Connect with us

Published

on

While having the odd bet on your football team to win at the weekend sounds like a bit of harmless fun, it could actually scupper your chances of getting a mortgage.

Lenders have always been cautious when it comes to approving mortgages, but some brokers have noticed that even the odd gambling transaction is now viewed as a red flag.

Typically, borrowers will be judged on a range of factors, including their income, age, credit utilisation and payment history, when they submit a mortgage application.

The exact requirements to be approved for a mortgage can vary depending on the lender.

Joe Childes, mortgage adviser at Right Choice Mortgages, told the Money blog he had recently seen banks declining applications based on gambling transactions on clients’ bank statements, even if it’s just the odd flutter.

“The tolerance for gambling transactions seems to vary from lender to lender,” he said.

“We have seen cases declined where clients have separate accounts for placing bets, but even just those who bet on the football at the weekend.

More from Business

“Gambling transactions can be questioned by the underwriter, or in some cases we have seen straight declines with no grounds for appeal.”

On LinkedIn, he raised one case where his clients had filed a joint application, had no forms of credit in the background and were asking for a mortgage of less than 50% loan-to-value ratio, but were declined twice.

The pair were never in their overdraft and had £5,000 in their current account.

Pic: iStock
Image:
Pic: iStock

“These are football bets only, and just present on one statement out of the past three. Affordability for the level of transactions seen is not a concern,” he said.

He questioned whether banks would make the same decision for those who excessively drink or smoke, or those who go to their local bookies and use cash to place bets.

“If the client can afford the spending, is it right to dictate how they use their hard-earned money?” he asked.

What bets could cause an issue?

Mr Childes said it was “habitual spending” on betting that appeared to spark most concern with lenders, even if clients could easily afford how much they were putting down.

“For some clients, betting on the football, for example, can be a hobby and the amount spent is not excessive in relation to their income,” he said.

“However, we have seen applications from these clients declined even where the clients are not under financial pressure and can maintain the level of spending.”

This story originally ran in the award-winning Sky News Money blog – click here to read more

People should be aware that underwriters will review their bank statements when they apply for a mortgage, and gambling transactions are likely to be questioned.

“If the number of transactions seen through your account are considered to be excessive, this could lead to your mortgage application being declined,” Mr Childes said.

Lenders haven’t been able to clarify what their “tolerance level” for gambling is, he added, with many saying it is assessed on a case-by-case basis.

The major lenders’ gambling policies

We asked all the major lenders to explain their gambling policies to the Money team – here’s what they said:

Santander

The high-street bank doesn’t have any specific gambling related policies for mortgage customers.

Instead, it undertakes affordability assessments when considering new mortgage applications.

This includes an assessment of a customer’s bank statements, which considers all their outgoings to make sure monthly repayments are affordable.

A photo of a mobile phone device with bank apps including Santander. Pic: iStock

Barclays

Barclays said it did not have any set rules when it comes to gambling: “We ensure all mortgages are affordable before we offer them, including testing at higher interest rates.”

Nationwide

As a “responsible lender”, Nationwide said it aimed to ensure customers can afford their mortgage payments now and in the future.

It said each application was assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking a range of factors into account to determine how much can be borrowed.

We also contacted HSBC, Natwest and Lloyds – but they didn’t get back to us.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

What should you do?

If you think your gambling habits might be causing you a problem, there are steps you can take.

Matt Zarb-Cousin, co-founder of gambling blocking software Gamban, said people should start to look at their behaviour if they are chasing losses, preoccupied with gambling and thinking about their next bet, and losing interest in other activities.

“These behaviours will often lead to such significant loss-chasing in a gambling session that it causes significant financial harm that can impact you for weeks or even months,” he said.

“Being able to spot the signs before it reaches that point, and quitting, can prevent this from occurring in the first place.”

If you want to quit online gambling, talkbanstop.com offers free tools and support.

Banks also offer the option to block gambling transactions, which provides another layer of friction that can help prevent relapse, Mr Zarb-Cousin said.

“Gambling transactions can affect mortgage applications, but the primary concern of lenders is you’re not getting into debt to fund gambling,” he said.

He pointed out that lenders often look at bank statements from the past three to six months, so even quitting for that amount of time before applying could put you in a better position.

Continue Reading

Business

City financier Kolade joins ranks of Channel 4 chair contenders

Published

on

By

City financier Kolade joins ranks of Channel 4 chair contenders

A leading financier and Conservative Party donor is among the contenders vying to chair Channel 4, the state-owned broadcaster.

Sky News has learnt from Whitehall sources that Wol Kolade has been shortlisted to replace Sir Ian Cheshire at the helm of the company.

Mr Kolade, who has donated hundreds of thousands of pounds to Tory coffers, is said by Whitehall insiders to be one of a handful of remaining candidates for the role.

A recommendation from Ofcom, the media regulator, to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy about its recommendation for the Channel 4 chairmanship is understood to be imminent.

Mr Kolade, who heads the private equity firm Livingbridge, has held non-executive roles including a seat on the board of NHS Improvement.

He declined to comment when contacted by Sky News on Monday.

His candidacy pits him against rivals including Justin King, the former J Sainsbury chief executive, who last week stepped down as chairman of Ovo Energy.

Debbie Wosskow, an existing Channel 4 non-executive director who has applied for the chair role, is also said by government sources to have made it to the shortlist.

Sir Ian stepped down earlier this year after just one term, having presided over a successful attempt to thwart privatisation by the last Tory government.

The Channel 4 chairmanship is currently held on an interim basis by Dawn Airey, the media industry executive who has occupied top jobs at companies including ITV, Channel 5, and Yahoo!.

The race to lead the state-owned broadcaster’s board has acquired additional importance since the resignation of Alex Mahon, its long-serving chief executive.

It has since been reported that Alex Burford, another Channel 4 non-executive director and the boss of Warner Records UK, was interested in replacing Ms Mahon.

Ms Mahon, who was a vocal opponent of Channel 4’s privatisation, is leaving to join Superstruct, a private equity-owned live entertainment company.

The appointment of a new chair is expected to take place by the autumn, with the chosen candidate expected to lead the recruitment of Ms Mahon’s successor.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport declined to comment on the recruitment process.

Continue Reading

Business

Premier League club Brentford to sell stake at £400m valuation

Published

on

By

Premier League club Brentford to sell stake at £400m valuation

The owner of Brentford Football Club has clinched a deal to sell a minority stake in the Premier League side to new investors at a valuation of roughly £400m.

Sky News has learnt that an agreement that will involve current owner Matthew Benham offloading a chunk of his holding to Gary Lubner – the wealthy businessman who ran Autoglass-owner Belron – is expected to be announced as early as Tuesday.

Matthew Vaughn, the Hollywood film-maker whose credits include Layer Cake and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, is also expected to invest in Brentford as part of the deal, The Athletic reported last month.

Further details of the transaction were unclear on Monday night, although one insider speculated that it could ultimately see as much as 25% of the club changing hands.

If confirmed, it would underline the continuing interest from wealthy investors in top-flight English clubs.

FA Cup winners Crystal Palace have seen a minority stake being bought by Woody Johnson, the New York Jets-owner, in the last few weeks, with that deal hastened by the implications of former shareholder John Textor’s simultaneous ownership of a stake in French club Lyon.

Sky News revealed in February 2024 that Mr Benham had hired bankers at Rothschild to market a stake in Brentford.

More from Money

Under Mr Benham’s stewardship, it has enjoyed one of the most successful transformations in English football, rising from the lower divisions to the top division in 2021.

It has also moved from its long-standing Griffin Park home to a new stadium near Kew Bridge.

This summer is proving to be one of transition, with manager Thomas Frank joining Tottenham Hotspur and striker Bryan Mbeumo the subject of persistent interest from Manchester United.

Brentford did not respond to a request for comment on Monday night, while a spokesman for Mr Lubner declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Economists say the cost of living crisis is over – here’s why many households disagree

Published

on

By

Economists say the cost of living crisis is over - here's why many households disagree

Talk to economists and they will tell you that the cost of living crisis is over.

They will point towards charts showing that while inflation is still above the Bank of England’s 2% target, it has come down considerably in recent years, and is now “only” hovering between 3% and 4%.

So why does the cost of living still feel like such a pressing issue for so many households? The short answer is because, depending on how you define it, it never ended.

Economists like to focus on the change in prices over the past year, and certainly on that measure inflation is down sharply, from double-digit levels in recent years.

But if you look over the past four years then the rate of change is at its highest since the early 1990s.

But even that understates the complexity of economic circumstances facing households around the country.

For if you want a sense of how current financial conditions really feel in people’s pockets, you really ought to offset inflation against wages, and then also take account of the impact of taxes.

More on Cost Of Living

That is a complex exercise – in part because no two households’ experience is alike.

But recent research from the Resolution Foundation illustrates some of the dynamics going on beneath the surface, and underlines that for many households the cost of living crisis is still very real indeed.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK inflation slows to 3.4%

The place to begin here is to recall that perhaps the best measure of economic “feelgood factor” is to subtract inflation and taxes from people’s nominal pay.

You end up with a statistic showing your real household disposable income.

Consider the projected pattern over the coming years. For a household earning £50,000, earnings are expected to increase by 10% between 2024/25 and 2027/28.

Subtract inflation projected over that period and all of a sudden that 10% drops to 2.5%.

Now subtract the real increase in payments of National Insurance and taxes and it’s down to 0.2%.

Now subtract projected council tax increases and all of a sudden what began as a 10% increase is actually a 0.1% decrease.

Read more:
UK economy figures ‘not as bad as they look’, analysts say
More options than ever for savers to beat inflation

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will we see tax rises in next budget?

Of course, the degree of change in your circumstances can differ depending on all sorts of factors. Some earners (especially those close to tax thresholds, which in this case includes those on £50,000) feel the impact of tax changes more than others.

Pensioners and those who own their homes outright benefit from a comparatively lower increase in housing costs in the coming years than those paying mortgages and (especially) rent.

Nor is everyone’s experience of inflation the same. In general, lower-income households pay considerably more of their earnings on essentials, like housing costs, food and energy. Some of those costs are going up rapidly – indeed, the UK faces higher power costs than any other developed economy.

But the ultimate verdict provides some clear patterns. Pensioners can expect further increases in their take-home pay in the coming years. Those who own their homes outright and with mortgages can likely expect earnings to outpace extra costs. But others are less fortunate. Those who rent their homes privately are projected to see sharp falls in their household income – and children are likely to see further falls in their economic welfare too.

Continue Reading

Trending