Connect with us

Published

on

She seemed perfect, at first. Her CV brimmed with all kinds of qualifications. And she had years of experience caring for vulnerable people.  

As Sarah Whitaker sat at her kitchen table and looked through the paperwork the care agency had sent her, she knew that Tracy was the one she could trust to look after David, her 89-year-old dad.

Retired businessman David Seal suffered a stroke in the summer and needed more and more support at home.

He was taking a daily cocktail of strong prescription medicines and also needed help emptying his catheter bag because going to the toilet had become difficult recently.

“We need somebody experienced in stroke management and catheter care,” said Sarah. “But we also needed somebody who could drive my dad to the town and back. And somebody who was a very good cook.

“My dad chose Tracy and she arrived the next day.”

Social care worker Tracy's profile with Access Care
Image:
Sarah was sent Tracy’s CV and profile by Hampshire-based Access Care

Tracy came by train and, on the journey to David’s home, revealed that she could not drive because there was a problem with her licence.

Sarah saw this as a red flag. But that wasn’t all she was worried about.

“We had to teach her how to open and close the catheter because she had never seen one before. And that was a surprise given her experience.”

It got worse. Tracy couldn’t cook and once served David deep-fried Brussels sprouts for lunch. Sarah was increasingly concerned about the carer’s medicine management skills too.

“She was giving dad pills here there and everywhere. And that’s a problem because if you give my dad a pill, he’ll swallow it. Whatever it is.”

This was far removed from the carer she had read so much about.

Sarah was introduced to Tracy through an introductory care agency, Hampshire-based Access Care. When Sarah got in touch about her concerns, the agency said they were confused too.

They had never had any complaints about Tracy. She was the model carer.

And then one sunny day in early September, as David was being pushed around the village in his wheelchair by his grandchildren, one of them pulled out a mobile phone to capture the happy scene.

“As soon as Tracy saw the camera she stepped out of view as quick as a flash,” said Sarah. “And later my daughter said that it seemed odd that she didn’t want to be on camera.”

The fake carer being pictured with David Seal
Image:
The woman who was looking after David Seal did not want to be pictured

Sarah rang the care agency again, who supplied her with a copy of Tracy’s driving licence. She looked at the video again.

“The image we had from the walk and the person in the driving licence photo were two different people.”

The next morning, Tracy – or whoever she was – packed her bags and left.

Sarah was horrified. She was left wondering who had been in her father’s house for nearly three weeks. It started to fit into place; the shoddy catheter care, the bad cooking and the poor handling of medicines.

She contacted the care agency again, who promptly contacted Tracy, who was adamant that she had been in the house caring for David.

Access Care contacted Hampshire Police. But the response was not what they expected.

A police constable replied on 4 November with disappointing news. They explained that officers had “limited lines of enquiry” and that because Tracy had denied the allegation, they would need an “independent witness” to confirm the allegation.

They seemed to be saying that they would not investigate, adding that it would be deemed “not in the public interest” to send a police officer to interview Tracy in person at her home, despite having her address.

Sarah Whitaker
Image:
Sarah said she only found out later that ‘Tracy’ was ‘two different people’

The police were clearly not interested and showed no signs of investigating. So as part of our investigation into this story, we tracked down Tracy to an address and decided to pay her a visit. To get her side of the story.

I arrived at a large housing estate and saw Tracy backing her car into the drive at the back. I approached her and said I wanted to speak to her about her work as a carer in David’s home.

At first, she said that she had worked very hard to provide the best care but that the family were not happy. She was very clear that she had lived in the home for nearly three weeks. No question about it.

But when I confronted Tracy with the photo evidence from the sunny village walk, her tone changed. She took in deep breath and sighed.

“I don’t know how to explain this,” she said slowly. “It’s so bad. Very bad. I’m sorry.”

Nick Martin speaks to Tracy, a social care worker whose identity was used by a fake carer
Image:
Tracy admitted to Sky News she sent a friend to care for David

Tracy explained to me that she had asked a friend to do the care job in her place, admitting that her friend was not a trained carer. She said nobody had forced her to do it and she had never done anything like this in the past.

She said she thought she could get away with it because the care agency never checked up on her.

“They [the agency] never met me face to face. They have to do more checks to know who is going in the house.”

Tracy, a social care worker, being confronted on a fake carer using her identity
Image:
The real Tracy said her care agency never checked in on her

I show Sarah the video of Tracy and her astonishing admission. “She was knowingly complicit and sent an untrained carer – a complete stranger – into the house of a vulnerable elderly man who is very ill. The nerve of the woman!”

Sarah did some research and reached out to the care regulator, the Care Quality Commission (CQC). But to her surprise, they said they could not help.

They don’t regulate introductory care agencies like the one Sarah used to hire Tracy.

“I thought it was absolutely incredible that the CQC were not involved and I was very surprised to discover that agencies like this send carers all over the the place but aren’t regulated in any way.”

Fully managed care is regulated by the CQC, while introductory agencies use self-employed carers
Image:
Fully managed care is regulated by the CQC, while introductory agencies – like Access Care – use self-employed carers

One of the reasons why the deception was picked up on so quickly is that Sarah lives next door to her dad. And so, we got around to talk to David and I asked him how he felt about having a stranger looking after him.

“I feel very cross about it. I feel fooled and misled,” he said. But David is also clear about another point: regulation. Or lack of it.

“There’s no point in being responsible for the care industry if you’re only dealing with people who are registered with you. It is quite pointless.”

A spokesperson for the Care Quality Commission told Sky News: “We appreciate the distress this incident has caused both Mr Seal and Mrs Whitaker, however as neither introductory agencies or self-employed carers are covered by CQC’s remit we are unable to take action in this case.

“These matters should be reported in the first instance to the local authority safeguarding team who have the remit to investigate the issue and take necessary action.

“Any questions regarding the legal framework for how health and social care is regulated in England is a matter for the government.”

Read more on social care:
Services for thousands ‘under threat’ after budget
Vulnerable children put in caravans in ‘stark failure’ – report

David Seal
Image:
David said CQC not regulating the introductory agencies is ‘pointless’

The care sector is big business. Home care services are worth over £12bn per year and rising, according to healthcare analysts LaingBuisson.

The government has written to Chief Executives of adult social care services telling them of their so-called ‘home first’ approach to healthcare, which supports people to live independently at home rather than being cared for in hospital. Just like the kind of care David was receiving.

And as winter comes and pressure increases on the NHS, these kinds of services are relied on more than ever.

“If you can’t guarantee that the person you’re expecting is the person you get then I think the system is very flawed,” Sarah tells me.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson told Sky News: “Our sympathies are with David’s family and friends in this deeply concerning case.

“This government inherited a social care system in crisis. We are committed to building a National Care Service – underpinned by national standards and delivered locally – to improve the consistency of care and ensure everyone can live an independent and dignified life.”

“A healthy NHS and social care system requires strong regulation to ensure patient and user safety and that’s why we are reforming the Care Quality Commission to make sure it is fit for purpose.”

Access Care CEO Tiggy Bradshaw also told Sky News: “We were shocked to hear of this terrible deception and are deeply sorry for what Mr Seal and his family have experienced.

“When we heard of these alarming allegations, we contacted Action Fraud and the police and commenced an urgent safeguarding review. We have been in close touch with the family throughout and will continue to collaborate with the police.

“We have strict protocols in place however these extremely unusual circumstances have given us cause for reflection.

“We are in the process of developing further security checks and procedures for families in receipt of care at home.”

Read more from Sky News:
One Direction stars arrive for Liam Payne’s funeral
Why is there talk of World War Three?

Several days after approaching Hampshire Police for comment, a spokesperson told us they were looking into the case, adding: “Officers are carrying out a number of enquiries and the incident is still under investigation to determine whether any crimes have been committed.”

Sarah meanwhile says she has been left deeply concerned by the incident.

