Connect with us

Published

on

Britain is now “directly involved” in the Ukraine war after its Storm Shadow missiles were used to strike targets inside Russia, according to Moscow’s ambassador.

Speaking to Sky News, Andrei Kelin also warned the West to carefully consider the lower bar Russia has established for using nuclear weapons.

It comes after Western allies green-lit Ukraine‘s use of long-range missiles to strike inside Russia this week, following months of requests.

War latest: Follow live updates

British Storm Shadow missiles were fired into Russia just days after President Biden authorised the same policy shift.

Russia’s President Putin responded on Thursday by saying Russia had tested a new intermediate-range missile in a strike on the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

He warned it could also be used against military facilities of countries that allow Kyiv to use their own missiles.

“We believe that we have the right to use our weapons against military facilities of the countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities,” Mr Putin said.

“And in case of escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond resolutely in a mirror way.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Analysis: How Ukraine will use UK missiles

The Russian ambassador told Sky News’ Mark Austin that Britain allowing Ukraine to use its missiles over the border had dragged the UK into the conflict.

“Absolutely, Britain and UK is now directly involved in this war, because this firing cannot happen without NATO staff, British staff as well,” said Mr Kelin.

He added: “The US administration, support by France and the UK, has made a deliberate decision to make these strikes, which seriously escalates the situation, and it can bring a collision between the nuclear powers.”

Mr Kelin called it “deliberate cheating of us” – claiming he had received multiple assurances the Storm Shadows would only be used inside Ukrainian territory.

What are Storm Shadow cruise missiles?

The air-to-air missile has a strike capability of more than 155 miles (250km) – meaning it would potentially allow Ukraine to hit further into Russian territory.

The missile weighs 1.3 tonnes and is just over 5m long.

It is launched from the air, and in theory can be used from Ukraine’s Soviet-made jets.

UK-owned Storm Shadow missiles are made in Stevenage by MBDA. Each cruise missile costs an estimated £2m.

The Storm Shadow was originally developed as a project between the UK and France in the mid 1990s.

It was used in Iraq in 2003, while France, Italy and the UK used it in Libya in 2011.

The missiles have also been used to bomb Islamic State targets in Syria and Iraq.

A 41 Sqaudron (the RAF's test and evaluation Sqn) Tornado GR4, preparing to test fire four Storm Shadow missiles over the Atlantic Ocean in 2014
Pic: Crown copyright
Image:
A 41 Squadron Tornado GR4, preparing to test fire four Storm Shadow missiles over the Atlantic Ocean in 2014. Pic: Crown copyright

Asked what the difference was between Ukraine using British missiles and Russia using Chinese, Iranian and North Korean equipment and manpower, Mr Kelin pointed to foreign fighters on the Ukrainian side.

“On that subject, I can say easily that we have plenty of mercenaries from different countries that are fighting right now on the side of Ukraine,” he said.

“We just have seen in the Kursk area of the Polish unit, which has a special uniform worn by Polish soldiers. So what’s the matter?”

In response to Mr Kelin’s comments, a Downing Street spokesperson said the government would not be “deterred or distracted by commentary from Vladimir Putin or the Russian ambassador”.

Until this week, Britain said its tanks, anti-tank missiles and other equipment could be used inside Russia, but had kept restrictions on long-range missiles – echoing America’s policy.

President Putin again raised the spectre of nuclear weapons this week when he approved changes that lower the threshold for such a strike.

Many have dismissed the move as empty sabre rattling, but Russia’s ambassador told Sky News he hoped the change “would be carefully considered by Western experts” as underestimating the risk of escalation is “dangerous”.

Putin threatens Western military facilities

Reports on Thursday suggested Russia may have fired an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) at the Ukrainian city of Dnipro.

President Zelenskyy said the weapon used had the speed and altitude of a ICBM.

He added: “Today, our crazy neighbour has once again shown what he really is and how he despises dignity, freedom, and human life in general. He is so afraid that he is already using new missiles.”

An investigation is under way to confirm the type of missile, Mr Zelenskyy added.

A spokesperson for the British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said reports of the missile’s use were “deeply concerning”.

