The JackRabbit XG is basically the stronger, bigger brother of the famous little JackRabbit micro e-bike, and I had the chance to test one out to see how well a tiny little EV could work for the average commuter. As it turns out, little is big these days!
JackRabbit is well known in the micromobility industry for its pint-sized urban runabouts. The brand’s diminutive 25 lb mini two-wheelers look like a micro take on a more or less conventional e-bike, yet despite their small size they still offer 20 mph speeds and enough range for most urban riders.
But just because the brand has long focused on being as small and lightweight as possible doesn’t mean they don’t also have aspirations for power and features. That was the idea behind the JackRabbit XG: take everything people know and love about a tiny JackRabbit and hotrod it into even more “oomph” in a mini package.
Check out what it’s like to throw a leg over one of these fun little rides in my video review below. Then keep on reading afterward for even more!
JackRabbit XG video review
JackRabbit XG tech specs
Motor: 500W geared rear hub motor
Top speed: 32 km/h (20 mph)
Range: 32+ km (20+ mi)
Battery: Dual 151 Wh batteries, plus the option to replace with larger RangeBuster batteries
Extras: Thumb throttle, rotatable handlebars, foldout foot pegs, bell, LCD display, kickstand, dual battery slots, optional fenders and other accessories
What is it for?
Since the JackRabbit XG is not an e-bike in the traditional sense (lacking functional pedals in favor of foot pegs), you’re obviously not going to choose a JackRabbit if you’re looking for exercise. Instead, this is purely a get-around-town type of ride, and probably also a have-some-fun-while-doing-it ride, too.
I’ll call it a micro e-bike since that’s how JackRabbit classifies it, but you wouldn’t be wrong to call it seated electric scooter, either.
Compared to the typical standing electric scooters we usually think of, the JackRabbit XG has a lot of major advantages. The wheels are bicycle-sized, giving it a much better ride over rougher terrain and streets with pot holes. The seat and handlebars will also feel more familiar to anyone with bike experience. Yet despite ‘feeling’ like a bike, it has the lightweight portability of a scooter, truly offering the best of both worlds.
I really like the sideways spinning handlebars since they can rotate 90 degrees and shrink the width of the JackRabbit to just 7-inches (when you also fold up the foot pegs).
It only takes a few seconds and suddenly the micro e-bike is extra micro. With the bars turned, it would easily hide away under a twin bed, such as in a college dorm room.
It could also be stashed behind a couch or in the back of a closet without taking up much room for itself.
The major upgrades
I’ve spent a lot of time on JackRabbit’s smaller and more affordable micro e-bike, so it was interesting for me to compare the JackRabbit XG’s bigger size and increased features.
The biggest upgrades are likely the size of the frame and the dual battery slots.
The bigger frame gives you more space to stretch out by putting the handlebars a bit further out in front of you, and also makes the bike more robust to allow a higher weight rating of up to 275 lb.
The dual battery slots mean the bike comes with an out-of-the-box range of 20 miles instead of 10 miles.
For riders who want even more range, one or two RangeBuster batteries seen above can be swapped into those battery slots, giving riders up to 48 miles of range (or even more, if you bring the original batteries with you in your pocket or bag!).
It’s important to note that the batteries are also UL-compliant, which is critical these days for ensuring battery safety. And if you stick with the smaller batteries, their sub 160Wh rating means you may be able to bring them on many domestic airlines in your carry-on luggage (but you should check with the airline first, as batteries between 100Wh and 160Wh sometimes require advance permission).
Last year I flew through several cities with my JackRabbit OG, and its 151 Wh battery stayed safely with me in my carry-on the whole time!
But the dual battery slots and larger frame are really just scratching the surface of all the upgrades. There’s a lot more here than meets the eye.
The new display is much nicer to use, finally giving more data than the original simple LED dot display, and it now gives controls for things like LED lights.
Speaking of those lights, they’re finally available to help keep you illuminated at night for others to see you on the road! And since they run off the main battery, you don’t have to worry about charging up separate LED light batteries.
The bigger 500W motor is another nice addition since it allows for better acceleration and also more powerful hill climbing. The speed is still limited to 20 mph, but that’s fine by me. With a wheelbase this short, you probably don’t want to be hitting Class 3 speeds anyway. I don’t have any big hills around me, but I imagine bombing down a huge hill on this thing at well over 20 mph would be a bit iffy.
