Connect with us

Published

on

Bereaved families and MPs are urging the government to take tougher steps to protect younger teenagers from “horrific” content on social media. 

The Australian government’s decision to legislate for a smartphone ban for under 16s has reignited the debate in the UK about further restrictions, and a Labour MP is hoping to get government support for curbs on social media.

Stuart Stephens is among those campaigning for the government to go further and spoke to Sky News.

Olly Stephens, 13year-old schoolboy stabbed to death in Bugs Bottom fields, Emmer Green, Reading
Image:
Olly Stephens, 13, was murdered in 2021

Olly Stephens with his father Stuart
Image:
Olly with his father Stuart

His son Olly was just 13 when he was murdered by other teenagers following a row which began on social media.

Mr Stephens said his son had been trying to stand up for another child who was a victim of “patterning” – humiliating someone and circulating it on video to blackmail them. Three 14-year-olds were jailed for Olly’s murder in 2021 – following an investigation involving 11 social media platforms.

“We are angry,” Mr Stephens said. “Without a doubt, without all that interaction he would still be here.

“There’s no accountability. These platforms are put out; kids use them, people get hurt, and we need to shine a light on that.

More on Smartphone

“I firmly believe that I lost my son because of weak governance and poor legislation, full stop, which is why we are doing what we are doing.

“I can’t show you any of the stuff that we saw on his phone, but it’s horrific. And a lot of that stuff you can’t unsee. And especially as a child, you’ve got a developing brain and you bombard them with horrific stuff that’s going to change them as an adult, and that’s not beneficial for society.”

Mr Stephens added: “You think this is never going to happen to you.

“He went into his world with the mobile phone. We need to bolster the legislation that’s already there, not weaken it.”

Olly's parents Stuart and Amanda Stephens said they have been left 'completely broken'
Image:
Olly’s parents Stuart and Amanda Stephens outside Reading Crown Court in September 2001. Pic: PA

Police searching an alleyway near to where a 13-year-old boy died in Emmer Green, Reading, after being stabbed on Sunday.
Image:
Police searching an alleyway near to where Olly was killed in July 2001. Pic: PA

Mr Stephens supports a private members’ bill being drafted by Labour MP Josh MacAlister which would raise the age of internet “adulthood” in which a child can give data to social media apps from 13 to 16 – in order to stop them being bombarded with unsolicited content via algorithms.

This would go further than the measures in the Online Safety Act, passed a year ago, which the regulator Ofcom will be implementing in phases from next year.

Ministers have promised sanctions for tech companies who fail to clamp down on harmful material, such as violence, explicit material and disinformation, and do not implement rigorous age verification for their platforms.

The Technology Secretary, Peter Kyle, is not minded to enact a full smartphone ban for under-16s but has said that nothing is “off the table”.

Labour MP Josh MacAlister is calling for a ban on smartphones in schools
Image:
Labour MP Josh MacAlister is calling for a change in the law

Mr MacAlister, a former teacher and now MP for Whitehaven and Workington, believes parents need to be empowered to stop their children “doom-scrolling” on social media and is hoping to get government support.

The MP, who has held meetings with parents, health professionals and tech experts, told Sky News he was concerned by figures showing the average 12-year-old is spending 21 hours a week online.

“We’ve reached a point where this is a topic of discussion at almost every family dinner table in the country. Parents, teachers, children themselves recognise the scale of this problem,” Mr McAllister said.

“We’ve got the Online Safety Act here in the UK, which is a great landmark initial piece of legislation, focused on obviously harmful content – violent images, pornography, those sorts of things.

“But in places like Australia, states in the US and France, governments are saying actually there is a wider effect of addictive social media smartphones and that’s taking children away from other activities.

“My bill is about trying to put that debate here into parliament and to persuade the government to act, to do really one simple thing through a number of measures.

“That is to make the version of smartphones that children use under 16 different to those above 16 – safer, less addictive; kick children off of them after they’ve spent a fair bit of time on their mobile.

“I don’t think that this is an issue where the genie is out of the bottle. We can absolutely set some new rules around this.”

Read more:
Nothing ‘off table’ in smartphone ban debate
Plan to ban phones from schools dropped

Susie Husemeyer is trying to restrict phone access to her daughter, Amelia, 12
Image:
Susie Husemeyer is trying to restrict phone access to her daughter, Amelia, 12

Sky News spoke to parents who feel that even legal content is taking over their children’s lives. The group Smartphone Free Childhood, set up by parents, now has 150,000 members promoting the use of “brick” mobile phones without apps.

One of its members, Susie Husemeyer, is trying to restrict smartphone use for her daughter Amelia, who is 12 years old.

After giving her a smartphone in her last year of primary school and trying to impose a time limit, she had second thoughts and has now disabled the internet on the device.

Amelia said: “I have messages, music to listen to on the bus, and calls. There’s a lot of peer pressure that’s like, how come you don’t have WhatsApp? I get a lot of my friends saying, ‘Your parents are so boring. How come your parents don’t let you do this?'”

But while her friends are often glued to their phones, she supports her parents’ decision.

“It’s not good for your mental health, especially without any restrictions.

“Sometimes I think I wish I had WhatsApp, as people will have a birthday party and set up a group chat about it and I’ll be completely left out.

“But usually I don’t. It would be easier if everyone was banned.”

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Susie said: “There is no doubt about it, she is left out. I think that parents like me are just in such a hard place because we’re trying to do the right thing by our children.

“But at the same time, our children’s peers are all using phones that have all these things enabled. And these devices are just so addictive.

“My message to government would be we are in desperate need of preserving our children’s childhoods because childhood lasts a lifetime, a good childhood lasts a lifetime, and a distracted childhood lasts a lifetime too, in terms of how the brain develops.”

Some children’s charities say a total ban on smartphones or social media punishes teenagers and ignores the benefits of phones when used safely.

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate stablecoin vote splits Democrats amid concerns over corruption

Published

on

By

Senate stablecoin vote splits Democrats amid concerns over corruption

Senate stablecoin vote splits Democrats amid concerns over corruption

US Senate Democrats are getting flak after they helped move stablecoin legislation ahead for discussion on the Senate floor.

On May 19, 16 Democratic senators broke from the party line to pass a motion to invoke cloture, which will now set the bill up for debate on the Senate floor. Some of the same Democrats had held up the bill in early May when they withdrew support, citing corruption concerns over President Donald Trump’s cryptocurrency dealings.

The bill’s opponents hailed lawmakers’ refusal to support it but were soon taken aback when the senators reversed their position. The lightly amended legislation contained no provisions regarding World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s crypto venture.

Some activists have said that the Democrats supporting the bill should be ousted in the upcoming Democratic primaries in 2026, reflecting a growing rift in the Democratic Party over cryptocurrencies.

Law, Politics, Congress, United States, Stablecoin, Features
The Senate voted 66-32 to move the bill ahead. Source: Stand With Crypto

Democratic lawmakers’ approach to crypto shows split in party

On May 19, moderate Democratic Senator Mark Warner announced he would support the bill, stating that it was “not perfect, but it’s far better than the status quo.”

Warner set corruption concerns aside, stating, “Many senators, myself included, have very real concerns about the Trump family’s use of crypto technologies to evade oversight […] But we cannot allow that corruption to blind us to the broader reality: blockchain technology is here to stay.”

Warner concluded it would be better for the US to move forward on imperfect stablecoin legislation than to fall behind other jurisdictions. 

Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, one of the bill’s sponsors, also pushed aside Trump corruption concerns, saying they should be addressed separately. 

Related: US Senate moves forward with GENIUS stablecoin bill

“A lot of what President Trump is engaged in is already illegal,” she said, adding that she didn’t want the president’s scandals to “distract us from the important goal of having a clear regulatory structure in the United States that can onshore this industry.”

During the vote, progressive Democrats disagreed. Senator Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee and a vocal critic of the crypto industry, reportedly got into a heated argument with Gillibrand on the Senate floor.

Warren argued on the Senate floor ahead of the vote, “A bill that turbocharges the stablecoin market, while facilitating the President’s corruption and undermining national security, financial stability, and consumer protection is worse than no bill at all.”

Democrats opposing the bill aren’t giving up either. Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado, who voted against the GENIUS Act, immediately introduced another bill, jokingly named “the STABLE GENIUS Act,” combining the names of the bills in the Senate and House of Representatives.

The bill would prevent the president, vice-president and members of Congress from “issuing or endorsing digital assets” and require them to place any assets they hold in a blind trust while in office.

While the bill has little chance of passing — numerous acts that would limit members’ of Congress financial activities have fizzled out — it shows the Democrats are split on how they should provide opposition.

Democratic activists lambast Democratic GENIUS supporters

The progressive and activist wings of the Democratic party have roundly criticized Congressional leadership for compromising with Republicans on measures that, they claim, should be deal breakers. 

In March, activists were enraged when Senator Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York and minority leader in the Senate, voted with the Republicans on a continuing resolution for government funding. One progressive observer accused him of giving up leverage and weakening the Democratic position. 

Then, in April, disagreements over how Democrats should fight Trump’s mass deportations further deepened the rift. 

Now, crypto has become another wedge between the activist wing, which provides crucial voter activation during elections, and centrists in Congress.

Ezra Levin, co-founder and co-executive director of progressive activist organization Indivisible, wrote on BlueSky:

Senate stablecoin vote splits Democrats amid concerns over corruption
Ezra Levin commenting on crypto bill. Source: Ezra Levin

Communications strategist Murshed Zaheed, who formally worked for the offices of Senator Harry Reid and Representative Louise Slaughter, urged people to call their senators to come out against the bill.

“Any Democrat who votes for this today — should never be taken seriously again if they send out emails, text and do videos […] talking a big game about Trump’s corruption,” he said.

Related: What to expect at Trump’s memecoin dinner

Chris Kluwe, a former American football player who has since become a prominent activist within Democratic politics, said on May 20 he was “excited to get a chance to speak at the CA state Dem convention on May 31st, I’m sure [the bill] won’t come up at all in the 4 minutes I’ve been allotted.”

On BlueSky, labor researcher and media law historian Peter Labuza posted “Primary List” in reply to a post of the 16 Democratic senators who helped support the bill.

The subject of primary elections, the intra-party elections to decide who will represent the party in a given district, has also grown contentious.

On May 12, the Democratic National Convention (DNC) voted to void the results of an internal party vote nominating David Hogg as a vice chair. The decision essentially strips Hogg of his title at the DNC and, with it, the ability to promote his controversial policy of sponsoring progressive challengers in Democratic primary elections. 

Hogg had planned to spend $20 million to support progressive and young candidates in Democratic Party primaries as part of the “Leaders We Deserve” campaign — an activist group that aims to elevate younger leaders with a more combative tone against the Trump administration. 

With the stablecoin bills in the House and Senate poised to move ahead, the Democrats seem ill-suited to mount an effective opposition to the bills. Internal struggles and interests within Congress have disunited lawmakers, while activists want a new crop of congresspeople to represent them next term.

In the Democratic Party’s internal battle between the anti-crypto progressive wing and the pro-crypto pragmatists, the latter is winning out, so far. 

Magazine: Father-son team lists Africa’s XRP Healthcare on Canadian stock exchange

Continue Reading

Politics

Robinhood proposes SEC rules for tokenized real-world assets

Published

on

By

Robinhood proposes SEC rules for tokenized real-world assets

Robinhood proposes SEC rules for tokenized real-world assets

Robinhood submitted a 42-page proposal to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), calling for a national framework to regulate tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

The brokerage is seeking to modernize financial infrastructure by making tokenized assets legally equivalent to their traditional counterparts and enabling compliant onchain settlement, Forbes reported on May 20.

In the proposal, Robinhood also revealed plans for creating the Real World Asset Exchange (RRE), a trading platform offering offchain trade matching and onchain settlement for efficiency and transparency.

Robinhood is advocating for uniform federal standards to replace the patchwork of state-level securities regulations that currently apply. The platform would also integrate Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) tools through partners like Jumio and Chainalysis to meet global compliance expectations.

Related: Central banks testing smart contract toolkit under BIS Project Pine

Robinhood asks for token-asset equivalence

A key feature of the proposal is the push for token-asset equivalence. Under Robinhood’s plan, a token representing a US Treasury bond, for instance, would be treated as the bond itself, not a derivative or synthetic product.

That would allow institutions and broker-dealers to handle tokenized RWAs within the existing regulatory system, potentially streamlining custody, trading and settlement processes.

Robinhood proposes SEC rules for tokenized real-world assets
Source: Cointelegraph

Technically, RRE would be built on a dual-chain architecture utilizing Solana and Base, according to an overview of the proposal by Franklin Elevator. The system is designed to combine high-frequency offchain trade matching with onchain settlement.

Franklin Elevator said Robinhood projects the platform will achieve sub-10 microsecond matching latency and throughput of up to 30,000 transactions per second.

This could compress the US capital markets’ standard settlement time from T+2 to T+0, cutting trading costs by an estimated 30% annually.

“RWA tokenization represents a new paradigm for institutional asset allocation. Robinhood is committed to leading this trend under a compliant framework,” Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said.

Cointelegraph reached out to Robinhood for comment, but they hadn’t responded by publication time.

Related: SEC Chair: Blockchain ‘holds promise’ of new kinds of market activity

Tokenization gains momentum

Robinhood’s proposal comes amid a renewed wave of interest in RWA tokenization, with major players from both traditional finance and crypto making headlines last week.

On April 30, BlackRock filed to create a blockchain-based share class for its $150 billion Treasury Trust Fund, allowing a digital ledger to mirror investor ownership. On the same day, Libre revealed plans to tokenize $500 million in Telegram debt via its new Telegram Bond Fund.

On May 1, MultiBank Group inked a $3 billion tokenization deal with UAE real estate firm MAG and blockchain provider Mavryk.

“The recent surge isn’t arbitrary. It’s happening because everything’s lining up,” Eric Piscini, CEO of Hashgraph, told Cointelegraph. “Rules are getting clearer in major markets. The tech is stronger, faster, and ready to scale. And big players are actually doing it,” he added.

Magazine: Father-son team lists Africa’s XRP Healthcare on Canadian stock exchange

Continue Reading

Politics

Kraken expands in Europe with regulated crypto derivatives

Published

on

By

Kraken expands in Europe with regulated crypto derivatives

Kraken expands in Europe with regulated crypto derivatives

Cryptocurrency exchange Kraken announced the launch of regulated derivatives trading on its platform under the European Union’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II).

According to a May 20 announcement, Kraken’s perpetual and fixed maturity crypto futures contracts will be available for trading by retail and institutional customers in the European Economic Area (EEA). The announcement follows the exchange acquiring an MiFID license in early February through the acquisition of a Cypriot investment firm, approved by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission.

Kraken’s head of exchange, Shannon Kurtas, said, “Europe is one of the fastest-growing regions for digital asset trading and investment, with some of the most sophisticated and demanding clients and institutions.”

He added, “Clients and partners increasingly seek comprehensive offerings within a regulated framework.”

Kraken, Europe, Cryptocurrency Exchange, Derivatives, European Union, Financial Derivatives
Source: Kraken Pro

Kraken had not responded to Cointelegraph’s request for comment by publication.

Release the Kraken

Kurtas said that following the deployment of the new derivatives products, “they [users] can seamlessly trade futures as part of a full suite of products” on the platform.

Derivatives, he said, will improve “capital efficiency, access to liquidity, reliability and enable sophisticated strategies and position management.” Kraken’s derivatives will be offered through a Cyprus-based MiFID II-regulated entity, Payward Europe Digital Solutions.

The launch follows Kraken completing its acquisition of the futures trading platform NinjaTrader earlier this month, as its first quarter revenue jumped 19% year-on-year to $471.7 million.

Crypto derivatives see lots of activity

Recently, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said his firm will continue to look for merger and acquisition opportunities, after acquiring crypto derivatives platform Deribit. The comments came after the publicly listed US crypto exchange earlier this month agreed to acquire Deribit, one of the world’s biggest crypto derivatives trading platforms.

Major crypto exchange Gemini has also recently received regulatory approval to expand crypto derivatives trading across Europe. Gemini’s head of Europe, Mark Jennings, said in a May 9 statement:

“Once we commence business activities, we will be able to offer regulated derivatives throughout the EU and EEA [European Economic Area] under MiFID II.”

Decentralized finance platform Synthetix also plans to venture further into crypto derivatives with plans to re-acquire the crypto options platform Derive. The transaction is subject to approval from both the Synthetix and Derive communities.

Magazine: How crypto laws are changing across the world in 2025

Continue Reading

Trending