Europe pushes ahead with China EV tariffs despite Germany’s objection
The European Union has voted to move forward with its plan to impose tariffs on electric cars imported from China, despite recent moves by Germany to attempt to block the proposal.
Chinese EV production has soared lately, as the country’s efforts to secure mineral contracts and build up its local auto manufacturing base have borne fruit.
Along with that drastic rise in EV production has come a rapid rise in EV sales within the country – and a rise of exports as well.
As those exports have hit international shores, audiences from Australia to Europe have found Chinese EVs as quite a reasonable value proposition when compared to domestic manufacturers, and sales have risen overseas as they have domestically.
This has been troubling for domestic European manufacturers, who have found it tough to keep up with the low prices that Chinese manufacturers are able to sell their cars at.
The EU has accused China of “flooding” its market with these EVs, and of unfair subsidy practices towards its local auto industry. (The EU also subsidizes EVs)
As a result of this, Europe decided to impose tariffs on Chinese EVs, with a sliding scale based on which manufacturers it deems most out of compliance with its investigations. Those numbers have been modified as negotiations have gone on, but have currently landed between 7.8% and 35.3%. This is notably much lower than the US tariff, which was recently raised from 25% to 100% and went into effect just a week ago.
Europe votes to impose tariffs, with German opposition
Today, the European Commission took a final vote to impose the tariffs. 10 member states supported the plan, 12 abstained, and 5 voted against, with the most significant opposition coming from the EU’s most populous country and the one with its largest auto industry, Germany.
While the initial vote passed easily with little opposition and many abstentions, including from Germany, the country changed its position and decided to oppose the tariff at today’s vote.
Germany had hoped to rally more nations to vote against the tariffs, but it was always going to be a high bar, requiring 15 countries and 65% of the EU population to overturn the previous vote. As of this week, it became apparent that Germany was never going to get there.
At first glance it seems incongruous that the country with the largest auto industry in Europe might oppose tariffs that are intended to protect the European auto industry. But the reason for this is because German automakers sell a lot of high-end and profitable vehicles to China, and fears retaliatory tariffs of the sort that often come up when countries erect trade barriers.
China specifically has been quite effective at targeting its retaliatory tariffs in the past. In response to trump-era tariffs, China enacted a 25% tariff on US goods in 2018 which, among other things, devastated the US soybean industry. China has already started investigating several EU product categories like brandy, dairy and pork products, and related European industry groups feel “abandoned” by their governments in face of this threat.
Beyond the threat of tariffs, Chinese consumers have been increasingly looking inward as well, abandoning foreign brands partially due to nationalistic sentiment as they feel that other countries have treated them unfairly.
So Germany sees how a Chinese tariff on European autos might hasten its decline in the world’s (just-recently-2nd) most populous country, cutting it off from 1.4 billion potential consumers.
Its vote against may have been tactical, though – an attempt to have their cake and eat it too. Germany may want the protective effects of a European tariff, allowing them to continue to sell to domestic buyers without being undercut by Chinese brands, but also want China to think that they were trying to stop the tariffs, thus lessening Beijing’s desire to retaliate against poor little Germany which did everything in its power to stop these tariffs.
European tariffs are also significantly lower than those recently imposed by the US, and Europe has been actively talking to Beijing and has modified tariff pricing and may modify it more going forward. This may be another tactical decision – by showing that it is more willing to work with China than the US is, and by setting a more “reasonable” tariff, the EU can portray itself as less extreme and thus less worthy of retaliation.
Electrek’s Take
If you’d like to read 3,300 words on what I think about this whole tariff idea, head on over to my article “Tariffs on China aren’t the way to win the EV arms race – getting serious on EVs is.” I promise you it’s a pretty good one. While the article is about the US tariff, much of it applies to Europe as well.
The fact is, tariffs are popular, but usually don’t work very well. We have a lot of examples of this happening, and while “most economists agree” should not be a silver bullet rule for interpreting the world, in this case, I think they’re generally right.
At best, I think these tariffs will offer a temporary reprieve to local manufacturers – which we have already seen they are more than willing to use to delay their plans and put themselves back into the exact same position they’re already in: behind.
