Sir Keir Starmer has called footage of a Labour MP punching someone “shocking” – but declined to say if he should resign.
In a video from the weekend Mike Amesbury, the MP for Runcorn and Helsby, was seen punching a man, who fell to the floor, before then hitting him repeatedly.
After the footage came to light, the Labour Party said it had administratively suspended his membership “pending an investigation”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:32
Footage of Mike Amesbury incident in Frodsham
During a Q&A after a pre-budget speech this morning, Sir Keir sidestepped a question about whether Mr Amesbury should resign as an MP.
“I have seen the video footage, it’s shocking,” he said.
“We moved very swiftly to suspend him as a member.
“There is now a police investigation and in the circumstances you will appreciate there’s not much more I can say about that.”
Earlier footage had shown Mr Amesbury shouting at a man while he was lying on the floor, saying: “you won’t ever threaten me again”.
Advertisement
In a statement the MP said he felt “threatened on the street following an evening out with friends” – and that he “contacted Cheshire Police myself to report what happened during this incident”.
“I will not be making further public comment but will, of course, cooperate with any inquiries if required by Cheshire Police,” he added.
The latest video showed two men standing facing each other before Mr Amesbury punched the other and continued hitting him on the ground.
It is not clear from the video what happened in the moments beforehand.
Three members of the public could then be seen walking over towards the two men and intervening.
A spokesperson for Cheshire Police said: “A 55-year-old man has been voluntarily interviewed under caution by police in relation to this incident. He has since been released pending further enquiries.”
Residents who live near newly installed pylons will be compensated with £250-a-year off their energy bills, a minister has said.
Housing and planning minister Alex Norris told Sky’s Wilfred Frost on Breakfast that communities “need to share the benefits” of the government’s tilt towards clean energy.
“If you’re making that sacrifice of having some of the infrastructure in your community, you should get some of the money back,” he said.
“So we’re making that commitment – £250-a-year if you are near those pylons.
“We think that’s a fair balance between people who are making that commitment to the country… they should be rewarded for that.”
Image: People living near power infrastructure could get hundreds of pounds off their bills a year as part of an overhaul of planning rules. File pic: PA
Ministers are currently pushing through an overhaul of the planning system – long seen as a brake on housebuilding and vital infrastructure projects – to stimulate growth in the economy.
Overnight it was announced parts of the planning system could be stripped away as part of the government’s attempts to speed up house building.
In its election-winning manifesto, Labour promised to build 1.5 million new homes over the next five years to tackle the lack of affordable housing, with recent statistics showing that there are 123,000 households in temporary accommodation – including nearly 160,000 children.
Sir Keir Starmer has repeatedly vowed to put “builders not blockers first”, announcing at the beginning of the year “unarguable cases” that are legally challenged will only be able to be brought back to the courts once – rather than the current three times.
Under the reforms announced last night, consulting bodies such as Sport England, the Theatres Trust and the Garden History Society will no longer be required for those looking to build under the new plans being considered by ministers.
While consultees will not be completely removed from the process, it will no longer be mandatory for builders to receive the opinion of such bodies and their scope will be “narrowed to focus on heritage, safety and environmental protection”, according to the government.
It is hoped the slimming down of the process will reduce waiting times for projects.
Mr Norris said the interjections of official bodies in planning decisions was causing a “bottleneck” in granting applications.
“I think viewers might be surprised to hear that there are two dozen-plus organisations that have to be consulted on planning applications – that’s providing a bit of a bottleneck, often not getting back in time,” he said.
He said that while members of Sport England were “fine people”, there was a case where the body held up the development in Bradford next to a cricket pitch.
“The hold up is around a disagreement on the speed at which cricket balls are hit,” he explained.
“So Sport England are querying the modelling of the speed at which the balls will be hit, and that, as a result, has meant that the whole process is now multiple years down the line, and there’s no build out.”