Rachel Reeves’ changes to agricultural inheritance tax could lead to food price rises and will have a “catastrophic” impact on family farms, farmers have warned.
Her announcement has been met with anger from rural communities, with celebrities such as Jeremy Clarkson saying farmers “have been shafted”, and Kirstie Allsopp saying the chancellor has “destroyed the ability [for farmers] to pass farms on to their children”.
Farmers and the Conservative shadow farming minister have told Sky News the plan, which is due to begin in April 2026, risks pushing up food prices due to uncertainty and the possibility of farms having to be sold up so less food is produced.
National Farmers’ Union (NFU) president Tom Bradshaw said the policy “will snatch away” the next generation’s ability to produce British food.
Fourth generation Warwickshire farmer Bizza Walters, 26, told Sky News she would be forced to sell some of her family farm’s 500 acres to pay the £7,500 a month she has estimated she would have to pay for 10 years if her father and uncles, who own the farm, died.
More on Farming
Related Topics:
“Our margins and costs are so tight and anything we make is reinvested, so I’d have to sell land which would not go back into food production,” she said.
“They’re going to have to come to their senses because food prices will go up because we won’t be able to produce as much food.”
Advertisement
Image: Jeremy Clarkson, whose TV show has opened up the struggles of farming to millions, said farmers have ‘been shafted’. Pic: PA
Country Land and Business Association (CLA) president Victoria Vyvyan told Sky News the government has “conflated a business asset with personal wealth” in their bid to tax the wealthy.
But she said farms are businesses and most run on tight margins with little spare cash.
She added a £1m farm would only be about 100 acres in most UK areas, “which is not a viable business proposition”.
The £1m cap could also rack up quite quickly as it is not just the value of land, but also livestock, farmhouses, sheds and machinery.
Image: Most farms are run on small margins. Pic: Sky News
Conservative shadow farming minister Robbie Moore, who is from a farming background, said the move is “catastrophic for family farms”.
“This is effectively thievery, putting two fingers up to the farming industry,” he told Sky News as he accused the government of failing to understand how farming works.
“They’ve completely underestimated the effect this will have, it creates a lot of uncertainty in terms of how that land will be managed.
“If you want to invest in that holding to produce food, you need certainty, and what the announcement creates is uncertainty.
“It will have a direct impact on the food security agenda and food prices further down the line.
“If you’re wanting to work hard to hand farmland down to the next generation, you’re completely disincentivised to do that.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:38
Are politicians listening to young farmers?
He reiterated what lots of farmers have been saying: that their land may be high in value, but they are struggling with cashflows, so paying tax to continue the family business may not be viable for many.
NFU president Mr Bradshaw added: “This budget not only threatens family farms but will also make producing food more expensive.
“This means more cost for farmers who simply cannot absorb it, and it will have to be borne by someone.
“Farmers are down to the bone and gristle, who is going to carry these costs?”
The government says it is still committed to supporting farmers and “the vital role they play to feed our nation”.
Speaking on Thursday, the chancellor described the changes as “fair and proportionate”.
“We needed to raise money in the budget yesterday, and we know that there are a lot of landowners who are very wealthy, some who buy land to avoid paying inheritance tax because previously there was no inheritance tax,” she said.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has been contacted for comment.
Bilal Bin Saqib, head of Pakistan’s crypto council, announced on May 28 that the country is moving to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
Speaking at the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, Saqib said the government of Pakistan followed the United States’ lead in establishing a Bitcoin strategic reserve and is embracing pro-crypto regulatory policies. The government official told the audience:
“Today is a very historic day. Today, I announce the Pakistani government is setting up its own government-led Bitcoin Strategic Reserve, and we want to thank the United States of America again because we were inspired by them.”
The announcement represents a significant departure from the government of Pakistan’s previous stance on cryptocurrencies, holding that crypto would never be legal in the country.
Pakistan’s shift reflects the broader trend of nation-states adopting pro-crypto policies following the regulatory shift in Washington, DC under the President Donald Trump administration.
Bilal Bin Saqib at the Bitcoin 2025 conference announcing a Bitcoin strategic reserve. Source: Cointelegraph
United States Vice President JD Vance took the stage to deliver a keynote address at the Bitcoin 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Nevada, encouraging Bitcoiners to deepen their involvement in politics.
Vance highlighted the strategic and geopolitical importance of Bitcoin, emphasizing that the US should maintain leadership in the crypto industry to remain competitive in the age of digital finance. Vance told the audience:
“What happens in the world of politics, what happens in the world of bureaucracy, will affect even the most transformational and valuable technologies if we do not make the right decisions. The first thing that I would ask you, is to take the momentum of your political involvement in 2024 and carry it forward to 2026 and beyond.”
“Don’t ignore politics because I guarantee you, my friends, politics is not going to ignore this community, not now, and not in the future,” the vice president continued.
Vice President JD Vance gives a keynote speech at Bitcoin 2025 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Source: Cointelegraph
Bitcoin continues to gain institutional legitimacy and has been elevated to an asset class with macroeconomic and geopolitical importance. Market analysts and Bitcoin advocates warn that the global race to acquire BTC is underway between sovereign powers.
Bitcoin maximalists and market analysts argue that high-stakes game theory compels nation-states to adopt BTC due to the downside or opportunity cost of not adopting the scarce digital asset as sovereign competitors do.
The regulatory shift in the United States prompted other governments to indicate a possible policy reset on cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin.
The government of India, for instance, is reconsidering its crypto policies in response to regulatory changes in the US. India’s economic affairs secretary, Ajay Seth, said that digital assets do not care about borders.
Opinion by: Scott Buchanan, chief operating officer of Bitcoin Depot
A new proposal to install Bitcoin ATMs in federal buildings highlights an important question: Can crypto truly go mainstream without a stronger physical presence? For years, the industry has focused on software and decentralization, but its reluctance to invest in real-world infrastructure is starting to show. Without physical access points, crypto risks becoming an exclusive, insiders-only system, rather than the open alternative it sets out to be.
Everyone loves to talk about decentralization. There’s a good reason behind this. It defines the movement, shapes the technology, and supportsthe vision of a better financial system. While the industry focuses on code and algorithms, it lacks something basic. A decentralized system that exists only online is not genuinely decentralized.
Physical infrastructure is the missing link
Bitcoin’s physical infrastructure is the missing link. Without tools like ATMs, kiosks and access points at traditional retail locations, crypto remains out of reach for millions. Decentralization is not just about removing intermediaries. True decentralization requires expanding access. Without real-world touchpoints, even the most advanced network becomes limited to a closed circle of insiders.
For crypto to become mainstream, it must be easy to reach digitally and physically. That means showing up in places people already go and seamlessly integrating into people’s lives. Many groups in the American population still rely on cash or don’t have access to traditional banks. According to the latest Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation report, around 5.6 million American households don’t have a bank or savings account. Bitcoin ATMs give these users access without needing an app, a bank account or a crash course in blockchain. Most crypto tools today assume a level of financial fluency and infrastructure that millions simply do not have. The result is a digital-only ecosystem that locks out newcomers and widens the divide between early adopters and everyone else.
User-friendly screen in the right place
Physical infrastructure helps address this issue. A Bitcoin ATM in a grocery store or gas station is not just a convenience but a bridge to financial inclusion. It is an invitation to someone who has never bought crypto, telling them they can participate. No bank, no broker, just a user-friendly screen in a familiar place.
These machines also generate new economic activity. Local businesses benefit from increased foot traffic as the kiosks create passive revenue. For many communities, they provide access to a parallel financial system that was previously out of reach. This is a tangible example of crypto’s real-world utility. It is already happening, and it is measurable.
The crypto industry’s blind spot
The industry often treats physical infrastructure like an afterthought. The obsession with building new digital solutions has created a blind spot. Innovation without usability builds systems that serve the few but exclude the many. If someone can buy Bitcoin (BTC) at the same place they buy their morning coffee, that is when crypto stops feeling like an obscure digital asset and starts becoming part of everyday life.
As governments increase regulation, trusted and transparent interfaces will become more important. When operated within regulatory frameworks, Bitcoin ATMs offer a way to provide access between traditional finance and digital assets. They are familiar, easy to monitor and offer a more approachable entry point for the general public.
Like any financial tool, Bitcoin ATMs have drawn scrutiny, particularly in cases where bad actors use them. Rather than dismissing the machines themselves, we should focus on investing in better oversight, stronger consumer education and smarter regulation. The overwhelming majority of people who use Bitcoin ATMs do so for legitimate reasons: to send remittances, to move money securely or to access digital assets without traditional banking barriers. Building trust does not mean avoiding or dismantling physical access, but improving it.
The first time someone uses Bitcoin should not involve reading a white paper or navigating a tutorial. It should be as familiar as using an ATM or tapping a payment terminal. This is not an argument against innovation. Software and protocols will continue to evolve and play an important role. Physical infrastructure provides something those tools cannot: trust through presence. When people can see and use crypto in their neighborhood, at a store they already visit or in a format they already understand, it changes how they think about crypto and who it is for.
According to Coin ATM Radar, there are over 30,000 Bitcoin ATMs in the US. It’s a meaningful start, but still only a small step toward widespread access.
Crypto’s long-term success will depend not just on innovation but also on inclusion. That means building more than networks; it means building presence. When people can interact with crypto in the physical world, it stops being abstract and becomes usable. That is how digital finance becomes everyday finance.
Opinion by: Scott Buchanan, chief operating officer of Bitcoin Depot.
This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.