Commonwealth leaders will agree plans to look at reparations for the slave trade, in defiance of Sir Keir Starmer.
The UK prime minister called the transatlantic slave trade “abhorrent” but ruled out reparations as he said countries affected would rather the UK help them with current issues, such as the impact of climate change.
His spokesman earlier this week said: “The government’s position on this has not changed – we do not pay reparations.”
However, as the biennial Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) begins in Samoa tomorrow, Sky News has learned officials from some countries are drawing up an agreement to conduct further research and begin a “meaningful conversation”.
It could leave the UK owing billions of pounds in reparations, which are usually defined as payments paid by a country for damage or losses caused to other countries or their people.
At the end of the summit, the 55 leaders will agree a “communique”, which explains what was discussed and summarises decisions on specific issues.
More on Commonwealth
Related Topics:
Some leaders are understood to want to include slavery reparations in the communique, with a draft version saying leaders “agreed that the time has come for a meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation towards forging a common future based on equity”, according to the BBC.
Other leaders want a separate declaration demanding reparatory justice, which the UK and some countries are unlikely to sign.
Advertisement
This would be the worst case scenario for the UK as leaders would have to vote on it, risking a split in the Commonwealth.
Image: The PM with Samoan Prime Minister Afioga Fiame Naomi Mata’afa (centre). Pic: PA
As well as payments, reparatory justice could also take the form of debt relief, an official apology, educational programmes, economic support, public health assistance and building museums.
Following reports Commonwealth leaders are demanding reparations, senior Labour MP Lucy Powell doubled down on the government’s position, saying: “Our position on reparations hasn’t changed.
“We’re committed to working with our Commonwealth partners on the very pressing issues that we are facing today, and looking forward to the future and not looking to the past.”
Mr Starmer’s spokesman added: “The prime minister believes that we should be facing forward and that remains our position.”
A source told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby Sir Keir’s refusal to put reparations on the agenda has agitated some leaders and it looks like no matter what he wants, the issue will be in the final communique.
Bahamas Prime Minister Philip Davis has said he wants reparatory justice mentioned in the communique and will try to have a “frank” conversation with Sir Keir.
“It’s not just about an apology,” he told Politico.
“It’s not about money, it’s about an appreciation and embracing and understanding of what our ancestors went through, that has left a scourge on our race, culturally, mentally and physically.”
Image: King Charles and Queen Camilla with members of a cricket team during a visit to the Samoan Cultural Village in Apia.
Pic: PA
He is hoping to speak directly to Sir Keir, who he called “a fair-minded just individual”, on Saturday when there will be a six-hour leaders’ retreat with no aides, leaving them to speak more freely.
The two leaders are familiar to each other, having each represented defendants in a legal case in 2003 that led to the mandatory death penalty being abolished in the Bahamas.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:53
What do Samoans think of King Charles?
King Charles and Queen Camilla are also in Samoa where the king will address the summit following a trip to Australia where they faced protests and accusations of stealing Aboriginal land and committing “genocide against our people”.
Although none of the Number 10 team are household names or public figures, the tally of those cycling through the top jobs is worth noting.
As of now, he’s had four chiefs of staff – the incumbent returning to the job, two cabinet secretaries with a third rumoured to be on the way and five directors of communications – a job that routinely fails to last a year these days.
The lesson this tells us is that when there’s blame to go around, Sir Keir is happy to apportion it to his closest aides.
In an interview today, the prime minister was clear that these changes are about moving to a new phase of government, more focused on delivery.
More on Keir Starmer
Related Topics:
A delivery phase implies legislation completed and a focus on implementation. Bluntly, this is not the case or an accurate assessment of the job that now needs to be done.
The autumn term is not about implementation.
It’s about filling the £20bn to £40bn black hole we expect to emerge in the autumn budget, as well as continuing to deal with an uncertain world globally, and deciding on massively tricky domestic issues like reform of special educational needs and whether to revisit welfare reform.
We are still at the “big choices” section of this parliament, not the delivery phase.
The big choice in Sir Keir’s reset on Monday has been to bring in his own Mr Fixit into Downing Street.
He chose a mid-level cabinet minister, Darren Jones – until today the number two in the Treasury – and has parachuted him into his office to oversee policy.
This is an appointment, I’m told, that was pushed and encouraged by Rachel Reeves because of Mr Jones’ role in the spending review.
As chief secretary, Mr Jones is meant to have gone item by item through every department’s budget. He knows where the financial bodies are buried and will be a major alternate source of advice for Sir Keir to individual cabinet ministers.
This is undoubtedly a recipe for conflict. There are already some around the cabinet table who found Mr Jones’ style a touch brusque. His fans say this is part of why he is effective: he is prepared to challenge what he’s told, is an independent thinker and unafraid to challenge big beasts.
He will now play this role permanently, on behalf of the prime minister, and structurally, this means he is bound to be disliked by several of these colleagues who will no doubt, in time, seek to undermine him, just as he will challenge them and have the last word with Sir Keir.
No matter that some might be surprised at the choice, as a fiscal and reforming hawk, since few would put him on the same ideological wing of the party as the prime minister. He is also a late joiner to the Starmer project, although joining in opposition spent years longer than some as chair of the business select committee rather than taking more junior roles.
This is now immaterial. He is responsible for making Sir Keir’s government work in practice. His colleagues could do worse than to sincerely wish him good luck and leave him to it, as there is a great deal to be done.