In this photo provided by Ukraine's 24th Mechanised Brigade press service, servicemen of the 24th Mechanised Brigade fire 120mm mortar towards Russian positions near Chasiv Yar town, in Donetsk region, Ukraine, Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2024. (Oleg Petrasiuk/Ukrainian 24th Mechanised Brigade via AP) Submission Date:	Nov 21, 2024 08:12 (GMT)
Image:
Ukrainian troops fire a 120mm mortar towards Russian positions near Chasiv Yar town, in Donetsk region. Pic: AP

Read more from Sky News:
Why is there talk of World War Three?

Arrest warrant issued for Israeli PM

However, in his TV address on Thursday evening, President Putin spoke of his forces using a new intermediate-range missile to hit a missile factory in Dnipro.

American officials also said their initial assessment was that the missile was an intermediate-range weapon.

In contrast, an ICBM can travel further – with a ranger greater than 3,500 miles (5,600km). They are generally used to deliver nuclear warheads but can carry other payloads.

Continue Reading

UK

Three die and a fourth in serious condition in hospital after helicopter crash on Isle of Wight

Published

on

By

Three die and a fourth in serious condition in hospital after helicopter crash on Isle of Wight

Three people have died following a helicopter crash during a flying lesson on the Isle of Wight.

A fourth person is in hospital in a serious condition following the incident, according to Hampshire Police.

Officers were called to the scene of a “helicopter that had come down” off Shanklin Road near Ventnor at 9.24am on Monday, the force said.

A spokesman for the aircraft’s owner Northumbria Helicopters said G-OCLV – which is listed as a Robinson R44 II helicopter – was involved in the accident during a flying lesson.

Fire and rescue vehicles at the scene near Ventnor. Pic: Stu Southwell
Image:
Fire and rescue vehicles at the scene near Ventnor. Pic: Stu Southwell

Aerial view of the crash site
Image:
Aerial view of the crash site

Four people, including the pilot, were on board the aircraft, which departed nearby Sandown Airport at 9am, the company also said in a statement.

A critical care team, including a doctor and specialist paramedic, was also sent to the crash site, Hants and Isle of Wight Air Ambulance added, alongside fire engines and other emergency vehicles.

The Air Accidents Investigation Branch confirmed it was alerted to the incident and was sending a team to investigate. A major incident was declared but has since been stood down.

A spokesperson for Hampshire and Isle of Wight Air Ambulance said in a statement: “We have treated and airlifted one patient to the Major Trauma Centre, University Hospital Southampton. Our thoughts are with them, and everyone involved in today’s incident.”

Darren Toogood, editor and publisher at the Island Echo, told Sky News presenter Kamali Melbourne the helicopter crashed on a “significantly busy, high-speed road” between the village of Godshill and the seaside town of Shanklin.

“It was on one of the first flights of the day,” he said.

“It’s a bank holiday weekend in August on the Isle of Wight. It’s an incredibly busy area. Lots of tourists down at the moment. It appears no vehicles were involved, which is incredible, given how busy this road would have been this morning.”

A witness, Leigh Goldsmith, told the Isle of Wight County Press she saw the helicopter “spiralling” before crashing into a hedge as she drove along the road.

Read more from Sky News:
Bands pull out from festival after group ‘cut off’ over flag
Ofwat probes payments to water bosses after Yorkshire row

Police have closed Shanklin Road, blocking it off with several emergency vehicles, and are warning people to avoid the area.

Northumbria Helicopters said it is “giving its full cooperation to the authorities investigating this incident”.

Joe Robertson, the MP for Isle of Wight East, said the local community was in shock.

“My heart goes out to the families of those who lost their lives in the helicopter crash outside Shanklin today,” he said in a statement. “It is very sad and tragic news during what should have been a happy Bank Holiday helicopter flight from Sandown Airport. The whole community is in shock.

“My sincere thanks to all the emergency services personnel who have been involved and to the investigators for their work ahead.”

Continue Reading

UK

‘Tamed’ algorithms and plummeting porn views: Impact of new online safety rules revealed one month on

Published

on

By

'Tamed' algorithms and plummeting porn views: Impact of new online safety rules revealed one month on

Sweeping new rules designed to deal with the “total Wild West” young people were experiencing online have now been in place across the UK for a month.

Ofcom’s Children’s Codes require pornography and other harmful content to be kept away from young people, either through age verification or algorithm changes.

More than half a million people have signed a petition calling for the Online Safety Act to be repealed, while ministers insist the legislation’s been a success.

So what difference have these controversial new regulations made?

‘I feel more clean’

In the days before they were enforced, Sky News spoke to a group of teenagers at a youth club in Warrington, and their experiences online were stark.

They told us about frequently stumbling across violence, pornography and harmful mental health content in their social media feeds.

One 17-year-old described seeing more harmful and inappropriate content online “than I can count”. Even a 12-year-old described being shown language that “can be quite explicit for children my age”.

So, one month later, we spoke to some of the teenagers again. The difference in what they reported was remarkable.

Ryan, 17, told us previously that the internet was a “very, very malicious” place and described frequently seeing inappropriate content.

Just one month on, he says his algorithm now seems “tamed” – although he’d still describe the internet as malicious.

“[My] algorithms have been quite tame in comparison to what they were. I haven’t seen any sort of advertisements and stuff that can be alluding towards anything inappropriate,” he said.

Liam, 16, also said Instagram felt “tamed” compared to what it was like before.

He was previously being served a lot of eating disorder content but “in the time that the rules have been in place I don’t actually think I’ve seen any”.

“I used to see them every few scrolls so it’s very much gone down.”

Young people gathered at the Warrington Youth Zone to talk to Sky News about online safety
Image:
Young people gathered at the Warrington Youth Zone to talk to Sky News about online safety

Seventeen-year-old Indie said she now feels like she “can actually scroll on the internet worry-free of what’s going to pop up”. Abbey, 17, also said she feels less worried about scrolling now.

“I feel really good about [the new rules] because now I don’t have to worry about seeing things I don’t want to see,” she said.

Ryan, 15, previously told us he was frequently being shown violent content that would ruin his day. Now, “when I’m scrolling TikTok, I’m free from violence”, he said.

“It feels better, to be honest. I feel more clean, in a sort of way, because like, I’ve not seen it.”

Of the six teenagers we re-interviewed, only one – 15-year-old Oliver – said he hadn’t really noticed a change.

However, harmful content is still sometimes being shown to teens, we soon found out.

Self-harm content on TikTok

We decided to test the social media platforms ourselves, inspired by an experiment run by the Molly Rose Foundation (MRF) in the weeks running up to the rules being enforced.

At that time, MRF found their teen Instagram and TikTok accounts were bombarded with self-harm and suicide content.

More science and tech news:
New dinosaur discovered
TikTok puts UK jobs at risk

Sky News experimented with fake teen accounts to see whether harmful content was still available
Image:
Sky News experimented with fake teen accounts to see whether harmful content was still available

One month later, we created TikTok and Instagram accounts belonging to a 15-year-old and searched for terms relating to suicide and self-harm.

On Instagram, all three search terms took us to a mental health support page, signposting to helplines and advice.

On TikTok, however, that wasn’t the case.

One search term took us to a mental health support page, similar to Instagram’s.

Another search term showed the message “no results”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Teens targeted with ‘suicide content’

But a third, relating to a specific type of self-harm, brought up numerous posts that should no longer be shown to young people under Ofcom’s guidance.

Some posts used euphemisms, others were more explicit about their content. None of it should be available to children in the UK now.

In response to our experiment, a TikTok spokesperson said:

“TikTok has designed 70+ features and settings that support the safety and well-being of teens and families on our app, and we partner with organisations such as Samaritans and the International Association for Suicide Prevention to bring well-being resources directly to our community.

“We continually enforce comprehensive Community Guidelines, with over 99% of violative content proactively removed by TikTok.

“This single account does not reflect the real experience of a teen on our platform.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Children as young as six’ finding porn

Pornography views plummet…

But a lot of the controversy about these rules hasn’t come from children. Adults use the internet too and the new age verification rules seem to have impacted the way they surf the web.

Not everyone’s happy about it.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What are the new online rules?

In the days after the new rules came in, hundreds of thousands of people signed a petition to repeal the Online Safety Act, the legislation that underpins Ofcom’s regulations.

Despite the government responding to that petition to say it had “no plans” to repeal the act, the number of signatories has now passed half a million.

“We all want children to be safe online, but I don’t think those benefits outweigh the significant costs, not just to millions of low-abiding children and adults in the UK, but also the effect this is having elsewhere around the world,” said Matthew Feeney, advocacy manager at Big Brother Watch.

He brought up privacy concerns before the rules were introduced and says he’s still concerned, having seen them in action.

“It’s doing the UK no favours internationally,” he said. “No other liberal democracy has taken steps like this in this kind of way.

“There are ways to talk about child safety online without embracing this approach to the internet, which treats everyone as a child by default.”

In Westminster, the rules proved controversial too; when Reform leader Nigel Farage said his party would repeal the act if elected, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle responded on Sky News by saying Mr Farage was “on the side of predators”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Minister’s Farage comments ‘no slip of the tongue’

“Anybody who thinks this legislation is going to be perfect in this moment must think again,” said Baroness Beeban Kidron, founder of 5Rights and a longtime supporter of the new legislation.

“It should not be a conversation about attackers, detractors, defenders. What we have to do is go again, and again, and again until we get the balance right.”

One of the most obvious ways general internet use has changed since the rules came in is through pornography.

According to a recent report by the Children’s Commissioner, the world’s four largest pornography sites received nearly 11 billion visitors each month in 2020; more than the number of visitors to Amazon, LinkedIn, Netflix, Zoom and eBay combined.

But within a day of the new regulations, the number of UK visitors to pornography sites plummeted – and has stayed low.

Data given to Sky News by Similarweb showed that between 19 July and 15 August, there was a 45% drop in the number of UK users to Pornhub, the country’s most popular pornography site.

Across the top 100 sites, there was a 33% drop.

Even pornography-based forums took a hit – Subreddits linked to bondage, discipline, sadism, and masochism (BDSM), for example, are experiencing 12% fewer visits from the UK than before the rules were introduced.

But that doesn’t necessarily mean the UK has lost its appetite for adult content.

But VPN use seems to be up

At the same time as UK porn visits were plummeting, the use of virtual private networks (VPNs) was rocketing, as people bypassed new age verification pages altogether.

VPNs mask their users’ location and may mean that plenty of people were accessing porn… they just didn’t look like they were in the UK.

The number of people searching for VPNs on Google spiked dramatically in the days after the rules were introduced.

Although the interest has waned, it is still higher than pre-regulation levels.

Five out of Apple’s top 10 downloaded apps were VPNs just one day after the rules started being enforced.

Baroness Beeban doesn’t believe it is children using VPNs to bypass age verification.

“I’ve actually found it extraordinary that the assumption is that all of the VPN surge is children. Think about it carefully.

“A lot of it will be adults who are actually trying to hide their own behaviour now that you actually have to be a bit more transparent.”

Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK

Continue Reading

UK

‘Headphone dodgers’ targeted by new TfL campaign

Published

on

By

'Headphone dodgers' targeted by new TfL campaign

A campaign encouraging people to use headphones when playing music on public transport is being rolled out in London from today.

Posters will begin appearing on the Elizabeth line on Tuesday reminding travellers not to play music out loud or to have conversations on speaker mode, as it may disturb other passengers.

It is the latest part of Transport for London’s Travel Kind campaign, which is being rolled out across the wider transport network.

Rules around train travel already make playing music out loud an offence. But like other issues, such as fare evasion, this is subject to being enforced by the British Transport Police or the train operators themselves.

People using their phones for loud content has become a political issue in recent months, with both the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives urging ministers to take action on it.

Earlier this year, the Lib Dems called for fines of up to £1,000 for “headphone dodgers” who play music out loud on buses and trains, while Tory shadow transport secretary Richard Holden said passengers should not have to “endure somebody else’s choice of crap music”.

Seb Dance, deputy mayor of London for transport, said the small minority who “play music or videos out loud can be a real nuisance to other passengers and directly disturb their journeys”.

“However Londoners spend their journey, whether catching up on their favourite series or listening to music, we want everyone to have a pleasant journey.”

Read more from Sky News:
Why Trump wants to meet Kim
Impact of online safety rules revealed

A previous Travel Kind campaign encouraged travellers to offer priority seating to those who need it. Pic: Transport for London
Image:
A previous Travel Kind campaign encouraged travellers to offer priority seating to those who need it. Pic: Transport for London

Posters will also encourage people to look up from their phones and to be aware that others travelling may be in need of a seat.

Previously, the Travel kind campaign included calls for vigilance about sexual harassment and urged travellers to move down inside London’s Tube carriages to ensure others can get on.

Continue Reading

Trending