Connect with us

Published

on

Automattic founder, Matt Mullenweg

Source: Automattic

Matt Mullenweg, who turned 40 in January, has now spent more than half his life working on WordPress. He’s never had such an insane two weeks.

WordPress, best known as a leading content management system, has hundreds of millions of sites currently using its templates, tools and plugins. But the WordPress universe is a complicated mishmash of open-source products, nonprofits, for-profit companies, trademarks and licenses.

The typically quiet but extremely important part of the internet — WordPress powers roughly 40% of all websites — has suddenly emerged as a major source of tech industry drama, threatening to upend an ecosystem that’s long been viewed, from the outside at least, as collegial, thanks to its longevity and the various fun-loving camps and learning sessions it hosts every year.

While WordPress’ technology is open source, meaning anyone can install it and use it for free, Mullenweg is also founder and CEO of Automattic, a venture-backed startup valued at $7.5 billion, as of 2021. WordPress.com is Automattic’s central businesses, and individuals and companies pay anywhere from $4 a month to over $25,000 a year for services like ad products, security, customer support and inventory management.

The saga that burst into public view in September featured the normally mild-mannered Mullenweg as its central character in a battle with WP Engine, one of the leading providers of WordPress hosting. Silicon Valley private equity firm Silver Lake bought a majority stake in WP Engine in 2018, investing $250 million and obtaining three board seats.

“I’ve been doing WordPress for 21 years, I have good relationships with every other company in the world,” Mullenweg said in an interview this week with CNBC.

WP Engine’s offense, according to Mullenweg and a cease-and-desist letter his attorneys sent to the company on Sept. 23, revolves around years of trademark violations and WP Engine’s claim that it’s bringing “WordPress to the masses.”

“We at Automattic have been attempting to make a licensing deal with them for a very long time, and all they have done is string us along,” Mullenweg wrote in a Sept. 26 post on his personal website, ma.tt. “Finally, I drew a line in the sand, which they have now leapt over.”

Here's how a three-month paid sabbatical can solve employee retention and burnout problems

Since then, the matter has escalated on an almost daily basis. WordPress took the drastic step of banning WP Engine from using the WordPress resources necessary to serve its customers, which preceded a lawsuit filed on Wednesday by WP Engine against Mullenweg and Automattic. Mullenweg then put out another post, calling WP Engine’s suit “meritless,” and announcing that he’d hired Neal Katyal, former U.S. acting solicitor general, for legal defense.

Tomasz Tunguz, a venture capitalist and founder of Theory Ventures, says the conflict speaks to the perpetual challenge of open-source software.

“What are the legitimate ways of monetizing open source and does the commercial entity created by the authors — how much control should they have with the commercialization efforts?” Tunguz said. In this case, “hundreds of millions in revenue is at stake between the two,” he added.

‘Silver Lake doesn’t give a dang’

In Mullenweg’s telling of the brouhaha, the battle has been years in the making. He’s been actively trying to strike a deal since January and finally got fed up, he said.

But to the outside world, it all felt very sudden. Mullenweg first referenced the matter in public on Sept. 17, in a blog post ahead of WordCamp, the largest annual gathering in the U.S. of WordPress users. The four-day event took place in Portland, Oregon, beginning on Sept. 17.

In the post, Mullenweg criticized WP Engine for not contributing enough back to the WordPress ecosystem. He said that Automattic contributed 3,786 hours per week to WordPress.org, (“not even counting me!”) compared to 47 hours for WP Engine.

For businesses and developers considering who they want to support, Mullenweg had this message: “Silver Lake doesn’t give a dang about your Open Source ideals. It just wants a return on capital.”

A Silver Lake spokesperson said WP Engine was handling all inquiries. A WP Engine representative referred to the company’s complaint against Automattic and Mullenweg, filed on Oct. 2. The spokesperson highlighted the introduction of the complaint.

“This is a case about abuse of power, extortion, and greed,” the filing begins. “The misconduct at issue here is all the more shocking because it occurred in an unexpected place — the WordPress open source software community built on promises of the freedom to build, run, change, and redistribute without barriers or constraints, for all. Those promises were not kept, and that community was betrayed, by the wrongful acts of a few—[Matt Mullenweg and Automattic]—to the detriment of the many, including WPE.”

On Sept. 20, three days after Mullenweg’s initial post, the WordPress founder showed he wouldn’t be backing down.

In his keynote, at an event that attracted an estimated 1,500 WordPress fanatics, Mullenweg warned the audience upfront that it “might be one of my spiciest WordCamp presentations ever.” After reading out his prior blog post, Mullenweg took swipes at Silver Lake, even naming a partner at the firm, Lee Wittlinger, as the man behind WP Engine, comparing him to a “schoolyard bully.”

Prior to taking questions, Mullenweg said of WP Engine’s presence at WordCamp, “they’re not going to be at future ones, I don’t think.”

Gap between closed-source and open-source AI companies smaller than we thought: Hugging Face

He wasn’t done.

The next day, in a post titled, “WP Engine is not WordPress,” Mullenweg wrote that even his mother didn’t know the difference, and he said WP Engine is “profiting off of the confusion” and “needs a trademark license to continue their business.”

His mom wasn’t the only one confused.

Bob Perkowitz, president of environmental nonprofit ecoAmerica, told CNBC that he’s known Mullenweg for 16 years and is even an investor in Automattic. For a number of his organizational and personal websites, Perkowitz said he’s long been a WP Engine customer. Tuning in remotely, he heard Mullenweg’s WordCamp presentation.

“I always thought that was part of WordPress,” Perkowitz told CNBC in an interview, referring to WP Engine. “They’re misleading, and they don’t contribute to the community.”

Perkowitz said he’s having his website administrator migrate all of the websites to different hosting companies.

Following Mullenweg’s presentation, WP Engine sent Automattic’s legal chief a cease-and-desist letter on Sept. 23, due to what the company called Mullenweg’s self-described “scorched earth nuclear approach.” The letter said Mullenweg had demanded a payout of a “very large sum of money” before his WordCamp keynote, and WP Engine didn’t pay up.

The letter said Mullenweg’s “false, misleading, and disparaging statements are legally actionable.”

Two days later, Mullenweg wrote on the WordPress.org site that WP Engine had been banned, meaning it “no longer has free access to WordPress.org’s resources.” Mullenweg encouraged WP Engine’s thousands of customers to contact the company “and ask them to fix it.”

WordPress then temporarily unblocked WP Engine and gave it until Oct. 1 to agree to terms of a licensing agreement, which Mullenweg made public. The crux of the deal is that WP Engine would agree to a royalty fee of 8% of monthly revenue to Automattic or commit 8% of revenue “in the form of salaries of WP Engine employees” working on WordPress features for WordPress.org.

No deal was made. The ban went into effect Oct. 1.

To the universe of WP Engine customers, Mullenweg’s actions were harsh and clumsy. Mullenweg says that what his critics don’t understand is how long he’s been trying to come to a deal.

“They’ve been delaying forever,” Mullenweg told CNBC. He decided, “I’m going to finally start talking about the evil stuff you’re doing unless you talk to me,” he said.

Fighting back

Far from negotiating, WP Engine on Wednesday filed its explosive lawsuit against Mullenweg and Automattic.

WP Engine accuses Mullenweg of slander and libel due to his public comments and says the WordPress founder has numerous conflicts of interest in how he runs the community and his company, give the open-source nature of the technology.

“Over the last two weeks, Defendants have been carrying out a scheme to ban WPE from the WordPress community unless it agreed to pay tens of millions of dollars to Automattic for a purported trademark license that WPE does not even need,” the lawsuit says. “Defendants’ plan, which came without warning, gave WPE less than 48 hours to either agree to pay them off or face the consequences of being banned and publicly smeared.”

Following WP Engine’s demands for a jury trial in its 61-page lawsuit, Mullenweg fired back, describing the complaint as “baseless” and “flawed, start to finish.”

On his personal website, Mullenweg acknowledged that the ordeal was causing a big internal clash at his company.

“It became clear a good chunk of my Automattic colleagues disagreed with me and our actions,” Mullenweg wrote.

He says he made the decision to offer buyout packages for anyone who resigned before early afternoon Thursday, offering $30,000 or six months of salary, whichever is higher. Anyone who took the deal wouldn’t be eligible to “boomerang,” a term for getting rehired.

Mullenweg said that 159 people, or 8.4% of the workforce, took the offer while the 91.6% who opted to stay turned down a collective $126 million.

Mullenweg concluded by saying, “now I feel much lighter.”

“I’m grateful and thankful for all the people who took the offer, and even more excited to work with those who turned down $126M to stay,” Mullenweg wrote. “As the kids say, LFG!”

Mullenweg may be openly enthusiastic and grateful for the employees he still has on board, but the WordPress community is a mess. Many WP Engine customers are suffering, and Automattic is gearing up for a legal fight against a private equity firm with over $100 billion in assets.

WATCH: An open-source future

AI's Open-Source Future

Continue Reading

Technology

Apple iPhone shipments to beat Samsung for the first time in 14 years, report says

Published

on

By

Apple iPhone shipments to beat Samsung for the first time in 14 years, report says

Apple CEO Tim Cook holds up a new iPhone 17 Pro during an Apple special event at Apple headquarters on September 09, 2025 in Cupertino, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Apple is set to ship more smartphones than Samsung in 2025, the first time it will have done so in 14 years, Counterpoint Research said in a note on Wednesday.

Apple will ship around 243 million iPhone units this year versus 235 million shipments from Samsung, Counterpoint told CNBC. Apple is likely to end up with a 19.4% share of the global smartphone market while Samsung’s share will be 18.7%.

Shipments refer to the number of devices vendors ship to retail channels and do not directly equal sales. However, they provide insights into demand and expectations of sales from smartphone makers.

Apple’s success is being driven by its iPhone 17 series launched in September, which, according to Counterpoint, had a “bumper” holiday sales season.

Sales of the iPhone 17 series in the U.S. — including the iPhone Air — during the first four weeks after launch was 12% higher than that of the iPhone 16 series, excluding the iPhone 16e, the research firm said. In China, a critical market for Apple, sales of the iPhone 17 series during the same period were 18% higher than its predecessor.

“Beyond the highly positive market reception for the iPhone 17 series, the key driver behind the upgraded shipment outlook lies in the replacement cycle reaching its inflection point. Consumers who purchased smartphones during the COVID-19 boom are now entering their upgrade phase,” Counterpoint Research Senior Analyst Yang Wang, said in the note.

Samsung meanwhile, could face challenges in the low-to-mid tier of the smartphone market from Chinese players, which could hamper the South Korean giant’s ability to reclaim the top spot, Counterpoint said.

Apple longer-term boost

Counterpoint Research forecasts Apple will hold the top spot in the global smartphone market through 2029. The analysts laid out a few reasons why.

Firstly, 358 million second-hand iPhones were sold between 2023 and the second quarter of 2025.

“These users are also likely to upgrade to a new iPhone in the coming years. These factors will form a sizable demand base, which is expected to sustain iPhone shipment growth over the coming quarters,” Counterpoint Research said.

Apple benefited from a lower-than-expected impact from tariffs given the trade truce between the U.S. and China. This helped Apple’s broader supply chain and growth in certain regions, such as emerging markets. The tech giant also benefited from a weaker U.S. dollar and a “resilient economic outlook” that boosted consumer confidence.

“With these structural tailwinds, Apple is well-positioned to surpass Samsung in annual shipments in 2025,” Wang said.

Meanwhile, Apple is expected to launch the entry level iPhone 17e next year as well as a foldable smartphone, Counterpoint forecast. The research firm said it expects the previously-announced improvements to Apple’s virtual assistant Siri as well as a “major iPhone design revamp” in 2027, to also underpin Apple’s dominance over the next few years.

“By expanding its lineup across multiple price tiers, including the growing “e” series, and potential adjustments to the Pro and Base launch cycles, Apple is strategically positioning itself to capture rising demand from aspirational consumers, particularly in emerging markets, and to strengthen its presence in the lower premium segment, which is projected to grow faster than the overall market,” Counterpoint said.

“Given an increasing preference for the iOS ecosystem, compatibility between devices and a substantial number of older models within Apple’s installed base due for renewal, Apple will retain the lead over other smartphone OEMs through the end of the decade.”

Continue Reading

Technology

Alphabet hits record highs, Burry’s AI concerns, Ukraine peace plan and more in Morning Squawk

Published

on

By

Alphabet hits record highs, Burry's AI concerns, Ukraine peace plan and more in Morning Squawk

Jensen Huang, chief executive officer of Nvidia Corp., during the US-Saudi Investment Forum at the Kennedy Center in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Nov. 19, 2025.

Stefani Reynolds | Bloomberg | Getty Images

This is CNBC’s Morning Squawk newsletter. Subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox.

Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day:

1. Nvidia enters the chat

Shares of Nvidia and Alphabet have diverged in recent days as the latter steps into the artificial intelligence spotlight. With some market watchers wondering if the Google parent will take the lead on AI, Nvidia attempted to reassure investors of its dominance in the industry.

Here’s the rundown:

  • Alphabet shares rose to all-time highs yesterday, the latest sign of trader excitement following the release of the tech giant’s upgraded Gemini 3 model last week.
  • Shares of the Google parent also appeared to get a boost from a report that Meta is considering purchasing the company’s AI chips.
  • Nvidia shares meanwhile closed down more than 2% yesterday.
  • The AI darling defended its technology following the Meta report, saying in a social media statement that it is “a generation ahead of the industry.”
  • While Nvidia said it’s a supplier for Google, the company asserted that its chips are more powerful than competitors’ products.
  • Shares of Alphabet are up more than 1% in premarket trading. Nvidia shares, on the other hand, ticked down further this morning.
  • Elsewhere on the AI front, Dell said yesterday that it was expecting a strong fourth quarter thanks to AI sales.

2. Gravy train

Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, US, on Friday, Nov. 21, 2025.

Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The stock market’s recovery rally continued yesterday. This time, the Dow Jones Industrial Average led the charge: The blue-chip index climbed more than 660 points, or 1.4%. Follow live markets updates here.

Investors appeared to be focused on the outlook for another interest rate cut at the Federal Reserve’s December gathering. Fed funds traders are pricing in an 84% likelihood of a rate decrease, up from around 50% just a week ago, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool.

Fed funds futures rose after Bloomberg reported that White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett — who’s seen as likely to advocate for further cuts — is a front runner to succeed Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC yesterday that there’s a “very good chance” that President Donald Trump will announce the Fed’s next leader “before Christmas.”

3. War in Ukraine

A resident walks at a square, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine November 25, 2025.

Stringer | Reuters

Ukraine is willing to move forward with the U.S.-backed framework for a peace deal that would end its yearslong war with Russia, according to several news reports.

Trump said at the White House yesterday that “we’re getting very close to a deal,” adding on social media that there were just “a few remaining points of disagreement.” He said he would meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin “when the deal to end this War is FINAL or, in its final stages.”

A Putin aide told reporters today that Russia hasn’t officially received a revised draft of the deal, which is widely considered favorable to Russia. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff is slated to travel to Moscow next week to meet with Putin.

Get Morning Squawk directly in your inbox

4. Burry’s AI bet

Michael Burry attends the premiere of “The Big Short” at Ziegfeld Theatre on November 23, 2015 in New York City.

Dimitrios Kambouris | Getty Images

“The Big Short” investor Michael Burry rose to fame by predicting the 2008 housing crash. Now, he has set his sights on a new topic: AI.

After deregistering his hedge fund Scion Asset Management, Burry launched a blog focused on why he thinks the AI trade is a bubble. Key to Burry’s criticism is the skepticism of Phil Clifton, a former Scion associate portfolio manager who believes that the costs of the industry’s infrastructure buildout boom haven’t been justified.

Nvidia is pushing back. CNBC’s Yun Li reported that the chipmaker quietly shared with analysts a private memo that mentioned Burry by name when rebuking his claims.

5. Bad vibes

A for sale sign is seen in front of a house in a Spring Branch neighborhood in Houston, Monday, Oct. 27, 2025.

Kirk Sides | Houston Chronicle | Getty Images

Homeowners are yanking “For Sale” signs out of their yards at an unusually high rate. Redfin reported yesterday that nearly 85,000 U.S. sellers took their homes off the market in September, marking the highest level for the month in eight years.

As CNBC’s Diana Olick reports, weak demand from buyers, falling home prices and an overall feeling of economic uncertainty might be contributing to sellers’ decisions to stay put. Redfin found that around 15% of delisted homes were at risk of selling at a loss.

Also yesterday, Conference Board said its Consumer Confidence Index in November fell to its lowest level since April. The group cited weak employment prospects as a driver of the decline.

The Daily Dividend

First Lady Melania Trump looks on as US President Donald Trump pardons Gobble, one of the National Thanksgiving turkeys, during the White House turkey pardon ceremony in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC on Nov. 25, 2025.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds | AFP | Getty Images

CNBC’s Kif Leswing, Arjun Kharpal, Sean Conlon, Jeff Cox, Kevin Breuninger, Yun Li, Holly Ellyatt, Diana Olick and Luke Fountain contributed to this report. Josephine Rozzelle edited this edition.

Continue Reading

Technology

CNBC Daily Open: The weight of Nvidia’s crown

Published

on

By

CNBC Daily Open: The weight of Nvidia's crown

Jensen Huang is interviewed by media during a reception for the 2025 Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering, at St James’ Palace November 5, 2025 in London, England, U.K.

Yui Mok | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown.

Shares of artificial intelligence czar Nvidia fell 2.6% on Tuesday as signs of unrest continued rippling through its kingdom.

Over the month, Nvidia has been contending with concerns over lofty valuations and an argument from the “The Big Short” investor Michael Burry that companies may be overestimating the lifespan of Nvidia’s chips. That accounting choice inflates profits, he alleged.

The pressure intensified last week in the form of a potential challenger to the crown. Google on Nov. 18 announced the release of its new AI model Gemini 3 — so far so good, given that Nvidia isn’t in the business of designing large language models  — powered by its in-house AI chips — uhoh.

And on Monday stateside, Meta, a potential kingmaker, appeared to signal that it is considering not just leasing Google’s custom AI chips, but also using them for its own data centers. It seemed like Nvidia felt the need to address some of those rumblings.

The chipmaker said on the social media platform X that its technology is more powerful and versatile than other types of AI chips, including the so-called ASIC chips, such as Google’s TPUs. Separately, Nvidia issued a private memo to Wall Street that disputed Burry’s allegations.

Power, whether in politics or semiconductors, requires a delicate balance.

Remaining silent may shroud those in power in a cloak of untouchability, projecting confidence in their authority — but also aloofness. Deigning to address unrest can soothe uncertainty, but also, paradoxically, signal insecurity.

For now, the crown is Nvidia’s to wear — and the weight of it is, too.

What you need to know today

The UK Autumn Budget 2025 is here. Britain prepares for a “smorgasbord” of tax hikes to be unveiled Wednesday. Follow CNBC’s coverage of the Budget throughout the day on our live blog here

U.S. stocks advanced on Tuesday. Major indexes had their third straight winning session, erasing earlier intraday losses. Asia-Pacific markets rose Wednesday. Shares of Foxconn climbed more than 3% after the firm received approval for a contract amendment.

Meta is looking to use Google AI chips. That’s according to a Monday report by The Information. Nvidia on Tuesday wrote on X that its chips are “a generation ahead of the industry.” The chipmaker also sent analysts a memo on alleged bubble claims.

Taiwan President pledges $40 billion more for defense. Lai Ching-te, Taiwan’s leader, on Wednesday said the self-governing island will improve its self-defense capabilities in the face of “unprecedented military buildup” by China.

[PRO] What to watch as UK budget is unveiled. Strategists told CNBC they will be monitoring the budget’s effects on interest rates, economic growth and the British pound — and one “rabbit out of the hat” from U.K. Finance Minister Rachel Reeves.

And finally…

Lights on in skyscrapers and commercial buildings on the skyline of the City of London, UK, on Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2025. U.K. business chiefs urged Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves to ease energy costs and avoid raising the tax burden on corporate Britain as she prepares this year’s budget.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The UK’s Autumn Budget is coming: Here’s what it could mean for your money

The run-up to this year’s U.K. Autumn Budget has been different from the norm because so many different tax proposals have been floated, flagged, leaked and retracted in the weeks and months leading up to Wednesday’s statement.

It has also made it harder to gauge what we’re actually going to get when Finance Minister Rachel Reeves finally unveils her spending and taxation plans for the year ahead.

— Holly Ellyatt

Continue Reading

Trending