The primary aim for candidates in a vice-presidential debate is to do no harm to the name at the top of the ticket. Both JD Vance and Tim Walz passed that test with flying colours.
It felt like a flashback to a pre-Trump debate era when candidates were allowed to be civil and, shock-horror, even briefly agree with those at the opposite lectern.
Image: The debate between Vance (L) and Waltz was much friendlier than that between Trump and Harris.
Pic: AP
Vance is the most interviewed of any of the four presidential candidates or running mates this year, regularly appearing on cable television in the US, and in the early exchanges it was telling.
He was slick and commanding, in contrast with Walz who betrayed early signs of nerves, stumbling over his words.
More on Jd Vance
Related Topics:
In Walz’s first answer about the Middle East crisis, he appeared to confuse Israel and Iran twice, at one point referring to “Israel and its proxies”.
But the man from Minnesota – as he so often reminded the viewer – soon found his way, peppering his answers with appeals to “folks” at home. He stared down the camera while delivering the everyman schtick which was the main reason Kamala Harris picked him as a running mate.
Advertisement
“I misspoke,” Walz said when challenged on his inaccurate statement about being in Hong Kong teaching when the Tiananmen Square massacre happened (newspaper records indicate he was, in fact, in Nebraska).
“I’m a knucklehead at times,” he added as if to say – you and I are just the same, you forget your keys in the car, and I forget that I was in the Midwest and not in the midst of one of the most notorious events in recent memory.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:16
‘Still saying he didn’t lose election’
Team Walz may have been expecting Vance to assume his “attack dog” persona but this was a more mellow, balanced, and even likeable performance from Trump’s understudy, specifically designed to appeal to the independent voter.
He began with a thank you to the broadcaster CBS for hosting the debate and to the viewers “caring enough about this country” to tune in.
He expressed concern for the 17-year-old son of Tim Walz, who had witnessed a shooting while playing volleyball. “I didn’t realise your son had witnessed a shooting,” he said, “that’s awful.”
Even on abortion – one of the thorniest issues for Republicans – he made a decent stab at appearing moderate.
“This is about health care,” he said. I just want to “make it easier for mums to afford to have babies,” he insisted while stating he has never called for a federal abortion ban.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:29
Vance and Walz debate abortion
In fact, Vance has in the past expressed his support for a bill which would ban abortion nationwide after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
Walz spotted his moment to seize upon the reproductive rights debate, one of the loudest rallying cries for the Democratic Party.
He retold the tragic story of Amber Thurman, a woman who died because she could not access legal abortions and timely medical care owing to Georgia’s abortion ban.
It is an incredibly powerful, distressing story and one the Democrats are using on the campaign trail to shine a light on Donald Trump’s role in overturning Roe v Wade, which gave women the constitutional right to choose.
There were no knockout blows for either candidate and as with all vice-presidential debates, it is unlikely to shift the dial on polling or alter the momentum of the election race.
But the fact that JD Vance did so well on the undercard may just entice Donald Trump to accept the offer of another bout against Kamala Harris because – as we well know – he does not like being outshone.
Donald Trump begins bulldozing much of the White House as his plans to build a mega ballroom begin – without planning permission, nor true clarity as to how it’s all being funded.
There are aesthetic questions, historical questions and ethical questions. We dig into what they are.
And – who is the young Democratic socialist about to become New York City’s first Muslim mayor? We tell you everything you need to know about Zohran Mamdani.
You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel – and watch David Blevins’ digital video on the White House ballroom here.
Email us on trump100@sky.uk with your comments and questions.
Analysis: Escalation will test Trump and Carney’s relationship
Trump turning once again on America’s closest ally Canada just proves how flippant his trade decisions are.
The smooth-talking confidence of Prime Minister Mark Carney persuaded Canadians to vote for him in this year’s election.
He certainly ran on a pitch to stand up to Trump, but his recent dealings with the US president have largely been diplomatic and cordial.
Carney was last in the Oval Office just over two weeks ago, and the pair laughed off Trump’s obsession with Canada becoming the “51st state”.
But now it’s a single advert from the government of Ontario that has triggered Trump to pause all trade talks between the two, calling its anti-tariff stance “egregious” on his social media platform Truth Social.
The advert uses Ronald Reagan’s voice to attack tariff policy – arguing trade barriers “hurt every American worker and consumer… markets shrink, and collapse, businesses and industries shut down and millions of people lose their jobs”.
But now, the Ronald Reagan Foundation has said the ad “misrepresents” his words – and they did not give their permission to use it.
Mere hours before Trump’s post, Carney was prodding Trump jokingly to bet on the outcome of the baseball World Series.
Given this latest escalation by the President tonight, their next interaction will be far from a laughing matter.
Vladimir Putin has described Donald Trump’s sanctions against two major oil firms as an “unfriendly act”.
However, the Russian president has insisted the tightened restrictions won’t affect the nation’s economy, a claim widely contradicted by most analysts.
In a major policy shift, Mr Trump imposed sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil – Russia’s biggest oil companies – on Wednesday.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:08
Will US sanctions on Russian oil hurt the Kremlin?
The White House said this was because of “Russia’s lack of serious commitment to a peace process to end the war in Ukraine”.
Putin has now warned the move could disrupt the global oil markets, and lead to higher prices for consumers worldwide.
A meeting between the two leaders had been proposed in Budapest, but Mr Trump said he had decided to cancel the talks because “it didn’t feel right to me”.
Speaking from the Oval Office, he had told reporters: “I have good conversations. And then, they don’t go anywhere. They just don’t go anywhere.”
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
Giving a speech in Moscow yesterday, Putin said “dialogue is always better than war” – but warned that Russia will never bow to pressure from abroad.
Earlier, his long-term ally Dmitry Medvedev had described Mr Trump as a “talkative peacemaker” who had now “fully embarked on the warpath against Russia”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:43
Why did Trump sanction Russian oil?
Oil prices have witnessed a sizeable jump since the sanctions were announced, with Brent crude rising by 5% – the biggest daily percentage gains since the middle of June.
In other developments, Lithuania has claimed that two Russian military aircraft briefly entered its airspace yesterday.
A Su-30 fighter and Il-78 refuelling tanker were in the NATO member’s territory for 18 seconds, and Spanish jets were scrambled in response to the incident.
Russia’s defence ministry denied this – and said its planes did not violate the borders of any other country during a “training flight” in the Kaliningrad region.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:47
Zelenskyy tells Sky News ‘ceasefire is still possible’
Volodymyr Zelenskyy attended a European Council summit in Brussels to discuss the war in Ukraine – and said the meeting had delivered “good results”.
He said Ukraine had secured political support for frozen Russian assets and “their maximum use” to defend against Russian aggression, adding the EU would “work out all the necessary details”.
Mr Zelenskyy thanked the bloc for approving its 19th sanctions package against Russia earlier today, and work was already beginning on a 20th.
European leaders are going to arrive in London later today for a “critical” meeting of the “Coalition of the Willing” – with the goal of discussing “how they can pile pressure on Putin as he continues to kill innocent civilians with indiscriminate attacks across Ukraine”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:43
How will the Russian oil sanctions affect petrol costs?
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: “The only person involved in this conflict who does not want to stop the war is President Putin, and his depraved strikes on young children in a nursery this week make that crystal clear.
“Time and again we offer Putin the chance to end his needless invasion, to stop the killing and recall his troops, but he repeatedly rejects those proposals and any chance of peace.
“From the battlefield to the global markets, as Putin continues to commit atrocities in Ukraine we must ratchet up the pressure on Russia and build on President Trump’s decisive action.”