Connect with us

Published

on

Many airlines urge customers to pay for specific seats in advance or run the risk of being split up – but is this really necessary?

We’ve taken a look…

Pick your airline carefully – and book seats at same time

It’s not a general rule that you’ll be split from your travel companions if you don’t pay to reserve the seats you want.

A 2023 study by Which? Travel found that families paying in excess of £100 to sit together are probably wasting their money, with most major airlines likely to sit you with the people you booked with automatically even if you don’t cough up for seat selection.

That means if all your tickets are in one reservation, with most operators there’s a decent chance you’ll be okay – as long as you get checked in early.

It also depends on the airline, with budget firms Ryanair and Wizz Air the most likely to split you up (more on Ryanair’s seat booking policy later).

It’s worth saying that there’s no legal right to sit next to your loved ones on a flight – not even your children – so not paying does carry a risk.

Getting seats together with children

According to the Civil Aviation Authority, airlines should aim to seat children close to their parents or guardians.

Its guidance – which aren’t hard and fast rules – says young children and infants accompanied by adults should ideally be seated in the same seat row, or an adjacent row if this isn’t possible.

Of the major UK airlines, British Airways and Tui both guarantee that children under 12 will be sat with at least one adult from their booking, even if they don’t pay or forget to check in early.

Jet 2 says it will “always endeavour to seat children and infants under the age of 12 next to their accompanying adults”, but if this is not possible they’ll be seated no more than one row away.

EasyJet similarly says its system will always try and seat families together, but if this isn’t possible, it will make sure children under 12 are seated “close” to an adult on the booking.

Wizz Air says an adult and child aged up to 14 will automatically be assigned seats next to each other during the check in process.

Ryanair, however, has different rules – we’ve taken a look at these below…

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Ryanair, like many airlines, offers the option of paying to reserve a seat or being allocated one at check-in.

But its system is well-known for splitting up groups rather than automatically putting them together, meaning it’s near-impossible to be seated with your travel companions without paying.

The Ryanair website warns passengers who don’t pay that it’s “unlikely” passengers with free seats will be with the rest of their group.

If you’re travelling with a child on a Ryanair flight, it’s compulsory for at least one adult to pay for a seat reservation. Seats can then be reserved for up to four children per adult. Other adults in the booking can take a free seat – but as we’ve explained above, they’ll likely be split from the rest of their family.

Disabled or elderly passengers get extra support

Those with reduced mobility, disabilities, difficulties with communication or the elderly should have the right to special assistance when travelling.

However, you will have to contact the airline before you fly.

Some airlines offer free seat selection

While many airlines have opted to introduce charges for the luxury of a reserved seat, it’s not the case for all.

Some carriers offering longer-haul journeys let you select your seat for free as soon as you book.

Pic: iStock
Image:
Pic: iStock

Qatar Airways (except for Economy Classic customers) and Japan Airlines have this option.

Virgin Atlantic lets passengers select a seat for free as soon as check-in opens, while British Airways says customers who check in a hold bag can select a seat for free at check-in.

Singapore Airlines says economy passengers can select a seat in advance for free or a fee “depending on the fare type you choose”.

Leave it until the last minute?

For the more laid-back travellers, one suggested hack is to leave check-in until the last minute to try and bag a decent seat – even on a budget flight.

Airlines charge higher fees for seats with extra legroom or in a good location, meaning they’re likely to be the ones left when it comes closer to take-off time.

Read more:
UK could see ‘end of clubbing’ with 10 venues closing a month
Why legion of shoplifters is causing an explosion in crime

Some flyers also suggest boarding the plane last to see if there’s any better seats free for a last-minute swap.

This is a gamble, of course, with there being no guarantee that you won’t be plonked next to the toilets – and it’s probably best saved for solo travellers at the risk of couples or groups getting split.

Ask a fellow passenger to swap

One less “hacky” option is to simply ask another passenger if they’ll swap seats with you (as long as you’re with a carrier that allows seat switching).

Your chances? If you’re just asking them to switch to a worse seat, they’re probably low. But if you’re asking an easy-going passenger to switch from the window to the aisle, or you’re wanting to sit with your companion and you’re offering a slightly better option in the swap, you could be in luck.

Follow Sky News on WhatsApp
Follow Sky News on WhatsApp

Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News

Tap here

If you’re a family and you’ve been split up, you can politely explain your situation and see if any generous passengers will help. Some airline staff can also help with swaps for those in need if their company allows.

Make use of loyalty programme

If you’re a frequent or semi-frequent flyer and your favourite airline offers a loyalty programme, it’s worth signing up to make use of the perks on offer.

Building up enough points means you can upgrade your ticket class to an option that includes free seat selection.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump trade war escalation sparks global market sell-off

Published

on

By

Trump trade war escalation sparks global market sell-off

Donald Trump’s trade war escalation has sparked a global sell-off, with US stock markets seeing the biggest declines in a hit to values estimated above $2trn.

Tech and retail shares were among those worst hit when Wall Street opened for business, following on from a flight from risk across both Asia and Europe earlier in the day.

Analysis by the investment platform AJ Bell put the value of the peak losses among major indices at $2.2trn (£1.7trn).

The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite was down 5.8%, the S&P 500 by 4.3% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average by just under 4% at the height of the declines. It left all three on course for their worst one-day losses since at least September 2022 though the sell-off later eased back slightly.

Trump latest: UK considers tariff retaliation

Analysts said the focus in the US was largely on the impact that the expanded tariff regime will have on the domestic economy but also effects on global sales given widespread anger abroad among the more than 180 nations and territories hit by reciprocal tariffs on Mr Trump‘s self-styled “liberation day”.

They are set to take effect next week, with tariffs on all car, steel and aluminium imports already in effect.

Price rises are a certainty in the world’s largest economy as the president’s additional tariffs kick in, with those charges expected to be passed on down supply chains to the end user.

The White House believes its tariffs regime will force employers to build factories and hire workers in the US to escape the charges.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The latest numbers on tariffs

Economists warn the additional costs will add upward pressure to US inflation and potentially choke demand and hiring, ricking a slide towards recession.

Apple was among the biggest losers in cash terms in Thursday’s trading as its shares fell by almost 9%, leaving it on track for its worst daily performance since the start of the COVID pandemic.

Concerns among shareholders were said to include the prospects for US price hikes when its products are shipped to the US from Asia.

Other losers included Tesla, down by almost 6% and Nvidia down by more than 6%.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM: It’s ‘a new era’ for trade and economy

Many retail stocks including those for Target and Footlocker lost more than 10% of their respective market values.

The European Union is expected to retaliate in a bid to put pressure on the US to back down.

The prospect of a tit-for-tat trade war saw the CAC 40 in France and German DAX fall by more than 3.4% and 3% respectively.

The FTSE 100, which is internationally focused, was 1.6% lower by the close – a three-month low.

Financial stocks were worst hit with Asia-focused Standard Chartered bank enduring the worst fall in percentage terms of 13%, followed closely by its larger rival HSBC.

Among the stocks seeing big declines were those for big energy as oil Brent crude costs fell back by 6% to $70 due to expectations a trade war will hurt demand.

The more domestically relevant FTSE 250 was 2.2% lower.

A weakening dollar saw the pound briefly hit a six-month high against the US currency at $1.32.

There was a rush for safe haven gold earlier in the day as a new record high was struck though it was later trading down.

Sean Sun, portfolio manager at Thornburg Investment Management, said of the state of play: “Markets may actually be underreacting, especially if these rates turn out to be final, given the potential knock-on effects to global consumption and trade.”

He warned there was a big risk of escalation ahead through countermeasures against the US.

Read more:
Trump tariff saga far from over
‘Liberation Day’ explained
What Sky correspondents make of Trump’s tariffs

Sandra Ebner, senior economist at Union Investment, said: “We assume that the tariffs will not remain in place in the
announced range, but will instead be a starting point for further negotiations.

“Trump has set a maximum demand from which the level of tariffs should decrease”.

She added: “Since the measures would not affect all regions and sectors equally, there will be winners and losers as in 2018 – although the losers are more likely to be in the EU than in North America.

“To protect companies in Europe from the effects of tariffs, the EU should not respond with high counter-tariffs. In any case, their impact in the US is not likely to be significant. It would be more efficient to provide targeted support to EU companies in the form of investment and stimulus.”

Continue Reading

Business

British businesses issue warning over ‘deeply troubling’ Trump tariffs

Published

on

By

British businesses issue warning over 'deeply troubling' Trump tariffs

British companies and business groups have expressed alarm over President Donald Trump’s 10% tariff on UK goods entering the US – but cautioned against retaliatory measures.

It comes as Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds launched a consultation with firms on taxes the UK could implement in response to the new levies.

Money blog: Pension top-up deadline days away

A 400-page list of 8,000 US goods that could be targeted by UK tariffs has been published, including items like whiskey and jeans.

On so-called “Liberation Day”, Mr Trump announced UK goods entering the US will be subject to a 10% tax while cars will be slapped with a 25% levy.

The government’s handling of tariff negotiations with the US to date has been praised by representative and industry bodies as being “cool” and “calm” – and they urged ministers to continue that approach by not retaliating.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The latest numbers on tariffs

Business lobby group the CBI (Confederation of British Industry) said: “Retaliation will only add to supply chain disruption, slow down investment, and stoke volatility in prices”.

Industry body the British Retail Consortium (BRC) also cautioned: “Retaliatory tariffs should only be a last resort”.

‘Deeply troubling’

While a major category of exports, in the form of services – like finance and information technology (IT) – has been exempted from the tariffs, the impact on UK business is expected to be significant.

Mr Trump’s announcement was described as “deeply troubling for businesses” by the CBI’s chief executive Rain Newton-Smith.

Read more:
US tariffs spark global market sell-off

Do Trump’s numbers add up?
Island home only to penguins hit by tariffs

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) also said the tariffs were “a major blow” to small and medium companies (SMEs), as 59% of small UK exporters sell to the US. It called for emergency government aid to help those affected.

“Tariffs will cause untold damage to small businesses trying to trade their way into profit while the domestic economy remains flat,” the FSB’s policy chair Tina McKenzie said. “The fallout will stifle growth” and “hurt opportunities”, she added.

Companies will need to adapt and overcome, the British Export Association said, but added: “Unfortunately adaptation will come at a cost that not all businesses will be able to bear.”

Watch dealer and component seller Darren Townend told Sky News the 10% hit would be “painful” as “people will buy less”.

“I am a fan of Trump, but this is nuts,” he said. “I expect some bad months ahead.”

Industry body Make UK said the 25% tariffs on cars, steel and aluminium would in particular be devastating for UK manufacturing.

Cars hard hit

Carmakers are among the biggest losers from the world trade order reshuffle.

Auto industry body the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) said the taxes were “deeply disappointing and potentially damaging measure”.

“These tariff costs cannot be absorbed by manufacturers”, SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said. “UK producers may have to review output in the face of constrained demand”.

The new taxes on cars took effect on Thursday morning, while the measures impacting car parts are due to come in on 3 May.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump trade war: The blunt calculation that should have spared UK from reciprocal tariffs

Published

on

By

Trump trade war: The blunt calculation that should have spared UK from reciprocal tariffs

Economists immediately started scratching their heads when Donald Trump raised his tariffs placard in the Rose Garden on Wednesday. 

On that list he detailed the rate the US believes it is being charged by each country, along with its response: A reciprocal tariff at half that rate.

So, take China for example. Donald Trump said his team had run the numbers and the world’s second-largest economy was implementing an effective tariff of 67% on US imports. The US is responding with 34%.

Trump latest: UK considers tariff retaliation

How did he come up with that 67%? This is where things get a bit murky. The US claims it studied its trading relationship with individual countries, examining non-tariff barriers as well as tariff barriers. That includes, for example, regulations that make it difficult for US exporters.

However, the actual methodology appears to be far cruder. Instead of responding to individual countries’ trade barriers, Trump is attacking those enjoying large trade surpluses with the US.

A formula released by the US trade representative laid this bare. It took the US’s trade deficit in goods with each country and divided that by imports from that country. That figure was then divided by two.

More on Donald Trump

So, in the case of China, which has a trade surplus of $295bn on total US exports of $438bn, that gives a ratio of 68%. The US divided that by two, giving a reciprocal tariff of 34%.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PM will ‘fight’ for deal with US

This is a blunt measure which targets big importers to the US, irrespective of the trade barriers they have erected. This is all part of Donald Trump’s efforts to shrink the country’s deficit – although it’s US consumers who will end up paying the price.

But what about the small number of countries where the US has a trade surplus? Shouldn’t they actually be benefiting from all of this?

Read more:
Trump tariff saga far from over
‘Liberation Day’ explained
What Sky correspondents make of Trump’s tariffs

That includes the UK, with whom the US has a surplus (by its own calculations) of $12bn. By its own reciprocal tariff formula, the UK should be benefitting from a “negative tariff” of 9%.

Instead, it has been hit by a 10% baseline tariff. Number 10 may be breathing a sigh of relief – the US could, after all, have gone after us for our 20% VAT rate on imports, which it takes issue with – but, by Trump’s own measure, we haven’t got off as lightly as we should have.

Continue Reading

Trending