Connect with us

Published

on

New York Yankees vs. Los Angeles Dodgers. East Coast vs. West Coast. Aaron Judge and Juan Soto vs. Shohei Ohtani and Mookie Betts.

Yeah, this World Series is going to be big — and we’re here to get you ready for all of the action.

With the first pitch of Game 1 scheduled for 8:08 p.m. ET at Dodger Stadium, we dive into the players and matchups that matter most for both teams. We also asked our ESPN MLB experts to make their picks for who will win the Series, how many games it will take and who will be the MVP of this Fall Classic.

Jump to: Dodgers | Yankees | Our predictions

Los Angeles Dodgers

Chance of winning: 52.2% | ESPN BET odds: -125

What’s on the line for the Dodgers: A much-needed exclamation point on L.A.’s incredible run of 12 consecutive playoff appearances (including 11 division titles), with five 100-win seasons since 2017. The only World Series title in this stretch came in 2020 and — fair or not — it’s a bit diminished because it came during the pandemic with limited attendance for the NLCS and Fall Classic played at Globe Life Field in Texas (along with expanded rosters, which helped a pitching-heavy Dodgers team go heavy on its bullpen). The Dodgers were the best team that season, but a championship in 2024 would be different.

Then, of course, there’s all the money the Dodgers spent this offseason to sign Shohei Ohtani and Yoshinobu Yamamoto and trade for/extend Tyler Glasnow. Over $1 billion in salary commitments. With that money, it’s World Series or bust, and while the Dodgers expect to remain competitive, some of their key players such as Freddie Freeman, Mookie Betts and Max Muncy (not to mention Clayton Kershaw) are on the other side of 30. You never know how long they can keep this level of dominance going.

And one more thing: Dave Roberts has the highest winning percentage of any manager in MLB history. With a second World Series title (and a few more years of managing), his Hall of Fame résumé would look pretty good. — David Schoenfield

Three reasons L.A. can win:

1. The depth of the lineup. Max Muncy set a postseason record by reaching base in 12 consecutive plate appearances during the NLCS, and Shohei Ohtani set a Dodgers postseason record by reaching 17 times in the same series. And yet neither was really in consideration for series MVP. That honor, without much pushback, went to Tommy Edman, who hits at the bottom of the lineup when the Dodgers are fully clicking. Given that Mookie Betts has clearly put his bewildering, 0-for-22 postseason slump behind him, Freddie Freeman has had close to a week to rest his sprained right ankle, Teoscar Hernandez and Will Smith showed signs of getting right again in NLCS Game 6, and that Kiké Hernández clearly has a propensity for thriving in October, the Dodgers’ lineup could be at full tilt for this World Series. So, sure, the Yankees can pitch around Ohtani. But there are many concerns behind him

2. The strength of the bullpen. Given the rest days that allowed the Dodgers to line up their three starting pitchers, L.A. might only have to stage one bullpen game in this series. It’s a clear strength, though, NLCS Game 2 notwithstanding. The Dodgers have six high-leverage relievers to deploy in those instances, a list that includes Ryan Brasier, Anthony Banda, Daniel Hudson, Evan Phillips, Michael Kopech and Blake Treinen. If Alex Vesia can return from an intercostal injury, that’s seven. If Brusdar Graterol can bounce back from shoulder inflammation, that’s eight. The Dodgers used a bullpen game to keep their season alive in the NLDS and to clinch a pennant in the following round. Don’t be surprised if they ride the bullpen to a championship.

3. The experience on the roster. The Dodgers could deploy as many as 10 players who were on the World Series roster when they overcame baseball in a bubble to win it all in 2020. Most of the others have been with them through the following three Octobers, which ended in disappointment. The stakes of this stage are not foreign to them. Quite the contrary, actually. Their biggest challenge might have been the five-day layoff that comes with a first-round bye. They finally conquered it this year — and they have the moxie to capture four more wins in what will be the most hyped World Series in recent memory. — Alden Gonzalez

Where the Dodgers are vulnerable: The lack of plentiful left-handed pitching out of the bullpen could be a problem area for L.A. Anthony Banda was the lone lefty reliever on the roster last round against the Mets. If Alex Vesia is healthy (he left Game 5 in the NLDS with an intercostal injury) it could help shore up a potential weakness.

Depending on Vesia’s health, Roberts runs the risk of having to use righties or overusing Banda against a lineup featuring the left-handed hitting Juan Soto, Anthony Rizzo and Alex Verdugo. Even if Banda and/or Vesia are effective against Soto, they will still have to stay in the game to face Aaron Judge and Giancarlo Stanton because of the three-batter minimum rule. That’s a step up from Mets sluggers Pete Alonso and Mark Vientos, and how Dodgers relievers fare in those key matchups could determine the series. — Jesse Rogers

How Dodgers can pitch Soto and Judge: First, let out a long sigh.

Soto does his damage up in the strike zone — and just above it (Hunter Gaddis is nodding). He also does almost all of his chasing out of the zone up there, but it is best to not tempt fate too many times near his nitro zone.

Here’s the best opportunity: Soto’s worst zones for any contact or slugging metrics are the low/in and low/out corners. Now, he doesn’t really chase out of the zone, so you have to throw a strike and hit your spot, probably best to do so with a slider. He will chase a bit below the zone with changeups, so cross your fingers with a fastball above the zone that maybe he fouls off, then when you’re ahead, throw a low slider in the zone or changeup just below the zone and you might have a fighting chance.

Do not throw Judge a middle-in fastball under any circumstances! You have a shot if you nibble around the zone, but even missing inside is a bad idea, so try to stay away and above and below the zone. I would advise to throw almost entirely sliders (especially hard, true sliders that look like fastballs out of the hand) down and away, which is by far his worst pitch and location. The other look you show to get him from leaning out over the plate for a slider is where you might get in trouble. Remember what I said about middle-in fastballs? Don’t do it! — Kiley McDaniel

Jeff Passan’s inside intel:

• Even if you exclude Game 5 of the NLCS, when Los Angeles didn’t manage to strike out a single New York Mets hitter, the Dodgers still have one of the worst strikeout rates this postseason. And as good as the Mets were that game, the Yankees are even more disciplined at the plate. They have a playoff-low 23.2% chase rate on pitches outside the strike zone. “If the Dodgers can strike the Yankees out,” one evaluator who watched Los Angeles all postseason said, “they’re going to be in good shape. I just don’t know that they will.” The flip side for the Dodgers: their hitters have the second-lowest chase rate in the playoffs at 25%

• Watch out, Carlos Rodon, Tim Hill and Nestor Cortes. The Dodgers have feasted on left-handed pitching this postseason, getting on base more than 40% of the time with their righty-stacked lineup. Against lefties, they are hitting 80 points higher. While 15 of Los Angeles’ 20 playoff home runs have come against right-handers, “I like their right-heavy lineup better,” a scout said. “Their left-handed hitters (who play against lefties, Max Muncy and Freddie Freeman) have good eyes and will work ABs. And their righties kill pitchers from the left.”‘

• Speaking of left-handed pitching: The only left-hander certain to be on the Dodgers’ roster is Anthony Banda, who entered this postseason with zero playoff experience. While he has been good in limited time, Banda could be alone in the bullpen after lefty Alex Vesia was left off the NLCS roster with a strained muscle in his ribs. The Yankees’ reliance on left-handedness — Juan Soto, Anthony Rizzo, Jazz Chisholm Jr., Austin Wells and Alex Verdugo all are regulars — might be problematic against other teams. Instead, another scout said, “their reverse-split guys (Luke Weaver and Tommy Kahnle) need to do the heavy lifting.”

New York Yankees

Chance of winning: 47.8% | ESPN BET odds: +105

What’s on the line for the Yankees: The obvious stakes are that the Yankees are trying to end a 15-year title drought now that they’ve quenched their pennant thirst. With 27 titles all-time, New York’s lead on the cosmic standings board is secure for eons to come but it has been a while. The last time New York won it all, Mariano Rivera and Derek Jeter were still active and Juan Soto had just celebrated his 11th birthday. More than the unrequited longings of Bronx fans is the reality that this might be the Yankees’ best chance for some time to come. Sure, the Yankees are always contenders to win it all but his Soto-Aaron Judge pairing is a rare thing and if Soto signs elsewhere, it’s also fleeting. When you think of all-time Yankee power duos, the specter of Lou Gehrig bolting for, say, the on-the-other-side-of-the-river Giants was not something the Babe Ruth era Yankees ever had to confront. Soto may stay of course but just in case, this is as good a time as any for the Bombers to take World Series No. 28. — Bradford Doolittle

Three reasons New York can win:

1. The starting rotation. Bullpen games are fashionable, but the surest way to win in October is with great starting pitching. And the Yankees have the advantage in that department. The Yankees have four legitimate starters to cover the seven-game series. Gerrit Cole is the best starting pitcher between the two clubs. Carlos Rodón, Clarke Schmidt, and Luis Gil are all capable of quality starts behind him. Cole has logged seven innings once in this postseason. Rodón went six in the ALCS. Starts like those alleviate the pressure on the bullpen, which increasingly matters as the series goes along. The Dodgers, meanwhile, have three starters before Game 4 will be a bullpen game for them. The formula has worked thus far but allows for less margin for error. Expose relievers enough and they’ll get hit. Just ask Emmanuel Clase and Cade Smith

2. The stress the top of the lineup applies on pitchers. Getting through the version of Gleyber Torres we’ve seen this month followed by Juan Soto, Aaron Judge and October Giancarlo Stanton atop the lineup is a gauntlet. Torres has a .400 OBP and has reached base in the first inning in eight of nine postseason games. Soto, a proven postseason performer, is 11-for-33 with three home runs, seven walks, seven strikeouts and a 1.106 OPS. Stanton has thrived in October again, swatting five home runs with five walks and a 1.179 OPS. Judge, the presumptive AL MVP, is just 5-for-31, but he’s worked seven walks and hit two home runs. They grind pitchers down.

3. Judge is due. The Yankees have made it this far without MVP Judge. Remember the regular season? When Judge posted perhaps the greatest season ever by a right-handed hitter? When he led the majors in home runs, RBIs, on-base percentage, slugging percentage, wRC+ and every version of WAR under the sun? That Judge has not emerged in the postseason, and the Yankees have gone 7-2 anyway. An MVP-level Judge emergence would change the series. — Jorge Castillo

Where the Yankees are vulnerable: The Yankees’ bullpen performance has been a revelation, given the context of mid-September, when Manager Aaron Boone talked about the need to be “creative.” What that entailed, in the end, was the shift of Luke Weaver into the closer role, in place of Clay Holmes, and the bullpen has performed spectacularly in the first two rounds of the postseason. But this Dodgers’ lineup is a whole different level of tough, and so Holmes and Tommy Kahnle and Tim Hill and the others will have to respond in big moments in this series. The Yankees need their starters to cover a majority of innings in this series, because the more that New York’s bullpen is exposed, the more likely it is that the Dodgers will get to them. L.A.’s bullpen is deeper. – Buster Olney

How Yankees can pitch Ohtani and Betts: I’m looking at heat maps of Ohtani’s tendencies, like how his nitro zone is almost the entire strike zone, and I can’t help but hear “Welcome to the Jungle” and Ohtani chuckling at me trying to find a weakness. I’m having trouble finding a type of pitch that he doesn’t have a 1.000 OPS against. He has excellent lateral plate coverage, so he’ll tend to spoil pitches just inside/outside — but he will whiff on stuff just above/below the zone. He has the least success with hard stuff that looks like four-seam fastballs out of the hand, like cutters, sliders, and sinkers. I think working down with firm stuff and mixing in a pitch or two above the zone to change his eyeline will give you a shot, maybe after getting ahead from him fouling off a cutter/slider on his hands. — Kiley McDaniel

Pitching to Betts is a walk in the park after breaking down Judge, Soto, and Ohtani. Betts’ weakest location is away, along with some struggles just above the zone. He excels down and in and even off the plate down and in. It might start sounding repetitive, but a four-seamer or two above the zone to mix things up is smart to deploy at the right time, with the pitch you’re trying to get to most often being a breaking ball down and/or away. He won’t swing and miss much, so it’ll be hard to strike him out, but his nitro zone is the inner half, while the outer half is less scary and off the plate away is where you’re trying to land those sliders. — Kiley McDaniel

Jeff Passan’s inside intel:

• The Yankees have no problem getting runners on base. Sometimes they just have trouble keeping them there and advancing them. If there is a clear advantage in this series, it’s the Dodgers’ on the basepaths. Not only do the Yankees make too many boneheaded mistakes, they were thrown out a disproportionate number of times on the basepaths and took extra bases (going first to third on a single, first to home on a double and second to home on a single) at the lowest rate in MLB, just 36% of the time. The Dodgers, meanwhile, were the best in baseball (49%) “They’re going to make dumb outs at inopportune times,” one scout said. “They’re just consistently not good at running.”

• Everything is pointing toward Nestor Cortes returning from a flexor strain in his left forearm, and because he hasn’t pitched since Sept. 18 and isn’t built up, the strong likelihood is him slotting into a relief or opener role. New York could be inclined to use him early in the series to see whether his stuff is playing — and if he can be an effective left-on-left counter to a pocket of the lineup that includes Shohei Ohtani and Freddie Freeman. “It’s risky spending a roster spot on a guy you don’t know you can rely on,” an executive involved in postseason roster construction said. “If he’s not good, you can just take him off the roster, but if he costs you a game, you’re already regretting the choice.”

• One thing the Yankees will be happy not to see against the Dodgers: changeups. No Dodgers pitcher regularly throws a change. Yoshinobu Yamamoto’s splitter and Brent Honeywell’s screwball function the same, but considering the Yankees’ OPS against changeups this season was 18th in MLB, Los Angeles — especially its bullpen, in which Evan Phillips, Michael Kopech and Blake Treinen do not offer a change – is doing the Yankees a favor. “It’s something to exploit,” a scout said. “And the Dodgers just don’t have guys who can do that.”

Our predictions

New York Yankees (7 votes)

Los Angeles Dodgers (7 votes)

How many games?

• Yankees in 7 (5 votes)
• Dodgers in 7 (4 votes)
• Dodgers in 6 (3 votes)
• Yankees in 6 (2 votes)

MVP: Juan Soto (4 votes), Aaron Judge (3 votes), Mookie Betts (3 votes), Shohei Ohtani (2 votes), Teoscar Hernandez (1 vote), Max Muncy (1 vote)

Our voting was split, why did you pick the Yankees?

The baseline percentages I use to run the simulations that generate the probabilities you read here are virtually dead even between the Yankees and Dodgers. In other words, this is a coin flip of a matchup with the Dodgers getting an extra home game which, based on what we’ve seen the last couple of years, may or may not be an advantage. My pick of the Yankees, given the hours upon hours I spent working with numbers and trying to appraise every team at each stage of the season, is based on little more than a hunch. Sorry, statheads.

Things I like about the Yankees:

• The Yankees are battle-tested after surviving a gauntlet of young, fast-rising AL Central contenders.

• I like that the Yankees have a more coherent pitching setup entering the series, one sharpened by the long layoff since the ALCS. Yes, you can say that helps the Dodgers and their bullpenning ways even more, but I still think there are diminishing returns in trying to ride that to the end, at least for that team.

• I also think the layoff will give Aaron Judge a chance to get his head together and he is overdue for a heater.

• More than anything: If there is one player I think could dominate this matchup from beginning to end, it’s Juan Soto, who, for now at least, resides in the Yankees dugout. — Doolittle

And why do you think the Dodgers will win it all?

Rigorous statistical studies have shown that it would take a best-of-75 series to determine the best team in a matchup of two essentially equal teams, which is what we have here, but given that we can’t really keep playing baseball until mid-January, we’re stuck with a best-of-7.

Here’s why I’m picking the Dodgers:

• I believe more in Shohei Ohtani right now than Aaron Judge.

• The Yankees haven’t been tested in the postseason — the Royals and Guardians, simply put, were average-at-best offensive teams. The Cleveland bullpen was also running on fumes.

• Sure, the Dodgers have issues with the starting rotation, but they’ve already proven they can overcome that with their bullpen depth.

• I don’t trust the Yankees bullpen. Tim Hill? Jake Cousins? Even Luke Weaver, as good as he’s been, was touched up for a couple home runs in the ALCS.

• Giancarlo Stanton can — and will — be pitched to. (though I’m not sure the same can be said for Juan Soto)

• Mookie Betts is back: .342/.419/.763, 4 HR, 12 RBIs over his past nine games. (though I do worry about Freddie Freeman’s ankle)

• Ohtani will deliver in Game 7. — Schoenfield

Continue Reading

Sports

What are FBS college football conference tiebreaker rules?

Published

on

By

What are FBS college football conference tiebreaker rules?

In the new 12-team College Football Playoff format, there is an added emphasis on conference championships. The four highest-ranked conference champions receive a first-round bye and a fifth conference champion is guaranteed a spot in the field. Those champions will be determined by conference title games held Dec. 6-7.

But in a college football landscape that has mostly done away with divisions and with some conferences expanding to as many as 18 teams, it can be difficult to figure out who is in line to reach those conference title games.

We’re here to help out. Below are the list of tiebreakers for each league to help determine conference championship game participants.

Atlantic Coast Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams)

4. Combined win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by the ACC commissioner

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams.

1. Combined head-to-head win percentage among the tied teams (if all tied teams are common opponents)

2. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

2a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, and no tied team defeated each of the other tied teams, but a tied team lost to each of the other tied teams, that team is eliminated

3. Win percentage against common opponents

4. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings

5. Combined win percentage of conference opponents

6. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

7. Draw administered by the ACC commissioner

Big 12 Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against the next-highest common opponent in the conference standings; in case of tied teams in standings, use each team’s win percentage against all of those teams

4. Combined win percentage in conference games of conference opponents (strength of conference schedule)

5. Total wins over the 12-game season (only one win against teams from FCS or lower division will be counted)

6. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

7. Coin toss

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams. When reduced to two tied teams, the two-team tiebreakers will be used.

1. Combined head-to-head among tied teams (if all tied teams are common opponents)

1a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

1b. If all tied teams are not common opponents, and no tied team defeated each of the other tied teams, but a tied team lost to each of the other tied teams, that team is eliminated

2. Win percentage against all common opponents

3. Record against next-highest common opponent in conference standings; in case of tied teams in standings, use each team’s win percentage against all of those teams

4. Combined win percentage in conference games of conference opponents (strength of conference schedule)

5. Total wins over the 12-game season (only one win against teams from FCS or lower division will be counted)

6. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

7. Coin toss

Big Ten Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by the Big Ten commissioner

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams. When reduced to two tied teams, the two-team tiebreakers will be used.

1. Combined head-to-head among tied teams

1a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

2. Win percentage against all common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by the Team Rating Score metric (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by the Big Ten commissioner

Southeastern Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams: if a two-team tiebreaker will not break a tie, combined records against tied common opponents will be used)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher relative total scoring margin against all conference opponents (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Random draw

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams.

1. Combined head-to-head among tied teams (if all tied teams are common opponents)

1a. If all tied teams are not common opponents, if any tied team defeated each of the other tied teams

1b. If all tied teams are not common opponents, and no tied team defeated each of the other tied teams, but a tied team lost to each of the other tied teams, that team is eliminated

2. Record against all common conference opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents from top-to-bottom of the conference standings (breaking ties among tied teams; if a two-team tiebreaker will not break a tie, combined records against tied common opponents will be used)

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher relative total scoring margin against all conference opponents (from SportSource Analytics)

6. Random draw

American Athletic Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. If one team is ranked in the latest CFP rankings (and didn’t lose in the final weekend of the regular season)

2a. If one team is ranked in the latest CFP rankings and lost in the final weekend of the regular season, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

2b. If both teams are ranked, the higher-ranked team that didn’t lose in the final weekend of the regular season (if both lose, a composite average of metrics)

2c. If neither team is ranked in the latest CFP rankings, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

3. Win percentage against common conference opponents

4. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) excluding exempt games

5. Coin toss

Three-plus team tie: In case of a tie for both conference championship spots, once the tiebreaker identifies one championship game representative, it will start over with the remaining tied teams.

1. Combined head-to-head (if all teams played each other)

1a. If one tied team defeated all other tied teams

2. If the highest-ranked team in the latest CFP rankings that didn’t lose in the final weekend of the regular season

2a. If the highest-ranked team loses in final weekend of regular season, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

2b. If multiple ranked teams in the CFP rankings, the highest ranked team(s) that wins in the final weekend of the regular season

2c. If all ranked teams lose on the final weekend, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

2d. If no teams are ranked in the final CFP rankings, a composite average of selected metrics will be used

3. Win percentage against common conference opponents

4. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) excluding exempt games

5. Coin toss

Conference USA

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie and three-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Highest CFP rankings going into the final weekend (if team wins in the final weekend)

3. Highest average ranking of four computer rankings (Connelly SP+, SportSource, ESPN SOR, KPI Rankings)

4. Highest average ranking of two computer rankings (SportSource, KPI Rankings)

5. Highest most recently published multiyear football Academic Progress Rate (if same, most recent year)

6. Draw administered by commissioner’s designee

Mid-American Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Win percentage against common opponents

3. Win percentage against common opponents based on MAC finish (breaking ties) from top-to-bottom of conference

4. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

5. Higher ranking by Team Rating Score metric (SportSource Analytics)

6. Draw administered by MAC commissioner

Three-team tie:

1. Combined head-to-head (if all teams played each other)

2. If one tied team defeated all other tied teams

3. Win percentage against all common opponents

4. Win percentage against all common opponents based on finish (with ties broken)

5. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents

6. Higher ranking by Team Rating Score metric (SportSource Analytics)

7. Draw administered by MAC commissioner

Mountain West Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie:

1. Head-to-head

2. Highest CFP ranking (if team wins in the final weekend)

2a. If only or both CFP ranked teams loses in the final weekend (or if there is no ranked teams), an average of metrics will be used

3. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference)

4. Record against the next-highest team in the conference standings (tied teams will be lumped together if tied teams played all those teams)

5. Win percentage against common conference opponents

6. Coin toss conducted virtually by the commissioner

Three-plus team tie:

1. Combined head-to-head (if all teams played each other)

2. If one tied team defeated all other tied teams

3. Highest CFP ranking among teams to win in the final weekend

4. Average of selected metrics (if ranked team loses or if no teams ranked)

5. Overall win percentage against all opponents (conference and nonconference); maximum one win against FCS or lower-division team

6. Record against the next-highest team in the conference standings (tied teams will be lumped together if tied teams played all those teams)

7. Win percentage against common conference opponents

8. Drawing conducted virtually by the commissioner

Sun Belt Conference

Conference’s tiebreaker policy

Two-team tie

1. Head-to-head

2. Overall win percentage

3. Win percentage against the next-highest team in the division standings (lumping together tied teams)

4. Win percentage against all common nondivisional conference opponents

5. Higher-ranked teams in the CFP rankings (if it wins in the final regular season week); if the highest-ranked team loses, an average of selected computer rankings (Anderson & Hester, Massey, Colley and Wolfe)

6. If no team is ranked in the CFP rankings, an average of selected computer rankings (Anderson & Hester, Massey, Colley and Wolfe)

7. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) against FBS teams

8. Coin toss

Three-plus team tie: (Teams will not revert to two-team tiebreaker once three-plus team tiebreaker is trimmed to two.)

1. Combined head-to-head

2. Divisional win percentage

3. Win percentage against the next-highest team in the division standings (lumping together tied teams)

4. Highest-ranked team in the CFP rankings (if they win in the final weekend of regular season); if that team loses, an average of selected computer rankings

5. If no team is ranked in the CFP rankings, an average of selected computer rankings (Anderson & Hester, Massey, Colley and Wolfe)

6. Overall win percentage (conference and nonconference) against FBS teams

7. Draw lots (conducted by commissioner)

Check out the ESPN college football hub page for the latest news, analysis, schedules, rankings and more.

Continue Reading

Sports

Soto will take time in free agency, Boras says

Published

on

By

Soto will take time in free agency, Boras says

SAN ANTONIO — Juan Soto will take his time surveying the free agent market before signing with a team, according to his agent Scott Boras.

Speaking at the general manager’s meetings Wednesday, Boras indicated that Soto desires a “thorough” vetting before making a decision.

“Due to the volume of interest and Juan’s desire to hear [from teams], I can’t put a timeframe on it, but it’s going to be a very thorough process for him,” Boras said. “He wants to meet people personally. He wants to talk with them. He wants to hear from them.”

That includes ownership, even for the New York Yankees, for whom he played in 2024 and hit 41 home runs with a league-leading 128 runs scored. Soto helped New York to a World Series appearance, but that doesn’t necessarily give the Yankees a leg up on the competition to sign him.

“He wants ownership that’s going to support that they are going win annually,” Boras said. “Owners want to meet with Juan and sit down and talk with him about what they’re going to provide for their franchise short term and long term.”

Soto’s overall deal is likely to be at least the second largest in MLB history behind Shohei Ohtani‘s 10-year, $700 million contract with the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Boras refused to compare the two players, but stressed Soto’s age (26) as a distinctive factor in teams’ pursuit of his client. Ohtani was 29 when he hit free agency.

“I don’t think Ohtani has much to do with Juan Soto at all,” Boras said. “It’s not something we discuss or consider. … He’s in an age category that separates him.”

Both New York teams have spoken to Boras already, though there are a handful of other big-market franchises that could be in play for his services, including the San Francisco Giants and Toronto Blue Jays.

Boras was asked how the competitive balance tax on payrolls could impact Soto’s free agency.

“I don’t think tax considerations are the focal point when you’re talking about a business opportunity where you can make literally billions of dollars by acquiring somebody like this,” Boras said.

Boras and Soto are only at the beginning stages of what could be a drawn-out process. One thing going for the player, in Boras’ estimation, is that Soto is “pretty well known” considering he has already been on three teams and played in 43 playoff games, including twice in the World Series.

In his agent’s eyes, every winning team should be interested.

“They’re [team executives] called upon to be championship magicians,” Boras said. “Behind every great magician is the magic Juan.”

Continue Reading

Sports

Sources: Angels add ex-Cubs RHP Hendricks

Published

on

By

Sources: Angels add ex-Cubs RHP Hendricks

SAN ANTONIO — Free agent pitcher Kyle Hendricks has agreed to a one year, $2.5 million contract with the Los Angeles Angels, sources familiar with the situation told ESPN.

Hendricks, 34, posted a 5.92 ERA for the Chicago Cubs last season but was better in the second half after a stint in the bullpen. His ERA was 4.41 from mid-July to the end of the regular season. He threw 7⅓ shutout innings in his last start as a Cub in late September after spending the first 11 years of his career with Chicago.

The Angels are hoping Hendricks finds more consistency in 2025, similar to what he displayed at times late in 2024. They also have a young pitching staff that needs mentoring. Hendricks can help in that department as well.

Hendricks won the ERA title in 2016, helping the Cubs to a World Series title. He was the last member of that team still playing for the Cubs until he became a free agent after the 2024 season. Overall, he’s 97-81 with a 3.68 ERA.

Hendricks is from the Los Angeles area, having gone to Capistrano Valley High School in Mission Viejo, California. He was originally drafted by the Angels in the 39th round in 2008 before attending Dartmouth. Additionally, his dad worked in the Angels’ ticket office for six years when Hendricks was a teenager.

Continue Reading

Trending