Connect with us

Published

on

The business secretary has suggested the government could put up national insurance for employers in the budget without breaking its election pledges.

Jonathan Reynolds told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips that Labour’s promise not to increase national insurance “was specifically in the manifesto, a reference to employees”.

National insurance is paid by both employees and employers and it has been unclear whether Labour’s vow not to increase the tax included both levies.

Politics latest: Minister quizzed on why Musk isn’t invited to UK summit

In Prime Minister Question’s on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer refused to rule out increases to the tax.

The business secretary’s comments are the clearest indication yet that such a rise is being considered.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

We have ‘incredible’ investments

But coming on the eve of a major investment summit, the suggestion risks a row with companies – who would be hit by such a tax rise – and may prompt questions over the government’s commitment to economic growth.

It also comes on the heels of an argument with the firm DP World over comments made by the transport secretary that caused the company to review a £1bn London port investment.

“You know that pledge was taxes on working people… there’s a lot already in the manifesto, but you have to wait for the detail of a budget… this will be a budget for growth,” said Mr Reynolds.

Shadow work and pensions secretary Mel Stride said increasing employer national insurance would amount to a “tax on jobs” and “what they should be about is growth and increasing productivity”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour ‘talked the economy down’

With the budget just over a fortnight away, the chancellor has also strongly hinted that she is planning to tweak the rules that dictate how much the government is allowed to borrow for spending on infrastructure investment.

Read more:
What are Labour’s fiscal rules?
The verdict on Starmer’s first 100 days
Budget will be Labour’s biggest test yet

Writing in The Sunday Times, Rachel Reeves said it was “time that the Treasury moved on from just counting the costs of investments, to recognising the benefits too”.

It has been reported that the Treasury is considering changing how it calculates debt by stripping out the value of assets it holds, such as transport or building infrastructure or the student loan book.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is a budget tax bombshell on the way?

This would bring down the headline government debt figure and allow the chancellor to borrow more money within her fiscal rule to have debt falling within a five-year forecast.

Crucially, such a move would not affect day-to-day spending so tax rises will likely still be needed to plug the hole in ongoing commitments.

But it would free up space for the Treasury take on more debt to spend on one-off projects – such as green technology, schools or hospitals – which ministers argue are essential to bring about economic growth.

👉 Tap here to follow Politics at Jack and Sam’s wherever you get your podcasts 👈

Supporters of such a change argue that the current approach fails to adequately capture the potential long-term economic benefits of borrowing to invest because of the five-year horizon within which debt must start falling.

Detractors say changing the fiscal rules in this way would amount to fiddling the figures to load the country up with liabilities.

Continue Reading

Politics

Australian regulator asks High Court to allow appeal in Block Earner case

Published

on

By

Australian regulator asks High Court to allow appeal in Block Earner case

Australian regulator asks High Court to allow appeal in Block Earner case

Australia’s financial regulator will seek the High Court’s permission to appeal a lower court’s ruling favoring fintech firm Block Earner, which found the company’s crypto-linked fixed-yield earning service is not a financial product.

The Australian Securities and Investment Commission said on May 21 that it wants to ask the High Court of Australia to clarify what the definition of a financial product is and clarify the circumstances when an interest-earning product and the conversion of assets from one form to another are regulated.

“The definition of financial product was drafted in a broad and technology-neutral way, and ASIC believes it is in the public interest to clarify this,” the watchdog said.

“This clarification is important as it applies to all financial products and services whether they involve crypto-assets or not.”

On April 22, Federal Court Justices David O’Callaghan, Wendy Abraham and Catherine Button found that Block Earner’s crypto-linked fixed-yield earning product is not a financial product, a managed investment scheme or a derivative under the Corporations Act.

ASIC said the court will consider its application. Special leave is required in an appeal to the High Court, and it’s only granted in cases where it would answer significant legal questions or matters of public interest.

A Block Earner spokesperson told Cointelegraph the matter has now escalated to a “broader legal question” around the definition of a financial product, which extends “well beyond Block Earner, and the crypto sector.” 

“We believe the Full Federal Court’s April ruling was a strong and well-reasoned decision that upheld the integrity of our operations,” the spokesperson said. “We remain confident in the soundness of that judgment and will respond to ASIC’s application through the appropriate legal channels.” 

Legal saga ongoing since 2022

ASIC first launched legal proceedings against Block Earner in November 2022, arguing the company needed a financial services license to offer its yield product, which was available from March 17, 2022, until the company shut it down on Nov. 16, 2022.

Related: Australia outlines crypto regulation plan, promises action on debanking

Australian regulator asks High Court to allow appeal in Block Earner case
ASIC was arguing Block Earner needed a financial services license to offer its crypto-linked fixed-yield earning product. Source: ASIC

In February 2024, an Australian court initially ruled the fintech firm would need a financial services license to operate its crypto yield-bearing products

Another June 2024 ruling in Australia’s Federal Court released Block Earner from any financial penalties because it had “acted honestly” and pursued its legal opinions before launching the products, which ASIC appealed.

Block Earner appealed the Federal Court’s decision that it needed a financial services license on July 9, 2024. 

Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered

Continue Reading

Politics

VanEck to launch Avalanche ecosystem fund

Published

on

By

VanEck to launch Avalanche ecosystem fund

VanEck to launch Avalanche ecosystem fund

VanEck plans to launch a private digital assets fund in June targeting tokenized Web3 projects built on the Avalanche blockchain network, the asset manager said in a statement shared with Cointelegraph.

The VanEck PurposeBuilt Fund, available only to accredited investors, aims to invest in liquid tokens and venture-backed projects across Web3 sectors, including gaming, financial services, payments, and artificial intelligence. 

Idle capital will be deployed into Avalanche (AVAX) real-world asset (RWA) products, including tokenized money market funds, VanEck said.

The fund will be managed by the team behind VanEck’s Digital Assets Alpha Fund (DAAF), which oversees more than $100 million in net assets as of May 21. 

“The next wave of value in crypto will come from real businesses, not more infrastructure,” Pranav Kanade, portfolio manager for DAAF, said in a statement.

VanEck to launch Avalanche ecosystem fund
RWAs are among crypto’s fastest-growing segments. Source: RWA.xyz

Related: Tokenized stocks could top $1T in market cap — Execs

Thematic crypto funds

VanEck’s PurposeBuilt Fund is the latest in a series of funds from the asset manager and rivals designed to offer exposure to projects and companies in fast-growing segments of Web3. 

On May 14, VanEck launched a new actively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF) to invest in stocks and financial instruments providing exposure to the digital economy.

In April, VanEck launched another ETF investing in a passive index of companies operating in the crypto space. 

Asset managers such as VanEck are requesting the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) permission to list upward of 70 crypto ETFs. 

The wave of ETF filings is in response to US President Donald Trump softening the agency’s regulatory stance toward crypto after Trump took office in January.

VanEck to launch Avalanche ecosystem fund
Avalanche TVL as of May 21. Source: DefiLlama

Avalanche RWA ecosystem

Avalanche has emerged as a hub for real-world assets (RWAs) and other institutional-oriented crypto projects.

Its interrelated networks, called subnets, allow institutions to run Ethereum-style smart contracts in a controlled environment. On May 16, Solv Protocol launched a yield-bearing Bitcoin token on the Avalanche blockchain, targeting institutional investors

Avalanche has around $1.5 billion in total value locked (TVL) as of May 21, according to data from DefiLlama. 

“We’re seeing a shift away from speculative hype toward real utility and sustainable token economies,” John Nahas, chief business officer at Ava Labs, said in a statement.

Magazine: Danger signs for Bitcoin as retail abandons it to institutions — Sky Wee

Continue Reading

Politics

US lawmaker reintroduces bill amid pushback on Trump’s crypto ties

Published

on

By

<div>US lawmaker reintroduces bill amid pushback on Trump's crypto ties</div>

<div>US lawmaker reintroduces bill amid pushback on Trump's crypto ties</div>

A Democratic representative in the US Congress will support a blockchain bill at a time when many left-leaning lawmakers are blocking crypto-related pieces of legislation due to concerns with President Donald Trump’s potential conflicts of interest.

In a May 21 notice, Minnesota Representative Tom Emmer said he had reintroduced the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, a bill that “solidifies that digital asset developers and service providers that do not custody consumer funds are not money transmitters.”Emmer, a Republican, said Democratic Representative Ritchie Torres would co-lead the bill, making it a bipartisan effort in Congress.

“The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act reflects a thoughtful, bipartisan effort to get digital asset policy right,” said Torres. “While similar language was voted down in markup last Congress, we took that feedback seriously and returned with a smarter, sharper framework that protects innovation without compromising oversight.”

Cryptocurrencies, Law, Politics, Congress
Reintroducing the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act on May 21. Source: Tom Emmer

Representatives of advocacy organizations, including the Crypto Council for Innovation, Solana Policy Institute, Digital Chamber, Coin Center, DeFi Education Fund and Blockchain Association, said they would support the proposed blockchain regulatory bill. It was unclear whether Emmer and Torres had a majority of votes in the House of Representatives for the legislation to pass.

Torres has supported many bills and policies favorable to the crypto industry since assuming office in 2021. Together with Emmer, he has led the Congressional Crypto Caucus to advance crypto-friendly policies in the House since March.

A bipartisan blockchain bill amid memecoin concerns?

Other Democratic House members, including Representative Maxine Waters, have suggested they intend to block any legislation related to crypto and blockchain until Republicans address Trump’s connections to the industry, such as his family’s stake in World Liberty Financial and his TRUMP memecoin. The president is planning to host a dinner with up to 220 people holding the most significant amounts of his memecoin on May 22.

Related: Interest groups, lawmakers to protest Trump’s memecoin dinner

Cointelegraph reached out to Torres’ office for comment but had not received a response at the time of publication.

Magazine: Trump’s crypto ventures raise conflict of interest, insider trading questions

Continue Reading

Trending