Connect with us

Published

on

We’ve been here before. Yvette Cooper is the third home secretary to promise to reform procedure for armed police officers after the shooting of Chris Kaba.

But then we have had three home secretaries in the past year: Tories Suella Braverman and James Cleverly and now Labour’s Ms Cooper.

It was when dozens of officers in London handed in their weapons after Metropolitan Police marksman Martyn Blake was charged, in September last year, that Ms Braverman launched a review.

Firearms officers “mustn’t fear ending up in the dock for carrying out their duties,” she declared. Her review would ensure they have the confidence to do their jobs, she said.

Yvette Cooper swerves budget questions – Politics latest

Then in March this year, Mr Cleverly announced that investigations into police officers suspected of committing offences in the line of duty would be “sped up”, to provide swifter clarity to both officers and victims.

“The government will amend the threshold for referring police officers for criminal prosecution, so that only cases that have a reasonable prospect of conviction should be referred,” the Home Office added.

More from Politics

So what happened to speeding up the reforms? Were they stalled by the July general election? Apparently not. Ms Cooper said it was right to wait until the end of Mr Blake’s trial before announcing changes. Fair point.

What are the changes, then? In a rare cross-party consensus between the two front benches, the home secretary has accepted all Mr Cleverly’s proposals, for which he was gracious in expressing his gratitude.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Retired firearms officer Tony Long, who shot dead Azelle Rodney in 2005, speaks to Sky News as a police officer is cleared of the murder of Chris Kaba.

But she’s gone much further. The one audible cheer from the surprisingly few MPs in the chamber – only around 25 or so on both sides – came when she proposed a “presumption of anonymity” for police on trial up to a conviction.

In his measured response, Mr Cleverly spoke of the fear of reprisals against Mr Blake and his family. A real concern. There are reports of criminals putting a £10,000 bounty on his head in revenge for the shooting of Mr Kaba.

The cross-party consensus didn’t extend to the back benches, however. From the Labour benches, there were concerns about confidence in police among black communities from left-wingers Diane Abbott, Bell Ribiero-Addy and Kim Johnson.

And from the Reform UK duo of Lee Anderson and Richard Tice there were demands for more government backing for the police. Mr Tice said confidence in the police disciplinary process and the Crown Prosecution Service was collapsing.

The home secretary said the anonymity proposal will be part of the government’s Crime and Policing Bill, a bill Sir Keir Starmer has claimed “will take back our streets”. But it’s an unwieldy piece of legislation.

It already includes measures on neighbourhood policing, improving the vetting of police officers and tackling anti-social behaviour, retail crime, knife crime and violence against women and girls.

It hasn’t yet been introduced in parliament, however. So despite all the talk by successive home secretaries about speeding up reforming trials of armed police officers, the wait goes on.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Not now’: Badenoch backs triple lock pension for the moment

Published

on

By

'Not now': Badenoch backs triple lock pension for the moment

Kemi Badenoch has said she does not want to scrap the triple lock “now” but said “lets see mess Labour leaves for us”.

The Tory leader told Sky News that the triple lock was a Conservative idea and that it was right to protect people who had contributed to the welfare system.

Politics latest: Number of Britons leaving the UK significantly higher than previously thought

The triple lock means the state pension must rise by whichever is highest of either average earnings, inflation or 2.5%.

However, she said she would not say she would “never” reform it or explicitly rule it out for the next parliament.

In April, the government stated that 55% of social security expenditure in 2025-26 would be spent on pensioners.

The Office for Budget Responsibility says the triple lock has pushed up the spending on the state pension by £12bn a year, compared to if it had been uprated in line with average earnings.

More on Conservatives

The problem with the triple lock, Ms Badenoch suggested, was low growth – with 0.1% in the UK.

She suggested it was also the reason why Argentinian President Javier Milei – whom she has praised as “fantastic” and “fearless” – could block pensioner entitlement rises is because they are growing at 6%.

“If we were growing a 2% to 3%, you wouldn’t have a problem with pensions,” she explained.

“Argentina is growing at 6%. What we’re seeing right now is growth at 0.1%. Growth is flatlining. We need to start with getting growth.”

