Connect with us

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has insisted it would “cost the taxpayer a fortune” if he were to watch Arsenal from the stands after it emerged he had accepted thousands of pounds worth of free football tickets.

The prime minister has faced criticism after Sky News’ Westminster Accounts project revealed he had received two-and-a-half times more gifts and hospitality than any other MP, totalling £107,145, since December 2019.

Sir Keir declared £12,588 of gifts from the Premier League; including four Taylor Swift tickets during the election campaign worth £4,000; two Euros finals tickets worth £1,628; and numerous tickets spanning several Arsenal matches adding up to well over £6,000.

Politics Live: Starmer branded ‘ivory tower leader’ for taking gifts

Government officials are worried the prime minister’s willingness to accept hospitality to go to football matches could amount to a conflict of interest given plans to overhaul the sport’s regulator which many clubs oppose.

Asked about his relationship with Arsenal Football Club, Sir Keir said he has attended matches as a season ticketholder for years.

But now he is prime minister, Sir Keir told ITV London the “security advice is that I can’t go to the stands”.

More from Politics

The prime minister added that if he did, it would “cost the taxpayer a fortune” on “additional security”.

Read more:
Westminster Accounts: How to explore the database for yourself
Westminster Accounts: Search for your MP

Sir Keir Starmer is a regular at Arsenal home and away matches
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer is a regular at Arsenal home and away matches

He said: “I’ve been offered tickets elsewhere in the ground where it’s more secure.

“We don’t have to use taxpayer money on additional security. And that’s why I’ve taken the decision that I have.”

Asked if he is worried about the optics of taking so many hospitality tickets, which cost hundreds of pounds each, Sir Keir said he thinks “most people” would agree his argument for doing so is “fair”.

Former Labour MP Harriet Harman has urged Sir Keir to stop trying to “justify” accepting free gifts as it is “making things worse” on the latest episode of Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast.

The baroness said the row was “out of line” for the prime minister and he should change his approach rather than “doubling down”.

She told the podcast: “You can either double down on it and try and justify it or you can just say it was probably a misstep, if I had my time again I wouldn’t do it and therefore I’m going to auction for charity or something.

“It’s not a hanging offence, but I think doubling down and trying to justify it is making things worse.”

Most of Sir Keir’s gifts and hospitality – £86,708 of the £107,145 – were accepted in the last parliament, but £20,437 was declared in this parliament for accommodation that straddles the two periods.

The biggest donor of gifts and hospitality is Labour peer Waheed Alli, who gave the equivalent of £39,122.

Speaking to regional broadcasters on Thursday, Sir Keir also insisted he is “completely in control” following a row within government over his top adviser’s pay.

The prime minister was asked why chief of staff Sue Gray was getting paid more than him, and told BBC South East: “I’m not going to get into discussions about individual salaries about any members of my staff. I’m sure you wouldn’t expect me to.”

Pressed on whether he had a grip on his team following briefings on the matter, Sir Keir said: “I’m completely in control. I’m focused and every day the message from me to the team is exactly the same, which is we have to deliver.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Binance mulls new US strategy, CZ potentially reducing stake: Report

Published

on

By

Binance mulls new US strategy, CZ potentially reducing stake: Report

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, is considering a strategic reshuffling to strengthen its presence in the US market, a move that could see Binance co-founder Changpeng “CZ” Zhao’s majority stake in the company reduced.

Zhao’s controlling stake in Binance has been a “major hurdle” to the company expanding to strategically critical US states, according to Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. Although no concrete plans have been announced, the conversation surrounding any potential action remains reportedly “fluid.” 

The company is also considering partnerships with US-based companies, including asset manager BlackRock and decentralized finance (DeFi) platform World Liberty Financial (WLFI), which is linked to US President Donald Trump, to strengthen its footprint in the country.

Rumors of Binance’s return to the US began to circulate in October after Trump pardoned Zhao, fueled by speculation from crypto industry executives and comments that Zhao made on social media.

“Will do everything we can to help make America the capital of crypto and advance Web3 worldwide,” Zhao said in October after the pardon.

Changpeng Zhao, United States, Binance
Source: CZ

In June 2019, Binance announced that it would stop serving US customers, and a separate company, called Binance.US and operated by BAM Trading Services, was formed to provide regulatory-compliant services to US users. 

In 2023, the US Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that Binance Holdings Ltd. operated both Binance.com and BAM Trading Services.

Binance.US does not feature crypto derivatives or access to the global Binance exchange’s liquidity and operates as a completely separate crypto exchange.

Cointelegraph reached out to Binance and Binance.US but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

The US is considered a key market for crypto exchanges and is ranked as the number two for global crypto adoption, according to Chainalysis’ 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index. Expanding to the US would open up US liquidity to the world’s largest crypto exchange.

Changpeng Zhao, United States, Binance
Binance claims the top spot among centralized crypto exchanges in terms of trading volume. Source: CoinGecko

Related: Binance names co-founder Yi He co-CEO alongside Richard Teng

Several US lawmakers voice opposition to the CZ pardon and the crypto industry

Trump’s pardon of Zhao in October drew backlash from several Democratic Party lawmakers in the US, including Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren and California Congresswoman Maxine Waters.

Waters said the pardon was a form of pay-to-play and accused Trump of doing political favors for the crypto industry that “helped line his pockets.”

Warren, who is one of the most vocal critics of the crypto industry, also criticized the pardon, characterizing it as “corruption.”  

The comments reflect pockets of resistance among some Democratic lawmakers to the crypto industry’s continued expansion in the US and could signal potential opposition to Binance returning to the US.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom