Connect with us

Published

on

Some hospitals in England were within “six or seven hours” of running out of personal protective equipment in the early stages of the COVID pandemic, a former health secretary has admitted.

Matt Hancock, who is no longer an MP, told the COVID public inquiry that some hospitals came “extremely close” to running out of stock in the first wave of the pandemic in spring 2020.

Mr Hancock, who was health secretary between 2018 to 2021, was giving evidence at the latest session of the UK COVID-19 Inquiry, looking at the impact the pandemic had on healthcare systems, patients and health care workers.

This morning he was booed by a protester as he arrived to give evidence at the inquiry.

Lead counsel to the inquiry Jacqueline Carey KC asked the ex-cabinet minister: “Do you accept that entering the coronavirus pandemic as we did, without a single gown, severely hampered the ability to provide safe and appropriate PPE for healthcare workers?”

Politics latest: PM and defence secretary issue warnings over Ukraine war

He replied: “The stockpile that we had was not as good as it needs to be in the future, absolutely.”

More on Covid-19

Pressed on whether England ever ran out of personal protective equipment (PPE), Mr Hancock said: “As a whole? No, but individual locations did.

Referring to the supply of gowns in April 2020 – in light of reports that some nurses at hospital in London had been forced to wear bin bags as protection – Mr Hancock said: “Gowns, I think, at one point, we got to within six or seven hours of running out.”

“We were working incredibly hard to make sure that we didn’t have a stock out. We nearly did.”

Mr Hancock was a familiar face at the regular press conferences that took place during the pandemic but was forced to resign in 2021 after he admitted breaking the government’s coronavirus guidance while pursuing an affair with an aide.

The inquiry, which has also heard other government figures including Boris Johnson and former prime minister Rishi Sunak, is examining the government’s response to the pandemic.

Mr Hancock also admitted during the inquiry session he believed the government “got wrong” the way funeral guidance was “applied” across the country during the pandemic.

During the early days of the COVID crisis, the number of people who could attend funerals was limited, with mourners told to keep two metres apart and only the closest relatives advised to attend.

Read more:
Nadine Dorries reveals impact of being abused by vicar

Public sector pay rises help drive up government borrowing

“Where I think we got it wrong was how the funeral guidance was applied on the ground. It wasn’t as had been intended,” he told the inquiry.

“But of course funerals were places where people gather and are deeply emotional, and people come together, and that was also the thing that was driving the spread of the virus.

“These were very difficult considerations.

“Broadly, on balance, I think they were about right, but we can go through every single decision, and you can easily make an argument one way or the other.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Competitors want to ‘kill Tether,’ most altcoins ‘won’t make it’ in 2025: Finance Redefined

Published

on

By

Competitors want to ‘kill Tether,’ most altcoins ‘won’t make it’ in 2025: Finance Redefined

Only the altcoins with potential ETF approvals and solid revenue-generation models will outperform the crypto market in 2025.

Continue Reading

Politics

SEC Commissioner dissents on agency’s memecoin stance

Published

on

By

SEC Commissioner dissents on agency’s memecoin stance

Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw said that the agency’s working definition of memecoins was vague and could be easily misconstrued.

Continue Reading

Politics

Minister resigns over cut to international aid budget

Published

on

By

Minister resigns over cut to international aid budget

Anneliese Dodds has quit as international development minister over Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to slash the overseas aid budget to pay for an increase in defence spending. 

Ms Dodds, who is also women and equalities minister and attends cabinet, said she was resigning from both posts “with great sadness” but would continue to support the government from the backbenches.

Politics Live: Starmer back in Downing Street after Washington trip

In her resignation letter to the prime minister, she acknowledged there was “no easy path” to fund the boost to defence but claimed there had been a “tactical decision” for the Overseas Development Aid (ODA) budget to “absorb the entire burden”.

She said: “You have maintained that you want to continue support for Gaza, Sudan and Ukraine; for vaccination; for climate; and for rules-based systems.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The cuts to USAID mean the charity will have to halve its operations in Gaza and the West Bank, the Save the Children boss told Sky News.

“Yet it will be impossible to maintain these priorities given the depth of the cut; the effect will be far greater than presented, even if assumptions made about reducing asylum costs hold true.”

Ms Dodds said the cut will likely lead the UK to pull-out from numerous African, Caribbean and Western Balkan nations, as well as a withdrawal of commitments to international banks and a reduced voice in the G7 and G20.

More from Politics

“Ultimately, these cuts will remove food and healthcare from desperate people – deeply harming the UK’s reputation,” she added.

“I know you have been clear that you are not ideologically opposed to international development. But the reality is that this decision is already being portrayed as following in President Trump’s slipstream of cuts to USAID.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The cuts to USAID mean the charity will have to halve its operations in Gaza and the West Bank, the Save the Children boss told Sky News.

Around £6bn per year will be taken out of the aid budget and transferred over to pay for defence.

That amounts to a reduction in aid spending from 0.5% of GDP to 0.3%.

In a letter responding to Ms Dodd’s resignation, Sir Keir said the decision to cut foreign aid “was a difficult and painful decision and not one I take lightly”.

“However, protecting our national security must always be the first duty of any government and I will always act in the best interests of the British people,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Does it matter that foreign aid has been cut in the UK?

The resignation comes after a key meeting between Sir Keir and Mr Trump on Thursday, during which the US leader praised the defence sending decision and also touted the prospect of a tariff-free trade deal.

Ms Dodds marks the loss of a fourth minister from the new Labour government, after Louise Haigh and Tulip Siddiq resigned and Andrew Gwynne was sacked.

Conservative MP Andrew Mitchell, who was the international development minister under Rishi Sunak, said Ms Dodds had “done the right thing”.

He posted on X: “Labour’s disgraceful and cynical actions demean the Labour Party’s reputation as they balance the books on the backs of the poorest people in the world. Shame on them and kudos to a politician of decency and principle.”

Resignation of Dodds shows Starmer’s ruthless side


Liz Bates is a political correspondent

Liz Bates

Political correspondent

@wizbates

She was one of his closest allies, but today Anneliese Dodds has quit Keir Starmer’s government with a stark warning about the direction of travel.

It’s been quite a journey since she got the top job in his opposition cabinet.

When he took over as Labour leader, she was appointed shadow chancellor and seen as a key player in his team.

Since that time, Starmer has shown himself to be a pragmatic, sometimes ruthless, operator when it comes to both policy and political friendships.

This resignation once again shows that side.

Not only is he pushing through deep cuts to foreign aid – a move he previously condemned – but in doing so, he has also cast aside one of his most loyal and long-standing colleagues.

Former Tory defence minister Tobias Ellwood also praised the decision as “courageous and principled”, saying that national security is “not just about hard power” but tackling threats like disease and extremism.

However, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch backed Sir Keir’s decision.

She said: “I disagree with the PM on many things BUT on reducing the foreign aid budget to fund UK defence? He’s absolutely right.

“He may not be able to convince the ministers in his own cabinet, but on this subject, I will back him.

“National interest always comes first.”

Read more from Sky News:
What foreign aid is being cut?
‘Trump not the reason for UK defence spending boost’

Sir Keir announced the decision to cut the aid budget on Tuesday, saying it would fund and increase defence spending from 2.3% of GDP to 2.5% in 2027. Labour’s manifesto had pledged to reach this target but it was not clear when that would be achieved or how it would be funded.

The prime minister admitted the inauguration of Mr Trump – who has made clear he no longer wants to bankroll NATO’s defence- “accelerated” his decision but said it had been three years in the making, after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

He said the reduction in foreign aid is “not a renouncement I’m happy to make”.

Asked about it during the Convention of the North conference, deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said: “I’m sorry to hear she’s resigned, it was a really difficult decision that was made.”

However, she said it was “absolutely right” that the cabinet endorse the prime minister’s actions to spend more money on defence.

Continue Reading

Trending