Labour’s first budget in 14 years will be delivered on 30 October, and as per the warnings of Rachel Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer, it will not be one the public is likely to welcome.
The chancellor and prime minister have spent months preparing the stage for a “painful” budget, where tax rises are likely in order to help fill the £22bn financial black hole Ms Reeves said she uncovered on entering No 11 Downing Street.
While Labour promised not to increase taxes on working people during the election campaign, the chancellor did leave some wriggle room that is now a point of speculation ahead of the budget.
Here Sky News takes a look at what measures could be included in the budget and what they could mean.
National insurance contributions are the UK’s second-largest tax and are expected to raise just under £170bn in 2024-25, about a sixth of all tax revenue, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).
More on Budget 2024
Related Topics:
They are paid by employees and the self-employed on their earnings, and by employers on the earnings of their staff – and at a higher rate than staff members themselves pay.
Employers currently pay 13.8% on their staff earnings, but the tax does not apply to employee pension schemes – this is something the chancellor could now target in the budget, with the IFS saying it could raise £17bn a year.
The Tories have accused Labour of breaking their manifesto promise not to increase national insurance – although Labour believes it made clear the distinction between employees and employers.
Laura Trott, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, said: “In 2021, the chancellor said increasing employer national insurance was a tax on ‘workers’.
Image: Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, Laura Trott
“That’s why even in her own words it breaks Labour’s manifesto promise not to increase tax on working people.”
Pension changes
Another measure the chancellor is reportedly considering is reducing the amount people can take out of their pensions tax-free.
At present, the tax-free lump sum most people over the age of 55 can take from their pension pot is 25%, up to a maximum of £268,275.
But according to The Telegraph, government officials have asked a major UK pension provider to look into the impact of cutting that amount to £100,000.
Financial advisers are said to be receiving a growing number of calls from clients wanting to cash in their 25% tax-free lump sum ahead of the budget.
Meanwhile, other changes Ms Reeves could make to pensions in a bid to raise revenue is charging national insurance on private pension incomes; introducing income tax on all inherited pensions and making pension pots liable to inheritance tax in the same way as other assets.
Inheritance tax
At present, inheritance tax – dubbed “the most hated tax” by the Tories – is charged at 40% and applies to estates worth more than £325,000.
There are, however, allowances that can mean it’s only paid on more valuable estates.
If a main residence is being passed to children or grandchildren a £175,000 allowance is added, meaning only amounts of £500,000 are subject to inheritance tax.
The tax rate could be increased, or the value people have to pay inheritance from could be lowered – while several exemptions – including on agricultural land and family businesses – could also be lifted.
Capital gains tax
Given the government’s pledge not to increase the three main taxes, there has been speculation that Labour could set its sights instead on capital gains tax.
Capital gains tax is the tax levied on the profit made on the sale of an asset that has risen in value – including second homes, shares, business assets and most personal possessions worth £6,000 or more, apart from cars.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
At present, people do not have to pay tax on the first £3,000 of profits, or £1,500 for trusts.
The tax-free threshold could be removed and the tax could be imposed on assets that are exempt now.
Alternatively, the tax rate could be increased. Capital gains tax is between 20-28% for those who pay higher rates of income tax, but could be increased to as much as 39%,according to The Guardian.
Asked about capital gains tax recently, the prime minister appeared to dismiss the idea it could be raised to as much as 39%, saying much of the budget speculation that had emerged so far was “wide of the mark”.
Council tax
Another solution the government could reach for is reforming the council tax system so the bands are changed.
Currently council tax is set in bands that are based on the 1991 value of homes, which has been branded “absurd” by the IFS and “incredibly poorly designed” by the Institute for Government.
Former shadow minister Jonathan Ashworth told Sky News during the election campaign that Labour would not change council tax bands – but there has nevertheless been reports the government could replace the banding system in favour of a 0.5% tax on the value of a property per year.
This would mean that someone in a property worth £350,000, for example, would pay £1,750 a year.
There was also speculation that the government could scrap the 25% council tax discount for single-occupant households, but this has subsequently been ruled out.
Stamp duty
Stamp duty is paid on the cost of a property over £250,000, with more paid for second homes and by non-UK residents.
Those buying their first home are entitled to relief in order to help people get on to the housing ladder – but this is due to be cut from April next year.
Labour has confirmed the threshold for stamp duty for first-time buyers will fall back to £300,000, after it was raised to £425,000 in 2022 by Rishi Sunak.
Labour could change the tax so it is focused on annual land value tax instead of on a transaction – but that could be a hard sell with the party.
Gambling tax
A report in The Guardian recently suggested the government was considering hiking taxes on “higher harm” products such as online casino games, in a move the left-leaning Institute for Public Policy Research said could raise up to £3.4bn by 2030.
Image: Further taxes on the gambling industry could feature in the budget
The newspaper claimed the 15% general betting duty, levied on high-street bookmakers’ profits, could be doubled, while remote gaming duty could go from 21% to 50%.
Fuel duty
In 2022 Mr Sunak cut fuel duty by 5p – until March next year.
This could be scrapped, with the RAC saying the cut costs the Treasury £2bn a year.
Fuel duty has otherwise been frozen for more than a decade.
On the banks of the Mersey, Runcorn and Helsby is a more complicated political picture than the apparent Labour heartland that first presents itself.
Yes, there are industrial and manufacturing areas – an old town that’s fallen victim to out-of-town shopping, and an out-of-town shopping centre that’s fallen victim to Amazon.
But there are also more middle-class new town developments, as well as Tory-facing rural swathes.
Image: Space Cafe director Marie Moss says a sense of community has faded
One thing this area does mirror with many across the country, though, is a fed-up electorate with little confidence that politics can work for them.
In the Space Cafe in Runcorn Old Town, its director Marie Moss says many in the region remember a time when a sense of community was more acute.
“People were very proud of their town… and that’s why people get upset and emotional as they remember that,” she says.
It’s this feeling of disenfranchisement and nostalgia-tinged yearning for the past that Reform UK is trading off in its targeting of traditional Labour voters here.
More on Liverpool
Related Topics:
Party leader Nigel Farage features heavily on leaflets in these parts, alongside spikey messaging around migration, law and order, and Labour’s record in government so far.
Image: Runcorn 2024 result
Taxi driver Mike Holland hears frequent worries about that record from those riding in the back of his cab.
A Labour voter for decades, he says locals were “made up” at last year’s election result but have been “astonished” since then, with benefit changes a common topic of concern.
“Getting a taxi is two things, it’s either a luxury or a necessity… the necessity people are the disabled people… and a lot of the old dears are so stressed and worried about their disability allowance and whether they are going to get it or not get it,” he says.
But will that mean straight switchers to Reform UK?
Image: Taxi driver Mike Holland has voted for Labour for decades, but is now looking at the Lib Dems and Greens – or may not vote at all
Mike says he agrees with some of what the party is offering but thinks a lot of people are put off by Mr Farage.
He’s now looking at the Liberal Democrats and Greens, both of whom have put up local politicians as candidates.
Or, Mike says, he may just not vote at all.
It’s in places like Runcorn town that some of the political contradictions within Reform UK reveal themselves more clearly.
Many here say they were brought up being told to never vote Tory.
And yet, Reform, chasing their support, has chosen a former Conservative councillor as its candidate.
It’s no surprise Labour has been trialling attack lines in this campaign, painting Mr Farage’s party as “failed Tories”.
As a response to this, look no further than Reform’s recent nod to the left on industrialisation and public ownership.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
But head 15 minutes south from Runcorn docks, and this by-election campaign changes.
Rural areas like Frodsham and Helsby have, in the past, tended towards the Tories.
The Conservatives, of course, have a candidate in this vote, one who stood in a neighbouring constituency last year.
But Reform is now making a hard play for their supporters in these parts, with a softer message compared to the one being put out in urban areas – an attempt to reassure those anxious about too much political revolution coming to their privet-lined streets.
Labour, meanwhile, is actively trying to mobilise the anti-Farage vote by presenting their candidate – another local councillor – as the only person who can stop Reform.
Image: Makeup artist Nadine Tan is concerned about division and anger in the community
The pitch here is aimed at voters like Frodsham makeup artist Nadine Tan, who are worried about division and anger in the community.
“I think they need to kind of come together and stop trying to divide everyone,” she says.
But like Mike the taxi driver five miles north, disillusionment could be the eventual winner as Nadine says, despite the “thousands of leaflets” through her door, she still thinks “they all say the same thing”.
One factor that doesn’t seem to be swinging too many votes, though, is the insalubrious circumstances in which the area’s former Labour MP left office.
Image: Labour MP Mike Amesbury was convicted of punching a man in the street. Pic: Reuters
But across the patch, many praise their ex-MP’s local efforts, while also saying he was “very silly” to have acted in the way he did.
That may be putting it mildly.
But it’s hard to find much more agreement ahead of Thursday’s vote.
A constituency still hungry for change, but unsure as to who can deliver it.
Full list of candidates, Runcorn and Helsby by-election:
Catherine Anne Blaiklock – English Democrats Dan Clarke – Liberal Party Chris Copeman – Green Party Paul Duffy – Liberal Democrats Peter Ford – Workers Party Howling Laud Hope – Monster Raving Loony Party Sean Houlston – Conservatives Jason Philip Hughes – Volt UK Alan McKie – Independent Graham Harry Moore – English Constitution Party Paul Andrew Murphy – Social Democratic Party Sarah Pochin – Reform UK Karen Shore – Labour John Stevens – Rejoin EU Michael Williams – Independent
Solana decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Loopscale has temporarily halted its lending markets after suffering an approximately $5.8 million exploit.
On April 26, a hacker siphoned approximately 5.7 million USDC (USDC) and 1200 Solana (SOL) from the lending protocol after taking out a “series of undercollateralized loans”, Loopscale co-founder Mary Gooneratne said in an X post.
The exploit only impacted Loopscale’s USDC and SOL vaults and the losses represent around 12% of Loopscale’s total value locked (TVL), Gooneratne added.
Loopscale is “working to resume repayment functionality as soon as possible to mitigate unforeseen liquidations,” its said in an X post.
“Our team is fully mobilized to investigate, recover funds, and ensure users are protected,” Gooneratne said.
In the first quarter of 2025, hackers stole more than $1.6 billion worth of crypto from exchanges and on-chain smart contracts, blockchain security firm PeckShield said in an April report.
More than 90% of those losses are attributable to a $1.5 billion attack on ByBit, a centralized cryptocurrency exchange, by North Korean hacking outfit Lazarus Group.
Launched on April 10 after a six-month closed beta, Loopscale is a DeFi lending protocol designed to enhance capital efficiency by directly matching lenders and borrowers.
It also supports specialized lending markets, such as “structured credit, receivables financing, and undercollateralized lending,” Loopscale said in an April announcement shared with Cointelegraph.
Loopscale’s order book model distinguishes it from DeFi lending peers such as Aave that aggregate cryptocurrency deposits into liquidity pools.
Loopscale’s main USDC and SOL vaults yield APRs exceeding 5% and 10%, respectively. It also supports lending markets for tokens such as JitoSOL and BONK (BONK) and looping strategies for upwards of 40 different token pairs.
The DeFi protocol has approximately $40 million in TVL and has attracted upwards of 7,000 lenders, according to researcher OurNetwork.
United States Senator Jon Ossoff expressed support for impeaching President Donald Trump during an April 25 town hall, citing the President’s plan to host a private dinner for top Official Trump memecoin holders.
“I mean, I saw just 48 hours ago, he is granting audiences to people who buy his meme coin,” said Ossoff, a Democrat, according to a report by NBC News.
“When the sitting president of the United States is selling access for what are effectively payments directly to him. There is no question that that rises to the level of an impeachable offense.”
Senator Ossoff said he “strongly” supports impeachment proceedings during a town hall in the state of Georgia, where he is running for reelection to the Senate.
The Senator added that an impeachment is unlikely unless the Democratic Party gains control of Congress during the US midterm elections in 2026. Trump’s own Republican Party currently has a majority in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.
TRUMP holders can register to dine with the US President. Source: gettrumpmemes.com
On April 23, the Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin’s website announced plans for Trump to host an exclusive dinner at his Washington, DC golf club with the top 220 TRUMP holders.
The website subsequently posted a leaderboard tracking top TRUMP wallets and a link to register for the event. The TRUMP token’s price has gained more than 50% since the announcement, according to data from CoinMarketCap.
The specific guest list is unclear, but the memecoin’s website states that applicants must pass a background check, “can not be from a [Know Your Customer] watchlist country,” and cannot bring any additional guests.
On April 25, the team behind TRUMP denied social media rumors that TRUMP holders need at least $300,000 to participate in an upcoming dinner with the president.
“People have been incorrectly quoting #220 on the block explorer as the cutoff. That’s wrong because it includes things like locked tokens, exchanges, market makers, and those who are not participating. Instead, you should only be going off the leaderboard,” they wrote.
The TRUMP token jumped on news of the private dinner plans. Source: CoinMarketCap
Legal experts told Cointelegraph that Trump’s cryptocurrency ventures, including the TRUMP memecoin and Trump-affiliated decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol World Liberty Financial, raise significant concerns about potential conflicts of interest.
“Within just a couple of days of him taking office, he’s signed a number of executive orders that are significantly going to affect the way that our crypto and digital assets industry works,” Charlyn Ho of law firm Rikka told Cointelegraph in February.
“So if he has a personal pecuniary benefit arising from his own policies, that’s a conflict of interest.”