Scout EVs have arrived and are available for pre-order with 500+ mile range, but there’s a catch
The wait is officially over. Volkswagen Group’s revival of the Scout brand has finally unveiled production-intent concept versions of its two flagship EV models. We are in Nashville, Tennessee, where Scout Motors shared details of its first SUV, the Traveler, and its all-electric pickup truck, the Terra. If Scout can hit its targets, these new EVs will also be quite reasonably priced.
Table of contents
A couple of updates post reveal:
- The Scout team would not confirm where the gas engines were going to be sourced from, but said a majority of the components will sourced locally and they will have help from a major investor. That would most likely be Volkswagen Group.
- For the EREV version, Scout is targeting about 150 miles of BEV range, the rest will come from the Harvester range extender.
- I asked if the EREV would cost less, but Scout isn’t sharing pricing at this time. That said, we were told that the EREV will cost less to build. Put two and two together, and customers will probably see savings if they go with the Harvester extender option.
- I asked if the UI is coming from Rivian and the Scout team would not confirm, but said they’d leave it to that joint venture’s team to make an announcement like that. Based on what we’ve heard from Scout so far about the EV, its “modern zonal software architecture” sure sounds a lot like Rivian’s tech.
Scout’s new EVs have been 80 years in the making
As you may or may not know, today’s iteration of the Scout was derived from the beloved nameplate of off-road vehicles built by International Harvester from 1961 to 1980. While only about 530,000 Scout trucks were built during that production run, the all-but-forgotten brand still holds a small but passionate fanbase, many of which were present at the media event outside Nashville today.
Two years ago, Volkswagen Group shared plans to capitalize off that heritage and revive the namesake for the modern EV age while planning to stay true to the rugged, off-road performance its remaining predecessors are still celebrated for. By November of 2023, we learned that Scout had two EV models in development with the help of contract manufacturer Magna International.
Until today, we had only seen broad renderings of the two flagship vehicles, an SUV and a pickup, as physical models were being designed and developed in Novi, Michigan, close to a new Innovation Center being erected nearby.
We know the two flagship models will be built at a new Scout production facility in the US, specifically in South Carolina. We were present at the site’s groundbreaking ceremony this past February. Even then, however, we had no real clues as to what these two new models would look like, other than that they would arrive as true off-road capable EVs.
However, Scout president and CEO Scott Keogh promised we would glimpse the first two Scout EVs this summer. Well, summer has come and gone, but the young EV marque has made good on its promise in the fall, officially debuting the Traveler SUV and Terra pickup in front of a massive crowd today.
Scout unveils two awesome looking new EVs
Over 300 people from the media, brand ambassadors, and original Harvester Scout owners gathered in Franklin, Tennessee, this afternoon where, just moments ago, the young automaker unveiled production intent concept versions of its first two EVs. Keogh spoke:
Two years in the making, the day has finally come to share the next generation of Scout vehicles with the world. The original core idea — rugged, versatile vehicles capable of off-road adventure and family duty — is more relevant than ever. We couldn’t be prouder to revitalize this iconic American brand, create thousands of American jobs, and put American ingenuity back to work.
The first EV model, seen above, is the Traveler SUV. This EV is expected to deliver over 7,000 pounds of towing and a payload capacity of nearly 2,000 pounds. It is also expected to deliver up to 350 miles of all-electric range, but even more, if you add a range extender (more on that in a bit). As you can see from the image above, the Traveler’s rear features a split tailgate for easy access to cargo and “protection from the elements when opened.”
The second Scout EV model to debut today is the Terra pickup truck (seen below). It will offer the same range and payload as the Traveler but is expected to be able to tow up to 10,000 pounds. The Terra will also feature a 5.5-foot pickup bed equipped with two 120V and one 240V power outlets.
Thanks to nearly 1,000 lb-ft of torque, both models will also be able to accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in as quickly as 3.5 seconds.
The Traveler and Terra will be built on a proprietary body-on-frame platform with a solid rear axle designed for off-road performance. The new platform also enables tires up to 35 inches, over one foot of ground clearance, close to three feet of water fording capability, a front sway bar disconnect, front and rear mechanical lockers, and “robust suspension options.”
Both Scout EVs will feature a four-wheel-drive system with an electric drive unit on each axle. The automaker also shared that it expects its fully electric models to be able to climb 100% grades.
As anticipated, all Scout EVs will utilize the North American Charging Standard (NACS), which will power their 800V architecture with rates as high as 350 kW. The EVs will also arrive with bi-directional charging capabilities.
Notice how we mentioned the “all-electric versions” a couple of times? That’s because today, we learned that Scout hopes to stomp any customer woes about range anxiety (especially when towing) by offering a gasoline range extender option.
Scout’s EVs can nab up to 500 miles of range as an EREV
While Scout said it would sell 100% BEV versions of the Traveler and Terra, it will also offer an
extended range electric vehicle (EREV) system upgrade with a gas-powered generator called “Harvester.”
The 350 miles of expected range in the full EV versions is already more than adequate and competitive in the segment, but for those Scout customers who want more peace of mind, they can secure an expected 500+ miles of range with the gas generator add-on.
Other features include modern zonal software architecture that enables over-the-air (OTA) updates and remote diagnostics. Both Scout EVs have ample frunk storage capable of fitting golf clubs, a gym bag, a small cooler, and 120V and USB-C power outlets.
The interior of both new models features a design philosophy described by the Scout team as “simple and bold, tactile, and fit for purpose.” The aesthetic of the instrument panel and its upper brow with a deep undercut is a nod to the original Harvester Scout II.
The Traveler SUV offers additional front storage with a multifunctional console, and both EVs will come with a front-row bench seat option Scout describes as part of its “Connection Machine.”
Lastly, Scout shared plans to offer several personalization opportunities and accessories, including auxiliary lighting, assist steps, power off-boarding solutions, off-road bumpers with recovery points, and a heavy-duty winch.
Scout Traveler and Terra pricing and availability
Even though Scout Motors remains a Volkswagen Group sub-brand, it describes itself as an independent American company and startup and operates as such. As Traveler and Terra EV production approaches, Scout shared plans to establish and nurture a one-to-one relationship with its customers. In this case, that means a direct-to-consumer sales model.
The automaker shared plans for retail spaces called Scout Workshops, where current and prospective customers can take advantage of “a test drive, a handshake, and hands-on service when needed.”
The company also shared that due to their initial design, 80% of Scout EV repairs will be able to be completed outside of a Workshop, whether it’s out in the terrain or in your driveway. So, Scout will establish a direct sales and service network for its customers, some of whom will join the brand’s community today with a Terra or Traveler pre-order.
Speaking of which, you’re probably wondering what these new EVs will cost. Since these remain production-intent concepts, we only have a partial breakdown of the trim options and how they differ. However, Scout did share some initial EV pricing today.
The Traveler SUV will start at a retail MSRP below $60,000, and its entry-level trim could arrive priced as low as $50,000, including “available incentives” – assuming that includes the full $7,500 federal tax credit since these EVs will be built entirely in the US.
The Terra truck is expected to hit the market with a starting retail price under $60k as well, and its entry-level option could be as low as $51,500 with available incentives. We will need to wait a while to learn exactly what those trims entail and what incentives are available at the time, but even at full price, these Scout EVs are relatively affordable compared to their competitors.
Pre-orders for the Scout Traveler and Terra are now open, and you can secure a reservation on the company’s website. However, targeted production of these EVs is not expected to begin in South Carolina until 2027.
Electrek’s take
Overall, Scout Motors did not disappoint today. The Terra and, to a higher degree, the Traveler SUV offer a nod to the brand’s past design elements but with an infusion of modern-day technology and performance.
From a design perspective, these new EVs look very similar to how I had imagined them based on what I had previously heard from the Scout team the past year. Today’s biggest surprise for me was the choice to offer an EREV version.
While I never condone gas engines, especially as so many more BEV models are becoming available at more affordable prices, this move by Scout makes a lot of sense and could truly pay off when it’s time to report initial sales figures.
We say it all the time on this site, but the average driver does not need 350 miles of range in their daily routine, so the BEV versions are already more than adequate if Scout can, in fact, hit those numbers. However, a vast topic of discussion amongst current and prospective BEV truck customers is the range loss during towing – it’s admittedly significant. It has probably deterred a sizable number of consumers from going all-electric in the past three years.
Adding a range extender is an intelligent solution that can give those drivers who actually need to tow a boat or large trailer extended distances more peace of mind. Should someone in the suburbs who mostly commutes to work and the store opt for that gas extender? No, but I can’t stop them.
It’s nice to have the option, and I have to respect Scout for taking the BEV approach first and adding gas for long hauls. These Scout EVs will still get 300+ miles of range before you’d even need the extender, so it will hopefully collect dust most of the time. But it’s nice to have that option, even if, at the very least, it shuts up skeptics or naysayers who say BEV trucks can’t compete with their gas counterparts.
It’s also a much better option than a PHEV, which prioritizes gas range in its system, so you’re only getting 15-40 miles of electric range before it’s just a hybrid. The Scout EVs are full-fledged BEVs first, with the option for gas to get you farther in specific driving scenarios. If you have to include combustion, this is the way to do it.
I also hope Scout can hit these price targets because for the size, range, and capabilities the Terra and Traveler are offering, those starting MSRPs are doable. Add the potential for incentives, and you could be looking at a $50,000 BEV truck that can compete with Rivian and Ford on the spec sheet but at a lower price.
A lot can change between now and 2027, but design-wise, Scout Motors looks to have come out swinging with its first two EVs, and I can’t wait to test them both out for myself.
What do you think? Let us know in the comments below.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Over the last few days, Elon Musk has been making several statements claiming that autonomous driving systems that use lidar and radar sensors are more dangerous than Tesla’s camera-only computer vision approach because the system gets confused when interpreting data from different sensors.
It’s not only false, Musk told me directly that he agreed that radar and vision could be safer than just vision, right after he had Tesla remove the radars from its vehicles.
Tesla has taken a controversial approach, using only cameras as sensors for driving inputs in its self-driving technology. In contrast, most other companies use cameras in conjunction with radar and lidar sensors.
When Tesla first announced that all its cars produced onward have the hardware capable of “full self-driving” up to level 5 autonomous capacity in 2016, it included a front-facing radar in its self-driving hardware suite.
However, in 2021, after not having achieved anything more than a level 2 driver assist (ADAS) system with its self-driving effort, Elon Musk announced a move that he called “Tesla Vision”, which consists of moving Tesla’s self-driving effort only to use inputs from cameras.
Here’s what I wrote in 2021 about Musk sharing his plan for Tesla to only use cameras and neural nets:
CEO Elon Musk has been hyping the vision-only update as “mind-blowing.” He insists that it will lead to a true level 5 autonomous driving system by the end of the year, but he has gotten that timeline wrong before.
By May 2021, Tesla had begun removing the radar sensor from its lineup, starting with the Model 3 and Model Y, and later the Model S and Model X in 2022.
Tesla engineers reportedly attempted to convince Musk to retain the use of radar, but the CEO overruled them.
We are now in 2025, and unlike what Musk claimed, Tesla has yet to deliver on its self-driving promises, but the CEO is doubling down on his vision-only approach.
The controversial billionaire is making headlines this week for a series of new statements attacking Tesla’s self-driving rivals and their use of radar and lidar sensors.
Earlier this week, Musk took a jab at Waymo and claimed that “lidar and radar reduce safety”:
Lidar and radar reduce safety due to sensor contention. If lidars/radars disagree with cameras, which one wins? This sensor ambiguity causes increased, not decreased, risk. That’s why Waymos can’t drive on highways.We turned off radars in Teslas to increase safety. Cameras ftw.
The assertion that “Waymos can’t drive on highways” is simply false. Waymo has been conducting fully driverless employee testing on freeways in Phoenix, San Francisco, and Los Angeles for years, and it is expected to make this technology available to rider-only rides soon.
Tesla is in a similar situation with its Robotaxi: they don’t drive on freeways without an employee supervisor.
Musk later added:
LiDAR also does not work well in snow, rain or dust due to reflection scatter. That’s why Waymos stop working in any heavy precipitation. As I have said many times, there is a role for LiDAR in some circumstances and I personally oversaw the development of LiDAR for the SpaceX Dragon docking with Space Station. I am well aware of its strengths and weaknesses.
It’s not true that Waymos can’t work in “any heavy precipitation.”
Here’s a video of a Waymo vehicle driving by itself in heavy rain:
In comparison, Tesla’s own Robotaxi terms of service mention that it “may be limited or unavailable in inclement weather.”
Last month, Tesla Robotaxi riders had their rides cut short, and they were told it was due to the rain.
There’s plenty of evidence that Musk is wrong and misleading with these statements, but furthermore, he himself admitted that radar sensors can make Tesla’s vision system safer.
‘Vision with high-res radar would be better than pure vision’
In May 2021, as Tesla began removing radar sensors from its vehicle lineup and transitioning to a vision-only approach, I was direct messaging (DMing) Musk to learn more about the surprising move.
In the conversation, he was already making the claim that sensor contention is lowering safety as he did this week in new comments attacking Waymo.
He wrote at the time:
The probability of safety will be higher with pure vision than vision+radar, not lower. Vision has become so good that radar actually reduces signal/noise.
However, what was more interesting is what he said shortly after claiming that:
Musk admitted that “vision with high-resolution radar would be better than pure vision”. However, he claimed that such a radar didn’t exist.
In the same conversation, I pointed Musk to existing high-definition millimeter wave radars, but he didn’t respond.
It was still early for that technology in 2021, but high-definition millimeter wave radars are now commonly used by companies developing autonomous driving technologies, including Waymo.
Waymo uses six high-definition radars in its system:
In short, Musk was already concerned about sensor contention in 2021, but he admitted that the problem would be worth solving with higher-definition radars, which already existed then and are becoming more common now.
Yet, he criticizes companies using radar and lidar, which work similarly to high-resolution radars but on different wavelengths, for even attempting sensor fusion.
It’s not impossible because Tesla can’t do it
Part of the problem here appears to be that Musk thinks something doesn’t work because Tesla can’t make it work, and he doesn’t want to admit that others are solving the sensor fusion problem.
Tesla simply couldn’t solve sensor fusion, so it focused on achieving autonomy solely through camera vision. However, those who continued to work on the issue have made significant progress and are now reaping the rewards.
Waymo and Baidu, both of which have level 4 autonomous driving systems currently commercially operating without supervision, unlike Tesla, have heavily invested in sensor fusion.
Amir Husain, an AI entrepreneur who sits on the Boards of Advisors for IBM Watson and the Department of Computer Science at UT Austin, points to advancements in the use of Kalman filters and Bayesian techniques to solve sensor noise covariance.
He commented on Musk’s statement regarding the use of radar and lidar sensors:
The issue isn’t a binary disagreement between two sensors. It generates a better estimate than any individual sensor can produce on its own. They all have a margin of error. Fusion helps reduce this.
If Musk’s argument held, why would the human brain use eyes, ears, and touch to estimate object location? Why would aircraft combine radar, IRST, and other passive sensors to estimate object location? This is a fundamental misunderstanding of information theory. Every channel has noise. But redundancy reduces uncertainty.
Musk’s main argument to focus on cameras and neural nets has been that the roads are designed for humans to drive and humans drive using their eyes and brain, which are the hardware and software equivalent of cameras (eyes) and neural nets (brain).
Now, most other companies developing autonomous driving technologies are also focusing on this, but to surpass humans and achieve greater levels of safety through precision and redundancy, they are also adding radar and lidar sensors to their systems.
Electrek’s Take
Musk painted Tesla into a corner with its vision-only approach, and now he is trying to mislead people into thinking that it is the only one that can work, when there’s no substantial evidence to support this claim.
Now, let me be clear, Musk is partly correct. When poorly fused, multi-sensor data introduces noise, making it more challenging to operate an autonomous driving system.
However, who said that this is an unsolvable problem? Others appear to be solving it, and we are seeing the results in Waymo’s and Baidu’s commercially available rider-only taxi services.
If you can take advantage of radar’s ability to detect distance and speed as well as work through rain, fog, dust, and snow, why wouldn’t you use it?
As he admitted in the DMs with me in 2021, Musk is aware of this – hence why he acknowledged that high-resolution radar combined with vision would be safer than vision alone.
The problem is that Tesla hasn’t focused on improving sensor fusion and radar integration in the last 4 years because it has been all-in on vision.
Now, Tesla could potentially still solve self-driving with its vision system, but there’s no evidence that it is close to happening or any safer than other systems, such as Waymo’s, which use radar and lidar sensors.
In fact, Tesla is still only operating an autonomous driving system under the supervision of in-car employees with a few dozen cars, while Waymo has been doing rider-only rides for years and operates over 1,500 autonomous vehicles in the US.
Just like with his “Robotaxi” with supervisors, Musk is trying to create the illusion that Tesla is not only leading in autonomy, but it is the only one that can solve it.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Trump’s Interior Department halted construction on 704 megawatt (MW) Revolution Wind, the US’s first multi-state offshore wind project that’s already 80% complete. Grid operator ISO New England says the decision is a threat to the grid.
ISO New England released a statement responding to the stop-work order, warning that “delaying the project will increase risks to reliability.”:
As demand for electricity grows, New England must maintain and add to its energy infrastructure. Unpredictable risks and threats to resources – regardless of technology – that have made significant capital investments, secured necessary permits, and are close to completion will stifle future investments, increase costs to consumers, and undermine the power grid’s reliability and the region’s economy now and in the future.
Revolution Wind, a joint development between Ørsted and BlackRock’s Global Infrastructure Partners, is a 65-turbine project capable of powering around 350,000 homes in Rhode Island and Connecticut once it’s complete. It was expected to come online next year. The project has created more than 1,200 jobs.
On August 22, the director of Bureau of Ocean Energy Management sent a vague letter to Ørsted commanding it to halt all activities on the fully permitted Revolution Wind, citing “national security interests,” yet providing no details.
BOEM’s Record of Decision for Revolution Wind, reported in 2023 in Section 4.6, page 185, states that the national security effects of the project would be “negligible and avoidable.”
This latest move echoes Trump’s cancellation in April of New York’s $5 billion Empire Wind 1 project, which was already under construction off New York’s coast. No viable reasons were given for that stop-work order either, and the cancellation was reversed in May.
Kit Kennedy, managing director for power at Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), released the following statement in response to the Revolution Wind order:
The Trump administration’s war on the electricity needed to power the grid continues on all fronts. Halting Revolution Wind is a devastating attack on workers, on electricity customers, and on the investment climate in the US.
New England homeowners will feel this when they tear open their electricity bills and look at the surging costs of keeping the lights on.
This administration has it exactly backwards. It’s trying to prop up clunky, polluting coal plants while doing all it can to halt the fastest growing energy sources of the future – solar and wind power.
It makes no sense to say we have an energy emergency and then make decisions like this. Unfortunately, every American is paying the price for these misguided actions.
Read more: Trump reversal revives Empire Wind, NY’s offshore energy giant
The 30% federal solar tax credit is ending this year. If you’ve ever considered going solar, now’s the time to act. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Tesla is teasing a new product release on Friday, August 29th, coming to Europe and the Middle East. It’s likely going to be the Model Y Performance.
On X today, Tesla has teased an upcoming product release coming this friday.
The post is cryptic. It only mentions ‘spoiler alert’ and the date August 29 with what looks like a close up of a vehicle with what appears to be a spoil – hence the “spoiler alert” reference:
There are main suspect is the Model Y Performance due to the spoiler reference.
Since the Model Y refresh in January, Tesla stopped selling the Model Y Performance. It is due to launch the top performance version under the new design.
When Tesla released the Model 3 refresh in 2024, it took about 4 months for Tesla to launch the new performance version.
Electrek’s Take
The only thing that I find strange with this likely being the Model Y Performance is the fact that they tweeted this from the Europe and Middle East account.
It would be strange for the Model Y Performance to launch there first, but who knows. Maybe Tesla started production at Gigafactory Berlin first.
I don’t think this will have a major impact on Tesla’s business. The Model Y Performance is the least popular version of the best-selling Model Y.
We don’t have the full mix of sales, but I wouldn’t be suprised if it represents less than 10% of Tesla’s Model Y deliveries.
The Model 3 Performance is probably a more popular option within the Model 3 lineup as it is a lot more fun to drive.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment11 months agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024