Europe pushes ahead with China EV tariffs despite Germany’s objection
The European Union has voted to move forward with its plan to impose tariffs on electric cars imported from China, despite recent moves by Germany to attempt to block the proposal.
Chinese EV production has soared lately, as the country’s efforts to secure mineral contracts and build up its local auto manufacturing base have borne fruit.
Along with that drastic rise in EV production has come a rapid rise in EV sales within the country – and a rise of exports as well.
As those exports have hit international shores, audiences from Australia to Europe have found Chinese EVs as quite a reasonable value proposition when compared to domestic manufacturers, and sales have risen overseas as they have domestically.
This has been troubling for domestic European manufacturers, who have found it tough to keep up with the low prices that Chinese manufacturers are able to sell their cars at.
The EU has accused China of “flooding” its market with these EVs, and of unfair subsidy practices towards its local auto industry. (The EU also subsidizes EVs)
As a result of this, Europe decided to impose tariffs on Chinese EVs, with a sliding scale based on which manufacturers it deems most out of compliance with its investigations. Those numbers have been modified as negotiations have gone on, but have currently landed between 7.8% and 35.3%. This is notably much lower than the US tariff, which was recently raised from 25% to 100% and went into effect just a week ago.
Europe votes to impose tariffs, with German opposition
Today, the European Commission took a final vote to impose the tariffs. 10 member states supported the plan, 12 abstained, and 5 voted against, with the most significant opposition coming from the EU’s most populous country and the one with its largest auto industry, Germany.
While the initial vote passed easily with little opposition and many abstentions, including from Germany, the country changed its position and decided to oppose the tariff at today’s vote.
Germany had hoped to rally more nations to vote against the tariffs, but it was always going to be a high bar, requiring 15 countries and 65% of the EU population to overturn the previous vote. As of this week, it became apparent that Germany was never going to get there.
At first glance it seems incongruous that the country with the largest auto industry in Europe might oppose tariffs that are intended to protect the European auto industry. But the reason for this is because German automakers sell a lot of high-end and profitable vehicles to China, and fears retaliatory tariffs of the sort that often come up when countries erect trade barriers.
China specifically has been quite effective at targeting its retaliatory tariffs in the past. In response to trump-era tariffs, China enacted a 25% tariff on US goods in 2018 which, among other things, devastated the US soybean industry. China has already started investigating several EU product categories like brandy, dairy and pork products, and related European industry groups feel “abandoned” by their governments in face of this threat.
Beyond the threat of tariffs, Chinese consumers have been increasingly looking inward as well, abandoning foreign brands partially due to nationalistic sentiment as they feel that other countries have treated them unfairly.
So Germany sees how a Chinese tariff on European autos might hasten its decline in the world’s (just-recently-2nd) most populous country, cutting it off from 1.4 billion potential consumers.
Its vote against may have been tactical, though – an attempt to have their cake and eat it too. Germany may want the protective effects of a European tariff, allowing them to continue to sell to domestic buyers without being undercut by Chinese brands, but also want China to think that they were trying to stop the tariffs, thus lessening Beijing’s desire to retaliate against poor little Germany which did everything in its power to stop these tariffs.
European tariffs are also significantly lower than those recently imposed by the US, and Europe has been actively talking to Beijing and has modified tariff pricing and may modify it more going forward. This may be another tactical decision – by showing that it is more willing to work with China than the US is, and by setting a more “reasonable” tariff, the EU can portray itself as less extreme and thus less worthy of retaliation.
Electrek’s Take
If you’d like to read 3,300 words on what I think about this whole tariff idea, head on over to my article “Tariffs on China aren’t the way to win the EV arms race – getting serious on EVs is.” I promise you it’s a pretty good one. While the article is about the US tariff, much of it applies to Europe as well.
The fact is, tariffs are popular, but usually don’t work very well. We have a lot of examples of this happening, and while “most economists agree” should not be a silver bullet rule for interpreting the world, in this case, I think they’re generally right.
At best, I think these tariffs will offer a temporary reprieve to local manufacturers – which we have already seen they are more than willing to use to delay their plans and put themselves back into the exact same position they’re already in: behind.
Meanwhile, what it immediately does is increase prices for EU consumers, and reduce EU manufacturers’ desire or need to compete on price. In a time where every country around the world has recently struggled with inflation, making one of the things that households spend the most money on more expensive doesn’t seem too wise.
This will also make people less willing to replace gas guzzlers with newer, cheaper-to-run electric vehicles, which means not only sustained high fuel costs for those families, but sustained high climate and health costs from the increased climate change that comes from using those old vehicles.