Meanwhile, what it immediately does is increase prices for EU consumers, and reduce EU manufacturers’ desire or need to compete on price. In a time where every country around the world has recently struggled with inflation, making one of the things that households spend the most money on more expensive doesn’t seem too wise.
This will also make people less willing to replace gas guzzlers with newer, cheaper-to-run electric vehicles, which means not only sustained high fuel costs for those families, but sustained high climate and health costs from the increased climate change that comes from using those old vehicles.
So I just don’t see this as the smart choice. Germany eventually came around to the right decision here – but it could have exercised leadership earlier, instead of playing tactical games and trying to appear as if it’s on both sides.
There’s always the chance the government might put more tariffs on solar panels, so the best time to go solar is now. Find a reliable and competitively priced solar installer near you on EnergySage, for free. They have pre-vetted installers competing for your business, ensuring high-quality solutions and 20-30% savings. It’s free, with no sales calls until you choose an installer. Compare personalized solar quotes online and receive guidance from unbiased Energy Advisers. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Japanese equipment giant Komatsu has added a not-so-giant electric excavator to its growing lineup of battery-powered construction equipment. The new Komatsu PC20E-6 electric mini excavator promises a full day of work from a single charge.
Komatsu says the design of its latest mini excavator was informed by data sourced from more than 40,000 working days of comparably-sized diesel excavators. The company found that, in 90% of its global customers’ mini excavator deployments, these vehicles are in active use for less than 3.5 hours per day.
“This defined the target for the required, reliable working time with the excavator,” reads the Komatsu web copy. “This result makes it possible for Komatsu to offer an attractively priced machine with a performance that exactly matches the requirements.”
Keeping costs down are relatively conservative specs. Komatsu chose to power the PC20E-6 with a 23.2 kWh battery pack sending electrons to an 11 kW (~15 hp), high-torque electric motors. Not exactly super impressive on paper, but the machine has an operating weight of 2,190 kg and enough juice for up to four (4) hours of continuous operation.
More than enough, in other words, to have completed 90% of of those 40,000 work days the company analyzed.
Getting it done
If, for some reason, that four hours’ runtime isn’t enough, an on-board charging option for 230V and 3kW charging power compatible with various plug adapters is standard, with an external DC quick charger for 400V and 12 kW charging as optional. In either case, it won’t be long before the machine is back at work.
To help the later adopters sleep well about their battery-powered investments, the PC20E-6 ships with Komatsu’s E-Support maintenance program, which includes free scheduled maintenance by a Komatsu-trained technician, a 3 year/2,000 hour warranty on the machine, plus a 5 year/10,000 hour warranty on the electric driveline. The company says the battery should last 10 years.
“The Komatsu E-Support customer program is included free of charge with every market-ready electric mini excavator and offers exclusive machine support,” said Emanuele Viel, Group Manager Utility at Komatsu Europe. “The bottom line is that the risk for the end customer is significantly reduced, especially when it comes to exploring the electrification advances in the industry.”
Komatsu hasn’t released official pricing quite yet, but has revealed that the P20E-6 will begin series production this October.
SOURCE | IMAGES: Komatsu.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Tesla has unexpectedly terminated a contractor’s contract at Gigafactory Texas, resulting in the layoff of 82 workers who were supporting the automaker’s production at the giant factory in Austin.
MPW Industrial Services Inc., an Ohio-based industrial service provider specializing in cleaning and facility management, has issued a new WARN notice, confirming that it will lay off 82 workers in Texas due to Tesla unexpectedly ending its contract with the company.
Here are the details from the WARN notice:
- State / agency: Texas Workforce Commission (TWC).
- Notice date: August 27, 2025.
- Employees affected: 82
- Likely effective date: September 1, 2025
- Context from the filing/letter: layoffs tied to an unexpected termination of a major customer contract (Tesla—Gigafactory Texas, 1 Tesla Road); positions include 61 technicians, 7 team leads, 7 supervisors, 7 managers; no bumping rights; workers not union-represented.
In April 2024, Tesla initiated waves of layoffs at the plant, resulting in the dismissal of more than 2,000 employees in Austin, Texas.
Since then, Tesla’s sales have been in a steady decline. While the automaker is expected to have a strong quarter in the US in Q3 due to the end of the tax credit, sales are expected to decline further in Q4 and the first half of 2026.
Many industry watchers have expected Tesla to initiate further layoffs due to the situation.
Electrek’s Take
We may be seeing the beginnings of a new wave of layoffs at Tesla, as the automaker typically starts with contractors.
To be fair, Tesla could also potentially end the contract unexpectedly for other reasons, but the timing does align with the need to cut costs and staff ahead of an inevitable downturn in US EV sales.
I think it’s inevitable that we start seeing some layoffs. I think Tesla will have to slow down production in the US to avoid creating an oversupply, especially in Q4-Q1.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
First, it was e-bikes, offering an efficient, effective, and low-cost way for teens and just about everyone to zip around town, yet drawing the temper of suburban traditionalists. Now golf carts are the new public enemy number one in suburbia, at least if you ask the growing number of online groups where residents complain about these small electric vehicles “clogging” their streets.
But beyond the hand-wringing, golf carts and their more sophisticated cousins known as Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) or Low Speed Vehicles (LSVs), are quietly becoming a popular alternative to cars for short trips around US cities and suburbs.
While most people still associate golf carts with retirement communities in Florida or slow rides across 18 holes, street-legal versions have been around for the last few decades.
But these aren’t your grandpa’s bare-bones carts, complete with a golf pencil clip. Many now come with DOT seat belts, lights, turn signals, mirrors, backup cameras, and speed limiters that allow them to operate legally on roads up to 35 mph, as long as they meet all the federal requirements for Low-Speed Vehicles (LSVs).
That means such vehicles are legally allowed to operate like cars, trucks, bicycles, or motorcycles on the vast majority of residential streets and a surprising portion of urban grids. In other words, for grabbing groceries, school drop-offs, or cruising to a friend’s house, they’re a practical, cheaper, and far greener substitute for firing up a 5,000-pound SUV.
Golf carts have been slowly taking off for years, but the pandemic accelerated the trend. Sales of golf carts and LSVs spiked as families looked for safe, outdoor transportation and an easy way to get around their neighborhoods. Now, in cities all over the country, the sight of parents driving their kids to school or running errands in a cart is increasingly common. In some towns, petitions have even popped up with hundreds of residents asking for local ordinances to legalize them on more streets, according to the Daily Mail.
Of course, not everyone is thrilled. There’s growing backlash against the increase in golf carts on streets, with many residents calling them a “plague” and complaining that they’re taking up space on the roads, in parking lots, or creating unsafe conditions. While rare, there have been serious accidents too, with a handful of tragic cases highlighting the dangers of mixing small, lightweight carts with full-size vehicles. Critics argue that carts lack the crash protection of cars and don’t always fall under homeowners’ insurance policies if an accident happens.
But for every critic, there’s a supporter pointing out that golf carts take cars off the road, save money on fuel, and are no more dangerous than scooters or e-bikes – modes of transport that already share the streets. And major golf cart makers have been happy to respond to the demand with boosted sales and new models. Companies like E-Z-GO, Club Car, WAEV, Kandi, and others are all rushing new models to the market as more suburban commuters discover that their next electric vehicle might just cost a fraction of what they thought it would – and come with a better breeze, too.
Electrek’s Take
If I didn’t know any better, I’d say it’s like the Karens are just following me around to poo-poo on any alternative vehicle I happen to drive that week. They’ve hit all my favorites. Pretty soon, they’ll be coming for my electric tractors, too!
But seriously, this feels like déjà vu. The same arguments we’ve heard for years against e-bikes are now being recycled against golf carts: too unsafe, too disruptive, too “different” from the car-centric status quo.
But the reality is, again, quite the same as e-bikes. These are small electric vehicles that make a ton of sense and are totally street legal, at least when they’re built correctly to conform to the proper laws.
They come with a lot of the same benefits, too. They’re cheap to operate, easy to park, perfect for short trips, and they prevent larger cars from needlessly clogging residential streets. Will they ruffle feathers among the kind of folks who have had one too many frisbees land in their yard? Perhaps. But much like e-bikes, their popularity is only going one direction – up.
I leave you with a few images of perhaps my favorite of all, the Kandi Mini. The nay-sayers can pull it from my cold, dead, golf
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment11 months agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024