Connect with us

Published

on

It was the trial that shocked America, now 30 years later the real-life story of two brothers who killed their parents in their Beverly Hills mansion is hitting the headlines again.

Lyle and Erik Menendez were convicted of shooting their father and mother Jose and Kitty Menendez multiple times at close range on 20 August 1989. They were 21 and 18 at the time.

(L to R) Nicholas Chavez as Lyle Menendez, Chloë Sevigny as Kitty Menendez, Javier Bardem as Jose Menendez and Cooper Koch as Erik Menendez. Pic: Netflix
Image:
(L to R) Nicholas Chavez as Lyle Menendez, Chloë Sevigny as Kitty Menendez, Javier Bardem as Jose Menendez and Cooper Koch as Erik Menendez. Pic: Netflix

A Netflix dramatization of their story – which has drawn accusations of “dishonesty” from Erik Menendez – is currently number one in the streamer’s viewing chart.

The same platform will be putting out a documentary next month.

So, what was the Menendez brothers’ crime, and why are people so fascinated by it?

The crime, trial and punishment

On 20 August 1989 Lyle and Erik Menendez shot their parents, Jose and Mary Louise “Kitty” Menendez, multiple times at close range in the family mansion in Beverly Hills, California.

While the brothers initially told police they found them dead when they got home, they were eventually tried for their murder.

An initial attempt to try each brother individually in front of separate juries ended in a mistrial after both juries failed to reach a verdict.

A second trial saw the brothers tried together.

Erik Menendez (L) left and his brother Lyle (R) in front of their Beverly Hills home in November 1989. Pic: Getty
Image:
Erik Menendez (L) left and his brother Lyle (R) in front of their Beverly Hills home in November 1989. Pic: Getty

The defence claimed the brothers committed the murders in self-defence after many years of alleged physical, emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of their father, with no protection from their mother.

They said they had feared for their lives after they threatened to expose their father.

The prosecution argued the murders were motivated by greed, and they killed their parents to avoid disinheritance.

Evidence of alleged abuse from their defence case was largely excluded from the joint trial by the judge.

In 1996, seven years after the killings, a jury found the brothers guilty, and they were convicted of first-degree murder and conspiracy to murder.

They were sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

Erik and Lyle Menendez, now aged 53 and 56 respectively, are currently in prison in San Diego, California.

To this day, both brothers say their actions stemmed from abuse at the hands of their parents which they say they had suffered over many years.

The Netflix drama

Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story stars Oscar-winner Javier Bardem as Jose, Chloë Sevigny as Kitty, and Cooper Koch and Nicholas Alexander Chavez as the Menendez brothers.

Monsters: The Lyle And Erik Menendez Story. Pic: Netflix
Image:
Monsters: The Lyle And Erik Menendez Story. Pic: Netflix

It attempts to explore the crime from different perspectives – both from the brothers’ and parents’ point of view.

Many viewers have commented on the graphic and violent nature of the show, which is both gory and gruesome.

Viewers have also been critical of implications the brothers had an intimate relationship.

Bardem, who plays the father Jose Menendez, said he was able to separate art from his personal life when working on the show.

“I’m a true believer in the fiction, in the imagination, in the joy of playing something without being taken by it,” he said.

Cooper Koch, who plays Erik, said he used recordings from the real-life trial to inform his performance.

“I just read everything that I could. I watched the entire trial. I slept with that trial on. So, like, I went to sleep listening to Erik [Menendez] and Leslie [Hope Abramson – the lawyer who defended the brothers] on the stand.”

What does Erik Menendez say?

The day after the show came out on Netflix, one of the real-life brothers, Erik Menendez, criticised the show, calling it “dishonest” and “inaccurate”, and hitting out at what he called “blatant lies” that made up the characterisation of his older brother Lyle.

In a statement shared by Erik’s wife Tammi on X, he said: “I believed we had moved beyond the lies and ruinous character portrayals of Lyle, creating a caricature of Lyle rooted in horrible and blatant lies rampant in the show. I can only believe they were done so on purpose.”

He went on to accuse the show’s creator, Ryan Murphy, of “bad intent”, and said the show put back the cause of male sexual assault victims by many years.

He also asked: “Is the truth not enough?” and thanked people for their support.

How has Ryan Murphy responded?

Murphy, who made the first series of Monser about US serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, responded to the comments, saying Erik had not actually seen the show, and that it was his obligation as the show’s creator to portray both sides of the story.

(L-R) Javier Bardem with Ryan Murphy at the Monsters premiere in LA. Pic: AP
Image:
(L-R) Javier Bardem with Ryan Murphy at the Monsters premiere in LA. Pic: AP

Murphy told Entertainment Tonight: “It’s really hard, if it’s your life, to see your life up on screen…

“There were four people involved, two people are dead, what about the parents? We had an obligation as storytellers to also try and put in their perspective based on our research, which we did.”

Murphy was also the showrunner behind Glee, Pose, The Watcher, Feud, American Horror Story, Hollywood and Ratched.

It’s not the first dramatization of the crime, which has previously been made into three TV movies and inspired an episode of US police procedural Law And Order.

The Netflix documentary

Hot on the heels of the Netflix drama, the streamer has a factual film on the way – but this one seems to have the approval of the Menendez brothers.

Directed by Argentinian filmmaker Alejandro Hartmann, the documentary The Menendez Brothers will stream on Netflix from 7 October.

The project promises to “offer new insight and a fresh perspective on a case that people only think they know”.

It will feature extensive audio interviews with Lyle and Erik Menendez, lawyers involved in the trial, journalists who covered it, jurors, family, and other informed observers.

A new development

In 2023 a documentary which aired on Peacock titled Menendez + Menudo: Boys Betrayed featured claims from former Puerto Rican boyband member Roy Rossello, who claimed the brothers’ father sexually assaulted him when he was a teenager.

Jose was a former executive at RCA Records.

Joseph Lyle Menéndez and Erik Galen Menéndez. Pics: Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Image:
Joseph Lyle Menéndez and Erik Galen Menéndez. Pics: Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility

Shortly after that documentary premiered, attorneys for Lyle and Erik Menendez filed a petition asking for a new trial, in light of the new evidence.

The LA county’s district attorney’s office told Sky News’ US partner NBC News they are investigating the claims and will have a response by 26 September.

The brothers’ defence team also say they’ve uncovered a letter that Erik Menendez had written to his cousin that was dated months before the murders, where he talked about what he said was abuse from his father and being afraid of him.

The defence team say this should warrant a new trial because it’s information they didn’t have when the case was first presented to a jury.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Posh boys’ playing gangsters: Eddie Marsan on TV and film industry’s obsession with upper-class actors

Published

on

By

'Posh boys' playing gangsters: Eddie Marsan on TV and film industry’s obsession with upper-class actors

Over the last two decades, Eddie Marsan has established himself as one of Britain’s most versatile and acclaimed character actors. From major blockbusters like the Sherlock Holmes films and Mission: Impossible III, to his roles on the TV series Ray Donovan, and more recently the sci-fi drama Supacell.

As a performer, he is a skilled observer. And one thing he’s come to notice a lot over the years is how few of his castmates tend to share his working-class roots.

“If you want to be an actor in this country, and you come from a disadvantaged background, you have to be exceptional to have a hope of a career,” he says. “If you come from a privileged background, you can be mediocre.”

Speaking after being named one of the new vice presidents of drama school Mountview, and meeting students at the establishment where he too first trained, Marsan is keen to stress why it’s so necessary to support young actors who can’t fund their careers.

Eddie Marsan at Mountview. Pic: Steve Gregson
Image:
Eddie Marsan at Mountview. Pic: Steve Gregson


“I came here when I was in my 20s… I was a bit lost, to be honest… I was serving an apprenticeship as a printer when Mountview offered me a place,” he says.

“There were no kinds of grants then, so for the first year an East End bookmaker paid my fees, then my mum and him got together and paid the second year, then Mountview gave me a scholarship for the third year, so I owe them everything.

“I didn’t earn a living as an actor for like six, seven yearsyears ago, actors could sign on and basically go on the dole while doing playsnow, in order to become an actor, you have to have the bank of mummy and daddy to bankroll you for those seven or eight years when you’re not going to earn a living.”

Marson and Dame Elaine Paige are both taking on ambassadorial roles to mark Mountview’s 80th anniversary, joining Dame Judi Dench, who has been president of the school since 2006.

“The parties are fantastic,” he jokes. “The two dames, they get so half-cut, honestly, you have to get an Uber to get them home!”

But he’s rather more serious about TV and film’s “fashion for posh boys”.

'If you come from a privileged background you can be mediocre' in the TV and film industry, says Marsan. Pic: Steve Gregson
Image:
‘If you come from a privileged background you can be mediocre’ in the TV and film industry, says Marsan. Pic: Steve Gregson

“When I went to America and I did 21 Grams and Vera Drake. I remember thinking, ‘great I’m going to have a career now,’ but I wasn’t the idea of what Britain was selling of itself.

“Coming back from Hollywood, a publicist said to me ‘when we get to London and do publicity for the film 21 Grams we’re going to come to you’… but no one was interested… I remember coming to Waterloo station and looking up and seeing all these posh actors selling Burberry coats and posters, and they hadn’t done anything compared to what I’d done, and yet they were the image that we were pushing as a country.”

Read more from Sky News:
Diary collection wins prestigious non-fiction prize
Beckham receives knighthood at Windsor Castle

A 2024 Creative Industries, Policy, and Evidence Centre report found 8% of British actors come from working class backgrounds, compared to 20% in the 70s and 80s.

“Even a gangster movie now, 40 years ago you would have something like The Long Good Friday or Get Carter with people like Michael Caine or Bob Hoskins who were real working-class actors playing those parts, now you have posh boys playing working-class characters.”

Within the last five or six years, he says there has at least been “more of an effort to include people of colour”.

Pic: Steve Gregson
Image:
Pic: Steve Gregson

‘They’re scared of a level-playing field’

“What I find really interesting is, I’ve been an actor for 34 years, and I remember for the first 20 years going on a set and very rarely within the crew and within the cast would you see a black face, very rarely.

“One of the saving graces really are things now like Top Boy and Supacell, where you have members of the black community making dramas about their communities, that can’t be co-opted by the middle classes.”

“People like Laurence Fox complaining that it’s unfair, I never heard them complain when you never saw a black face, never once did they say anything. Now that people are trying to address it, they think it’s unfair…because they’re scared of a level playing field.”

Now, more than ever, Marsan says he feels compelled to point out what needs to change within the industry he works in.

“Look, social media is destroying cultural discourse. It’s making people become very binary… acting and drama is an exercise in empathy and if there’s one thing that we need more of at the moment it’s that.”

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Joey Barton’s posts ’caused me sleepless nights’, says Jeremy Vine

Published

on

By

Joey Barton's posts 'caused me sleepless nights', says Jeremy Vine

Broadcaster Jeremy Vine has told a jury he felt “wickedly torn down for no reason” by ex-footballer Joey Barton, whose online posts led him to take civil action.

The TV and radio presenter said he intervened to support football commentators Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko after Barton shared an image online of their faces superimposed on to a photograph of notorious serial killers Fred and Rose West.

After a televised FA Cup match between Crystal Palace and Everton in January 2024, the former Manchester City and Newcastle United footballer likened the sports broadcasters to the “Fred and Rose West of commentary”.

Responding to the comment, Vine said on X: “What’s going on with @Joey7Barton? I just glanced at the Rose West thing… genuinely, is it possible we are dealing with a brain injury here?”

Joey Barton arrives at Liverpool Crown Court. Pic: PA
Image:
Joey Barton arrives at Liverpool Crown Court. Pic: PA

‘I was quite shocked’

Giving evidence on Wednesday, Vine said: “I was quite shocked by what Mr Barton had said about two very respected commentators in Lucy Ward and Eni Aluko.

“I thought it was very vicious to impose them on the images of two mass murderers of children, and I was looking for an explanation.

“I said ‘are we dealing with a brain injury here’ as a way of underlining my own feelings that he had crossed the line on that tweet.”

Barton, 43, is currently standing trial at Liverpool Crown Court, accused of posting grossly offensive messages on X aimed at the three broadcasters, allegedly with the intent to cause distress or anxiety.

The court heard that Mr Barton replied to Vine’s tweet with a post referring to him as “you big bike nonce”.

The defendant, who has 2.7 million followers on X, also made references to convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Jeremy Vine. Pic: PA
Image:
Jeremy Vine. Pic: PA

‘This now gets really serious’

Vine told the prosecutor he felt “very alarmed” that Mr Barton was choosing “this word ‘nonce’ to throw around” and that “this was now escalating”.

“This now gets really serious. He is accusing me of being a paedophile,” he said.

“These are disgusting actions. It’s a despicable thing to say.

“It gravely upset me, and I had a sleepless night that night.”

As more posts followed, Vine “began to feel scared”.

Read more from Sky News:
How many prisoners are released by mistake in the UK?
Migrant sent back to France for second time in two months

Vine said: “I realised I had to take some action, but I was not sure what to do. I realised the quickest remedy would be some sort of civil action.”

