Connect with us

Published

on

This article was featured in the One Story to Read Today newsletter. Sign up for it here.

For a few hours, Pete Hegseths nomination as secretary of defense was the most disturbing act of Donald Trumps presidential transition. Surely the Senate wouldnt confirm an angry Fox News talking head with no serious managerial experience, best known for publicly defending war criminals, to run the largest department in the federal government. Then, in rapid succession, Trump announced appointments for Matt Gaetz, Tulsi Gabbard, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The appearance of these newer and even more aberrant characters, like a television show introducing a more villainous heel in its second season, muted the indignation over Hegseth.

Obscured in this flurry of shocking appointments is the fact that Hegseths drawbacks are not limited to his light rsum or to the sexual-assault allegation made against him. Inexperienced though he may be at managing bureaucracies, Hegseth has devoted a great deal of time to documenting his worldview, including three books published in the past four years. I spent the previous week reading them: The man who emerges from the page appears to have sunk deeply into conspiracy theories that are bizarre even by contemporary Republican standards but that have attracted strangely little attention. He considers himself to be at war with basically everybody to Trumps left, and it is by no means clear that he means war metaphorically. He may be no less nutty than any of Trumps more controversial nominees. And given the power he is likely to holdcommand over 2 million American military personnelhe is almost certainly far more dangerous than any of them.

Hegseth began his involvement in conservative-movement politics as a Princeton undergraduate. He then joined the Army and quickly developed a profile, when not on active duty, as a budding Republican spokesperson. He testified against Elena Kagans appointment to the Supreme Court (on the grounds that, while dean of Harvard Law School, she had blocked military recruiters from campus in protest of Dont Ask, Dont Tell) and lobbied in favor of the Bush administrations Iraq policy. As the Republican Partys foreign-policy orientation changed radically under Trump, Hegseths positions changed with it. But his devotion to the party remained constant. After stints running the advocacy groups Vets for Freedom and Concerned Veterans for America, and a failed Senate campaign, he finally settled at Fox News, where he joined a chorus in support of Trump.

Along the way, Hegseth has written five books. The first, extolling Theodore Roosevelts legacy, revolves around ideas that Hegseth has since renounced, after converting to Trumpism. Another is simply a collection of war stories. The other three, all published in the past four yearsAmerican Crusade (2020), Battle for the American Mind (2022), and The War on Warriors (2024)lay out his worldview in florid, explicit, and often terrifying detail.

A foundational tenet of Hegseths philosophy, apparently carrying over from his Roosevelt-worshipping era, is a belief in the traditional masculine virtues and the potential for war to inculcate them. Hegseth maintains that boys require discipline and must aspire to strength, resilience, and bravery. His preferred archetype for these virtues appears to be Pete Hegseth, whose manful exploits on either the basketball court (he played for Princeton) or the battlefield are featured in all three books.

David A. Graham: The perverse logic of Trumps nomination circus

Hegseth complains that society no longer gives veterans like him their proper measure of deference. Being a veteran no longer demands respect of the coastal elites or reverence from large swaths of the public, he writesan observation that will sound strange to anybody who has ever attended a football game or listened to a speech by a politician from either party. In previous generations, men had to find ways to salvage their honor if they didnt get to fight in a war. (The single strongest piece of evidence for Hegseths thesisthe popularity of the lifelong coastal elitist, proud war-avoider, and POW-mocker Donald Trumpgoes unmentioned).

Hegseths demand for greater respect grows out of his belief that he personally succeeded in the face of forbidding odds. I had been an underdog my whole life, he writes. I persisted. I worked my ass off. But the woke military, he complains, doesnt reward that kind of individual merit and grit. Instead, it has grown so obsessed with diversity that it promotes unqualified minorities and allows women in combat, reducing its effectiveness and alienating hard-working, meritorious soldiers such as, well, him. He also frets that the inclusion of women in combat erodes traditional gender norms. How do you treat women in a combat situation, he asks, without eroding the basic instinct of civilization and the treatment of women in the society at large?

(The treatment of women by Hegseth specifically happens to be the subject of a recently disclosed police report detailing an alleged sexual assault of a woman at a 2017 political conference. Hegseth denies the allegation and says that the encounter, which took place while he was transitioning between his second and third wives, was consensual. He paid the alleged victim an undisclosed sum in return for her signing a nondisclosure agreement.)

One episode looms especially large in Hegseths mind as the embodiment of the wokification of the military and its abandonment of traditional merit. In 2021, Hegseth, an active National Guard member, wished to join the Washington, D.C., unit protecting incoming President Joe Bidens inauguration. The National Guard, however, excluded him from the detail because he was deemed a security risk on account of a bicep tattoo of the Deus vult symbola reference to the Crusades that is popular with some far-right activists.

The logic of the snub was straightforward. Bidens inauguration took place in the immediate aftermath of an insurrection attempt that had included many members of the armed forces, some operating within far-right networks. But to Hegsethwho protests that the Deus vult tattoo is simply an expression of his Christian faith, not a white-nationalist symbolthe decision was an unforgivable personal affront.

He expresses indignation at the notion that he could even be suspected of harboring radical ideas. I fought religious extremists for over twenty years in uniform, he writes. Then I was accused of being one. This is not as paradoxical as Hegseth makes it sound. Many of the people most eager to fight against extremists of one religion are extremist adherents of another religion. An example of this would be the Crusades, an episode that Hegseth highlights in American Crusade as a model to emulate.

In any case, evidence of Hegseths extremism does not need to be deduced by interpreting his tattoos. The proof is lying in plain sight. In his three most recent books, Hegseth puts forward a wide range of familiarly misguided ideas: vaccines are poisonous; climate change is a hoax (they used to warn about global cooling, you know); George Floyd died of a drug overdose and was not murdered; the Holocaust was perpetrated by German socialists.

Where Hegseths thinking begins venturing into truly odd territory is his argument, developed in Battle for the American Mind, that the entire basic design of the U.S. public education system is the product of a century-long, totally successful communist plot. Hegseth is not just hyperventilating about the 1619 Project, Howard Zinn, or other left-wing fads, as conservatives often do. Instead he argues that the systems design is a Marxist scheme with roots going back to the founding of the republic. The deist heresies of Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, he writes, laid the groundwork to implant communist thought into the school system. Then, American Progressives in the late 1800s blended the idea of Marxist government with aspects from the Social Gospel and the belief in an American national destiny in order to mae Marxism more palatable to Americans.

The nefarious plan to turn America communist involves steps that appear anodyne to the untrained eye. Yes, our modern social scienceslike political science, previously known as politics, and social studies, previously known as individual disciplines like history, economics, geography, and philosophyare byproducts of Marxist philosophy, he writes. Let that sink in: the manner in which we study politics, history, and economics in American schoolspublic and privatetoday is the product of Marxists. That was always the plan, and it worked. Hegseth will no longer sit back and allow communist indoctrination to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids.

The Marxist conspiracy has also, according to Hegseth, begun creeping into the U.S. military, the institution he is now poised to run. His most recent book calls for a straightforward political purge of military brass who had the gall to obey Democratic administrations: Fire any general who has carried water for Obama and Bidens extraconstitutional and agenda-driven transformation of our military. Trump appears to be thinking along similar lines. He is reportedly working on an executive order that will fast-track the removal of officers lacking in requisite leadership qualities and compiling a list of officers involved in the Afghanistan retreat, who will likewise be shoved out.

To what end? Trump has already signaled his interest in two revolutionary changes to the Defense Departments orientation. One is to legalize war crimes, or at least cease enforcement of the rules of war. The president-elect has enthusiastically endorsed the use of illegal military methods and has pardoned American soldiers who committed atrocities against detainees and unarmed civilians, following a loud campaign by Hegseth on Fox News.

Graeme Wood: War crimes are not difficult to discern

In The War on Warriors, Hegseth makes plain that he considers the very idea of rules of war just more woke nonsense. Modern war-fighters fight lawyers as much as we fight bad guys, he writes. Our enemies should get bullets, not attorneys. He repeatedly disparages Army lawyers (jagoffs), even claiming that their pointless rules are why America hasnt won a war since World War II. (Ideally, the secretary of defense would be familiar with historical episodes such as the Gulf War.)

Writing about his time guarding prisoners at Guantnamo Baywhere, as even the Bush administration eventually admitted, most detainees were innocent men swept up by American forcesHegseth describes calls for due process as a stab in the back of brave soldiers like him. The nation was dealing with legal issues (mostly led by weak-kneed, America-hating ACLU types) concerning enemy combatants, international rights of illegal combatants, and the beginnings of extrajudicial drone attacks, he writes. Not to mention the debate about the rights of assholes (I mean, detainees) at Gitmo.

Trumps second and even more disturbing interest in having a loyalist run the department is his enthusiasm for deploying troops to curtail and, if necessary, shoot domestic protesters. His first-term defense secretaries blanched at these demands. Hegseth displays every sign of sharing Trumps impulses, but in a more theorized form.

The clearest through line of all three books is the application of Hegseths wartime mentality to his struggle against domestic opponents. American Crusade calls for the categorical defeat of the Left, with the goal of utter annihilation, without which America cannot, and will not, survive. Are the Crusades just a metaphor? Sort of, but not really: Our American Crusade is not about literal swords, and our fight is not with guns. Yet. (Emphasisgulphis.)

Battle for the American Mind likewise imagines the struggle against the communist educational plot as a military problem: We are pinned down, caught in an enemy near ambush. The enemy has the high ground, and is shooting from concealed and fortified positions.

And The War on Warriors repeatedly urges readers to treat the American left exactly like foreign combatants. Describing the militarys responsibility to the nation, Hegseth writes, The expectation is that we will defend it against all enemiesboth foreign and domestic. Not political opponents, but real enemies. (Yes, Marxists are our enemies.) The Marxist exception swallows the not political opponents rule because pretty much all of his political opponents turn out to be Marxists. These include, but are not limited to, diversity advocates (They are Marxists You know what they are? Theyre traitors), newspapers (the communist Star Tribune), and, as noted, almost anybody involved in public education.

Lest there be any ambiguity, Hegseth incessantly equates the left to wartime enemies. They do not respect cease-fires, do not abide by the rules of warfare, and do not respect anything except total defeat of their enemyand then total control, he writes at one point. At another, he argues, We should be in panic mode. Almost desperate. Willing to do anything to defeat the fundamental transformation of the American military and end the war on our warriors.

Hegseths idea of illegitimate behavior by the domestic enemy is quite expansive. Consider this passage, recalling his time advocating for the Iraq War: While I debated these things in good faith, the Left mobilized. Electing Obama, railroading the military, pushing women in combatreadiness be damned. The Left has never fought fair. The most remarkable phrase there is electing Obama. Hegseths notion of unfair tactics used by the left includes not only enacting administrative policies that he disagrees with, but the basic act of voting for Democrats. The inability or unwillingness to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate political opposition likely endeared Hegseth to Trump, who shares the trait.

A defense secretary with a tenuous grip on reality, who cant differentiate foreign enemies from domestic political opponents, and who seems to exist in a state of permanent hysteria is a problem that the United States has never had to survive. The main question I was looking to answer when I started reading Hegseths collected works was whether he would follow a Trump command to shoot peaceful protesters. After having read them, I dont think he would even wait for the order.

Continue Reading

Sports

Kiley McDaniel’s favorite Day 1 draft picks, biggest surprises and best available Day 2 prospects

Published

on

By

Kiley McDaniel's favorite Day 1 draft picks, biggest surprises and best available Day 2 prospects

With Day 1 of the 2025 MLB draft complete, it’s time to look at which picks in the first round stood out most.

After weeks of speculation about the various directions the Washington Nationals could go with the No. 1 pick, they surprised the industry by taking Oklahoma high school shortstop Eli Willits — and the Los Angeles Angels followed up with a surprising pick of their own at No. 2 by taking UC Santa Barbara pitcher Tyler Bremner

Though the nature of the baseball draft means that some of the picks we aren’t quite sure about on Day 1 will become clearer when we see how teams spread their bonus allotment around later in the draft, here are the early picks I liked the most and some eye-opening selections along with the top players still available entering Day 2.


Five favorite moves

Mariners and Pirates get their guys

The buzz leading up to the draft was that Kade Anderson was atop the Mariners’ draft board and Seth Hernandez was the top target (after Willits, who wasn’t going to get there) of the Pirates. Seattle was the other team taking a long look at Hernandez, but the shenanigans at the top two picks (more on that later) means that both Seattle and Pittsburgh got their preferred arms.

A’s select Arnold and Taylor

The Athletics had only two picks on Day 1 but received excellent values at each. Jamie Arnold was the top prospect in the draft entering the season and seemed primed to go somewhere between No. 2 and No. 8 after an uneven season. He somehow was the prospect left holding the short straw, falling to the 11th pick. Devin Taylor was in the mix at multiple picks in the comp round but lasted five selections into the second round.

Twins embrace risk with Quick and Young

The Twins took two hit-first college infielders as their first picks last year (Kaelen Culpepper and Kyle DeBarge), took another one in the 2023 second round (Luke Keaschall), and two more in the top two rounds in 2022 (Brooks Lee, Tanner Schobel) — and also took one with their first pick this year in Marek Houston.

What interested me though is what Minnesota did after that, taking big swings with the upside of Riley Quick (four potential plus pitches but below-average command) and Quentin Young (80-grade power potential with big questions on contact rate).

Phillies try to jump the reliever trade market?

Gage Wood has a chance to start long term but can also go straight to the upper minors — if not the big leagues — and potentially help the bullpen later this season, like a trade deadline addition. The Phillies’ next pick, Cade Obermueller, is another possible starter who also could move quickly as a lefty turning 22 later this month with two knockout pitches in his fastball/slider combo. Odds are good that at least one of them can provide big league value in the next 12 months if Philly wants to utilize them that way.

The Red Sox land Witherspoon, Phillips and Eyanson

The Red Sox are interested in creating more pitching depth and selected a number of interesting arms on Day 1. Kyson Witherspoon had a lot of interest in the top 10, but the Red Sox got him at No. 15.

He’ll need to sharpen his execution a notch and his short arm action is unique, but there’s midrotation upside. Marcus Phillips has a chance to start but could also bring another distinctive look as a late-inning arm with four plus pitches from a low slot and a triple-digit fastball. Anthony Eyanson is a different sort, with fringy fastball velocity but standout command along with a slider and splitter that keep hitters off-balance.

Five eye-openers

Eli Willits at No. 1

The buzz ahead of the draft was that there were three players in play for the top pick and Willits was my third-ranked player in the class, so the same group is what I would’ve been considering — and I love Willits as a player. The bonus will be a factor in evaluating how successful this pick will be viewed — I’ll guess it starts with an eight — but I think this will be seen as a solid decision, as long as Kade Anderson or Ethan Holliday don’t become stars.

Tyler Bremner at No. 2

The biggest piece of late buzz I was hearing is that Bremner was in play at No. 3 to the Mariners. I didn’t hear his name at all at No. 2 so that made this pick the first shocker in the draft.

Bremner was considered in this area (on a deal) because he could easily be the best pitcher in this class — but only if he can develop a better slider, which isn’t a small if. The Angels seem to have a thought about how to solve this, and how he progresses will be one of the more followed storylines of this draft.

Tigers take Yost and Oliveto

I like both players, but it’s fascinating that these two and the most-rumored prep hitter tied to Detroit that they didn’t take (Coy James, who had a tough summer) were all missing strong 2024 summer performances.

Jordan Yost and Michael Oliveto were the only two prep position players in the first-round mix who weren’t in the major national events on the summer circuit, thus creating a lot of uncertainty about how to project them.

The Tigers are right to assume this could create a potential quick gain in value if Yost and Oliveto can perform early in their pro careers, but I don’t remember seeing a team double down on lack of summer exposure in the early rounds.

Orioles take two catchers in the first round, and two pitchers in the second

It’s certainly a bit odd that the Orioles took two college catchers with their first two picks after taking another one (Ethan Anderson) in the second round last year. Obviously, teams don’t draft for big league need — the O’s already have Adley Rutschman — and they need at least two catchers at all four full season minor league affiliates, it’s just odd to see them invest in this position early multiple times. And after all of the position players they have drafted under Mike Elias, they did sneak in two arms on Day 1 with Joseph Dzierwa (a command-forward lefty) and J.T. Quinn (one of my favorite college relievers with the traits to start in pro ball).

Guardians lean into power

The Guardians often draft, or sign internationally, hit-first players who are often underpowered, with Steven Kwan a prominent example. They swerved a lot this year, taking Jace LaViolette with their first pick (I compare him to Cody Bellinger or Joey Gallo; he hit .258 this season) and Nolan Schubart (24% strikeout rate, 22% in-zone whiff rate) with their fifth pick on Day 1. Those two have big power and strong pull/lift rates, and LaViolette has the athleticism to play center field, so there’s real talent, it’s just not usually the type that the Guardians have targeted.


Best available for Day 2

Listed by top 250 draft rankings

43. Mason Neville, OF, Oregon
44. Matthew Fisher, RHP, Evansville Memorial HS (Ind.)
53. Josiah Hartshorn, LF, Orange Lutheran HS (Calif.)
55. Brock Sell, CF, Tokay HS (Calif.)
61. Jack Bauer, LHP, Lincoln Way East HS (Ill.)
69. Coy James, SS, Davie County HS (N.C.)
70. Alec Blair, CF, De La Salle HS (Calif.)
71. Mason Pike, RHP, Puyallup HS (Wash.)
72. Cam Appenzeller, LHP, Glenwood HS (Ill.)
73. Briggs McKenzie, LHP, Corinth Holders HS (N.C.)

Continue Reading

UK

Gregg Wallace: Over half of allegations against MasterChef presenter upheld, including one of unwanted physical contact

Published

on

By

Gregg Wallace: Over half of allegations against MasterChef presenter upheld, including one of unwanted physical contact

An investigation into Gregg Wallace’s “inappropriate behaviour” on MasterChef has found more than half of the allegations against him have been substantiated, including one of “unwanted physical contact”.

MasterChef’s production company Banijay UK shared a summary of its report into historical allegations of misconduct against the 60-year-old presenter, carried out by independent law firm Lewis Silkin over seven months.

The report said the number of sustained allegations made Wallace’s return to MasterChef “untenable”.

Last week it emerged Wallace had been sacked as MasterChef presenter, with reports of more than 50 fresh allegations against him.

The investigation heard evidence from 78 witnesses, including 41 complainants. The investigations team spoke to Wallace three times for the report, conducting 14 hours of interviews with him.

There were 83 allegations against Wallace, and 45 of them were upheld. All were related to MasterChef.

The upheld allegations were:

• Twelve claims he made inappropriate jokes and innuendo;

• Sixteen reports he made sexually explicit comments;

• Two allegations that he made sexualised comments to or about someone;

• Four complaints that he made culturally insensitive or racist comments;

• Three claims that he was in a state of undress;

• Seven allegations of bullying;

• One allegation of unwanted touching.

Nearly all the allegations against Wallace were related to behaviour which is said to have occurred between 2005 and 2018, with just one substantiated allegation taking place after 2018.

Wallace and Anne-Marie Sterpini in 2014
Image:
Wallace and Anne-Marie Sterpini in 2014

Ahead of the publication of the summary, Wallace had said he had been “cleared of the most serious and sensational accusations” made against him.

He also said his neurodiversity had “now formally (been) diagnosed as autism”, saying in the social media post that it was “suspected and discussed by colleagues across countless seasons of MasterChef”.

BBC held no ‘central’ information over Wallace concerns

Additionally, the report summary found there were 10 standalone allegations about other people between 2012 and 2018/2019, two of which were substantiated. These were unrelated to Wallace, and those people were not named in the summary.

The investigation found that complaints had previously been raised with the production company between 2005 and 2024.

Gregg Wallace on MasterChef. Pic: BBC/ Shine TV 2024
Image:
Gregg Wallace on MasterChef. Pic: BBC/ Shine TV 2024

While the report flagged inadequate reporting procedures before 2016, when Endemol merged with Shine ahead of Banijay acquiring Endemol Shine in 2020, it said there were significant improvements to HR processes and training after 2016.

The investigation said some formal action was taken by the BBC in 2017, but it also noted the corporation held no information regarding concerns raised over Wallace centrally, resulting in issues being addressed as a first offence.

Sky News has tried to contact Gregg Wallace today.

Gregg Wallace after being made a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) by the Princess Royal in an investiture ceremony at Windsor Castle. Picture date: Tuesday February 28, 2023.
Read less

Picture by: Andrew Matthews/PA Archive/PA Images
Date taken: 28-Feb-2023
Image:
Gregg Wallace after being made a Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE) by the Princess Royal in an investiture ceremony at Windsor Castle. Picture date: Tuesday February 28, 2023.
Read less

Picture by: Andrew Matthews/PA Archive/PA Images


Responding to the findings of the report, the BBC said the corporation had “no plans to work with [Wallace] in future”, saying his behaviour “falls below the values of the BBC”.

The BBC said “opportunities were missed” to address Wallace’s behaviour, adding, “We accept more could and should have been done sooner”.

Concerning the allegations against other individuals flagged in the report, the BBC said they had asked Banijay UK to take action to address these issues, and said it would “be completed as a priority”.

The corporation has yet to decide if the unseen MasterChef series that was filmed with Wallace last year will still be aired.

Production staff deserve ‘much, much better’

Banijay UK chief executive Patrick Holland called the report “uncomfortable reading”, but said its findings provided “valuable insight” for production teams moving forward.

In a nod to Wallace’s recent autism spectrum disorder diagnosis, Mr Holland said Wallace’s neurodiversity was “relevant to certain behaviours identified in the report”, admitting “the production could have done more to identify, manage and communicate patterns of inappropriate behaviour”.

Philippa Childs, head of creative industries union Bectu, said the report findings made it clear that “inappropriate behaviour has gone unchecked for far too long,” adding: “This is a real failure by Banijay to take these issues seriously and act accordingly”.

Ms Childs said the report highlighted the precarious position of production staff, the majority of whom are freelance workers, who she said deserve “much, much better”.

Wallace was the original presenter of the BBC show Saturday Kitchen in 2002 and has also featured on Eat Well For Less?, Inside The Factory, Turn Back Time, Harvest and Supermarket Secrets.

He was best known, however, for presenting MasterChef, MasterChef: The Professionals, and Celebrity MasterChef.

Continue Reading

UK

Postman who murdered and beheaded girlfriend jailed for at least 23 years

Published

on

By

Postman who murdered and beheaded girlfriend jailed for at least 23 years

Warning: This article contains details readers may find distressing.

An “evil” postman who moaned about being lonely hours before he severed his girlfriend’s head and tried to dismember her body has been jailed for a minimum of 23 years.

Ewan Methven murdered 21-year-old Phoenix Spencer-Horn in the flat they shared in East Kilbride, South Lanarkshire, in November last year.

The High Court in Glasgow heard the killer dumped his partner’s body parts in their hallway and failed to call emergency services for two days.

Phoenix Spencer-Horn
Image:
Phoenix Spencer-Horn was murdered in November

The 27-year-old then bought drugs, watched pornography and sent sickening texts to Phoenix’s worried mum pretending she was still alive.

Phoenix was stabbed 20 times – including 10 times in the face – using three knives in an attack that unfolded after she returned from her waitressing job in Lanarkshire.

The 21-year-old had described Methven as her “soulmate” on social media, saying in one TikTok video: “Life is so much more beautiful and full of colour with you.”

A few months later she was murdered by the same man she had been in a relationship with for two years.

Ewan Methven.
Pic Police Scotland/PA
Image:
Ewan Methven was jailed on Monday. Pic: Police Scotland

Methven received a life sentence with at least 23 years behind bars when he retuned to the dock on Monday.

The judge, Lord Matthews, described it as a “dreadful crime”.

He told Methven: “You were a trusted member of her family, but you betrayed that trust and robbed her of life in the cruellest way.

“Not content with what you had done to her, you robbed her of all dignity in death by decapitating her and trying to dismember her in an attempt to defeat the ends of justice.”

The pair had been in a relationship for two years.
Image:
The pair had been in a relationship for two years

Lord Matthews highlighted victim impact statements supplied by Phoenix’s family and said he had “rarely read such outpourings of grief”.

The judge said: “The way you treated this innocent young woman after her death meant that her family did not even have the comfort of saying goodbye to her.”

He added: “I have this morning seen a letter written by you, but it answers none of the questions which must be plaguing the family. You blame the effect of substances but that is no excuse.”

‘Personification of evil’

Sky News has interviewed the couple’s neighbour who lives directly next door.

Toni Brown, 25, described the horror of discovering what happened.

She said: “I think I stayed out of the house for about a week after that. I couldn’t even sit.

“It’s horrific. It gives me shivers thinking about it. It is crazy to think I stayed next door to a monster like that.

“What scares me the most is knowing she was lay there and I was in here oblivious.”

Toni Brown
Image:
Neighbour Toni Brown spoke to Sky News

Asked whether she heard any noises or violence around the time of the murder, Ms Brown said: “There was a bad smell in my house in the early hours of the morning she was found.

“There was a bad smell in my kitchen basically where the walls join together.”

Methven’s own defence lawyer told the court that society will see the killer as the “personification of evil”.

When he eventually called 999, he claimed to have suffered a drug-induced blackout during the violent killing.

Phoenix Spencer-Horn was murdered by the man she once called her "soulmate"
Image:
Ms Spencer-Horn was murdered by the man she once called her ‘soulmate’

Another life lost to gender-based violence

The case has raised questions once again about the growing prevalence of gender-based violence.

Fiona Drouet’s daughter Emily was 18 when she took her own life at university in Aberdeen in 2016, days after being choked and slapped by her ex-boyfriend.

Angus Milligan was later convicted of physical and psychological abuse.

Fiona Drouet
Image:
Fiona Drouet’s daughter was a victim of physical abuse from an ex-boyfriend

Ms Drouet, who now campaigns on violence against women across the UK and Ireland, has set up a charity called Emily’s Test in her daughter’s name.

Reacting to the death of Ms Spencer-Horn, Ms Drouet told Sky News: “There is another mother and father that have just been plunged into utter hell.

“Somebody once said to me that if God came to you and said, ‘I am going to give you this beautiful daughter, but you’ll only have her for 18 years and then we need to take her back, would you still want her?’ and I would take those 18 years and go through the pain rather than have nothing.

“Although just now that probably offers no words of comfort for Phoenix’s parents, maybe one day it can.”

If you suspect you are being abused and need to speak to someone, there are people who can help you, including The National Domestic Violence Helpline on 0808 2000 247 or Women’s Aid online.

Continue Reading

Trending