Furniture waste is a growing concern as consumers and companies seek to reduce carbon emissions. In the U.S. alone, we throw out roughly 12 million tons of furniture every year, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, leaving it to rot in landfills. Most of it is less than fifteen years old. Recycling furniture can be difficult, mostly because selling and moving it is such a pain.

Apparel companies like Poshmark, Dpop and Thredup are thriving in online thrifting, but furniture thrifting is a lot more complicated, simply due to the size of the items. Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace list furniture, but it’s up to the consumers to figure out how to pick up and deliver the items. That can be costly and potentially dangerous, with strangers inviting strangers into their homes.

AptDeco is offering a new business model. The New York-based startup is an online marketplace for buying and selling used furniture that provides pick-up and delivery for items. It also works with major retailers, like West Elm and Pottery Barn, to sell floor models or resell items that have been returned.

“By extending the lifecycle of furniture, overall it’s just better for the environment, whether it be less wood being chopped out of forests to just the supply chain associated with producing that furniture,” said Reham Fagiri, founder and CEO of AptDeco.

For big furniture retailers, there is big waste in returns and the reverse logistics involved — from the costs to the transportation emissions. Instead, partner brands are now selling their returned items on AptDeco as soon as a customer requests a return, directly from the customer’s home. AptDeco uses its own resale data to price items to sell quickly, often within a week. They can then retrieve the item from the returner’s home and deliver it directly to a resale buyer, bypassing the need to take these returned items to a distribution center first. 

Kathleen O’Brien bought her dining room table, TV console and headboard from AptDeco.

“The world is kind of on fire, literally, and so anything that I can do to reduce my own footprint in the world is what I’m trying to do, like in all aspects of my life and furniture specifically,” said O’Brien.

While the furniture sells at as much as a 50% discount to new, the service comes at a price.

“We earn a percentage that ranges from 15% to as high as 60% depending on the product, the brand, the condition, and a lot of different variations that go into it,” said Fagiri.

The company operates everywhere in the U.S. except Alaska and Hawaii. The company’s carrier network across so many markets makes its expansion potential very attractive to investors like Initialized Capital. 

“Contributing to the circular economy through their logistics business is a great example of the types of climate adaptation companies that we see as having longevity in the next phase of climate tech,” said Zoe Perret, a partner at Initialized Capital,

AptDeco is also backed by Comcast Ventures, Y Combinator, Hearst Lab, Great Oaks Venture Capital and Soma Capital. It has raised $14.5 million in total funding so far.

In the 10 years since its launch, Fagiri says the company has offset over 19 million pounds of carbon dioxide from the environment. That’s equivalent to roughly 6.5 million cars taken off the road.

CNBC producer Lisa Rizzolo contributed to this piece.

It only took a high-profile U.S. presidential election to introduce millions of people to Bluesky.

The micro-blogging startup said it has gained 8.7 million new users since Election Day, underscoring consumer appetite for an alternative to Elon Musk’s X, formerly known as Twitter, and Meta’s Threads. And while these larger social media platforms still dwarf Bluesky, the startup now has more than 22 million users and is not showing any signs of slowing down.

Bluesky’s surge may seem sudden, but it has been experiencing bursts of user growth for more than a year, COO Rose Wang told CNBC. 

In September, Bluesky said 2 million users flocked to the service the week after the Brazilian Supreme Court temporarily suspended X in the country for failing to appoint a local legal representative and failing to comply with the country’s content-moderation policies.

Bluesky had experienced a previous surge in July 2023 after X, then still named Twitter, temporarily limited the number of posts users could read per day.

The company expected user growth to drop off when Brazil lifted its ban in October, but in the wake of the election, the growth surge Bluesky is on now feels different, Wang said. 

“It’s just cool when your grandma is like, ‘Oh, I know what you’re working on,'” she said. 

Bluesky could be on the verge of a turning point if it continues rapidly attracting users, said David Carr, a research editor at the internet analyst firm Similarweb. The app’s buzz is akin to the early days of Google when the search engine began attracting consumer interest and publicity while fending off competition from older and larger search engines such as AltaVista and Yahoo, Carr said.

“We have seen these reversals, at least early in the history of social networks,” Carr said, noting that the once-mighty Myspace eventually lost to Facebook.

At the time, then-Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was looking for somebody to lead an internal project for a so-called decentralized social network, and he chose Graber.

“Jay was being interviewed for project lead of Bluesky, and I remember she gave the presentation to our house,” Wang said. “We’re all like, ‘How cool.'”

The premise behind Bluesky was that users would be able to take their profiles and data on the app and share it across other social networks that incorporate its open-source software.

Graber’s peers were supportive of the idea and she had Twitter’s backing, Wang said. The key question was, when is the right time to introduce a new social network to the market, she said.

Wang joined Graber and the project’s other initial members, Daniel Holmgren and Paul Frazee, as a contractor later that year and helped kick off an effort to learn how to build a decentralized social network protocol that could be as large as Twitter, she said. 

Graber then asked Twitter to separate Bluesky out in a bid for independence, and in October 2021, she formed Bluesky Social to allow her team to continue developing the core decentralized social network technology, now called AT Protocol, and app as a public benefit corporation, according to a Delaware State filing.

Dorsey stepped down as Twitter’s CEO and was replaced by Parag Agrawal in November 2021. Graber publicly revealed the now-incorporated Bluesky PBLLC in February 2022, saying, “Our mission is to develop and drive large-scale adoption of technologies for open and decentralized public conversation.”

The timing was perfect, Wang said. 

Musk offered to buy Twitter in April 2022, and the $44 billion acquisition was completed in October 2022. Just days before Musk officially took over Twitter, the Bluesky team publicly unveiled more details about their project and rolled out a waitlist for the Bluesky app. 

“I remember Jay coming to me and saying, ‘Hey, guess how many people are on the waitlist? Like a million people over three days,'” Wang said. “I was like, oh, okay, now is the time.”

In 2023, landing an invitation to Bluesky was all the rage for eager social media users, and the startup’s decision to open up its waitlist to the general public in February 2024 set it up for the multiple waves of user growth that year. 

Bluesky announced in October that it raised $15 million in an investment round led by Blockchain Capital, bringing the startup’s total funding to $36 million, according to Pitchbook.

Although Blockchain Capital invests in several crypto companies, Wang said Bluesky has no association with cryptocurrency. She said, however, that it shares the spirit of “decentralization.”

No one at Bluesky is interested in having “a central authority in control of all your data,” Wang said.

Despite Bluesky starting as a side project within Twitter, the startup has lost its last connection to the original micro-blogging app. In May, Dorsey revealed that he left the Bluesky board, saying in an interview that while he respects Graber, he decided to shift his focus on a competing protocol called Nostr. 

Dorsey said he believes Nostr is more in line with his original vision for the future of social media and less bureaucratic.

“Everything we wanted around decentralization, everything we wanted in terms of an open source protocol, suddenly became a company with VCs and a board,” Dorsey said of Bluesky. “That’s not what I intended to help create.”

Graber acknowledged Dorsey’s role in Bluesky’s origin story in her interview with CNBC.

“In 2019, Jack had a vision for something better for social media, and so that’s why he chose me to build this, and we’re really thankful for him for setting this up,” she said. 

Losing Dorsey has also given Bluesky more credibility among users, especially those who believe in the app’s decentralized nature and want nothing to do with Musk, Meta and Threads’ Mark Zuckerberg, or some other billionaire.

Speaking with CNBC’s “Money Movers” on Thursday, Graber said Bluesky’s decentralized and open nature makes the app “billionaire-proof” because users can take their data elsewhere at any moment. 

“If someone bought or if the Bluesky company went down, everything is open source,” Graber said. “What happened to Twitter couldn’t happen to us in the same ways, because you would always have the option to immediately move without having to start over.”

The future of Bluesky’s business

Advertisers have taken note of Bluesky’s rising popularity and want to know more about its user demographics, said Jack Johnston, a senior social innovation director for the digital marketing agency Tinuiti.

“It’s the No. 1 question that a lot of brands are asking for, and for better or worse, Bluesky is not publicizing much about that data beyond just the volume of users coming to the platform,” Johnston said.

It makes sense that Bluesky has attracted advertiser interest, Wang said, but the platform’s audience may have joined the current ad-free service in part because they’re tired of viewing a deluge of online ads across other social apps.

“I just don’t think that that slides with Gen Z,” Wang said.

Graber echoed the point on CNBC’s “Money Movers,” saying Bluesky is “not going to build an algorithm that just shoves ads at you, locking users in. That’s not our model.”

If Bluesky continues providing users a quality service, “the brands will come,” Wang said, but they will “have to figure out how to talk to people authentically.”

There’s no immediate plans for Bluesky to build an online ad business, Wang said, but the company is open to the idea as long as it’s not an intrusive experience. She pointed to Reddit’s “community-based” advertising model, in which companies can run online ads tailored to match the interests of users of a particular subreddit, as an example of how the startup could potentially pursue advertising.

Wang also pointed to TikTok’s boost model, which advertisers can use to promote the organic videos of third-party creators as if they were in-house ads.

“The video is doing well because it’s authentic,” Wang said. “Just boost that video and then make sure that the creator gets a much bigger cut than they’re normally getting.”

Bluesky is looking for ways to support the users “who are actually the ones making the network awesome and fun,” Wang said.

It’s also possible that in the “mid to long term” Bluesky could build its own payments platform that would allow users to pay one another, with the startup taking a cut of each transaction, Wang said. 

Despite Bluesky’s buzz, there’s a chance that the startup’s eventual monetization plans could upset users, Similarweb’s Carr said. 

“How do you go about making this a business, and a more suspicious version of that is, ‘How do I know that once you monetize this, that you’re not going to do it in a way that I hate?'” Carr said.

Watch: Bluesky CEO: Our platform is ‘radically different’ from anything else in social media

Social media creators are turning to monthly subscription services to generate revenue directly from their followers in an attempt to find a stable source of income in an increasingly competitive and volatile market. 

The creator economy peaked in September 2021, according to research published this month by the Bank of America Institute. While the average monthly income for content creators has increased over the past three years, a typical, full-time U.S. employee makes five times as much in monthly income on average. 

“This suggests that it’s rare to earn a full-time wage in content creation — let alone get rich,” said the research, which was also conducted by the Bank of America Institute, a think tank that conducts its research using Bank of America customer data. 

Analysts at the Bank of America Institute attribute this to a slowdown in paid partnerships, a more competitive market for creators, a decline in online viewership since the pandemic and a concentration of paid partnerships among the top creators. 

While internet virality is unpredictable, turning content creation into a full-time career requires meeting certain financial needs, like the ability to pay monthly bills, content creators told CNBC. As a result, creators are looking to diversify their revenue streams, and in addition to paid partnerships, many content creators are increasingly looking to monthly subscription platforms like Substack and Patreon for consistency in their monthly income. 

Substack and Patreon have emerged as attractive options because they enable creators to charge their followers directly for their content. Creators can offer their followers different tiers of subscriptions for monthly fees, with each tier including different perks. Since its launch in 2013, Patreon has paid creators over $8 billion, while Substack claims to host more than 4 million paid subscribers.

On TikTok and Meta’s Instagram, creators have to navigate algorithmic models that control when their content is shown, making income from those apps highly volatile. Earnings can fluctuate dramatically, spiking or plummeting based on how these platforms choose to promote their content.

“I can’t rely on that to be what pays my bills,” said Molly Burke, a creator with more than 4 million followers across her social apps. “As an entrepreneur, as a business owner, as a creator, I have to figure out how I’m going to sustain this as a career for as long as possible.” 

Social media platforms increasingly rely on algorithms to decide what content users see, based on their past interactions and preferences. These algorithms analyze user behavior to create personalized content feeds, which often prioritize posts that are likely to generate engagement, such as likes or shares.

As a result, many creators feel pressured to make content that caters to the algorithm, even if they believe it lowers the quality of their work, content creators said.

“It ebbs and flows,” Burke said. “Sometimes my TikToks are popping and I’m getting all the views, and then that algorithm just dips for a bit.” 

While nearly half of creators work full time, most rely heavily on brand deals for income, with more than two-thirds having brand partnerships as their primary revenue source, according to a separate study by influencer marketing agency NeoReach. The study found that more than 48% of creators earn $15,000 or less annually, even as the global influencer market reached $21 billion in 2023. There are more than 50 million content creators worldwide, Goldman Sachs said in April 2023. 

Burke, a creator known for her videos about living with blindness and navigating daily life, has been producing content on the internet for five years. While it’s not her biggest income stream, she uses her Patreon revenue to help cover essential expenses, including rent.

“I feel extremely lucky and grateful that it is a revenue stream that I can rely on, that I know at the bare minimum I can get my rent covered this month,” she said.

Subscription platforms like Patreon address this by allowing creators to bypass the algorithm entirely, connecting directly with their most loyal fans who are willing to pay for exclusive content.

“Membership alone is a huge business for creators,” Patreon founder and CEO Jack Conte said in an interview with CNBC. “It’s creating predictable, reliable, huge sources of revenue for creators at a degree in scale that we’ve never seen before.”

The Try Guys, a comedy group known for their challenge-based videos, have 8 million subscribers and 2.7 billion views on YouTube, but in May, they announced the launch of their own streaming service called 2nd Try. The group moved most of its new videos behind a $5-a-month paywall, where subscribers can watch the new content without ads.

In the three months since launching 2nd Try, the company said it is on track to reach profitability.

“We needed to build something that we could at least have some more consistency with,” Try Guys co-founder Keith Habersberger told CNBC.