Connect with us

Published

on

Newly elected MPs are struggling to set up offices in their constituencies due to fears for their safety and spiralling rents, Sky News has learnt.

Several MPs who spoke to Sky News said they believed landlords were becoming increasingly reluctant to have them as tenants due to the perceived risks that came with the job – which one likened to the debanking row that engulfed Nigel Farage last year.

The combination of rising rents and increased security requirements has meant that some MPs have felt unable to have constituency offices on high streets and in buildings with shop windows, where they are visible and easily accessible to the public.

In some cases, they said they had received security advice recommending that they do not have very visible offices due to the need for enhanced protection.

Politics latest: Labour grandee dismisses Trump ‘stunt’

One MP said they were currently subletting a shopfront for their constituency office while they looked for somewhere more suitable long-term because the safety was not up to standard.

“Because budgets for renting are so tight and landlords are so scared of controversy, MPs are now struggling to be in their communities,” they told Sky News.

More from Politics

“There is a real conflict in that you want to appeal to your constituents, but the people who work for you and do casework are very mindful of some of the challenges of being in an open shop window and the threats that exist.

“Ultimately you can go and rent somewhere but it may not be appropriate for the work we are trying to do. The one compromise you can’t make is the safety and security of your people.”

MPs’ safety has been a longstanding cause for concern, with fears heightening since the murders of Jo Cox and Sir David Amess in 2016 and 2021, respectively.

Last year, the issue was thrust into the spotlight after Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons speaker, admitted that fears over the safety of MPs had been a factor in his decision-making in a contentious vote over the war in Gaza.

Jo Stevens, now the Welsh Secretary, had her constituency office in Cardiff vandalised following the vote, with the words “murderer” sprayed on the walls.

The office of  Mike Freer MP  
Pic:Mike Freer
Image:
The office of Mike Freer MP following an arson attack.
Pic: Mike Freer

And Mike Freer, the former Conservative MP for Finchley and Golders Green, stood down at the last election following an arson attack on his office in December 2023.

In October, the House of Commons agreed to set up the Speaker’s conference with a new committee chaired by Sir Lindsay to discuss the issue of MPs’ safety and the effectiveness of the response to the threats they face.

‘We are less visible when trust is already low’

A Labour MP said there was now a “nervousness” among landlords that MPs may prove to be risky clients and that there was concern potential damage to their buildings may not be covered by insurance.

They said the issues combined meant the nature of the job was now changing.

“People now want to be in big, closed-off office blocks rather than high street locations that people can pop into.

“It’s almost similar to the de-banking scandal,” they added, referring to how some banks have refused to open bank accounts for some holders that could be deemed to pose a risk to the bank’s reputation.

“Because of these security concerns, we’ve got a new generation of MPs who are far less visible at a time when there’s already not a lot of trust in politics and politicians, and we don’t know yet what the consequences will be,” the MP added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Mike Freer blames social media for threats

For the MPs who do want to rent an office on a high street – particularly in and around London – the rise in rents has made it “near impossible” to find one that offers value for money.

Budgets for renting out constituency offices are set by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA), which also decides MPs’ pay.

For the financial year 2024-25, IPSA’s budget for entire office costs – extending beyond rent – was £36,500 for London, and £33,020 for non-London MPs.

One Labour MP in a new constituency in the capital said IPSA’s office finding service had struggled to find anything affordable in their area, forcing them to share a neighbouring MP’s office in the short term.

Paul Kohler, the Liberal Democrat MP for Wimbledon, told Sky News he was currently using a party campaign office while he looked for a more suitable one for constituency work.

“Clearly we want somewhere that is accessible to the public but the high street is not a cheap place to rent,” he said, adding: “The offices that are affordable aren’t suitable.”

Read more:
PM rejects reparations calls

Why row with Team Trump is awkward for Starmer

On top of the office costs budget, IPSA has a separate budget for security costs.

For the financial year 2022-23, the most recent year for which data is available, the total amount spent on security assistance for MPs was £3.3m.

Sky News understands that IPSA has been made aware of a couple of incidents where landlords have withdrawn offers of rent after learning the prospective tenant is an MP.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘The abuse of MPs is normalised’

An IPSA spokesperson told Sky News: “We support MPs with finding suitable constituency offices, including offering advice on how to secure properties which fit within their budgets.

“Some of the things we encourage MPs to consider include looking at more affordable spaces away from the high street, opting to hire venues for engagement with constituents, considering serviced offices, renting or subletting from the local party.

“We review budgets every year and take into account economic indicators and market information, as well as available information on commercial rents. We then make recommendations for any adjustments to the budgets, which are considered by our board.”

A House of Commons spokesperson said: “The ability for MPs to perform their parliamentary duties safely, both on and off the estate, is fundamental to our democracy.

“The parliamentary security department, working closely with the police, offer all MPs a range of security measures for those with offices or surgeries in their constituencies – helping to ensure a safe working environment.

“We do not comment on individual MPs’ security arrangements or advice because we would not wish to compromise the safety of MPs, parliamentary staff or members of the public, but these are kept under continuous review.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Home secretary denies ‘watering down’ grooming gangs response following backlash

Published

on

By

Home secretary denies 'watering down' grooming gangs response following backlash

The home secretary has denied the government is watering down its response to child grooming gangs after it was accused of dropping plans for local inquiries.

Yvette Cooper announced at the beginning of the year that “victim-centred, locally-led inquiries” would take place in five areas after the issue caught the attention of tech billionaire Elon Musk.

But this week, safeguarding minister Jess Phillips did not provide an update on the reviews and instead said local authorities would be able to access a £5m fund to support any work they wanted to carry out.

Politics latest: ‘Our position hasn’t changed’ on tariffs, says minister

Her statement led to accusations that the government was diluting the importance of the local inquiries by giving councils the choice over how to spend the money.

Asked by Anna Jones on Sky News whether the government was “watering down” its response, Ms Cooper said: “No, completely the opposite.

“What we’re doing is increasing the action we’re taking on this vile crime.”

More on Yvette Cooper

The home secretary pointed to the rapid audit that is being carried out by Baroness Louise Casey, which will bring together the data gathered so far on grooming gangs and consider the lessons that should be learned at a national level.

She added: “Most important of all, what we’re doing is we’re increasing the police investigations, because these are dangerous perpetrators and again, they should be behind bars.”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk wears a 'Trump Was Right About Everything!' hat while attending a cabinet meeting at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 24, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Image:
Elon Musk has been critical of Labour’s response to grooming gangs and has called for a national inquiry.

Demands for a national inquiry into the scandal – in which girls as young as 11 were groomed and raped across a number of towns and cities in England over a decade ago – grew louder this year after Mr Musk accused Labour of failing to act on the issue on his social media platform X.

The government refused to hold a national inquiry, citing the work carried out by Professor Alexis Jay, who led the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse that looked into abuse by organised groups following multiple convictions of sexual offences against children across the UK between 2010-2014.

However, it did commit to holding local inquiries in five areas backed by £5m in funding and advised by Tom Crowther KC.

‘Political mess’

But ministers are facing a backlash following Ms Phillips’ statement in the Commons on Tuesday – made an hour before parliament rose for Easter recess – in which she said the government would take a “flexible approach” by allowing five councils to launch victims’ panels or locally led audits.

Labour MPs angry with government decision grooming gangs


Photo of Mhari Aurora

Mhari Aurora

Political correspondent

@MhariAurora

With about an hour until the House of Commons rose for Easter recess, the government announced it was taking a more “flexible” approach to the local grooming gang inquiries.

Safeguarding minister Jess Philips argued this was based on experience from certain affected areas, and that the government is funding new police investigations to re-open historic cases.

Sky News presenter and former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission Trevor Philips called the move “utterly shameful” and claimed it was a political decision.

One Labour MP told Sky News: “Some people are very angry. I despair. I don’t disagree with many of our decisions but we just play to Reform – someone somewhere needs sacking.”

The government insists party political misinformation is fanning the flames of frustration in Labour, and that they not watering down the inquiries – on the contrary, they say are increasing the action being taken – , but while many Labour MPs have one eye on Reform in the rearview mirror, any accusations of being soft on grooming gangs only provides political ammunition to their adversaries.

One Labour MP told Sky News the issue had turned into a “political mess” and that they were being called “grooming sympathisers”.

On the update from Ms Phillips on Tuesday, they said it might have been the “right thing to do” but that it was “horrible politically”.

“We are all getting so much abuse. It’s just political naivety in the extreme.”

Read more:
Grooming gangs: What we know from the data
Fewer criminals set to be jailed amid overcrowding

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said yesterday that she was “absolutely astonished that Labour has dropped what it said it would do in January”.

“They are clearly uncomfortable with having inquiries that are looking into this issue,”she said.

“They said that they’ll have a pot of money for councils to bid in, but why would a council bid for money to investigate itself?

“We need something that is national. We need a statutory inquiry so we can compel witnesses, and I’m going to make sure that we force another vote.”

‘We will leave no stone unturned’

Ms Phillips later defended her decision, saying there was “far too much party political misinformation about the action that is being taken when everyone should be trying to support victims and survivors”.

“We are funding new police investigations to re-open historic cases, providing national support for locally led inquiries and action, and Louise Casey… is currently reviewing the nature, scale and ethnicity of grooming gangs offending across the country.

“We will not hesitate to go further, unlike the previous government, who showed no interest in this issue over 14 years and did nothing to progress the recommendations from the seven year national inquiry when they had the chance.

“We will leave no stone unturned in pursuit of justice for victims and will be unrelenting in our crackdown on sick predators and perpetrators who prey on vulnerable children.”

Continue Reading

Politics

OpenSea urges SEC to exclude NFT marketplaces from regulator’s remit

Published

on

By

OpenSea urges SEC to exclude NFT marketplaces from regulator’s remit

OpenSea urges SEC to exclude NFT marketplaces from regulator’s remit

Non-fungible token marketplace OpenSea has urged the US Securities and Exchange Commission to exclude NFT marketplaces from regulation under federal securities laws.

The SEC needs to “clearly state that NFT marketplaces like OpenSea do not qualify as exchanges under federal securities laws,” OpenSea general counsel Adele Faure and deputy general counsel Laura Brookover said in an April 9 letter to Commissioner Hester Peirce, who leads the agency’s Crypto Task Force.

Faure and Brookover argued that NFT marketplaces don’t meet the legal definition of an exchange under US securities laws as they don’t execute transactions, act as intermediaries or bring together multiple sellers for the same asset.

“The Commission’s past enforcement agenda has created uncertainty. We therefore urge the Commission to remove this uncertainty and protect the ability of US technology companies to lead in this space,” Faure and Brookover wrote.

Marketplace, SEC, United States, OpenSea

OpenSea’s legal team has asked the SEC to issue informal guidance on NFT Marketplaces. Source: SEC

“In preparing this guidance, the Crypto Task Force should specifically address the application of exchange regulations to marketplaces for non-fungible assets, similar to the recent staff statements on memecoins and stablecoins,” Faure and Brookover added. 

Under a notice published on April 4, the SEC said stablecoins that meet specific criteria are considered “non-securities” and are exempt from transaction reporting requirements.

Meanwhile, the SEC’s division of corporation finance said in a Feb. 27 staff statement that memecoins are not securities under the federal securities laws but are more akin to collectibles.

NFT marketplaces don’t fit broker definition, says OpenSea

Faure and Brookover argued the Crypto Task Force should also exempt NFT marketplaces like OpenSea from having to register as a broker, arguing they don’t give investment advice, execute transactions, or custody customer assets.

“We ask the SEC to clear the existing industry confusion on this issue by publishing informal guidance. In the longer term, we invite the Commission to exempt NFT marketplaces like OpenSea from proposed broker regulation,” they said.

Related: OpenSea pauses airdrop reward system after user backlash

Under the Trump administration, the SEC has slowly been walking back its hardline stance toward crypto forged under former Chair Gary Gensler.

The regulator has dismissed a number of enforcement actions it previously launched against crypto firms and has dropped probes into crypto companies over alleged securities law violations, including one into OpenSea.

Magazine: Trump-Biden bet led to obsession with ‘idiotic’ NFTs —Batsoupyum, NFT Collector

Continue Reading

Politics

SafeMoon boss cites DOJ’s nixed crypto unit in latest bid to toss suit

Published

on

By

SafeMoon boss cites DOJ’s nixed crypto unit in latest bid to toss suit

SafeMoon boss cites DOJ’s nixed crypto unit in latest bid to toss suit

Braden John Karony, the CEO of crypto firm SafeMoon, has cited the US Department of Justice’s directive to no longer pursue some crypto charges in an effort to get the case against him and his firm dismissed. 

In an April 9 letter to New York federal court judge Eric Komitee, Karony’s attorney, Nicholas Smith, said the court should consider an April 7 memo from US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that disbanded the DOJ’s crypto unit.

“The Department of Justice is not a digital assets regulator,” Blanche said in the memo, which added the DOJ “will no longer pursue litigation or enforcement actions that have the effect of superimposing regulatory frameworks on digital assets.”

Blanche also directed prosecutors not to charge violations of securities and commodities laws when the case would require the DOJ to determine if a digital asset is a security or commodity when charges such as wire fraud are available.

SafeMoon boss cites DOJ’s nixed crypto unit in latest bid to toss suit

An excerpt of the letter Karony sent to Judge Komitee. Source: PACER

In the footnote of the letter, Karony’s counsel wrote an exemption to the DOJ’s new directive would be if the parties have an interest in defending that a crypto asset is a security, but added that “Karony does not have such an interest.”

The Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission filed simultaneous charges of securities violations, wire fraud, and money laundering against Karony and other SafeMoon executives in November 2023.

The government alleged Karony, SafeMoon creator Kyle Nagy and chief technology officer Thomas Smith withdrew assets worth $200 million from the project and misappropriated investor funds. 

Another attempt to nix the case

The letter is Karony’s latest attempt to get the case thrown out. In February, he asked that his trial, scheduled to begin on March 31, be delayed as he argued President Donald Trump’s proposed crypto policies could potentially affect the case.

Related: OKX pleads guilty, pays $505M to settle DOJ charges

Later in February, Smith changed his plea to guilty and said he took part in the alleged $200 million crypto fraud scheme. Nagy is at large and is believed to be in Russia.

SafeMoon filed for bankruptcy in December 2023, a month after it was hit with twin cases from the SEC and DOJ. It was also hacked in March 2023, with the hacker agreeing to return 80% of the funds.

Magazine: 3 reasons Ethereum could turn a corner: Kain Warwick, X Hall of Flame

Continue Reading

Trending