Can a Labour prime minister get on well with a Republican US president? Or a Conservative PM with a Democrat in the White House?
The short answer is yes, absolutely.
There are plenty of examples of a good relationship and close bond between a Labour prime minister and Republican president. And vice versa.
Indeed, some prime ministers and presidents from seemingly opposing political parties have bonded for the simplest or most trivial reasons. Cigars, toothpaste and burgers, for example.
And it’s not always rosy between prime ministers and presidents of the two sister parties. There have been some big fallings out: over Suez, Vietnam and the Caribbean island of Grenada.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:58
Starmer says the ‘special relationship’ is ‘as important today as it has ever been’
But never has a British Labour prime minister faced such special challenges in maintaining the “special relationship” with a Republican president as Sir Keir Starmer does right now.
It’s not just policy differences – on issues such as trade tariffs, Ukraine, Israel, defence spending, Brexit and climate change – that divide Downing Street and the White House right now.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
Never before has an incoming president faced such a tirade of brutal insults from senior members of a UK government like those hurled at him by leading members of Sir Keir’s cabinet.
He’s a “racist KKK and neo-Nazi sympathiser”, (David Lammy, 2017), an “odious, sad little man”, (Wes Streeting, 2017) and “a racist misogynistic, self-confessed groper”, (Ed Miliband, 2018). And that’s just a sample.
That’s not all. Last month, the Republican Party filed a legal complaint after almost 100 Labour Party aides flew to the US to campaign for Kamala Harris, alleging “blatant foreign interference” in the presidential election.
Critics, led by the new Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, have accused Sir Keir and his party of playing student politics by picking a fight with the most powerful man in the world. And someone who’s notoriously vindictive.
It was all very different 80 years ago (critics would also say that political leaders were real statesmen back then).
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:09
Badenoch calls out Lammy at PMQs
The phrase “special relationship”, describing the alliance between the UK and US, was first used by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri in 1946, in which he also coined the phrase “the Iron Curtain”.
That speech was introduced by president Harry Truman, a Democrat, with whom Churchill had attended the Potsdam Conference in 1945 to negotiate the terms of the end of the Second World War.
They were close friends and would write handwritten letters to each other and addressed one another as Harry and Winston. Truman was also the only US president to visit Churchill at Chartwell, his family home.
Churchill also had a close relationship with another Democrat president, Franklin D Roosevelt. Their close bond during the Second World War was described as a friendship that saved the world.
Image: Prime minister Winston Churchill and president Franklin Roosevelt at the White House in Washington on 23 December, 1941. Pic: AP
One reason they got on famously was that they were both renowned cigar smokers. Like Churchill, Roosevelt’s cigar smoking was a widely reported part of his public persona after he became president.
But after Churchill’s bromances with Democrat presidents, his Conservative successor Anthony Eden fell out badly with the Republican president Dwight Eisenhower over the Suez Crisis in the mid-1950s.
And it was a Conservative prime minister and a Democrat president with seemingly nothing in common, the stuffy and diffident Harold Macmillan and the charismatic John F Kennedy, that repaired the damage.
“Between them they had rescued the special relationship after the rupture of the Suez Crisis, and done so at a time of uniquely high tensions around the world,” wrote British author Christopher Sandford in Harold And Jack, The Remarkable Friendship Of Prime Minister Macmillan And President Kennedy.
Image: Harold Macmillan and John F Kennedy at Andrews Air Force Base. Pic: AP
It was the early 1960s and these were dangerous times, rather like now, of course. Back then it was the Berlin Wall, the Cuban missile crisis and threat of nuclear weapons.
“Through it all, the two leaders had exchanged not only formal messages but also a steady flow of handwritten notes, Christmas and birthday cards, congratulations, and, on occasion, condolences,” Sandford wrote.
But it was a relationship abruptly cut short in 1963, by “supermac’s” demise caused by the John Profumo sex scandal and then JFK’s assassination in Dallas just a month later.
“Like many of those who came into the Kennedys’ orbit,” the Washington Post wrote, “Macmillan was enchanted by Jacqueline Kennedy, and she seems to have happily entered into a father-daughter relationship with him that lasted long after her husband’s assassination.”
Image: John F Kennedy with Harold MacMillan, during lunch in Bermuda in 1962. Pic: AP
After Kennedy, the so-called “special relationship” cooled once again during the tenure of Labour’s Harold Wilson and Democrat Lyndon Johnson, when Wilson rejected pressure from Johnson to send British troops to Vietnam.
And even though Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan were ideological soulmates, Thatcher was furious when she wasn’t consulted before the Americans invaded Grenada in 1983 to topple a Marxist regime.
Even worse, according to Thatcher allies, a year earlier Reagan had stayed neutral during the Falklands war. Reagan said he couldn’t understand why two US allies were arguing over “that little ice-cold bunch of land down there”.
Image: Margaret Thatcher was frustrated with Ronald Reagan over his position on the Falklands. Pic: PA
Long before the accusations of Starmer’s Labour meddling in the Trump-Harris election, the Tories were accused of dirty tricks in the Bill Clinton-George HW Bush presidential election of 1992.
During the campaign the Home Office checked immigration nationality records to see whether Clinton applied for British citizenship while a student at Oxford University to escape the Vietnam draft. It wasn’t true.
Image: US president Bill Clinton held a toast with John Major during a dinner at Downing Street. Pic: PA
Then prime minister John Major issued a grovelling public apology and Clinton was forgiving. In 1994 the “special relationship” received a huge boost when the president took Major to the home in Pittsburgh where his grandfather and father lived and worked.
Then it was back to Washington where Major became the first foreign leader to stay overnight in the Clinton White House. But as well as the flattery, the pair worked closely in the early stages of the Northern Ireland peace process.
Clinton’s political soulmate, of course, was Tony Blair. They were as close as Reagan and Thatcher. But it was with the Republican George W Bush that Labour’s Blair embarked on the defining mission of his premiership, the Iraq war.
Image: The Blairs spent two nights with the Clintons at Camp David. Pic: AP
George “Dubya” Bush had defeated Clinton’s vice president Al Gore in the bitterly contested presidential election of 2000 and in early 2001 he entertained Blair at Camp David. It was to prove to be a historic encounter.
“He’s a pretty charming guy,” the president gushed at their news conference. “He put the charm offensive on me.” How many times have we heard that said about Tony Blair?
Then it got deeply personal. They were asked if they’d found something in their talks that they had in common. “Well, we both use Colgate toothpaste,” the president replied.
Quick as a flash, an embarrassed Mr Blair intervened: “They’re going to wonder how you know that, George.”
Image: Tony Blair and George W Bush first met in 2001. Pic: Reuters
The war was the turning point of Blair’s decade in Number 10. He was branded a liar over claims about Saddam Hussein’s “weapons of mass destruction”, he was vilified by the Labour left and it was the beginning of the end for him.
Some years later, the Tory prime minister sometimes called the “heir to Blair”, David Cameron, bonded over burgers with the Democrat president Barack Obama, serving a BBQ lunch to military families in the Downing Street garden.
Image: David Cameron and Barack Obama served burgers to guests in the Downing Street garden in 2011. Pic: Reuters
They seemed unlikely allies: Obama the first African-American president and Cameron the 19th old Etonian prime minister. It was claimed they had a “transatlantic bromance” in office.
The two leaders were often pictured together playing ping-pong or golf, eating burgers or watching a basketball game. “Yes, he sometimes calls me bro,” Cameron once said of president Obama.
Cameron even persuaded Obama to help the Remain campaign in the 2016 Brexit referendum, when he claimed the UK would be “at the back of the queue” on trade deals with the US if it left the EU.
Image: David Cameron and Obama also enjoyed a round of golf. Pic: Reuters
Which brings us, neatly, to Sir Keir and president-elect Trump and the prime minister’s hopes of building a special relationship.
On the plus side, the president likes the UK – his mother was Scottish and he owns two golf courses in Scotland. And we’re told by Sir Keir that the dinner at Trump Tower in September went well. The mouthy Mr Lammy admitted he was even offered a second portion of chicken. “He was very gracious,” he claimed.
On the other hand, neither the prime minister nor the president smoke cigars, like Churchill and Roosevelt did. We’re not sure which toothpaste they use, unlike Bush and Blair, either.
Image: Donald Trump served fries to customers at a fast food chain during the election campaign. Pic: Reuters
And while the president obviously likes burgers – he famously flipped them in a McDonald’s during the election campaign – and steak, well done, with ketchup, Sir Keir is vegetarian, though he does eat fish.
But if even a stuffy old toff like Harold Macmillan can get on well with the flamboyant JFK and glamorous Jackie Onassis, there’s hope for Sir Keir and that much-vaunted “special relationship”.
Women and children would be detained and deported under Nigel Farage’s plans to stop small boat crossings in the Channel.
Addressing a news conference in Oxford, Mr Farage admitted that the question of “how we deal with children is much more complicated”, but insisted: “Women and children, everybody on arrival will be detained.”
The Reform UK leader laid out his plans to deport hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants if he wins the next election in 2029 – saying the small boats crisis in the English Channel was fuelling “rising anger” among the public and creating a “genuine threat to public order”.
‘The boats will stop coming within days’
“The only way we will stop the boats is by detaining and deporting absolutely anyone that comes via that route,” Mr Farage said.
“And if we do that, the boats will stop coming within days, because there will be no incentive to pay a trafficker to get into this country.
More on Asylum
Related Topics:
“If you come to the UK illegally, you will be detained and deported and never, ever allowed to stay, period. That is our big message from today.”
The news conference followed a weekend in which hundreds of people made the dangerous crossing to Britain via the Channel.
Labour says it is tackling the issue by signing its “one in, one out” pilot scheme with France, which came into force earlier this month.
It allows the UK to send some people who have crossed the Channel back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with ties to Britain – but Reform and the Conservatives have said it will make little difference given that more than 28,000 people had made the crossing to the UK in 2025 alone.
Under Reform’s “operation restoring justice programme” – which has been denounced by Opposition parties as “inflammatory” and “unworkable” – anyone who arrives in the UK illegally via small boat would be detained and deported and refused permission to stay.
Mr Farage said he believed the party would be able to deport around 600,000 asylum seekers in the first parliament of a potential Reform UK government, at an estimated cost of £10bn over the five-year period.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:07
Migrants attempt Channel crossing
Illegal migrants would be forced to return to their home countries, something the Reform leader said could be achieved by the UK by choosing not to follow certain human rights laws.
The party is planning to repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act and leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), arguing that such laws have allowed foreign offenders to challenge their own deportation orders through the courts and remain in the UK.
It would also disapply the 1951 Refugee Contention and the UN Convention Against Torture, and the Council of Europe’s anti-trafficking convention, which prevent people from being deported to countries where they face the prospect of torture or ill treatment.
Instead, under its own Illegal Migration (Mass Deportation) Bill, those who come to the UK on small boats will be barred from claiming asylum, and held in detention centres on spare RAF bases rather than taxpayer-funded hotels – which have been subject to a number of protests from local communities in recent months.
‘The alternative is to do nothing’
Reform is also seeking to sign returns deals with countries including Afghanistan, despite its poor human rights record and the threat that those sent back would be subject to torture and ill treatment.
Mr Farage faced a number of questions about the human rights abuses perpetuated by the likes of Afghanistan and Eritrea, another country he is seeking to send illegal migrants to if they arrive in Britain.
Asked whether he was “comfortable” with the prospect of people being tortured if they were sent back after entering the UK illegally, Mr Farage said: “What really bothers me is what is happening on the streets of our country. What really bothers me is what is happening to British citizens.”
He added: “The alternative, of course, is to do nothing. That’s the very clear alternative, is that we just do nothing. We just allow this problem to magnify and grow.
“We head to a point, where there, and I genuinely, I don’t want this to happen, I want our proposals to be accepted so we can prevent civil disorder from happening, but that is the direction this country is headed in. We cannot be responsible for all the sins that take place around the world. It’s just literally impossible.”
The Liberal Democrats criticised the plans for mass deportations, saying they risked “ripping up” human rights and potentially paying autocratic regimes to take people back.
Deputy Leader Daisy Cooper said: “Of course Nigel Farage wants to follow his idol Vladimir Putin in ripping up the human rights convention. Winston Churchill would be turning in his grave. Doing so would only make it harder for each of us as individuals to hold the government to account and stop it trampling on our freedoms.”
Green Party MP Ellie Chowns accused Mr Farage of “inflammatory rhetoric” and accused him of “whipping up anger, hatred and even disorder”.
“The policy proposals themselves are unworkable. They rely on ripping up swathes of international law and would likely face many legal obstacles in the UK courts that could use British common law to block such cruelty.”
Vienna-based Bitpanda is eyeing Frankfurt or New York for a future listing, with its co-founder warning that London’s IPO market is too illiquid to attract investors.