Farage emboldened by Trump’s victory – but whether he can replicate that success remains to be seen

Published

4 months ago

November 9, 2024

admin

Fresh from Donald Trump’s victory party at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, it is an emboldened Nigel Farage who meets us at his latest Reform conference in Newport, South Wales.

“What a win!” He chirps, as the cameras are set up.

To be clear: Nigel Farage is not on the brink of becoming the next British prime minister, but there are undoubtedly parallels between the Reform leader and the US president-elect.

Politics latest: Ex-Blair aide is new national security adviser

Both men are trying to tap into disillusioned “left behind” voters, both men are cutting through in rural communities and former industry heartlands. There are red MAGA hats on show at the Reform conference on Friday.

But once the cameras are rolling, and I ask about criticism that he is not spending enough time in his constituency of Clacton, Mr Farage’s mood shifts.

He is undeniably testy. “How much time does Keir Starmer spend in his constituency?” he shoots back, when I ask about missed budget votes while he was in the US.

I remind him he is not yet prime minister.

“I have bought a house in Clacton! What more do you want!”

Behind the scenes though, someone close to Mr Farage tells me he is struggling with the balance of being a constituency MP, leading Reform and pre-agreed (paid) commitments in the US.

“I honour the commitments, they were already there” he tells me, “I’ve taken far less on for next year”.

After our interview, a source close to him said: “Nigel has been to Clacton more than 10 times since being elected. Has kept his promise to have a property in the constituency. Writes a weekly column for the Clacton Gazette (10 weeks in a row). And is having two further visits next week.”

Another interesting, and at times uncomfortable, part of the interview is when I ask about Donald Trump’s position on Ukraine.

Mr Farage tells me there need to be “concessions on both sides”.

When I push on whether that means Ukrainians making territorial concessions he tells me: “I’m not playing your silly game.”

He may well be wary of the backlash he faced in the election campaign for suggesting the West “provoked” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by expanding eastwards. He did say the war was “of course” President Putin’s fault.

But in truth it is not Mr Farage’s foreign, but his domestic policy that is what has brought people here on Friday.

The NHS, cost of living and immigration are the issues that come up again and again, and people here think the Reform leader has the answers: “He is just different,” one member says.

The Reform party clearly spots an opportunity in Wales. It won 16.9% of the vote share here, and launched its manifesto (or what it calls its “contract”) in Merthyr Tydfil.

Despite winning no seats, they received a greater share of the vote than the Liberal Democrats and Plaid Cymru.

Mr Farage’s team tell me he could win “20-plus” seats at the Senedd elections in 2026.

The elections for the Welsh parliament are part of Reform’s masterplan, a spring board for more coverage and ultimately more power.

After the interviews he bounces up for his seat and heads out to address the conference rally. The thousand or so members here can’t contain their excitement: for all the warm up acts, they’ve come here for one man.

In the confines of the Newport conference hall, Nigel Farage is preaching to the choir. His base has always been solid, whether he can really replicate something similar to Trump’s success is a very different question.

Politics

JD Vance denies insulting British troops over ‘random country’ jibe

Published

33 seconds ago

March 4, 2025

admin

JD Vance denies insulting British troops over 'random country' jibe

JD Vance has hit back at criticism after saying a potential peacekeeping force in Ukraine would be “20,000 troops from some random country that hasn’t fought a war in 30 or 40 years”.

The US vice president was accused of “disrespecting” British forces who served alongside the US in Iraq and Afghanistan, with a former veterans minister branding him a “clown” who needs to “check his privilege”.

Politics latest: Trump stopping aid to Ukraine is ‘profoundly worrying’

Although the UK and France are the only countries to have pledged troops to a potential peacekeeping force, Mr Vance said the suggestion he was referring to those two allies is “absurdly dishonest”.

“I don’t even mention the UK or France in the clip, both of whom have fought bravely alongside the US over the last 20 years, and beyond,” he said in a post on X.

“There are many countries who are volunteering (privately or publicly) support who have neither the battlefield experience nor the military equipment to do anything meaningful.”

Mr Vance made the initial comments to Fox News on Tuesday, saying the only security guarantee Donald Trump will provide for Ukraine is a minerals deal.

He said: “The president knows that if you want real US security guarantees, if you want to actually ensure that Vladimir Putin does not invade Ukraine again, the very best security guarantee is to give Americans economic upside in the future of Ukraine.

“That is a way better security guarantee than 20,000 troops from some random country that hasn’t fought a war in 30 or 40 years.”

Several British politicians interpreted this as a dig at the UK and France, who have led the idea of a “coalition of the willing” to provide boots on the ground in Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire.

James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, accused Mr Vance of “ignoring the service and sacrifice” of personnel from the two countries that fought in Afghanistan after 9/11.

He said that is the only time NATO’s Article 5 has been invoked, which holds that members of the alliance will come to the defence of an ally under attack.

He added: “Britain and France came to their aid deploying 1,000s of personnel to Afghanistan, including numerous parliamentary colleagues, past & present. It’s deeply disrespectful to ignore such service & sacrifice.”

Former Tory veterans minister Johnny Mercer called Mr Vance a “clown” who “needs to check his privilege”.

Helen Maguire, the Lib Dem’s defence spokesperson who also served in the army before her career in politics, accused Mr Trump’s deputy of “erasing the hundreds of British troops who gave their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan from history”.

She said: “Six of my own regiment, the Royal Military Police, didn’t return home from Iraq. This is a sinister attempt to deny that reality. Vance has demeaned his office.”

Speaking after Mr Vance clarified his remarks, a Downing Street spokesperson said the US vice president was “talking about other countries” when asked if he should apologise.

They added Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer “is full of admiration for British troops who fought alongside the US and others in wars and their courage and bravery”.

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch told GB News “a lot of people are getting carried away”.

“They’re saying loads of things and getting quite animated, let’s keep cool heads,” she said.

“I believe President Trump and JD Vance want peace, they’re looking after their national interest, we need to do so as well.”

It is not the first time Mr Vance has riled the UK, after previously attacking it over free speech and saying the UK is “Islamist under Labour”.

A history of JD Vance riling the UK

JD Vance seems to save some of his most incendiary comments about other countries for the UK.

Donald Trump’s vice president has regularly caused outrage among MPs, most recently with what many saw as a perceived dig at British troops.

During last year’s presidential election campaign, Mr Vance suggested Labour’s victory here made Britain the “first truly Islamist country” with nuclear weapons.

Recalling a conversation about who might be “the first truly Islamist country that will get a nuclear weapon”, he said rather than it being somewhere like Iran, he settled on the UK “since Labour just took over”.

Mr Vance also used a landmark speech at the Munich Security Conference to criticise the UK and Europe over free speech, saying there had been a “backslide away from conscience rights” that had put “basic liberties of religious Britons, in particular, in the crosshairs”.

He doubled down on those remarks during Sir Keir Starmer’s meeting with Donald Trump in the Oval Office last week, claiming the government’s stance is something that affects US tech companies and, therefore, American citizens.

Sir Keir interjected, saying “we’ve had free speech for a very long time, it will last a long time, and we are very proud of that”.

The row comes after the Trump administration paused military aid to Ukraine following an extraordinary showdown between the US President and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

The falling out has thrown into jeopardy the prospect of a minerals deal, which would give the US access to Ukraine’s deposits of rare earth minerals.

Mr Trump has suggested this would deter Russia from invading Ukraine again if a peace deal is struck – but Sir Keir said yesterday that it would not be enough on its own.

The prime minister told MPs on Monday that Britain must “lead from the front” on supporting Ukraine and Europe must “do the heavy lifting to support peace on our continent”.

However, he said “to succeed, this effort must also have strong US backing”.

Politics

Everything you need to know about Sir Keir Starmer’s four-point peace plan for Ukraine

Published

34 seconds ago

March 4, 2025

admin

Everything you need to know about Sir Keir Starmer's four-point peace plan for Ukraine

Sir Keir Starmer has declared that a “coalition of the willing” will come together and draw up a peace plan to end the war in Ukraine.

The prime minister said this will be presented to US President Donald Trump for his support, after he clashed publicly with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the White House last week.

Sir Keir unveiled his four-point plan for peace in the Commons on Monday, the day after European leaders – plus Canada and Turkey – hurriedly gathered in London for talks on the Ukraine war.

Politics latest: JD Vance hits back at claims he disrespected British troops

He said this so-called “coalition of the willing” would enforce any peace deal in the war-torn country, and announced a plan for Kyiv to use £1.6bn of UK export finance to buy 5,000 more air defence missiles.

Washington has since paused military aid to Kyiv, with no indication of how long this could last.

Here, Sky News explains everything you need to know about Europe’s plan for peace.

What is Sir Keir Starmer’s four-point plan?

The prime minister has warned there are more tough choices to come on the war in Ukraine, insisting the UK must “lead from the front” when it comes to securing peace in Europe.

He did just that over the weekend, when 19 leaders gathered at Lancaster House to discuss building a lasting peace.

Led by the UK and France, the initiative could see troops from a number of European and NATO countries deployed to Ukraine as peacekeepers in order to deter Russian President Vladimir Putin from rearming and attacking again in the future.

At its heart is a four-point plan, which was agreed by attendees of the security summit:

1. Any lasting peace must guarantee Ukraine’s sovereignty and security

2. Military aid to Ukraine must remain, while increasing the economic pressure on Russia

3. If a peace deal is reached, Ukraine’s defences must continue to be boosted

4. European leaders will join forces in a “coalition of the willing” to devise a peace plan for Ukraine. This will be presented to the US

What is the ‘coalition of the willing’?

The final point of Sir Keir’s plan points to a “coalition of the willing”, which will come together to devise a peace plan for Ukraine.

This could see troops from a number of European and NATO countries deployed to Ukraine as peacekeepers in order to deter Putin from invading in the future.

Sir Keir said Europe “must do the heavy lifting” on defence and indicated several countries had expressed interest in being part of the coalition.

This approach would allow NATO members to act in a group but not under the NATO umbrella, avoiding vetoes from member states who do not approve or do not wish to be involved.

It is not yet entirely clear who the “coalition of the willing” are, though the UK and France are likely involved. It is also likely the Baltic states – Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia – will sign up to the initiative.