The suspect in the Madeleine McCann case has been cleared of a string of sex attacks in Portugal, unrelated to the missing British toddler.
Christian B, as he is known under privacy laws, had denied three rapes and the sex abuse of two young girls while he was living on the Algarve coast.
During a trial that began in February, chief prosecutor Ute Lindemann branded the German drifter a “sadistic psychopath” and urged the judge to jail him for 15 years.
She also said he was so dangerous – with previous convictions for rape, child sex abuse, theft and fraud – he should be held in preventive detention after serving his sentence.
But his own lawyer said he was put on trial for the sex crimes this year only because he was the suspect for the abduction of Madeleine, who vanished from her family’s rented holiday apartment in Portugal in 2007.
Image: Madeleine McCann vanished in Portugal in 2007. Pic: PA
In his closing speech this week, defence lawyer Friedrich Fulscher said: “This story will teach us what terrible consequences it can have when the investigating officers of the public prosecutor’s office lose the necessary emotional distance from a case, and this attitude is combined disastrously with amateur investigations by a police authority.”
He said Christian B should never have been charged with the sex crimes.
Addressing the prosecutor directly, he added: “Your decision (to prosecute) would have been different if the accused had not been Christian B, the man to whom you also want to attribute an offence which has attracted the attention of the world public and which lay like a fog over these proceedings.”
Christian B, who moved between his native Germany and Portugal from the 1990s until his arrest and deportation in 2017, has been the main suspect for Madeleine’s disappearance for at least seven years.
Hans Christian Wolters, the German prosecutor in charge of the Madeleine investigation, has said in the past that he believes Christian B abducted the three-year-old and that she is dead.
But the 47-year-old suspect, who is currently serving a seven-year sentence for the rape of an elderly American woman in Portugal, has not been charged over Madeleine and denies any involvement in her disappearance.
The current trial in Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, has been held on intermittent days over the past eight months.
The main charge against Christian B was the rape of Irish holiday worker Hazel Behan in her room in the resort of Praia da Rocha in 2005. She has waived her right to anonymity.
Ms Behan was raped several times and whipped by a masked intruder brandishing a knife, in a prolonged ordeal that bore similar horrific hallmarks to the rape for which Christian B is in jail now, said the prosecutor.
But his lawyer said Ms Behan’s description of her attacker did not match Christian B’s, particularly a cross-like mark she said she saw on his right thigh, which he says he does not have.
Ms Behan’s belief that Christian B was her attacker may have sprung from the influence of media reports about his rape conviction, said Mr Fulscher.
He accused two main prosecution witnesses, former friends Helge Busching and Manfred Seyferth, of lying about video tapes they claimed to have seen allegedly showing Christian B raping an elderly woman and a girl of about 14 in his rented home in Portugal. The video tapes didn’t exist, he said.
Christian B was also charged with grabbing the wrist of a 10-year-old girl and exposing himself to her on an Algarve beach and masturbating in front of another young girl during a festival in a hillside village above the coast.
The five sex crimes were said to have been committed between 2000 and 2017.
With this trial over, the Braunschweig prosecutor’s office will be under pressure to refocus on its Madeleine investigation and decide whether to charge Christian B over her disappearance.
“We have lost our beautiful daughter, sister, friend and mother. Annabel was a truly wonderful woman,” the tribute read.
“She touched the hearts of so many.
“She gave her life to helping the vulnerable and the disadvantaged whether it was in refugee camps in Africa or setting up MamaSuze in London, to enhance the lives of survivors of forced displacement and gender-based violence.”
When I got to Chequers on Sunday, the prime minister had clearly been up for most of the night and hitting the phones all morning with calls to fellow leaders in Europe and the Middle East, as he and others scrambled to try to contain a very dangerous situation.
His primary message was to try to reassure the public that the UK government was working to stabilise the region as best it could and press for a return to diplomacy.
But what struck me in our short interview was not what he did say but what he didn’t – what he couldn’t – say about the US strikes.
It was clear from his swerve on the question of whether the UK supported the strikes that the prime minister neither wanted to endorse US strikes nor overtly criticise President Donald Trump.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:00
Starmer reacts to US strikes on Iran
Instead, his was a form of words – repeated later in a joint statement of the E3 (the UK, Germany and France) – to acknowledge the US strikes and reiterate where they can agree: the need to prevent Iran having a nuclear weapon.
He also didn’t want to engage in the very obvious observation that President Trump simply isn’t listening to Sir Keir Starmer or other allies, who had been very publicly pressing for de-escalation all week, from the G7 summit in Canada to this weekend as European countries convened talks in Geneva with Iran.
Image: Donald Trump and Sir Keir Starmer at the G7 in Canada last week. Pic: Reuters
It was only five days ago that the prime minister told me he didn’t think a US attack was imminent, when I asked him what was going on following President Trump’s abrupt decision to quit the G7 early and convene his security council at the White House.
When I asked him if he felt foolish or frustrated that Trump had done that and didn’t seem to be listening, he told me it was a “fast moving situation” with a “huge amount of discussions in the days since the G7” and said he was intensely pressing his consistent position of de-escalation.
What else really could he say? He has calculated that criticising Trump goes against UK interests and has no other option but to press for a diplomatic solution and work with other leaders to achieve that aim.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:15
What is Operation ‘Midnight Hammer’?
Before these strikes, Tehran was clear it would not enter negotiations until Israel stopped firing missiles into Iran – something Israel is still saying it is not prepared to do.
The US has been briefing that one of the reasons it took action was because it did not think the Iranians were taking the talks convened by the Europeans in Geneva seriously enough.
It is hard now to see how these strikes will not serve but to deepen the conflict in the Middle East and the mood in government is bleak.
Iran will probably conclude that continuing to strike only Israel in light of the US attacks – the first airstrikes ever by the US on Iran – is a response that will make the regime seem weak.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
But escalation could draw the UK into a wider conflict it does not want. If Iran struck US assets, it could trigger Article 5 of NATO (an attack on one is an attack on all) and draw the UK into military action.
If Iran chose to attack the US via proxies, then UK bases and assets could be under threat.
The prime minister was at pains to stress on Sunday that the UK had not been involved in these strikes.
Meanwhile, the UK-controlled airbase on Diego Garcia was not used to launch the US attacks.
There was no request to use the Diego Garcia base, the president moving unilaterally, underlining his disinterest in what the UK has to say.
The world is waiting nervously to see how Iran might respond, as the PM moves more military assets to the region while simultaneously hitting the phones.
The prime minister may be deeply opposed to this war, but stopping it is not in his gift.
Initially, only those with a body mass index of over 40 who have at least four other health problems linked to obesity will be eligible.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:21
Can you get pregnant when on weight loss drugs?
Some doctors have raised concerns about the additional workload this new programme will bring, while pharmacists fear it could lead to supply shortages.
Dr Claire Fuller from NHS England said: “We urgently need to address rising levels of obesity and prioritise support for those who are experiencing severe ill health – and greater access to weight loss drugs will make a significant difference to the lives of those people.”
She added: “While not everyone will be eligible for weight loss drugs, it’s important that anyone who is worried about the impact of their weight on their health discusses the range of NHS support available with their healthcare professional.”
More on Nhs
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:22
Weight loss drugs ‘changing way we see obesity’
The chairwoman of the Royal College of GPs welcomed NHS England’s decision to pursue a phased rollout, and said current workloads must be factored in to ensure the jabs can be prescribed safely.
Professor Kamila Hawthorne went on to say: “While weight loss medications have a lot of potential benefits for patients who are struggling to lose weight and who meet all the clinical criteria for a prescription, they mustn’t be seen as a ‘silver bullet’ to aid weight loss.
“We also need to see a focus on prevention, stopping people becoming overweight in the first place so they don’t require a medical intervention later.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
9:19
‘How I tried to get weight loss drugs’
Her remarks were echoed by the National Pharmacy Association’s chairman Olivier Picard, who says “prescribing these medications alone misses the point”.
He argued that they need to be part of a comprehensive strategy that includes lifestyle coaching, exercise and nutritional guidance – but many GPs currently “lack the bandwidth” to provide this support.
“As a result, we could end up in a situation where patients are prescribed the medication, lose weight, and then experience rebound weight gain once the course ends – simply because the foundational lifestyle changes weren’t addressed,” Mr Picard added.
Estimates suggest about 29% of the adult population is obese.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting says the government “is determined to bring revolutionary modern treatments to everyone who needs them, not just those who can afford to pay”.