsling, Erik Karlsson and Rasmus Dahlin is some kind of top four. The Swedish defensemen are a who’s who of Norris Trophy conversations over the past decade. Behind that group, Mattias Ekholm has been consistently steady, and Hampus Lindholm plays a key shutdown role on a great team. Their inclusion frees up Karlsson and Dahlin from penalty killing, and should allow them to thrive offensively. Jonas Brodin will be in the mix too, with Rasmus Andersson and Adam Larsson likely to get consideration for bottom-pair roles. Sweden’s depth on the blue line will be a major strength.

If Jacob Markstrom plays the way he’s capable of in New Jersey, he is likely to back up Linus Ullmark. Both goalies have been in the Vezina conversation in recent seasons, with Ullmark playing more consistently over the past few seasons. Lucas Wallstedt goes in favor of Sam Ersson, given that Sweden views him as a key piece of their international landscape in the future. If Ersson vastly outplays Wallstedt in the early season, he may get the nod, but it is unlikely either sees action in the tournament if Ullmark and Markstrom are healthy.


Finland

Finland’s strength is up front, where its center depth includes Aleksander Barkov, Sebastian Aho, Roope Hintz and Anton Lundell. Other nations have more scoring depth, but Finland has three centers who are elite two-way players, while Lundell is developing into a two-way stud.

Outside of Mikko Rantanen, Finland lacks elite scoring talent on the wings. If Patrik Laine can find his form in Montreal, he’s likely to play higher in the lineup and score. Eeli Tolvanen and Joel Armia are on the bubble up front, if players like Laine or Mattias Maccelli don’t have good starts to the season. Expect Finland to play a tight checking game and rely on their elite two-way players to win low-scoring games. This is a country that has had significant success in recent international tournaments, so they shouldn’t be overlooked despite that relative lack of pop.

On the blue line, Finland is led by Miro Heiskanen — the only true star on the back end. He will log major minutes, play in all situations and quarterback the power play. Olli Maatta and Juuso Valimaki could trade places depending on their performance. Expect Esa Lindell, Rasmus Ristolainen and Niko Mikkola to be key penalty killers and bring a physical element to the defensive zone.

Juuse Saros will be a huge part of Finland’s ability to contend in this tournament, and is a shoo-in to be the starter. Saros will likely be backed up by Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen or Kaapo Kahkonen, but is likely to remain Finland’s starter for the entire tournament.

Continue Reading

Trending