Sarah Whitaker
Image:
‘If the system can be played this easily, then the system needs to change,’ Sarah said

“We knew nothing about this person who was in my dad’s home. For all I know she could have been an axe murderer,” she told Sky News.

“The fact that the carer was able to get away with it for as long as she did put the entire system in doubt.

“If the system can be played this easily, then the system needs to change.”

Continue Reading

UK

890 people arrested at Palestine Action protest yesterday – including 17 on suspicion of assaulting police officers

Published

on

By

890 people arrested at Palestine Action protest yesterday - including 17 on suspicion of assaulting police officers

The Metropolitan Police has said 890 people were arrested at a protest against the banning of Palestine Action as a terror group on Saturday – including 17 on suspicion of assaulting officers.

A total of 857 individuals were arrested in Parliament Square in London under the Terrorism Act 2000 over alleged offences, the force said.

It added that a further 33 were arrested for other offences, with 17 of those detained on suspicion of assaulting officers. The Met Police did not say what the other 16 arrests were for.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Claire Smart, who led the policing operation, thanked Met Police officers for their “professionalism and tireless work despite the level of abuse that they faced”.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Ms Smart said: “The violence we encountered during the operation was coordinated and carried out by a group of people, many wearing masks to conceal their identity, intent on creating as much disorder as possible.

“Many of those individuals have now been arrested and we have begun securing charges.”

Defend Our Juries, which organised the demonstrations, insisted the rally was “the picture of peaceful protest”.

More on London

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Do I look like a terrorist?’ nurse at protest asks Sky News

Ms Smart also claimed that the “contrast between this demonstration and the other protests we policed yesterday, including the Palestine Coalition march attended by around 20,000 people, was stark”.

She added: “You can express your support for a cause without committing an offence under the Terrorism Act or descending into violence and disorder, and many thousands of people do that in London every week.

“We have a duty to enforce the law without fear or favour. If you advertise that you are intending to commit a crime, we have no option but to respond accordingly.”

Defend Our Juries previously estimated 1,500 had gathered for the rally on Saturday, where many held signs saying: “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.”

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

Pics: PA
Image:
Pics: PA

The group has been banned as a terror group since 5 July after MPs voted overwhelmingly in favour of the move proposed by then-home secretary Yvette Cooper, making it illegal to express support for the group.

It came shortly after two Voyager aircraft suffered around £7m worth of damage at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on 20 June.

Defence Secretary John Healey told Sky’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips that he expects newly appointed Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood to be “just as tough” as her predecessor on Palestine Action.

He said: “I expect her to defend the decision the government has taken to proscribe Palestine Action because of what some of its members are responsible for, and were planning for.”

Read more from Sky News:
Israel warns Gaza City residents to flee
Anger over Israeli president’s planned visit to UK
Sydney beaches closed after fatal shark attack

The Met Police previously said the consequences for those charged under the Terrorism Act include a maximum sentence of six months’ imprisonment.

The Home Office is set to appeal against the High Court ruling allowing Palestine Action’s co-founder, Huda Ammori, to proceed with a legal challenge against the government over the group’s ban.

Continue Reading

UK

Labour considering using military barracks to house asylum seekers

Published

on

By

Labour considering using military barracks to house asylum seekers

Defence Secretary John Healey has told Sky News the government is considering using military barracks to house asylum seekers, as an estimated 1,000 people arrived in the UK on small boats on Saturday.

“We are looking at the potential use of military and non-military sites for temporary accommodation for the people who come across on these small boats that may not have a right to be here,” he told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips.

“I’m looking really hard at it. I’m looking at it with the Home Office, and I recognise that the loss of confidence of the public over recent years in Britain’s ability to control its borders needs to be satisfied. And we have to deal with this problem with the small boats,” Mr Healey added.

Politics latest: Labour considers housing migrants on military sites

The measure follows widespread protests this summer over housing migrants in hotels.

Fresh small boat arrivals were spotted on Sunday, after an estimated 1,000 people arrived on Saturday – when French authorities said 24 people were rescued while trying to cross the Channel.

The figures compare to a relatively recent lull in crossings. In the previous seven days (30 August to 5 September) the Home Office recorded no small boat arrivals.

More on Asylum

Zia Yusuf, head of policy at Reform UK, told Trevor Phillips that Britain has become a “soft touch” on migration, before suggesting between 15 and 25 detention sites will need to be built to detain asylum seekers. He described these as “purpose-built modular steel structures”.

“We can look around the world at where things have worked and worked well. President Trump stood up 3,000 detention beds in eight days. That was this year in the state of Florida – using steel modular structures,” Mr Yusuf said.

He added that the president’s crackdown has significantly reduced illegal border crossings and suggested the same could happen in the English Channel to deter migrants.

“These are unarmed, largely men in dinghies, we don’t need a particularly formidable military to be able to take them to a detention centre,” he said.

Zia Yusuf from Reform UK said he believes Britain has become a "soft touch" on migration
Image:
Zia Yusuf from Reform UK said he believes Britain has become a “soft touch” on migration

Shabana Mahmood will have the job of tackling illegal immigration after taking over from Yvette Cooper as home secretary on Friday – when Sir Keir Starmer carried out a major cabinet reshuffle following the resignation of his deputy prime minister Angela Rayner.

National Crime Agency (NCA) figures show record levels of disruption of immigration crime networks in 2024/25.

Join the Sky News immigration debate

Officials believe this contributed to the lowest number of boats crossing the Channel in August since 2019.

But, despite the 3,567 arrivals in August being the lowest since 2021, when looking across the whole of 2025, the figure of 29,003 is the highest on record for this point in a year.

Sky’s Political Correspondent Liz Bates said that after Labour scrapped the previous government’s controversial Rwanda policy and shut down the Bibby Stockholm barge, ministers are “hitting up against many of the same problems” with “a really broken and very slow asylum system”.

“The context to all of this is a huge shake-up at the Home Office, and I think something of an admission that [Yvette] Cooper, despite her years of experience, could not get a grip… of this problem of people coming across the Channel in small boats and then ending up in asylum hotels,” she added.

Army bases were previously used by the Conservative government, but this prompted local protests, and the sites were widely criticised for their poor conditions in some cases.

Read more from Sky News:
Farage wants Afghan women deported
Huge rise in asylum protests
Attack on Epping asylum seeker

As Sky’s Home Editor Jason Farrell writes, Ms Mahmood has become the home secretary of a country where the national flag is being hoisted as a symbol of dissatisfaction – with anger at the arrival of desperate migrants crossing the Channel in small boats.

Sir Keir’s sweeping changes

Sir Keir Starmer has announced sweeping changes to his ministerial team in the Home Office as his government works to get a grip of illegal migration to the UK.

Here’s a list of who has been moved, besides the home secretary.

Dame Angela Eagle, who was border security and asylum minister, has been moved to the environment department.

Dame Diana Johnson, who was policing and crime minister, has been moved to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).

She has said in a post on X that it was an “honour” to work with police officers, and she is “delighted” to be moving to the DWP.

Dan Jarvis has been given a role in the Cabinet Office, in addition to his post as security minister in the Home Office.

And Sarah Jones, who was industry minister, has been moved to the Home Office.

Continue Reading

UK

Harry wants to put ‘trials and tribulations’ behind him in first UK visit in months – but will he meet the King?

Published

on

By

Harry wants to put 'trials and tribulations' behind him in first UK visit in months - but will he meet the King?

Prince Harry will carry out a rare public engagement outside of London this week, as he heads back to the UK for a visit with “no negativity”.

After a tumultuous five years, the Duke of Sussex and his team are hoping this may be a trip that can help begin to “put the trials and tribulations behind them” and herald a reset, according to sources close to the royal.

It’s been confirmed the duke will be in Nottingham on Tuesday, visiting a youth organisation that he’s maintained strong personal contact with since moving to America.

Harry, who is no longer a working royal, is set to carry out a run of engagements and make a substantial donation to BBC Children in Need to support work tackling violence affecting young people.

Prince Harry, last seen in the UK in April 2025. Pic: AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali
Image:
Prince Harry, last seen in the UK in April 2025. Pic: AP Photo/Alberto Pezzali

It is not known if he will meet with his estranged brother, the Prince of Wales, or his father, the King.

The King is currently in Balmoral with the Queen, and so far, no engagements have been announced for the couple this coming week.

The monarch last met his youngest son face-to-face more than 18 months ago, when the duke made a transatlantic dash to see his father after hearing about his cancer diagnosis. The pair spent less than an hour together.

‘There is no negativity with this trip,’ say sources close to Harry

Harry’s past visits to the UK, since stepping away from royal life, have often been shrouded in secrecy with any public moments taking place in London. This will also be the first time in a while that he isn’t returning due to a court case.

Sources close to Harry suggest that already means “there is no negativity with this trip” saying that “Harry is really looking forward to coming back to do what he loves”, focusing on his charity work.

“It’s a moment to put the trials and tribulations of the last few years behind us,” they added.

But Harry and his team are well aware that there will be considerable interest in whether or not he will see his father, the King. Hopes of reconciliation and a potential meeting were ramped up earlier in the summer when members of Harry’s team were photographed meeting with the King’s communications secretary for the first time. Both sides aren’t commenting on any possible contact between Harry and his father this week.

When Harry arrives in London on Monday the King will be in Scotland, marking Queen Elizabeth’s death and his Accession Day. But it’s understood that Harry is due to be in the UK for most of the coming week. The strain in the relationship between father and son was emphasised by Harry in an interview he gave after he lost his legal challenge against the Home Office over his security.

We also understand that his team have tried to “pack in as much as possible” in the coming days, with a number of private meetings and public visits to other organisations with which he has longstanding links.

We are told he will not be meeting lawyers.

Ultimately it appears that Prince Harry and his team are hoping this visit will have a different, more upbeat tone, compared to other recent trips to the UK, in what feels like a reset for the duke.

It has been suggested that he may have wanted to make the trip longer but as he’s “financially responsible” for the visit, including the travel and security bill for him and his team, his time here comes at a considerable cost.

Read more:
Harry’s broken relationship with Royal Family – how did we get here?
Harry and Meghan extend Netflix partnership

Harry last visited the Community Recording Studio (CRS) in Nottingham’s St Ann’s area to mark World Mental Health Day in 2019, just two months before he and the Duchess of Sussex announced they were stepping down as senior working royals and moving to North America.

The Duke of Sussex last visited the Community Recording Studio in Nottingham in 2019. Pic: PA
Image:
The Duke of Sussex last visited the Community Recording Studio in Nottingham in 2019. Pic: PA

He is planning to hold a private briefing with Children in Need, the Police and Crime Commission, the CRS and community outreach group Epic Partners in Nottingham, stage informal catch-ups with some of the young people he met before, and watch performances from CRS artists and make a short speech.

Harry appears to be focusing on his philanthropic ventures while his wife, Meghan, works on her lifestyle brand, As Ever. She is not expected to join him on the trip to the UK.

Meghan is not expected to join the duke on his trip. Pic: Netflix
Image:
Meghan is not expected to join the duke on his trip. Pic: Netflix

Senior aides to the King and the duke were pictured together in London this July in what was reported to be an initial step towards opening channels of communication between the two sides.

Harry levelled repeated accusations at the King, Queen, William and Kate in his Oprah interview, Netflix documentary, and memoir Spare. But he outlined hopes for a “reconciliation” with his family in a BBC interview in May.

His sit-down with the BBC came in the wake of a court battle over his security in the UK. His level of security was changed after the couple stepped down as senior royals.

Harry took a legal challenge to the Court of Appeal, which he ultimately lost in May. He said he “can’t see a world in which I would be bringing my wife and children back” to the UK.

Continue Reading

Trending