Connect with us

Published

on

One of the UK’s largest water companies is considering shipping supplies from Norway to the UK.

Southern Water said the idea was a “last-resort contingency measure” in case of extreme droughts in the early 2030s.

Up to 45 million litres could be brought to the UK per day under the proposals.

The Financial Times, which first reported the potential move, said the water, from melting glaciers by fjords in the Scandinavian country, would be transported by tankers.

It comes as fears grow over the future of water services in the UK following droughts in the summer of 2022 when some areas of the country came close to running out of supplies.

The Financial Times said Southern Water was in “early-stage” talks with Extreme Drought Resilience Service, a private UK company that supplies water by sea tanker.

The firm would pay for the measure out of customers’ bills, according to the report.

Southern Water, which covers Hampshire, Kent, East and West Sussex, and the Isle of Wight, currently gets its supplies from groundwater and rare chalk streams.

However, the Environment Agency (EA) has urged the firm to reduce its reliance on such sources amid concerns over the environmental impact and fears they could make the risk of droughts worse.

‘Costly and carbon-intensive’

Water firms have come under growing criticism in recent years over sewage spills and rising bills, with households facing an average increase of 21% over the next five years.

Companies have also been urged to improve their infrastructure to help supplies. Currently around a fifth of water running through pipes is lost to leaks, according to regulator Ofwat.

And a report by the EA earlier this year found that Southern Water, along with Anglian Water, Thames Water and Yorkshire Water, was responsible for more than 90% of serious pollution incidents.

Following criticism over sewage discharges, Southern Water’s chief executive Lawrence Gosden blamed “too much rain” in 2023 for the problem during an interview with ITV News.

Read more from Sky News:
Flood warnings for swathes of UK
‘Extremely dangerous’ hurricane hits Florida
Mohamed al Fayed and police ties ‘felt corrupt’

The company said it was facing a shortfall of 166 million litres per day in Hampshire alone during future droughts.

But the firm said it was already undertaking other measures to address the problem, including by building the UK’s first new reservoir in more than three decades in Havant Thicket.

However, Greenpeace UK’s chief scientist Dr Doug Parr criticised the Norway proposal and said the firm should focus more on addressing issues domestically.

“Tankering in huge quantities of water from Norway will inevitably be a costly and carbon-intensive alternative to that of doing a better job with the water resources that are available in a rainy country like the UK,” he said.

He added: “Despite the obvious failings of planning, water companies need to start thinking of potable fresh water as a precious and finite resource, and plan to start treating it as such.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

From 2022: How can we protect ourselves from water crisis?

Tim McMahon, Southern Water’s managing director for water, said: “We put less water into supply now than we did 30 years ago and measures like reducing leakage have enabled us to keep pace so far with population growth and climate change.

“As we work to take less water from our chalk streams and build new reservoirs like Havant Thicket in Hampshire, we need a range of options to help protect the environment while this infrastructure comes online.”

Mr McMahon added: “Importing water would be a last resort contingency measure that would only be used for a short period in the event of an extreme drought emergency in the early 2030s – something considerably worse than the drought of 1976.

“We’re committed to continuing to work with our regulators on developing the right solutions to meet the challenge of water scarcity, while protecting the environment.”

Continue Reading

UK

Stephen Lawrence killer David Norris ‘admits role in attack’, says Parole Board

Published

on

By

Stephen Lawrence killer David Norris 'admits role in attack', says Parole Board

Reports suggest one of Stephen Lawrence’s killers has accepted he was at the scene of the murder but claims he did not wield the knife, the Parole Board has said.

The board made the disclosure as it agreed a hearing on freeing David Norris should take place in public.

The racist murder of Mr Lawrence, 18, is one of the most notorious cases of modern times.

He was killed in an unprovoked attack by a gang of five or six white youths as he waited to catch a bus in Eltham, southeast London, in April 1993.

Norris, now 48, was one of only two people, alongside Gary Dobson, to be jailed for the murder in 2012.

His minimum jail term expired in December and he’s now set to be considered for release on licence.

Undated handout file photo issued by the Crown Prosecution Service of David Norris, a member of the racist gang which killed black teenager Stephen Lawrence. Norris has been placed in segregation in jail where he is serving a life sentence for the murder of Mr Lawrence, who was stabbed to death in Eltham, south-east London, on April 22 1993. Norris reportedly got hold of a mobile phone and sent selfies of himself in his cell to friends outside. Issue date: Tuesday September 27, 2022.
Image:
David Norris Pic: PA

As part of the background to the case, the Parole Board said Norris had continued to deny the offence after his trial.

More on Stephen Lawrence

However, it said he appeared to have changed his story.

“Recent reports now suggest he has accepted he was present at the scene and punched the victim but claims that he did not wield the knife,” said the board’s vice chair Peter Rook KC.

“He does not accept he holds racist views.”

The nature of the reports is not detailed by the Parole Board.

The board said Norris had been diagnosed with PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) after several assaults on him in prison.

Norris’s solicitors argued that holding his hearing in public would increase the risk he faces and said he would “suffer additional emotional distress”, the board added.

Among other objections, his lawyers said there was “no good reason” to depart from the usual protocol of private hearings – and that Norris wouldn’t be able to give his “best evidence” in public.

The board disagreed and approved the media request – supported by Stephen’s parents – to hold it in the open.

Mr Rook said Norris’s psychological reports had been considered, but were trumped by factors such as the ongoing public interest in the case.

He said this interest remained high due to the failings and racism that marred the case – detailed in the 1999 Macpherson report.

Read more from Sky News:
Duchess of York ‘offered to help secure PPE early’

Surgeon admits abusing 299 patients

“I have concluded that it is in the interests of justice for there to be a public hearing in this case,” he wrote.

“The compelling factors in favour of a public hearing outweigh the points raised on Mr Norris’ behalf. I am satisfied that the Parole Board’s ability to carry out its core functions will not be compromised by this hearing being in public.”

A date for the hearing has still to be set.

Continue Reading

UK

Heathrow Airport closed after ‘significant power outage’ due to nearby fire

Published

on

By

Heathrow Airport closed after 'significant power outage' due to nearby fire

Heathrow Airport is to remain shut until midnight due to a large fire at a nearby electricity substation.

A spokesperson said it was “experiencing a significant power outage across the airport” and warned passengers to stay away until further notice.

A statement said: “Whilst fire crews are responding to the incident, we do not have clarity on when power may be reliably restored.

“To maintain the safety of our passengers and colleagues, we have no choice but to close Heathrow until 23h59 on 21 March 2025.”

“We expect significant disruption over the coming days and passengers should not travel to the airport under any circumstances until the airport reopens,” the statement added.

The fire is at a substation in Hayes, about 1.5 miles away, and thousands of homes are believed to be without power.

Images show large flames and plumes of thick black smoke.

More on Heathrow Airport

London Heathrow is one of the world’s busiest airports and had a record 83.9 million passengers last year, with a plane landing or taking off around every 45 seconds.

The airport’s website is currently down as travellers scramble for information.

A plane taking off from Heathrow Airport. Pic: PA
Image:
Heathrow is one of the world’s busiest airports. File pic: PA

London Fire Brigade (LFB) said overnight that 10 engines and around 70 firefighters were at the scene on Nestles Avenue.

It said a transformer within the substation is alight, but the cause is so far unknown.

Around 150 people have been evacuated and a 200-metre cordon is in place.

LFB said it had received more than 190 calls over the incident – with the first received at 11.23pm.

Residents have been urged to keep windows and doors closed due to the “significant amount of smoke”.

Scottish and Southern Electricity Networks said at 12.23am on X that a “widespread power cut” was affecting Hayes, Hounslow and surrounding areas.

However, it estimated it would be “resolved by 3am”

A graphic on the company’s website suggested around 16,000 homes were affected.

Firefighters from Heathrow, Hayes, Hillingdon, Southall and other stations are all involved in the response.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Continue Reading

UK

Putin will break any peace deal where Ukraine is not ‘defended’ by ‘coalition of the willing’, Starmer warns

Published

on

By

Putin will break any peace deal where Ukraine is not 'defended' by 'coalition of the willing', Starmer warns

Vladimir Putin will break any peace agreement with Ukraine that is not “defended” by an international coalition of forces, the British prime minister has said.

Sir Keir Starmer was talking on Thursday as he visited a UK base to meet a group of senior military officers from more than 30 nations tasked with turning a political desire to support Kyiv into an actionable plan to help protect the country from land, sea and air in the event of a ceasefire.

But, with Donald Trump pushing hard for Russia and Ukraine to stop fighting now, there are concerns among analysts that the “coalition of the willing” – led by the UK and France – will be overtaken by events, with peace declared before it has time to get its act together.

In a sign of the challenge, the southern Ukrainian city of Odesa was struck on Thursday night by what its governor described as a “massive” Russian drone attack even as the US president talked up the prospects for peace.

US negotiators are set to meet separately with Ukrainian and Russian officials in Saudi Arabia on Monday to try to make progress on a ceasefire.

Mr Trump also claimed he was on the brink of signing an economic deal with Ukraine – something that has been trailed for weeks as a key step in strengthening US-Ukraine relations and locking in Washington’s support for Kyiv’s future, but has yet to materialise.

Ukraine war latest: Follow live updates

More from UK

Clearly alive to the urgency to act, Sir Keir greeted the group of visiting military planners at the UK’s Permanent Joint Headquarters at Northwood, on the edge of London.

They gathered around a large map of Ukraine spread out across a table.

“Now is the time to be doing this,” the prime minister told the officers from a range of European and other allied countries, including Turkey, the Netherlands and Canada. Ukrainian officers were also present as well as NATO officials.

“We don’t know what the outcome of any [peace] talks is going to be, but we do know that if there is a deal, it’s important to have done the preparation beforehand.”

Vladimir Putin speaks during the Congress of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs in Moscow.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Pic: Reuters

The size and shape of what Western officials have described as a “reassurance force” for Ukraine are unclear – so too what kind of military headquarters would command it.

Initial briefings on the concept suggested it could involve thousands of troops deployed to cities and to protect critical infrastructure such as nuclear power stations, but kept back from frontline areas, while Royal Air Force warplanes and other countries’ jets would protect Ukraine’s skies, and various navies, including the Royal Navy, would help secure the sea.

Yet, without US support, the European offer, even with backing from other aligned nations such as Canada, would not act as much of a deterrence to Russia.

And that is if the coalition is ready to deploy in time for any ceasefire.

Read more:
Does Trump have any red lines?

The ‘coalition of the willing’ that could secure peace in Ukraine

The British prime minister said peace would only endure if “it is a defended deal”.

He offered a sense of what the military planners have been tasked with delivering after the political leaders of all the countries involved agreed to work together to help Ukraine.

“What’s happening here is turning that political intention into reality – the concept into plans, whether that’s in relation to what might happen at sea or air or defending borders,” Sir Keir said.

“But it is vitally important we do that work because we know one thing for certain, which is a deal without anything behind it is something that Putin will breach.

“We know that because it’s happened before. And I’m absolutely clear in my mind it will happen again.”

Continue Reading

Trending