Angela Rayner criticises ‘scaremongering’ over inheritance tax changes for farmers
Angela Rayner has criticised “scaremongering” over Labour’s reforms to inheritance tax on farms.
The deputy prime minister had to defend the government’s changes to the levy in a bruising House of Commons session, as she stood in for Sir Keir Starmer while the prime minister was away at a G20 summit.
It came a day after more than 10,000 farmers gathered in Westminster to protest against the announcement in last month’s budget.
Politics latest: Rayner faces hostile crowd
The government will reduce inheritance tax relief applied to farms from 6 April 2026. The full 100% relief will only apply to the first £1m of property. Above this amount, landowners will pay inheritance tax at a reduced rate of 20%, rather than the standard 40%.
Farmers will still benefit from reductions, with Labour saying that a “typical” couple handing their estate to their children can gift up to £3m tax-free, and then pay the 20% tax. They will also have 10 years to pay the charge, interest-free.
However, many in agriculture have criticised the decision, and political parties from across the spectrum questioned Ms Rayner on it.
Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrat deputy leader and MP for St Albans in Hertfordshire, said farmers felt “betrayed” by the Conservative government and “lied to by Labour”.
Ms Rayner said she was “sorry” to hear that farmers were “distressed by what I would say is scaremongering around what the Labour Party is doing”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Why should farmers be taxed more?
Alex Burghart, the shadow chancellor for the Duchy of Lancaster, was standing in for Kemi Badenoch – as it is convention for the leader of the Opposition to stand aside from Prime Minister’s Questions if the prime minister is away.
He asked Ms Rayner about a “typical, mid-sized, 360-acre” farm in Yorkshire – saying a family had spoken to their accountant and been told they could be liable to pay £500,000 in inheritance tax – equivalent to 12 years of profit.
The Tory MP added that the NFU is set to publish a report showing 75% of all commercial farms will fall above the threshold of paying inheritance tax.
Read more on farming:
Thousands protest at Downing Street
Jeremy Clarkson says govt should ‘back down’
Rowdy PMQs had ‘teacher is away vibes’
From the outset, this session of PMQs had a distinct “the teacher is away” vibe.
It was rowdy, shouty and prickly.
Labour MPs chuckled as their opposite numbers loudly cheered Alex Burghart – the relatively unknown shadow minister standing in for Kemi Badenoch today.
Angela Rayner quickly reminded colleagues he was the “minister for growth” during Liz Truss’s disastrous spell in Downing Street, sparking whooping from the government benches.
Burghart responded by referencing the views of “city economists… real economists” – a stinging reference to a story around the chancellor changing her LinkedIn profile to remove an apparently erroneous reference to being an economist at Halifax Bank of Scotland before entering politics.
With his microphone frequently cracking and topping out, the shadow Cabinet Office minister zeroed in loudly on inflation and changes to inheritance tax for farmers.
Other Tory backbenchers and the Lib Dem deputy followed suit, seizing on the farming protests that engulfed Westminster yesterday.
It led to what may be the main news line from this session – as Angela Rayner accused critics of “scaremongering” over the impact of the agriculture changes.
There were reprimands from the Speaker as well, with one Labour backbencher told off and the Tory MP Danny Kruger admonished.
He bit back though, saying to the Speaker “are you talking to me? I haven’t opened my mouth” and gestured to colleagues behind to shift the blame.
Sir Lindsay Hoyle later apologised to Mr Kruger – saying his colleague James Wild had put his hand up to being the naughty Tory.
The Speaker warned the pair they should maybe not sit next to each other again.
An appropriately classroom-like exchange in a session where calm maturity was not always at the front of many minds.
Ms Rayner says she “stands by the figures” the government had previously laid out.
She said: “The vast majority of estate owners will see no change and pay no tax on land valued at £1m.
“Couples can pass on £3m tax-free, and those above the thresholds will pay only half the normal rate, and can pay over ten years interest-free.”
👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈
Reform’s Lee Anderson also criticised the policy, and Conservative Saqib Bhatti asked Ms Rayner why Labour has “declared war on British farmers”.
Ms Rayner said the government “hasn’t declared war on farmers” – before reiterating her response on thresholds.
She also said Labour needed to raise money to account for the “£22bn black hole from the Conservatives”.
The crypto community is missing the opportunity to reimagine rather than transpose rulemaking for financial services. More technologists must join the regulatory conversation.
Whitehall officials tried to convince Michael Gove to go to court to cover up the grooming scandal in 2011, Sky News can reveal.
Dominic Cummings, who was working for Lord Gove at the time, has told Sky News that officials in the Department for Education (DfE) wanted to help efforts by Rotherham Council to stop a national newspaper from exposing the scandal.
In an interview with Sky News, Mr Cummings said that officials wanted a “total cover-up”.
Politics latest: Grooming gangs findings unveiled
The revelation shines a light on the institutional reluctance of some key officials in central government to publicly highlight the grooming gang scandal.
In 2011, Rotherham Council approached the Department for Education asking for help following inquiries by The Times. The paper’s then chief reporter, the late Andrew Norfolk, was asking about sexual abuse and trafficking of children in Rotherham.
The council went to Lord Gove’s Department for Education for help. Officials considered the request and then recommended to Lord Gove’s office that the minister back a judicial review which might, if successful, stop The Times publishing the story.
Lord Gove rejected the request on the advice of Mr Cummings. Sources have independently confirmed Mr Cummings’ account.
Education Secretary Michael Gove in 2011. Pic: PA
Mr Cummings told Sky News: “Officials came to me in the Department of Education and said: ‘There’s this Times journalist who wants to write the story about these gangs. The local authority wants to judicially review it and stop The Times publishing the story’.
“So I went to Michael Gove and said: ‘This council is trying to actually stop this and they’re going to use judicial review. You should tell the council that far from siding with the council to stop The Times you will write to the judge and hand over a whole bunch of documents and actually blow up the council’s JR (judicial review).’
“Some officials wanted a total cover-up and were on the side of the council…
“They wanted to help the local council do the cover-up and stop The Times’ reporting, but other officials, including in the DfE private office, said this is completely outrageous and we should blow it up. Gove did, the judicial review got blown up, Norfolk stories ran.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Grooming gangs victim speaks out
The judicial review wanted by officials would have asked a judge to decide about the lawfulness of The Times’ publication plans and the consequences that would flow from this information entering the public domain.
A second source told Sky News that the advice from officials was to side with Rotherham Council and its attempts to stop publication of details it did not want in the public domain.
One of the motivations cited for stopping publication would be to prevent the identities of abused children entering the public domain.
There was also a fear that publication could set back the existing attempts to halt the scandal, although incidents of abuse continued for many years after these cases.
Sources suggested that there is also a natural risk aversion amongst officials to publicity of this sort.
Read more on grooming gangs:
What we do and don’t know from the data
A timeline of the scandal
Mr Cummings, who ran the Vote Leave Brexit campaign and was Boris Johnson’s right-hand man in Downing Street, has long pushed for a national inquiry into grooming gangs to expose failures at the heart of government.
He said the inquiry, announced today, “will be a total s**tshow for Whitehall because it will reveal how much Whitehall worked to try and cover up the whole thing.”
He also described Mr Johnson, with whom he has a long-standing animus, as a “moron’ for saying that money spent on inquiries into historic child sexual abuse had been “spaffed up the wall”.
Asked by Sky News political correspondent Liz Bates why he had not pushed for a public inquiry himself when he worked in Number 10 in 2019-20, Mr Cummings said Brexit and then COVID had taken precedence.
“There are a million things that I wanted to do but in 2019 we were dealing with the constitutional crisis,” he said.
The Department for Education and Rotherham Council have been approached for comment.
Gemini is set to receive approval from Malta, while Coinbase is expected to get the green light from Luxembourg, according to Reuters.
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports1 year agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Sports2 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Environment2 years agoGame-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike