Connect with us

Published

on

Federal Reserve officials appeared divided at their meeting earlier this month over how much farther they may need to cut interest rates, but as a group agreed this was a moment to avoid giving much concrete guidance about how US monetary policy is likely to evolve in the weeks ahead.

“Participants noted that monetary policy decisions were not on a pre-set course and were conditional on the evolution of the economy and the implications for the economic outlook … They stressed that it would be important for the (Federal Open Market) Committee to make this clear as it adjusted its policy stance,” said minutes of the Nov. 6-7 meeting, which were released on Tuesday.

TheFedcut itsbenchmark policy rateby a quarter of a percentage point to the 4.50%-4.75% range at the meeting three weeks ago, a session that followed Republican candidateDonald Trump’svictory in the Nov. 5presidential election.

Participants noted the complications of making policy right now, with “many” saying that the volatility of recent economic data made it important to try to discern underlying trends, and many also observing that the uncertainty about the neutral rate of interest made it hard to determine how much current interest rates were actually suppressing economic activity.

That left some participants noting “that the Committee could pause its easing of the policy rate and hold it at a restrictive level” if inflation remained too high, and some saying that cuts could be accelerated “if the labor market turned down or economic activity faltered.”

“Many” officials argued that doubts about the true stance of monetary policy “made it appropriate to reduce policy restraint gradually.”

After the release of the minutes, financial markets added slightly to bets on a rate cut in December, and kept intact prior bets on a slower pace of reductions next year, with just one cut priced in by the middle of the year.

Fedofficials at the meeting appeared to steer clear at this session of any discussion about the economic implications of Trump’s coming return to office, according to the minutes.

The session also followed stronger-than-expected economic data – “remarkable” is howFedChair Jerome Powell referred to it – that stoked concern monetary policy may not be restricting the economy as much as thought.

Officials since the meeting have said ongoing economic strength meant the Fed’s benchmark policy rate might already be close to the “neutral” level, where it neither stimulates nor restrains activity, an argument for fewer rate cuts approved at a slower pace in order to avoid easing policy too much and possibly rekindling inflation.

Others argue the economy was likely to slow and the job market continue to weaken, which would be a reason to continue easing financial conditions to encourage spending and investment.

While investors still expect theFedto deliver another quarter-percentage-point cut at its Dec. 17-18 meeting, the odds have slipped from greater than 80% in mid-October to about 60% currently.

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer refuses to say if further tax rises will be imposed at spring statement

Published

on

By

Starmer refuses to say if further tax rises will be imposed at spring statement

The prime minister has refused to say whether further tax rises will be imposed in the spring statement.

Sir Keir Starmer said the government was in the “early stages” of looking at whether tax rises or spending cuts were needed to meet Labour’s self-imposed fiscal rules.

He would not say if Ms Reeves is looking at further tax cuts to give her more headroom after months of economic downturn, and said the “big decisions” on tax were made in the October budget.

Politics latest: ‘Very important’ US agrees to Chagos deal between UK and Mauritius

Speaking to reporters on the plane to Washington DC to meet Donald Trump, he said: “Obviously I am not going to get ahead of myself until we have made decisions.

“But as I have said before, in terms of the big decisions on tax obviously the budget was the place that we took those decisions – but as ever, going into a statement I am not going to say in advance what we might do and what we might not do.

“But let me not set hares running, the big decisions were in the budget of last year and that’s the way we are approaching this spring statement.”

More on Rachel Reeves

What are the UK’s fiscal rules?

In October, Rachel Reeves set out new fiscal rules – restrictions on fiscal policy the government sets to constrain its own decisions on spending and taxes.

They are:

The stability rule: The current budget should be on course to be in balance or surplus by 2029/30

The investment rule: Net financial debt should fall as a share of the economy in 2029/30

The welfare cap: Some types of welfare spending must remain below a pre-specified level

It is less than a month away from the spring statement on 26 March, when the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) will publish its forecast on the UK economy.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out the fiscal watchdog’s toplines, which are widely expected to be a reduction in growth outlook and will warn the chancellor is at risk of breaching her fiscal rules.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Income taxes will have to rise’

Former Bank of England governor Lord Mervyn King told Sophy Ridge’s Politics Hub programme on Wednesday that income taxes will have to rise to plug the UK’s financial blackhole.

He said taxes would need to be increased to accommodate both a rise in defence spending, announced on Tuesday, and public services reform.

“The obvious tax to raise is the basic rate of income tax, we will all contribute to it,” he said.

Lord King added he would not have raised employers’ national insurance contributions, as Ms Reeves did in October, but would instead have increased employees’ income tax.

Read more:
Two reasons why Starmer’s meeting with Trump really matters

Starmer insists on security guarantee for Ukraine as he arrives in Washington

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer: ‘We want to strike a new partnership’

The OBR is required to produce two economic forecasts a year, but, the chancellor said she would only give one budget a year to provide stability and certainty on upcoming tax changes.

However, there is speculation about tax changes due to the poor economic climate since the autumn budget.

Inflation has risen to its highest level in 10 months to 3%, there has been a sharp rise in government bond yields and growth has not been as high as expected.

This has led to the chancellor’s £9.9bn headroom against her fiscal rules being all but wiped out.

Ms Reeves could extend a freeze on income tax bands and allowances beyond April 2028, dragging more people into paying more tax as their pay rises.

She is reportedly considering lowering the annual limit on how much people can put into cash ISAs from £20,000 to £4,000.

Continue Reading

Politics

Mike Amesbury: MP jailed for punching constituent in street walks free after appealing against prison sentence

Published

on

By

Mike Amesbury: MP jailed for punching constituent in street walks free after appealing against prison sentence

Former Labour MP Mike Amesbury will walk free after winning an appeal against his 10-week jail sentence for punching a man in the street.

The sentence handed to him on Monday will now be suspended for two years.

It means the Runcorn and Helsby MP will not be jailed, unless he commits any more crimes within that time.

Politics latest: I can trust Trump, says Starmer

Honorary Recorder of Chester Judge Steven Everett, sitting with two magistrates, also ordered Amesbury to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work, undertake a 120-day alcohol monitoring requirement, go on an anger management course and carry out 20 days of rehabilitation work.

Amesbury, 55, pleaded guilty in January to beating by assault after punching Paul Fellows, 45, in Main Street, Frodsham, Cheshire, in the early hours of 26 October after his constituent asked him about a bridge closure.

He had been set to serve 40% of his sentence – four weeks – in prison followed by a year on licence.

More from Politics

However, his lawyer launched an appeal shortly after he was sentenced and after the appeal was heard at Chester Crown Court on Thursday, the judge said his jail time should be suspended.

Amesbury arrived at the court in a prison van, having spent three nights in prison, and was led into the building in handcuffs by an officer.

The judge initially ordered a 12-month alcohol monitoring requirement, but changed his mind and said it should be 120 days.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

CCTV shows Labour MP punch man

The Labour Party, which suspended Amesbury shortly after the incident, said he would not be allowed back into the party after his original sentencing.

However, he remains an independent MP and will continue to receive his £91,000 salary under parliamentary rules, which state an MP only has their salary removed when they are no longer an MP.

Amesbury has been urged to resign by Labour and Reform but has not done so and a recall petition cannot be issued until he has exhausted any appeals. He has not yet indicated if he will appeal his latest sentence.

A recall petition kickstarts a by-election if 10% of an MP’s constituents sign it.

Read more:
Yvette Cooper calls for new Runcorn MP

Starmer refuses to say if further tax rises will be imposed

Footage replayed in court on Thursday, showed Amesbury punching Mr Fellows in the head, knocking him to the ground then punching him five more times.

He was heard saying: “You won’t threaten your MP again will you, you f****** soft lad?”

The hearing was told Amesbury gave a prepared statement in a police interview where he initially claimed he had been approached by a man “shouting and screaming” about local and national matters, including a local swing bridge and immigration.

MP Mike Amesbury (right) arrives at Chester Ellesmere Port and Neston Magistrates' Court, where he will be sentenced on a charge of assault, after he was found guilty of attacking Paul Fellows in Frodsham, Cheshire, on October 26. Picture date: Monday February 24, 2025. PA Photo. See PA story COURTS Amesbury. Photo credit should read: Peter Byrne/PA Wire

In the statement, he told police: “I thought I was about to be physically assaulted by this male. I was terrified and felt vulnerable and cornered by the male and others in the group.”

He said the man’s “arms were swinging” and he thought there was no option but to “defend” himself.

Judge Everett said: “What he said to police doesn’t seem to fit in with the CCTV in pretty well any respect.”

Amesbury’s barrister told the court he had spent three nights in prison, “an experience he will never forget, certainly”.

He said the “public shaming” and “embarrassment” had a huge impact on Amesbury, who he said “will learn a painful lesson”.

Continue Reading

Politics

Two reasons why Starmer’s meeting with Trump really matters

Published

on

By

Two reasons why Starmer's meeting with Trump really matters

I’ve been on quite a few trips now to the White House with successive prime ministers, but I can’t remember one that mattered as much as this. 

As Keir Starmer himself puts it, “everything has changed” and the prime minister finds himself negotiating with an old ally that is looking at the post-war world order afresh and doesn’t much like what it sees.

As Donald Trump appears to abandon the role the US took in the world during the Second World War and is now looking away from Europe and Ukraine, Starmer’s task is to try to win his attention, and support, once more.

Politics latest: PM’s ‘very stupid decision’ condemned

The prime minister’s two goals when he meets President Trump on Thursday are to help persuade him to put in place US security guarantees for Ukraine to deter Russian aggression post any peace deal, and dissuade President Trump from imposing tariffs on the UK.

That’s why, when it comes to UK security and economy – the two principal foundations of the Starmer administration – this meeting, this relationship, really matters.

It might be too much to say President Trump has the power to derail the Starmer project, but he does have in his gift the power to make Starmer’s twin task of guaranteeing British security and delivering economic growth far more challenging.

So the stakes are high for Britain and on the plane over to Washington that jeopardy was obvious to see.

When the prime minister came down to the back of the plane to answer questions from journalists travelling with him, he began the session with us by saying he had a lot of important things to discuss and was going to keep his answers short.

He then assiduously stuck to an agreed script, weighing each answer carefully as he swerved a number of questions on Ukraine and trade by saying he “wasn’t going to get ahead of discussions”, as he praised President Trump, referenced the special relationship as often as he could and insisted again the UK would not pick between the US and Europe.

Read more:
Trump threatens 25% tariffs on EU
CIA to look at UK backdoor ‘request’

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Can Starmer ‘win’ in Washington?

From the PM’s trip to Ukraine in January when he all but confirmed to Sky News that he was prepared to put British boots on the ground in a peacekeeping force, to his language around Europe stepping up at NATO in February, the European summit last week in Paris and then this week’s big commitment to accelerate the UK’s defence spending, the Number 10 team have been building up to this meeting, step by step.

But they are also all too aware that a positive outcome isn’t guaranteed when it comes to President Trump – and much will rest on what they find when Keir Starmer and Donald Trump meet in the room.

“We honestly don’t know what’s in his mind,” said one senior figure who has been war gaming the trip.

There were already bumps before the prime minister even landed. As Keir Starmer told reporters on the plane over that the security guarantees around any Ukraine peace deal “had to be sufficient to deter Putin from coming again” (and that requires a US military backstop in the minds of the Europeans), President Trump told reporters he was “not going to make security guarantees beyond very much”. “We’re gonna have Europe do that…Europe is their next door neighbour.”

Those remarks are perhaps not the ones the Number 10 team were hoping to hear, but they have a rule now to focus not on what Trump says, but what he actually does.

Much of what happens in the next 24 hours will be beyond the control of Sir Keir Starmer, but he has at least prepared the ground as best he can with a president who hates criticism, loves flattery and is very transactional.

👉 Follow Trump 100 on your podcast app 👈

Starmer goes to Washington full of praise of President Trump – a leader he said on the plane over that he trusts – and a concrete pledge to put British troops into a peacekeeping force and lift UK defence spending, a key Trump ask of all NATO allies.

He has done the groundwork, now it comes down to the art of the deal.

Continue Reading

Trending