But asked whether the Tories would “never” look at reforming the policy, she said: “That moment is not now. And I don’t want people to be confused about what our policy is right now. Our policy is to keep the triple lock. Let us focus on welfare, that is the picture of what we mean by right now.”

Asked how long that would be her position for, Ms Badenoch replied: “Well, let’s see what this budget leaves. Let’s see what mess Reeves leaves for us.”

Read more:
Starmer: I’ll lead Labour into next general election
MPs warned of new spying attempts from China-linked agents

The triple lock is the cause of much debate, given the economic climate, with Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also saying its future depended on the state of the economy.

Asked by political correspondent Tamara Cohen whether a potential Reform government would keep the triple lock, Mr Farage said the matter was one of “open debate” and that keeping the triple lock would depend “on the state of the economy”.

Pressed on when he would make a decision because pensioners were becoming concerned, he said: “Not now. Nearer the election.”

He added: “Right now they’re getting above inflation increases.

“That doesn’t mean they’re wealthy. The real worry for many pensioners will be even with modest pensions, this budget could drag them all into the tax system. That’ll worry them even more.”

Continue Reading

Politics

No ‘free tickets’ on council tax under Reform

Published

on

By

No 'free tickets' on council tax under Reform

Nigel Farage gave a press conference on Tuesday, highlighting £25bn of savings he claims Rachel Reeves can make in her budget – including slashing overseas aid and welfare for foreign citizens.

But he said the areas where the local councils are now run by Reform are experiencing “massive problems” with their finances and may have to raise council tax.

The Reform leader claimed that when campaigning in the local elections in May, he “did not make a single promise – not a single promise in that election campaign that we’d be able to freeze or cut council tax”.

“I never said it once. And you know why? Because I realised the massive debts that we were inheriting from those county councils.”

Read more: What taxes could go up now?

A turquoise tide saw Reform gain control of 10 councils and win some 600 local councillors.

Farage promised a “DOGE” unit, inspired by Elon Musk’s initiative in the US, to slash waste.

More on Council Tax

But most councils have indicated they will have to raise council tax, as they grapple with budget shortfalls and the pressures of adult social care.

I asked him why voters should believe he could easily find spending to slash in national government, if the record in local councils was anything to go by.

Mr Farage said: “There is a massive problem and this is going to need the national government to work with the local government to reduce those burdens.

“Are we determined to make changes? Yes. Will we cut debt? Yes. But can we give people a free ticket at this moment in time on council tax? No.”

Kent County Council – where a leaked phone call exposing tensions about budgets led to councillors being suspended – is expected to raise council tax by the maximum of 4.99% next year.

Durham County Council is reported to be looking at raising parking charges.

Farage added later in the press conference that he hoped councils would keep their rises to the level of inflation, 3.8% in September.

Continue Reading

Politics

Regulator clarifies US banks can handle gas fees using crypto holdings

Published

on

By

Regulator clarifies US banks can handle gas fees using crypto holdings

The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued guidance to banks confirming their authority to hold specific cryptocurrencies for the purpose of paying network gas fees.

In a Tuesday notice, the OCC said US banks were allowed to hold crypto on their balance sheets to pay network, or gas fees, provided the transactions were for permissible activities. The regulator said that an authorized national bank “may hold amounts of crypto-assets as principal necessary for testing otherwise permissible crypto-asset-related platforms.”

“As with any activity, a national bank must conduct these activities in a safe and sound manner and in compliance with applicable law,” said the OCC.

Cryptocurrencies, Government, Banks, United States
Source: OCC

The notice expanded upon a May letter informing banks that they could handle digital assets on behalf of their customers and outsource some crypto activities to third parties. Both sets of guidance came amid the OCC striking a different tone on crypto under US President Donald Trump, reducing the regulatory burden on financial institutions.

Related: UK central bank still ‘disproportionately cautious’ about stablecoins

The Tuesday letter cited the GENIUS stablecoin bill signed into law in July, which establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. According to the OCC, stablecoin transactions at authorized national banks will likely require network fees, allowing the bank to pay through assets in its custody or an agent.

Implementing GENIUS Act, looking to pass market structure

Although the stablecoin bill was signed into law in July, the legislation is still likely to be months away from implementation, as the US Treasury and Federal Reserve need to finalize the regulations.