Civil proceedings were initiated in March 2024. A week later, a post from Mr Barton’s X account stated: “If anyone has any information about Jeremy Vine – pictures, screenshots, videos, or messages that could help us in the case – please send them to me using the hashtag #bikenonce.”

Jurors heard that in June 2024, Barton agreed to pay Mr Vine £75,000 in damages for defamation and harassment, along with his legal expenses, as the two parties reached a settlement in the civil case.

In a separate agreement, Barton also paid Vine an additional £35,000 in damages and legal costs relating to similar issues.

The court was told that Mr Barton issued a public apology on his X account in June 2024, admitting that he had made a “very serious allegation” on social media.

He denies the offences said to have been committed between January and March 2024.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Helen Garner’s ‘unsparing’ diary collection becomes first to win prestigious Baillie Gifford non-fiction prize

Published

on

By

Helen Garner's 'unsparing' diary collection becomes first to win prestigious Baillie Gifford non-fiction prize

A writer, whose “candid” and “unsparing” diaries have become the first to ever win the prestigious Baillie Gifford Prize for Non-Fiction. has told Sky News she is “delighted” to see the literary format recognised rather than dismissed.

Helen Garner, an acclaimed Australian author and diarist whose celebrity fans include singer Dua Lipa and fellow writer David Nicholls, said that diaries, often written by women, tended to be given “short shrift” in the literary industry.

She has now won the Baillie Gifford award for How To End A Story, a collection which charts 20 years of her life, from publishing her debut novel while raising a young daughter in the 1970s to the disintegration of her marriage in the 1990s.

Garner accepted the award via video link from Australia. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize
Image:
Garner accepted the award via video link from Australia. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize

Judges hailed her as a “brilliant observer and listener” and described the diaries as a “recklessly candid, unsparing, occasionally eye-popping account of the implosion of a marriage”.

Speaking to Sky News’ Sophy Ridge and Wilfred Frost on the new Mornings with Ridge and Frost programme, Garner, 82, said: “My main reason to be delighted is that I think diaries have been given short shrift in literature. I think they are literature.

“Because they were often written by women, they used to be dismissed as just sort of verbal sludge that people… sort of lazily wrote down, but in actual fact to keep a decent diary involves as much hard work as writing a full-on book – in my experience, anyway. So I’m really glad that it’s been recognised.”

Garner was named winner of the £50,000 prize at a ceremony in London on Tuesday, and accepted her award via video link from Melbourne, Australia.

Journalist Robbie Millen, who chaired the prize jury, said her “addictive” book was the unanimous choice of the six judges.

“Garner takes the diary form, mixing the intimate, the intellectual, and the everyday, to new heights,” he said, comparing her to Virginia Woolf in the canon of great literary diarists. “There are places it’s toe-curlingly embarrassing. She puts it all out there.”

How To End A Story was the judge's unanimous choice. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize
Image:
How To End A Story was the judge’s unanimous choice. Pic: Baillie Gifford Prize

‘The mess my life became is not unique’

Garner, who has published novels, short stories, screenplays and true crime books, told Sky News she has been surprised to hear from so many readers who have related to her words and most intimate thoughts.

“People have said to me, ‘this could be my marriage’,” she said. “I found that rather shocking because it’s quite a painful story of a marriage collapsing, starting off with love, but then developing over the years into something painful and destructive.

“I’ve been glad to find that I’m not unique in that way, that the mess that I made in my life, the mess that my life became, it’s not unique. In fact, it’s archetypal. It’s something that’s happened to gazillions of people in the history of the world.”

Asked by Ridge if the book would have been a “difficult read” for her ex-husband, Garner replied: “I don’t know, I haven’t spoken to him for approximately 25 years. We won’t be speaking to each other again, I imagine. And if you’ve read the diary, you’ll see why.”

The other shortlisted titles

Jason Burke’s The Revolutionists: The Story Of The Extremists Who Hijacked The 1970s

Richard Holmes’s The Boundless Deep: Young Tennyson, Science And The Crisis Of Belief

Justin Marozzi’s Captives And Companions: A History Of Slavery And The Slave Trade In The Islamic World

Adam Weymouth’s Lone Wolf: Walking The Faultlines Of Europe

Frances Wilson’s Electric Spark: The Enigma Of Muriel Spark

How To End A Story is the first set of diaries to win the Baillie Gifford Prize, which was founded in 1999 and recognises English-language books in current affairs, history, politics, science, sport, travel, biography, autobiography and the arts.

It was selected from more than 350 books published between 1 November 2024 and 31 October 2025.

Continue Reading

Trending