Connect with us

Published

on

A housing minister has lost her building safety brief after Grenfell survivors complained about her attendance at a conference sponsored by a firm criticised by an inquiry into the deadly fire.

Rushanara Ali said she understands that “perception matters” and trusted relationships between the government and the Grenfell community are “essential”.

It came after Grenfell United, a group that represents survivors and bereaved families, allegedly demanded her removal, according to The Sunday Times.

The paper reported she had been a regular attendee of the Franco-British Colloque, an annual policy forum, which was co-chaired by the former chairman of Saint-Gobain, Pierre-Andre de Chalendar between 2012 and 2024.

The French manufacturing firm was until recently the majority owner of Celotex, the company which made most of the flammable insulation used behind the panels on the building.

Housing minister Rushanara Ali on the state of housing in the UK
Image:
Rushanara Ali says ‘perception matters’

Celotex was one of the companies the Grenfell Inquiry report said cynically, deliberately, and dishonestly sold what they knew to be flammable construction materials as “fire safe”.

The fire, which broke out on 14 June 2017 in the 24-storey tower block in Kensington, west London killed 72 people.

Read more:
Grenfell Inquiry main findings

What happened in the Grenfell Tower fire

Ms Ali said in a statement: “Trusted relationships between ministers and the Grenfell community are essential for this department.

“Before I became a minister, I called for the French delegation of the Franco-British Colloque to cut ties with Saint Gobain.

“But I understand that perception matters and I have therefore concluded that the building safety portfolio would be best transferred to another minister.

“Our goals of making buildings safe and preventing another tragedy continue to be very important issues for me, and the deputy prime minister and the rest of the ministerial team have my full support in delivering on this work.”

She will remain a minister in the housing department, keeping her responsibilities for homelessness and rough sleeping.

Continue Reading

Politics

What is NHS England – and what does abolishing it mean?

Published

on

By

What is NHS England - and what does abolishing it mean?

Sir Keir Starmer has confirmed plans to abolish the “arms-length body” NHS England.

But what is the quango – and why is the prime minister scrapping it?

What is NHS England and how does it work?

NHS England was established in 2013 by former Tory health secretary Andrew Lansley to give the NHS greater independence and autonomy – with an intention for it to operate at arm’s length from the government.

It was set up as a quango – an organisation that is funded by taxpayers, but not controlled directly by central government – and is responsible for delivering high-quality care, supporting staff, and ensuring value for money.

Politics latest: Follow live updates

Its website states that it has a “wide range of statutory functions, responsibilities and regulatory powers”, which include working with the government to agree funding and priorities for the NHS and overseeing the delivery of safe and effective NHS services.

NHS England employs about 13,000 people.

As health is a devolved matter, the equivalent bodies for Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland cannot be abolished by the prime minister.

Why has it been scrapped?

The prime minister has said abolishing the body will bring management of the NHS “back into democratic control”.

This move will put the NHS “back at the heart of government where it belongs,” he said during a speech in east Yorkshire on Thursday, “freeing it to focus on patients, less bureaucracy, with more money for nurses”.

He added that the NHS will “refocus” on cutting waiting times at “your hospital”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM to abolish NHS England

When answering a question from a cancer patient on how the decision would improve NHS services, Sir Keir said: “Amongst the reasons we are abolishing it is because of the duplication.

“So, if you can believe it, we’ve got a communications team in NHS England, we’ve got a communications team in the health department of government; we’ve got a strategy team in NHS England, a strategy team in the government department. We are duplicating things that could be done once.”

He said by stripping out the duplication, it allows the government to “free up that money to put it where it needs to be, which is the front line”.

The Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: “This is the final nail in the coffin of the disastrous 2012 reorganisation, which led to the longest waiting times, lowest patient satisfaction, and most expensive NHS in history.

“When money is so tight, we can’t justify such a complex bureaucracy with two organisations doing the same jobs. We need more doers, and fewer checkers, which is why I’m devolving resources and responsibilities to the NHS frontline.

“NHS staff are working flat out but the current system sets them up to fail. These changes will support the huge number of capable, innovative and committed people across the NHS to deliver for patients and taxpayers.

“Just because reform is difficult doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done. This government will never duck the hard work of reform. We will take on vested interests and change the status quo, so the NHS can once again be there for you when you need it.”

What will happen now?

NHS England will be brought back into the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), it was announced, in order to end duplication.

The department said the reforms would reverse the 2012 reorganisation of the NHS “which created burdensome layers of bureaucracy without any clear lines of accountability”.

The government said the changes will also “give more power and autonomy to local leaders and systems – instead of weighing them down in increasing mountains of red tape”.

“Too much centralisation and over-supervision has led to a tangled bureaucracy, which focuses on compliance and box-ticking, rather than patient care, value for money, and innovation,” the government said.

Board members stepped down days before

In the days before Sir Keir’s announcement, NHS England said three leading board members were stepping down at the end of the month.

Chief Financial Officer Julian Kelly, NHS Chief Operating Officer Emily Lawson and Chief Delivery Officer and National Director for Vaccination and Screening Steve Russell will leave their roles in the coming weeks.

At the time, NHS chief executive Amanda Pritchard – who is also stepping down – said the board members made their decision based on the upcoming changes to the size and function of the centre.

Sir James Mackey, who will be taking over as transition chief executive of NHS England, said while he knows the announcement will “unsettle staff” it will also bring “welcome clarity” as the NHS focuses on “tackling the significant challenges ahead”.

Incoming NHS chair, Dr Penny Dash, added she will be working to “bring together NHSE and DHSC to reduce duplication and streamline functions”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Turkey tightens crypto regulations with new rules for exchanges, custodians

Published

on

By

Turkey tightens crypto regulations with new rules for exchanges, custodians

Turkey tightens crypto regulations with new rules for exchanges, custodians

Turkey is advancing its cryptocurrency regulations with new rules for crypto asset service providers (CASPs).

On March 13, Turkey’s Capital Markets Board (CMB) published two regulatory documents regarding the licensing and operations of CASPs, including crypto exchanges, custodians and wallet service providers.

The framework grants the CMB full oversight of crypto platforms, ensuring compliance with national and international standards.

Cryptocurrencies, Turkey, Cryptocurrency Exchange, Policy

An excerpt from the title page of the CASP regulation document by the CMB. Source: Official Gazette

It also sets standards and requirements for establishing and providing crypto asset services in Turkey, covering establishment capital, history of executives, shareholder rules and others.

Stricter requirements for CASPs

Under the framework, CASPs will be required to invest in compliance infrastructure and establish dedicated risk management teams to identify and manage a range of risks. The providers must also establish a price monitoring system to alert suspicious trading activity.

Turkish CASPs must adhere to stringent reporting requirements, providing the CMB with timely information about their operations.

Additionally, the new framework further strengthens Turkey’s crypto Anti-Money Laundering (AML) standards, requiring CASPs to record significant data sets of transaction information, including canceled and unexecuted transactions.

Cryptocurrencies, Turkey, Cryptocurrency Exchange, Policy

An excerpt from CMB’s CASP regulation document (translated by Google). Source: Official Gazette

Turkey previously introduced crypto AML regulations in December 2024, requiring users to share identifying information with CASPs for transactions of more than 15,000 Turkish liras ($409).

According to the document, Turkey’s new crypto regulations align with global standards and follow regulatory approaches set by Europe’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Magazine: How crypto laws are changing across the world in 2025

Continue Reading

Politics

Apple vs Home Office encryption court battle must be held in public, say MPs

Published

on

By

Apple vs Home Office encryption court battle must be held in public, say MPs

Any court showdown between Apple and the Home Office over customer data must be held in public, MPs have demanded.

It comes after the tech giant announced last month that it would no longer offer UK customers its most advanced, end-to-end security encryption feature for cloud data storage following a row with the government.

The dispute was sparked when ministers reportedly decided to issue Apple with a Technical Capability Notice (TCN) demanding the right to see the user data.

Legally, neither of the parties can publicly confirm the existence of the order.

Politics latest: Cabinet minister apologises in Commons

However, ComputerWeekly and others have reported that Apple has launched an appeal against the TCN, with an initial hearing set to be heard on Friday before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal at the High Court in London.

A court listing document shows a behind-closed-doors application is due to be held before Lord Justice Singh and Mr Justice Johnson.

Veteran Tory MP and civil rights campaigner Sir David Davis told Sky News: “If the Home Office wants to have effectively unfettered access to the private data of the (innocent) general public, they should explain their case in front of the public.”

The notice shown to Apple users wanting to use Advanced Data Protection
Image:
The notice shown to Apple users wanting to use Advanced Data Protection

Also speaking to Sky News, Liberal Democrat technology spokesperson Victoria Collins said: “The move by the government endangers people here in the UK and sets a dangerous precedent for authoritarian regimes across the globe…

“I’m proud to add my name to the call for the hearing on this crucial issue to be open to the public. People deserve to know what’s happening to their private personal information.”

Read more from Sky News:
Starmer ‘disappointed’ about Trump steel tariffs

Russian captain arrested over ship crash
Hostages killed after train hijacked

Reform UK chief whip Lee Anderson said: “If the government wishes to pry on its people, they can make that claim in public. This now puts the security and privacy of the British people at risk.

“The government should have as little involvement in our personal lives as possible. Not in our tweets, not in our text messages, and certainly not with full access to our phones.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is your iPhone data less secure?

Prior to its removal in the UK, Apple‘s Advanced Data Protection service allowed users the ability to encrypt their data in such a way that no one, not even the tech company, would be able to access it.

Critics fear the use of end-to-end encryption – where third-party access is impossible – could help criminals like paedophiles hide their activity from authorities.

However, providing access to encrypted data, whether to a government or a company, provides potential pathways for third parties such as hackers to access information.

Successive governments have said they want to restrict the use of the function.

Apple has never commented on the TCN, but said in a previous statement: “Enhancing the security of cloud storage with end-to-end encryption is more urgent than ever before.

“Apple remains committed to offering our users the highest level of security for their personal data and are hopeful that we will be able to do so in the future in the United Kingdom.

“As we have said many times before, we have never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services and we never will.”

The Home Office declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Trending