So I just don’t see this as the smart choice. Germany eventually came around to the right decision here – but it could have exercised leadership earlier, instead of playing tactical games and trying to appear as if it’s on both sides.
There’s always the chance the government might put more tariffs on solar panels, so the best time to go solar is now. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
In a joint statement, French and German economists have called on governments to adopt “a common approach” to decarbonize European trucking fleets – and they’re calling for a focus on fully electric trucks, not hydrogen.
France and Germany are the two largest economies in the EU, and they share similar challenges when it comes to freight decarbonization. The two countries also share a border, and the traffic between the two nations generates major cross-border flows that create common externalities between the two countries.
At the same time, the EU’s transport sector has struggled to reduce emissions at the same rate as other industries – and road freight in particular is a major contributor to harmful carbon emissions issue due to that industry’s heavy reliance on diesel-powered trucks.
And for once, it seems like rail isn’t a viable option:
While rail remains competitive mainly for heavy, homogeneous goods over long distances. Most freight in Europe is indeed transported over distances of less than 200 km and involves consignment weights of up to 30 tonnes (GCEE, 2024) In most such cases, transportation by rail instead of truck is not possible or not competitive. Moreover, taking into account the goods currently transported in intermodal transport units over distances of more than 300 km, the modal shift potential from road to rail would be only 6% in Germany and less than 2% in France.
That leaves trucks – and, while numerous government incentives currently exist to promote the parallel development of both hydrogen and battery electric vehicle infrastructures, the study is clear in picking a winner.
“Policies should focus on battery-electric trucks (BET) as these represent the most mature and market-ready technology for road freight transport,” reads the the FGCEE statement. “Hence, to ramp-up usage of BET public funding should be used to accelerate the roll-out of fast-charging networks along major corridors and in private depots.”
The appeal was signed by the co-chair of the advisory body on the German side is the chairwoman of the German Council of Economic Experts, Monika Schnitzer. Camille Landais co-chairs the French side. On the German side, the appeal was signed by four of the five experts; Nuremberg-based energy economist Veronika Grimm (who also sits on the National Hydrogen Council, which is committed to promoting H2 trucks and filling stations) did not sign.
You can read an English version of the CAE FGCEE joint statement here.
Electrek’s Take
MAN Trucks’ CEO famously said that it was “impossible” for hydrogen to compete with BEVs, and even committed to building 200 hydrogen-powered semi truck to prove out that hypothesis.
He’s not alone. MAN’s board member for research and development, Frederik Zohm, said that the company is the one saying hydrogen still has years to go. “(MAN) continues to research fuel cell technology based on battery electrics,” he said, in a statement quoted by Hydrogen Insight, before another board member added that, “we (MAN) expect that, in the future, we will be able to best serve the vast majority of our customers’ transport applications with battery-electric trucks.”
With companies like Volvo and Renault and now Mercedes racking up millions of miles on their respective battery electric semi truck fleets, it’s no longer even close. EV is the way.
SOURCE | IMAGES: CAE FGCEE; via Electrive.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
GE Vernova has produced over half the turbines needed for SunZia Wind, which will be the largest wind farm in the Western Hemisphere when it comes online in 2026.
GE Vernova has manufactured enough turbines at its Pensacola, Florida, factory to supply over 1.2 gigawatts (GW) of the turbines needed for the $5 billion, 2.4 GW SunZia Wind, a project milestone. The wind farm will be sited in Lincoln, Torrance, and San Miguel counties in New Mexico.
At a ribbon-cutting event for Pensacola’s new customer experience center, GE Vernova CEO Scott Strazik noted that since 2023, the company has invested around $70 million in the Pensacola factory.
The Pensacola investments are part of the announcement GE Vernova made in January that it will invest nearly $600 million in its US factories and facilities over the next two years to help meet the surging electricity demands globally. GE Vernova says it’s expecting its investments to create more than 1,500 new US jobs.
Vic Abate, CEO of GE Vernova Wind, said, “Our dedicated employees in Pensacola are working to address increasing energy demands for the US. The workhorse turbines manufactured at this world-class factory are engineered for reliability and scalability, ensuring our customers can meet growing energy demand.”
SunZia Wind and Transmission will create US history’s largest clean energy infrastructure project.
Read more: The largest clean energy project in US history closes $11B, starts full construction
If you live in an area that has frequent natural disaster events, and are interested in making your home more resilient to power outages, consider going solar and adding a battery storage system. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. They have hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisers to help you every step of the way. Get started here. –trusted affiliate link*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports12 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business3 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway