Could Rachel Reeves’s budget ‘jiggery-pokery’ scare investors?
Budgets are all about numbers.
In the coming 24 hours, we’ll be engulfed with all sorts of figures – about the state of the economy, about the size of the deficit, about the fiscal rules the new chancellor is planning to introduce in the coming months.
But in fact most budgets, this one included, can really be boiled down to the difference between two big numbers.
Politics live blog: Budget 2024 latest developments
Total government spending and total government receipts.
Right now the UK government is spending just over £1.2trn a year and bringing in just over £1.1trn in taxes and receipts.
In other words, this country is spending more than it generates in tax receipts.
So it has to borrow the difference.
That borrowing, also known as the deficit, is (as you’ve already probably worked out from the above numbers) around £100bn a year.
And politicians, including the chancellor, spend rather a lot of time fretting about the deficit.
Indeed, the main objective of the various different fiscal rules they’ve imposed on themselves in recent decades has been to narrow the gap between those two big numbers.
Broadly speaking, the easiest way to do this is to cut something few people notice in the short run – government investment.
When he came into office in 2010, George Osborne cut a lot of parts of public spending, but he absolutely slashed the amount the public sector spent on buildings, infrastructure and machinery – capital spending.
Having lifted the total briefly after the pandemic, Jeremy Hunt was planning a similar fall in investment in the coming years.
Rachel Reeves has said repeatedly ahead of the budget that she plans to invest far more in the coming years.
This is a noble goal, given investment tends to benefit future generations, however, it will not be cheap in the short run.
Indeed, keeping investment spending at current levels will cost roughly £30bn a year by the end of this decade.
So how does the chancellor square that with her fiscal rules?
Well, one part of the answer is that she’s planning to increase the revenues coming into the Exchequer, reportedly via higher national insurance charges for insurers.
But the other part of the answer is that she’s changing her fiscal rules as well.
Budget 2024: Rachel Reeves vs the fiscal rules
The long and the short of it is that Ms Reeves looks likely to choose a set of fiscal rules that ignore investment spending.
Both her updated debt rule and her current budget rule essentially omit capital spending – although they include debt interest costs, so she can’t just borrow willy-nilly.
Read more:
NHS will have billions of pounds of new funding
Supermarket giants face £200m hit from NI hike
Keep up with all the latest news from the UK and around the world by following Sky News
That might sound like fiscal jiggery-pokery, and some in the market fret that investors will soon take fright as a result.
Indeed, some suggest they already are, and point to the fact the UK’s cost of government borrowing – as measured by the benchmark 10-year bond yield – has risen from under 4% to nearly 4.3% in the past month alone.
However, this is a slight misreading of this market, which is as affected by global economic factors and central bank action as much as by UK budgetary policy.
Indeed, compare the recent changes in the UK’s borrowing rates with those in Germany and the US and British government bond yields are close to where they usually trade in the run up to a budget.
And they are far, far below where they were in the run-up to Liz Truss’s mini-budget.
Even so, there are bound to be a few unexpected surprises and some relevant new data points in this fiscal event.
It is a budget after all.
The UK’s benchmark stock index has reached another record high.
The FTSE 100 index of most valuable companies on the London Stock Exchange closed at 8,505.69, breaking the record set last May.
It had already broken its intraday high at 8532.58 on Friday afternoon, meaning it reached a high not seen before during trading hours.
Money blog: Major boost for mortgage holders
The weakened pound has boosted many of the 100 companies forming the top-flight index.
Why is this happening?
Most are not based in the UK, so a less valuable pound means their sterling-priced shares are cheaper to buy for people using other currencies, typically US dollars.
This makes the shares better value, prompting more to be bought. This greater demand has brought up the prices and the FTSE 100.
The pound has been hovering below $1.22 for much of Friday. It’s steadily fallen from being worth $1.34 in late September.
Also spurring the new record are market expectations for more interest rate cuts in 2025, something which would make borrowing cheaper and likely kickstart spending.
What is the FTSE 100?
The index is made up of many mining and international oil and gas companies, as well as household name UK banks and supermarkets.
Familiar to a UK audience are lenders such as Barclays, Natwest, HSBC and Lloyds and supermarket chains Tesco, Marks & Spencer and Sainsbury’s.
Other well-known names include Rolls-Royce, Unilever, easyJet, BT Group and Next.
Read more:
Russia sanctions: Fears over UK enforcement by HMRC
Trump tariff threat prompts IMF warning ahead of inauguration
FTSE stands for Financial Times Stock Exchange.
If a company’s share price drops significantly it can slip outside of the FTSE 100 and into the larger and more UK-based FTSE 250 index.
The inverse works for the FTSE 250 companies, the 101st to 250th most valuable firms on the London Stock Exchange. If their share price rises significantly they could move into the FTSE 100.
A good close for markets
It’s a good end of the week for markets, entirely reversing the rise in borrowing costs that plagued Chancellor Rachel Reeves for the past ten days.
Fears of long-lasting high borrowing costs drove speculation she would have to cut spending to meet self-imposed fiscal rules to balance the budget and bring down debt by 2030.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
They Treasury tries to calm market nerves late last week
Long-term government borrowing had reached a high not seen since 1998 while the benchmark 10-year cost of government borrowing, as measured by 10-year gilt yields, was at levels last seen around the 2008 financial crisis.
The gilt yield is effectively the interest rate investors demand to lend money to the UK government.
Only the pound has yet to recover the losses incurred during the market turbulence. Without that dropped price, however, the FTSE 100 record may not have happened.
Also acting to reduce sterling value is the chance of more interest rates. Currencies tend to weaken when interest rates are cut.
-
Sports2 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports10 months agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years agoBank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway