The King and Queen are facing a snub from senior politicians in Australia when they begin a tour of the country later this week, according to reports.
The visit will be the King’s most significant overseas tour since his cancer diagnosis and his first to Australia as the nation’s head of state.
A reception for the royal couple in Canberra on 21 October has invited all the nation’s state premiers – but none are reported to have accepted, blaming other commitments.
The King is due to address community and political leaders at the event, according to Buckingham Palace.
Victoria’s state premier Jacinta Allan was the latest leader to confirm she will not be attending, while South Australian premier Peter Malinauskas blamed a regional cabinet meeting for his expected absence.
Other premiers blamed workload from preventing them attending the reception, while Queensland’s Steven Miles said he will be concentrating on his election campaign.
Sections of the Australian media have criticised the snub by the politicians, calling it an “insult”, “disrespectful” and “childish”.
Is the snub an effort to restart monarchy debate?
This trip has been in the planning for months and months, so, too, all the engagements.
It’s hard to see how a diary clash could prevent the state premiers’ attendance.
The King has already condensed this tour to allow for his health.
But a visit to the land-locked capital, Canberra, was never not going to feature.
He is Australia’s head of state, and will address a reception at Parliament House, the political heart of the country.
Buckingham Palace said the event will be attended by “political and community leaders”.
But not, it seems, all of them. Not one of the eight political leaders of Australia’s states and territories is going, and none will be there to hear the King of Australia’s address.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper is describing this as a “childish no-show”.
With just two and a half days of engagements planned in Australia, this is a whirlwind visit.
It leaves little time for discussion or debate about the future of the monarchy.
Research shows support for republicanism in Australia isn’t growing.
Maybe this is an attempt to restart the conversation.
It comes as a poll in the Daily Telegraph in Sydney revealed one in four of those surveyed had a more favourable view of the monarch than before he was crowned.
Some 33% would like to see Australia become a republic, but 45% said the nation should remain a monarchy, the results suggested.
Advertisement
The King will pause his cancer treatment when he and his wife begin the Australian tour on Friday.
Royal doctors have already given the 75-year-old permission to briefly halt his weekly treatment cycle in order to fly to Australia before a state visit to Samoa in the South Pacific.
The King and Queen will be away for 11 days, with the tour covering nine days with two days of travel either side.
The entourage will include the King’s doctor, while the programme of engagements has been designed to provide extra time for rest and recovery.
A large part of Gatwick Airport’s South Terminal has been evacuated after a “suspected prohibited item” was discovered in luggage and a bomb disposal team has been deployed, police said.
Sussex Police said the explosive ordnance disposal team was being sent in “as a precaution” and a security cordon is in place.
The airport, which is the UK’s second busiest, said the terminal was evacuated after a “security incident”.
In a post on X, it said: “Safety and security of our passengers and staff remains our top priority.
“We are working hard to resolve the issue as quickly as possible.”
It said the North Terminal was still operating normally.
Footage on social media taken outside the airport showed crowds of travellers heading away from the terminal building.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
“Arrived at London Gatwick for routine connection. Got through customs to find out they’re evacuating the entire airport,” one passenger said.
“Even people through security are being taken outside. Trains shut down and 1,000s all over the streets and carparks waiting.”
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
Another said passengers near the gates were being told to stay there and not go back to the departure lounge.
Gatwick Express said its trains were not calling at Gatwick Airport.
“Gatwick Airport will not be served until further notice,” it tweeted.
“This is due to the police and emergency services dealing with an incident at the airport.
“At present, the station and airport are being evacuated whilst the police are dealing with an incident. We would recommend delaying your journey until later this morning.”
It said local buses were also affected and would be unable to run to the airport.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.
Hundreds of people affected by the Manchester Arena bombing cannot continue legal action against MI5, judges have ruled.
More than 300 people, including survivors and those bereaved by the 2017 attack at an Ariana Grande concert, brought a case to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), claiming failures to take “appropriate measures” to prevent the incident infringed their human rights.
In a ruling on Friday, Lord Justice Singh and Mrs Justice Farbey said the cases could not proceed as they were brought too late.
Lord Justice Singh said: “We are particularly conscious of the importance of the rights concerned… We are also conscious of the horrendous impact of the atrocity on the claimants and their families.
“Any reasonable person would have sympathy for them.
“The grief and trauma which they have suffered, particularly where young children were killed, is almost unimaginable.
“Nevertheless, we have reached the conclusion that, in all the circumstances, it would not be equitable to permit the claims to proceed.”
More on Manchester
Related Topics:
Lord Justice Singh acknowledged that while the tribunal “readily understand” why the legal claims were not filed until after the final report from the inquiry into the attack, “real expedition” was needed at that point.
The judge added: “We bear in mind the other matters that had to be investigated and arrangements which had to be put in place but, in our view, the filing of the proceedings was not given the priority which, assessed objectively, it should have been.”
Advertisement
Had the claims gone ahead, the judge noted the security services would have needed to “divert time and resources to defending these proceedings rather than their core responsibilities” – which includes preventing future attacks.
Salman Abedi killed 22 people and injured hundreds when he detonated a rucksack bomb at the end of an Ariana Grande show at Manchester Arena on 22 May 2017.
Hudgell Solicitors, Slater & Gordon and Broudie Jackson Canter, three of the law firms representing complainants affected, said the ruling was “extremely disappointing” for their clients.
In a statement, the firms said: “Ever since the attack in May 2017, our clients have had to endure continued delays but have done so with great patience and understanding in the hope that by allowing all legal processes to be fully explored, transparency and justice would be achieved.
“It took almost six years for the failings of MI5 to be revealed, confirmed when the inquiry chair published his volume three findings in March 2023, in which he said MI5 had missed a ‘significant opportunity’ to prevent the attack.
“This report concluded that within this six-year period, the security service corporate witnesses X and J gave evidence on oath that had presented an inaccurate picture, and the same inaccurate picture had been presented to Lord Anderson when he compiled his report in December 2017.”
The law firms said following these findings, their clients believed the IPT would “provide the route to the formal vindication of their human rights”.
The firms added: “We are disappointed that time is one of the reasons now being used against them to prevent their claims progressing. Seven years have now passed since the atrocity in May 2017 – six years of that seven-year delay was caused by MI5.
“This judgment certainly doesn’t exonerate MI5. There were failings by MI5 and multiple other parties leading up to and on the actual evening of 22 May 2017 and collectively we continue to support our clients in their fight for full accountability and justice.”
The inquiry into the bombing found it might have been prevented if MI5 had acted on key intelligence received in the months before the attack.
The agency’s director-general, Ken McCallum, expressed deep regret that such intelligence was not obtained.
Two pieces of information about Abedi were assessed at the time by the security service to not relate to terrorism.
But inquiry chairman Sir John Saunders said, having heard from MI5 witnesses at the hearings, he considered that did not present an “accurate picture”.
Lawyers for those affected previously said the inquiry found there was a “real possibility” that one of the pieces of intelligence could have obtained information which may have led to actions preventing the attack.
And at the hearing earlier this month, Pete Weatherby KC, for those affected, described the IPT claims as “the next step” in vindication for his clients after the inquiry’s findings.
Many areas of Britain faced frosty and icy conditions this morning ahead of the arrival of Storm Bert tomorrow.
The Met Office said it expects the storm to bring “heavy rain, strong winds and disruptive snow to parts of the UK through the weekend” and potentially cause travel disruption and flooding.
Much of the UK experienced temperatures close to freezing last night, the Met Office said, with -6C (21.2F) recorded at Tulloch Bridge in Scotland.
Several yellow warnings for snow and ice were in place across the UK until 10am on Friday, while one covering parts of Scotland will remain in place until midday.
They came ahead of an amber warning for heavy snow and ice in place between 7am and 5pm on Saturday in central parts of Scotland.
The Met Office said 10-20cm of snow was likely on ground above 200m and there could be as much as 20-40cm on hills above 400m.
Several other yellow alerts for wind, rain and snow will also cover much of the UK.
Met Office meteorologist Honor Criswick said: “Through into Friday… snow showers are set to continue mainly around coastal areas though once again still a few feeding inland at times.
“There will also still be plenty of autumnal sunshine. Still feeling cold though, particularly in those brisk winds – once again we’re only looking at highs of around 5C, slightly higher in the southwest around 7C.
“Across the north those temperatures struggling to move past 2-3C.
“As we head into Friday evening, a change is on its way as we introduce Storm Bert moving its way in from the Atlantic. So we’ll see clouds spilling in from the southwest with outbreaks of rain – heavy at times by the time we reach Saturday morning.”
“Heavy” outbreaks of rain are likely throughout Saturday, “falling as snow” at times across parts of England and Scotland, Ms Criswick said.
More than 114 schools were shut in the Highland Council area on Thursday because of snow, almost 40 were shut in Aberdeenshire and 12 were closed in Moray.
In England, 89 schools were shut in Devon, 60 in Cornwall and 18 in Dorset, while in Wales 18 were closed in Denbighshire, 10 in Conwy and two in Wrexham.