The new dual brakes offer more powerful stopping as well, which is nice when you have a more powerful motor. You never want to have more ‘go’ then you have ‘stop’.
There are even more interesting accessories you can add now, such as higher handle bars and a rear strut fender for keeping the puddle spray off of your back.
Basically, it feels like a lot of thought went into the new designs! Since this isn’t some out-of-the-catalog white labeled e-bike, they likely had to design a lot of this stuff from scratch without the benefit of dozens of other e-bike companies using the same parts first.
One change that doesn’t thrill me though is replacing the keyed lock for the batteries with a thumb screw lock.
On the one hand, it sure does make it easier to swap your battery out when you want to. On the other hand, it sure does make it easier for a thief to steal your battery if you lock your bike outside and don’t bring the batteries in with you.
Of course when the batteries are this small, you can easily put them in your bag to bring them inside. But I still would like the option to lock them so I’m not obligated to bring them in with me all of the time.
Fortunately, JackRabbit does give us a keylock accessory on their site if you want to swap out the thumb locks, but you’ve got to pony up an additional $25 per lock.
But what about the price?
Yep, here’s the kicker. Oh lordy, it’s priced at $1,749. That’s some serious dough!
I had gotten so used to the $999 price of the smaller JackRabbit OG that the significantly higher cost of the XG really slaps you across the face.
On the one hand, JackRabbit doesn’t get the benefit of using lots of pre-existing bike parts that they can simply select out of catalogs. Sure, some things like tires and motors are the same. But many other parts like the frame, handlebar mechanism, and unique batteries all have to be custom made for JackRabbit. So I understand that they aren’t getting the same economies of scale that bring us ultra-cheap electric bikes.
But at the same time, I know there are people out there who compare watts per dollar as their main metric, and JackRabbit will never win there. If you’re looking for the fastest or longest range ride for the least money, this ain’t it. You can leave now.
If you’re still here, then you obviously are open to other features and advantages of specific e-bikes, and that’s exactly what JackRabbit is about. Sure, you pay a premium, but you get a super lightweight and easy-to-ride micro e-bike that folds up to a mere 7 inches wide. For some people, that’s worth the premium. And if it’s not, then I still recommend checking out the OG and OG2 models from JackRabbit for $999 and $1,299. You don’t get dual batteries or some of the other features, but the prices are better and you still get a lot of the benefits found in the XG like the small size and peppy speed.
If you’ve got the cash though, the JackRabbit XG is a seriously fun ride and offers way more features than I ever expected from such a small, minimalist little e-bike.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
That network of dependable high-speed chargers, paired with solid app integration that makes it easy for Tesla drivers to find available chargers just about anywhere in the US, gave the brand a leg up – but no more. By opening up the Supercharger network to brands like Ford, Hyundai, Kia, and others, Tesla has given away its biggest competitive advantage.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Add in charging and route-planning apps like Chargeway, that make navigating the transition from CCS to NACS easier than ever with its intuitive colors and numbers and easy on/off switch for vehicles equipped with NACS adapters, and it feels like the time is right to start suggesting alternatives to the old EV industry stalwarts. As such, that’s exactly what I’m going to do.
Here, then, are my picks for the best Tesla S3XY (and Cybertruck) alternatives you can buy.
Less Model S, more Lucid Air
Lucid Air sedans; via Lucid.
Developed by OG Tesla Model S engineers with tunes from Annie Get Your Gun playing continuously in their heads, the Lucid Air promises to be the car Tesla should and could have built, if only Elon had listened to the engineers.
With panel fit, material finish, and overall build quality that’s at least as good as anything else in the automotive space, the Lucid Air is a compelling alternative to the Model S at every price level – and I, for one, would take a “too f@#king fast” Lucid Air Sapphire over an “as seen on TV” Model S Plaid any day of the week. And, with Supercharger access reportedly coming later this quarter, Air buyers will have every advantage the Supercharger Network can provide.
HONORABLE MENTIONS
Less Model 3, more Hyundai IONIQ 6
2025 Hyundai IONIQ 6 Limited; via Hyundai.
Hyundai has been absolutely killing it these days, with EVs driving record sales and new models earning rave reviews from the automotive press. Even in that company the IONIQ 6 stands out, with up to 338 miles of EPA-rated range and lickety-quick 350 kW charging available to make road tripping easy – especially now that the aerodynamically efficient IONIQ 6 has Supercharger access through a NACS adapter (the 2026 “facelift” models get a NACS port as standard).
Once upon a time, Mrs. Jo Borrás and I were shopping three-row SUVs and found ourselves genuinely drawn to the then-new Model X. Back then it was the only three-row EV on the market, but it wasn’t Elon’s antics or access to charging, or even the Model X’s premium pricing that squirreled the deal. It was the stupid doors.
We went with the similarly new Volvo XC90 T8 in denim blue, and followed up the big PHEV with a second, three years later, in Osmium Gray. When it’s time to replace this one, you can just about bet your house that the new 510 hp EX90 with 310 miles of all-electric range will be near the top of the shopping list.
The sporty EV6 GT made its global debut by drag racing some of the fastest ICE-powered cars of the day, including a Lamborghini, Mercedes-AMG GT, a Porsche, even a turbocharged Ferrari – and it beat the pants off ’em. Combine supercar-baiting speed with an accessible price tag, NACS accessibility, $10,000 in customer cash on remaining 2024 models ($3,000 on 2025s) and just a hint of Lancia Stratos in the styling, the EV6 is tough to beat.
If you disagree with that statement and feel like driving a new Tesla Cybertruck is the key to happiness, I’m not sure an equally ostentatious GMC Hummer EV or more subtle Rivian R1T will help you scratch that particular itch – but maybe therapy might!
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
BYD Shenzhen, the world’s largest car transport ship (Source: BYD)
Republicans launched multiple attacks against EVs, clean air and American jobs this week, at the behest of the oil industry that funds them. These attacks won’t be successful, and EVs will continue to grow regardless, and inevitably take over for outdated gasoline vehicles.
However, these republican attacks on EVs will still have some effect: they will diminish the US auto industry globally, leading to job losses and surrendering one of the jewels in the crown of American industry to China, where there is no similar effort to destroy its own domestic EV industry.
But they should inspire worry for Americans, because they will only harm the country’s domestic manufacturing base in the face of a changing auto industry.
Republicans keep trying to kill clean cars
The last time a republican occupied the the White House, we saw similar efforts to try to raise fuel and health costs for Americans, and to block superior EV technology from flourishing. That didn’t work in the end, and EVs continued to grow both during that period and after.
All the while, fossil fuels have maintained their privileged policy position, being allowed to pollute with impunity and costing the US $760 billion per year in externalized costs. Much of that subsidy is accounted for in the cost of pollution from gas cars, which are one of the primary uses of fossil fuels, which means that, in fact, gasoline vehicles receive much more subsidy than EVs do.
And yet, EVs still managed to grow substantially, despite these headwinds. EV sales have continued to grow, both in the US and globally, even as headlines incorrectly say otherwise. The republican party’s attempts to kill them were futile, and will continue to be.
It didn’t work, but it did delay progress
However, anti-EV actions from Mr. Trump and the republican party did manage to delay progress from where it could have been if America actually instituted smart industrial policy earlier.
Surely the American auto industry would be ahead of where it is now if those investments had had time to come online. But instead, republicans are currently trying to kill those jobs, which has already led to several manufacturing projects being cancelled this year, depriving Americans of the economic boost they need right now.
Meanwhile, there’s one place that this sort of stumbling isn’t happening: China.
China is taking advantage
China has spent more than a decade focusing on securing material supply, building refining capacity, developing their own battery technology, and encouraging local EV manufacturing startups.
This has paid off recently, as Chinese EVs have been rapidly scaling in production in recent years. It took a lot of the auto industry by surprise how rapidly Chinese companies have scaled, and how rapidly Chinese consumers have adopted them, after having an initially slow start.
But that adoption hasn’t just been local, it’s also global. Last year, China became the largest auto exporter in the world, taking a crown that Japan had held for decades. But the change was even more dramatic than that – as recently as 2020, China was the sixth-largest auto exporter in the world, just behind the US in 5th place.
China’s dramatic turn upward started in 2020, and now it’s in first place. Meanwhile, because of all the faffing about, the US remains exactly where it was in 2020 – still in fifth place. Well, sixth now, since China eclipsed us (and everyone else).
But tariffs have been tried before, and they didn’t work. When Japan had a similarly meteoric rise to global prominence as an auto manufacturer in the 1970s and 80s, largely due to their adoption of new technology, processes, and different car styles which incumbents were ignoring, the US tried to stop it with tariffs.
All this did was make US manufacturers complacent, and Japan still managed to seize and maintain the crown of top auto exporter (occasionally trading places with Germany) from then until now.
Then as now, the true way to compete is to adapt to the changing automotive industry and take EVs seriously, rather than giving the auto industry excuses to be complacent. But instead, republicans aren’t doing that, and in fact are working to ensure the American auto industry doesn’t adapt, by actively killing the incentives that were leading to a boom in domestic manufacturing investment.
US auto industry jeopardized by republicans
Make no mistake about it: destroying EV incentives, and allowing companies to pollute more and innovate less, will not help the US auto industry catch up with a fast moving competitor.
As we at Electrek have said for years, you cannot catch up to a competitor that is both ahead of you and moving faster than you.
It also applies to nations, which could have spent the last decade doing what the Chinese auto industry has been doing, but instead non-Chinese automakers have been begging their governments for more time, even though it’s not the regulations that threaten them, it’s competition from a new and motivated rival that is moving faster and in a more determined manner towards the future.
The way that we get around this should be clear: take EVs seriously.
But that’s not what republicans are doing, and in doing so, they are signing the death warrant for an important US industry in the long term.
Another thing republicans are trying to kill is the the rooftop solar credit, which means you could have only until the end of this year to install rooftop solar on your home before the cost of doing so goes up by an average of ~$10,000. So if you want to go solar, get started now, because these things take time and the system needs to be active before you file for the credit.
To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
International equipment manufacturer Vermeer has unveiled a full-scale prototype of its Interlune excavator, a machine designed to ingest 100 metric tons of rocks and dirt per hour, extracting valuable helium as it makes its way across the surface … of the Moon.
Helium plays a critical role in the manufacturing of semiconductors, chips, optics, and all the other stuff that makes EVs, autonomy, the Internet, and the rest of twenty-first century life possible. The problem is that, despite being the second-most common element in the universe, helium is pretty rare on Earth – and we are rapidly running out. As such, there are intense economic and political pressures to find new and reliable sources of helium somewhere, anywhere else, and that demand has sparked a new modern space race focused on harvesting helium on the Moon and getting it back home.
To that end, companies like American lunar mining startup Interlune and the Iowa-based equipment experts at Vermeer are partnering on the development of suite of interplanetary equipment assets capable of digging up lunar materials like rocks and sand from up to three meters below the surface, extract helium-3 (a light, stable isotope of helium believed to exist in abundance on the Moon), then package it, contain it, and ship it back to Earth.
“When you’re operating equipment on the Moon, reliability and performance standards are at a new level,” says Rob Meyerson, Interlune CEO. “Vermeer has a legacy of innovation and excellence that started more than 75 years ago, which makes them the ideal partner for Interlune.”
The company showed a scaled prototype of the machine at the 2025 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas (above), emphasizing the need to develop new ways to operate equipment assets in the extreme temperatures of extraplanetary environments beyond diesel or even hydrogen combustion.
On the airless surface of the moon, it would be impossible for an internal combustion engine to operate on the moon’s surface because there is no oxygen for combustion. Electrically powered machines seem the obvious solution with solar power generation supplying the electricity. But the answer is not that simple.
Temperature changes on the surface of the moon are extreme. They can soar to 110° C and plummet to -170° C. Developing electric construction machinery to perform in this environment is no easy task, but Komatsu is tackling issues one by one as they appear. Using thermal control and other electrification technologies, we are engineering solutions.
Despite Komatsu’s apparent head start, however, Vermeer seem to pulled ahead – not just in terms of machine development, but in terms of extraction potential as well.
“The high-rate excavation needed to harvest helium-3 from the Moon in large quantities has never been attempted before, let alone with high efficiency,” said Gary Lai, Interlune co-founder and CTO. “Vermeer’s response to such an ambitious assignment was to move fast. We’ve been very pleased with the results of the test program to date and look forward to the next phase of development.”
Interlune is funded by grants from the US Department of Energy and NASA TechFlights. In 2023, the company received a National Science Foundation (NSF) Small Business Innovation Research award to develop the technology to size and sort lunar regolith (read: dirt). Interlune has raised $18 million in funding so far, and is planning its first mission to the Moon before 2030.
Electrek’s Take
Interlune helium harvester concept; via Interlune.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.