Connect with us

Published

on

A government minister has said Sir Keir Starmer accepting more freebies than any other MP “is not important at all”.

Jess Phillips said she was “satisfied” with the prime minister’s explanation it would “cost the taxpayer a fortune” in security if he watched Arsenal from the stands after it emerged he has accepted thousands of pounds worth of free football tickets.

The prime minister has faced criticism after Sky News’ Westminster Accounts project revealed he had received two-and-a-half times more gifts and hospitality than any other MP, totalling £107,145, since December 2019.

He has declared £12,588 in gifts from the Premier League, including numerous tickets for Arsenal matches totalling more than £6,000.

But Ms Phillips, minister for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, told Sky News: “I don’t think it’s important at all.”

👉 Click here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts 👈

She added: “I think you have to consider how people in the country feel about things.

“I have to say, nobody has mentioned it to me. I haven’t had a single email about it.

“I have had lots of emails about people not being able to get on a housing list.

“And so I’d really, really much rather focus on that and for Keir Starmer to focus on getting house building going.”

Read more:
Westminster Accounts: How to explore the database for yourself
Westminster Accounts: Search for your MP

Sir Keir Starmer in the stands ahead of the Manchester United v Arsenal match at Old Trafford in May. Pic: PA
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer in the stands ahead of the Manchester United v Arsenal match at Old Trafford in May. Pic: PA

The government has also been embroiled in a row this week over Sir Keir’s top adviser, Sue Gray, being paid more than the prime minister.

A leak to the BBC revealed Ms Gray, who led the “partygate” inquiry into Boris Johnson’s government, is paid £170,000, which is a higher salary than the prime minister’s £167,000.

However, Ms Phillips denied it means Sir Keir does not have a handle on how things are running inside Number 10.

She said: “All I can say is from my bit of government is that it’s running quite smoothly in that we have been in government for 11 weeks and just even in the bit of work that I work in, we have changed more, put more in train than was done in 10 years [under the Conservatives].”

Read more:
Sue Gray ‘on right pay for job’ despite earning more than PM

Starmer trying to justify freebies is ‘making it worse’

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘There’s a problem with leaking’

Ms Phillips admitted it “does seem like there is a problem with leaking” but added: “Hasn’t that always been the case?”

Sir Keir has insisted he is “completely in control” when asked why Ms Gray gets paid more than him.

Former Labour MP Harriet Harman, now a peer and co-host of Sky News’ Electoral Dysfunction podcast, said Ms Gray’s salary is “the rate for the job”.

The baroness said Ms Gray is an “incredibly able person” and added the cabinet secretary earns £200,000 while the person running Manchester City Council earns £220,000.

Continue Reading

Politics

EU sanctions crypto entities for election interference, disinformation

Published

on

By

EU sanctions crypto entities for election interference, disinformation

EU sanctions crypto entities for election interference, disinformation

The EU has sanctioned multiple entities for using cryptocurrencies to evade restrictions, channel funds, and propagate pro‑Russian disinformation and election interference.

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer says former Tory ministers have ‘serious questions to answer’ over Afghan data breach

Published

on

By

Starmer says former Tory ministers have 'serious questions to answer' over Afghan data breach

Sir Keir Starmer has said former Tory ministers have “serious questions to answer” about how the names of Afghans who worked with UK forces were exposed.

Nearly 7,000 Afghan nationals are being relocated to the UK after their names were accidentally sent in an email in February 2022, when Boris Johnson was prime minister, but the leak was only discovered by the British military in August 2023, when Rishi Sunak was PM.

A super-injunction, preventing the reporting of the mistake, was imposed that year in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak.

The Conservative government at the time then started transporting thousands of Afghans to the UK in secret as they were in danger.

On Tuesday, the injunction was lifted.

Politics latest: Starmer hammered over unexpected inflation rise

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Victim of Afghan data breach speaks to Sky

Kicking off Prime Minister’s Questions, Sir Keir said: “Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen.

“The chair of the defence committee has indicated that he intends to hold further inquiries.

“I welcome that and hope that those who are in office at the time will welcome that scrutiny.”

The data breach saw a defence official accidentally release details of almost 19,000 people seeking to flee Afghanistan after the return of the Taliban.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch avoided mentioning the data breach, but Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey said it was “shocking” how it had been kept secret for three years.

Sir Ed said the prime minister will have the Lib Dems’ support if he decides to pursue a public inquiry.

Mr Healey’s Tory predecessor, Sir Ben Wallace, said he makes “no apology” for applying for the initial four-month injunction and insisted it was “not a cover-up”.

The scheme, which had been kept under wraps until yesterday, has so far cost hundreds of millions of pounds.

However, the total cost to the taxpayer of existing schemes to assist Afghans who are deemed eligible for British support, as well as the additional cost from the breach, will come to at least £6bn.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Afghans being relocated after data breach

Earlier, Defence Secretary John Healey told Sky News he is “deeply uncomfortable” with the government using a super-injunction to keep the massive data breach hidden.

He said: “I’m really deeply uncomfortable with the idea that a government applies for a super-injunction.

“If there are any [other] super-injunctions in place, I just have to tell you – I don’t know about them. I haven’t been read into them.

“The important thing here now is that we’ve closed the scheme.”

Mr Healey was informed of the breach while in opposition, and earlier this year he commissioned a review that led to the injunction being lifted.

He said “accountability starts now” and added Labour had to deal with the risks, court papers, intelligence assessments and different schemes when they came to power last summer before they could lift the injunction.

Continue Reading

Politics

CLARITY Act isn’t perfect, but it’s the bill US Congress must pass this summer

Published

on

By

CLARITY Act isn’t perfect, but it’s the bill US Congress must pass this summer

CLARITY Act isn’t perfect, but it’s the bill US Congress must pass this summer

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act isn’t perfect, but Congress should pass it this summer to establish the US as the global leader in digital asset regulation.

Continue Reading

Trending