AI chipmaker Cerebras is trying to be the first major venture-backed tech company to go public in the U.S. since April and to capitalize on investors’ insatiable demand for Nvidia, now valued at $3.3 trillion.
While its position in artificial intelligence infrastructure represents a major tail wind, Cerebras has challenges — most notably a hefty reliance on a single Middle Eastern customer — that may prove too weighty to overcome in the company’s attempt to ride the Nvidia wave. Valued at $4 billion in 2021, Cerebras is reportedly seeking to roughly double that in its IPO.
“There’s too much hair on this deal,” David Golden, a startup investor at Revolution Ventures who led tech investment banking at JPMorgan Chase from 2000 to 2006, said in an interview this week. “This would never have gotten through our underwriting committee.”
Cerebras launched in 2016 and three years later unveiled its first processor. The company, headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, claims its current chip is faster and more efficient than Nvidia’s graphics processing unit, or GPU, for training large language models.
In 2023, Cerebras’ sales more than tripled to $78.7 million. In the first half of 2024, revenue climbed to $136.4 million, and growth appears poised to ramp up significantly, as Cerebras says in its prospectus that it’s signed agreements to sell $1.43 billion worth of systems and services, with prepayment expected before March 2025.
But the most glaring red flag in Cerebras’ filing relates to customer concentration. One company based in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, accounted for 87% of revenue in the first half of the year. The customer, G42, is backed by Microsoft, and it’s entirely responsible for the $1.43 billion purchase commitment.
Cerebras doesn’t list any other clients in its prospectus, but it does name a few on its website, including AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and the Mayo Clinic. Cerebras says in the filing that, in expanding its customer base, the company plans to “aggressively pursue opportunities in relevant sectors such as healthcare, pharmaceutical, biotechnology” and other areas “where our AI acceleration capabilities can address critical computational bottlenecks.”
In addition to its reliance on G42 for business, Cerebras counts the company as an investor, and it’s seeking clearance from the Treasury Department’s Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., or CFIUS, to give the Middle Eastern firm a bigger position. G42 has agreed to purchase a $335 million stake by April that, at current levels, would make it the largest owner. G42 can pick up $500 million more in Cerebras shares if it commits to spend $5 billion on the company’s computing clusters.
CFIUS has the authority to review foreign investments in U.S. companies for potential national security concerns. Cerebras said in its filing that it doesn’t believe CFIUS has “jurisdiction over G42’s purchase of our non-voting securities” but added that “there is no guarantee that CFIUS will approve” it. Reuters on Tuesday reported that Cerebras was likely to delay its initial public offering and call off its roadshow, scheduled to start next week, due to a national security review. Reuters cited people familiar with the matter.
U.S. lawmakers have expressed unease about G42’s historic ties to China, through both past investments and customer relationships. G42 said in February that it had sold its stakes in Chinese companies after Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., chairman of the Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, wrote a letter of concern to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo about what he called G42’s “extensive business relationships with Chinese military companies, state-owned entities and the PRC intelligence services.”
G42 didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Shunned by top banks
Even if it achieves CFIUS approval, Cerebras has a lot to overcome in trying to sell this deal to investors following a long stretch of suppressed valuations for smaller tech companies and a shortage of IPOs since the end of 2021.
Adding to Cerebras’ list of potential roadblocks is the fact that none of the primary tech investment banks are involved.
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have long dominated IPO underwriting in tech, with JPMorgan Chase also battling to get in the mix. They’re all absent from the Cerebras deal, and sources with knowledge of the process, who asked not to be named because the talks are private, said they stayed away in part due to the risks associated with customer concentration and foreign investment.
The deal is being led by Citigroup and Barclays, which are both large global banks but not the ones that get leadership positions on top tech IPOs.
Representatives from Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley declined to comment. Barclays didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Cerebras’ auditor is BDO, which isn’t one of the so-called Big Four accounting firms. For the other three venture-backed IPOs this year, the accountants were KPMG (Reddit and Rubrik) and PwC (Astera Labs), which are two of the Big Four, along with Deloitte and Ernst & Young.
BDO declined to comment.
There’s also Cerebras CEO Andrew Feldman, who pleaded guilty in 2007 to one count of circumventing accounting controls when he was vice president of marketing at a public company called Riverstone Networks a few years earlier.
“What else could you have added to this to make it really difficult?” Revolution’s Golden said.
A Cerebras spokesperson declined to comment for this story.
The major Wall Street banks, for their part, are finding other ways to play in the burgeoning AI infrastructure market. Last week, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley were among a roster of banks that participated in issuing a $4 billion revolving line of credit to OpenAI. And on Friday, Nvidia GPU provider CoreWeave announced the close of a $650 million credit facility that was led by the top three tech banks.
Peter Thiel, president and founder of Clarium Capital Management LLC, speaks during the Bitcoin 2022 conference in Miami, Florida, on Thursday, April 7, 2022.
Eva Marie Uzcategui | Bloomberg | Getty Images
For Cerebras, there’s still a path to an IPO, given the sheer excitement around AI chips and the dearth of investable opportunities in the market.
Also, Nvidia is trading near a record. Mizuho Securities estimates that Nvidia controls 95% of the market for AI training and inference chips used for models like OpenAI’s GPT-4. Venture capitalist Peter Thiel said at the All-In Summit last month that Nvidia is the only company in the space that’s making money.
“Nvidia is making over 100% of the profits,” Thiel said in an on-stage interview at the event in Los Angeles. “Everybody else is collectively losing money.”
Cerebras is still in the money-losing column, reporting a second-quarter net loss of almost $51 million. However, excluding stock-based compensation, the company is close to breakeven on an operating basis.
Retail investor Jim Fitch, a retired homebuilder in Florida, is among those excited about the opportunity to get in early. Fitch, who said he sold out of his Nvidia stock years ago, told CNBC that the benefits outweigh the risks. He noted that Feldman, Cerebras’ co-founder and CEO, sold his prior company, SeaMicro, to Nvidia rival Advanced Micro Devices for more than $300 million over a decade ago.
Fitch is drawn to the promise of Cerebras’ technology, particularly its WSE-3 chip, which the company calls “the fastest AI processor on Earth,” packed with 4 trillion transistors.
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on Nov. 21, 2025 in New York City.
Spencer Platt | Getty Images
Last week on Wall Street, two forces dragged stocks lower: a set of high-stakes numbers from Nvidia and the U.S. jobs report that landed with more heat than expected. But the leaves that remained after hot tea scalded investors seemed to augur good tidings.
Even though Nvidia’s third-quarter results easily breezed past Wall Street’s estimates, they couldn’t quell worries about lofty valuations and an unsustainable bubble inflating in the artificial intelligence sector. The “Magnificent Seven” cohort — save Alphabet — had a losing week.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics added to the pressure. September payrolls rose far more than economists expected, prompting investors to pare back their bets of a December interest rate cut. The timing didn’t help matters, as the report had been delayed and hit just as markets were already on edge.
On Friday, New York Federal Reserve President John Williams said that he sees “room” for the central bank to lower interest rates, describing current policy as “modestly restrictive.” His comments caused traders to increase their bets on a December cut to around 70%, up from 44.4% a week ago, according to the CME FedWatch tool.
And despite a broad sell-off in AI stocks last week, Alphabet shares bucked the trend. Investors seemed impressed by its new AI model, Gemini 3, and hopeful that its development of custom chips could rival Nvidia’s in the long run.
Meanwhile, Eli Lilly’s ascent into the $1 trillion valuation club served as a reminder that market leadership doesn’t belong to tech alone. In a market defined by narrow concentration, any sign of broadening strength is a welcome change.
Diversification, even within AI’s sprawling ecosystem, might be exactly what this market needs now.
Qube Holdings receives takeover proposal from Macquarie. The asset management firm has put forth a non-binding proposal to acquire Qube Holdings, an Australian logistics company, at an enterprise value of 11.6 billion Australian dollars ($7.49 billion).
Bessent doesn’t see a U.S. recession in 2026. “We have set the table for a very strong, noninflationary growth economy,” the U.S. Treasury secretary said Sunday in an interview on “Meet the Press.” However, he acknowledged that some sectors have been struggling.
Singapore inflation creeps up. The country’s consumer price index for October rose 1.2% year on year, the highest since August 2024 and surpassing the 0.9% estimate in a Reuters poll of economists. Core inflation also increased a higher-than-expected 1.2%.
[PRO] Opportunities in China’s tech sector. Despite a trade truce between the U.S. and China, ongoing tensions mean both will focus on homegrown technology, analysts say. Here are the Chinese tech firms that Wall Street banks are keeping an eye on.
And finally…
A picture taken on December 8, 2014 in Abidjan shows a Chinese shoe dealer in a transaction at Adjamene’s market.
Chinese business dealings in Africa, once dominated by state-owned enterprises, are now increasingly shifting toward consumer products from the private sector.
Chinese investments in Africa’s resource-intensive sectors have declined by roughly 40% since their 2015 peak, according to Rhodium Group China Cross-Border Monitor released on Nov. 18 this year. Meanwhile, China’s exports to Africa have surged by 28% year on year over the first three quarters of 2025, the report said.
Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on Nov. 21, 2025 in New York City.
Spencer Platt | Getty Images
Last week on Wall Street, two forces dragged stocks lower: a set of high-stakes numbers from Nvidia and the U.S. jobs report that landed with more heat than expected. But the leaves that remained after hot tea scalded investors seemed to augur good tidings.
Even though Nvidia’s third-quarter results easily breezed past Wall Street’s estimates, they couldn’t quell worries about lofty valuations and an unsustainable bubble inflating in the artificial intelligence sector. The “Magnificent Seven” cohort — save Alphabet — had a losing week.
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics added to the pressure. September payrolls rose far more than economists expected, prompting investors to pare back their bets of a December interest rate cut. The timing didn’t help matters, as the report had been delayed and hit just as markets were already on edge.
On Friday, New York Federal Reserve President John Williams said that he sees “room” for the central bank to lower interest rates, describing current policy as “modestly restrictive.” His comments caused traders to increase their bets on a December cut to around 70%, up from 44.4% a week ago, according to the CME FedWatch tool.
And despite a broad sell-off in AI stocks last week, Alphabet shares bucked the trend. Investors seemed impressed by its new AI model, Gemini 3, and hopeful that its development of custom chips could rival Nvidia’s in the long run.
Meanwhile, Eli Lilly’s ascent into the $1 trillion valuation club served as a reminder that market leadership doesn’t belong to tech alone. In a market defined by narrow concentration, any sign of broadening strength is a welcome change.
Diversification, even within AI’s sprawling ecosystem, might be exactly what this market needs now.
What you need to know today
And finally…
The Beijing music venue DDC was one of the latest to have to cancel a performance by a Japanese artist on Nov. 20, 2025, in the wake of escalating bilateral tensions.
China’s escalating dispute with Japan reinforces Beijing’s growing economic influence — and penchant for abrupt actions that can create uncertainty for businesses.
Hours before Japanese jazz quintet The Blend was due to perform in Beijing on Thursday, a plainclothesman walked into the DDC music club during a sound check. Then, “the owner of the live house came to me and said: ‘The police has told me tonight is canceled,'” said Christian Petersen-Clausen, a music agent.
— Evelyn Cheng
Correction: This report has been updated to correct the spelling of Eli Lilly.
Meta halted internal research that purportedly showed that people who stopped using Facebook became less depressed and anxious, according to a legal filing that was released on Friday.
The social media giant was alleged to have initiated the study, dubbed Project Mercury, in late 2019 as a way to help it “explore the impact that our apps have on polarization, news consumption, well-being, and daily social interactions,” according to the legal brief, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
The filing contains newly unredacted information pertaining to Meta.
The newly released legal brief is related to high-profile multidistrict litigation from a variety of plaintiffs, such as school districts, parents and state attorneys general against social media companies like Meta, Google’s YouTube, Snap and TikTok.
The plaintiffs claim that these businesses were aware that their respective platforms caused various mental health-related harms to children and young adults, but failed to take action and instead misled educators and authorities, among several allegations.
“We strongly disagree with these allegations, which rely on cherry-picked quotes and misinformed opinions in an attempt to present a deliberately misleading picture,” Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said in a statement. “The full record will show that for over a decade, we have listened to parents, researched issues that matter most, and made real changes to protect teens—like introducing Teen Accounts with built-in protections and providing parents with controls to manage their teens’ experiences.”
A Google spokesperson said in a statement that “These lawsuits fundamentally misunderstand how YouTube works and the allegations are simply not true.”
“YouTube is a streaming service where people come to watch everything from live sports to podcasts to their favorite creators, primarily on TV screens, not a social network where people go to catch up with friends,” the Google spokesperson said. “We’ve also developed dedicated tools for young people, guided by child safety experts, that give families control.”
Snap and TikTok did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The 2019 Meta research was based on a random sample of consumers who stopped their Facebook and Instagram usage for a month, the lawsuit said. The lawsuit alleged that Meta was disappointed that the initial tests of the study showed that people who stopped using Facebook “for a week reported lower feelings of depression, anxiety, loneliness, and social comparison.”
Meta allegedly chose not to “sound the alarm,” but instead stopped the research, the lawsuit said.
“The company never publicly disclosed the results of its deactivation study,” according to the suit. “Instead, Meta lied to Congress about what it knew.”
The lawsuit cites an unnamed Meta employee who allegedly said, “If the results are bad and we don’t publish and they leak, is it going to look like tobacco companies doing research and knowing cigs were bad and then keeping that info to themselves?”
Stone, in a series of social media posts, pushed back on the lawsuit’s implication that Meta shuttered the internal research after it allegedly showed a causal relationship between its apps and adverse mental-health effects.
Stone characterized the 2019 study as flawed and said it was the reason that the company expressed disappointment. The study, Stone said, merely found that “people who believed using Facebook was bad for them felt better when they stopped using it.”
“This is a confirmation of other public research (“deactivation studies”) out there that demonstrates the same effect,” Stone said in a separate post. “It makes intuitive sense but it doesn’t show anything about the actual effect of using the platform.”