Connect with us

Published

on

BYD Song L electric cars at the 21st Changchun International Automobile Expo in Changchun, Jilin province, China, on July 17, 2024.

Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

SINGAPORE — Chinese automakers BYD, Leapmotor, and Xiaomi have raced past their annual delivery targets a month ahead of schedule, underscoring their rapid growth and strong market demand as the year comes to a close.

Electric vehicle juggernaut BYD delivered 504,003 passenger vehicles in November, up from last month’s 500,526. Its cumulative deliveries for passenger cars stand at 3,740,930, exceeding its initial full-year target of 3.6 million deliveries.

Meanwhile, Stellantis-backed Leapmotor saw 40,169 deliveries in November, up 5.22% from the previous month and 117% year on year. The company has delivered 251,207 cars year-to-date, surpassing its 250,000 annual delivery target.

Xiaomi, likewise, achieved the feat of surpassing its annual target of 100,000 deliveries midway through November. The company launched its first car, the SU7, in March this year.

For the full month of November, the Chinese phonemaker company delivered more than 20,000 cars for the second consecutive month this year. Xiaomi has revised its target to 130,000 deliveries by the end of the year.

Chinese electric carmaker Zeekr said Sunday it delivered 27,011 cars in November, beating the previous month’s record by 7.83%, and increasing by 106% year on year.

This month’s deliveries brings its full year’s deliveries to 194,933 — only slightly short of its full-year delivery target of 230,000 vehicles.

Hyundai's incoming CEO on Elon Musk's proximity to Trump: It's good for electric vehicles

The Geely-backed automaker began deliveries of its new five-seater SUV Zeekr Mix on Oct. 23.

Xpeng also achieved an all-time best with 30,895 deliveries in November, up 29% from the previous month.

The deliveries included the company’s mass-market car, Mona M03, which exceeded 10,000 deliveries for the third consecutive month. Xpeng launched Mona M03 in late August with prices starting at $16,812, while Tesla’s cheapest car, the Model 3, starts at 231,900 yuan ($31,897).

Xpeng’s November deliveries also included more than 7,000 deliveries of the P7+, which launched Nov. 7 and received 31,528 orders by midnight that day.

Premium brand Nio delivered 20,575 cars in November, up 28.9% year on year. Deliveries included 5,082 vehicles from its lower-priced brand Onvo, which was launched in September.

In a Nov. 20 earnings call, the company said it aimed to deliver between 72,000 and 75,000 cars in the fourth quarter. That means Nio has to deliver at least 30,449 cars in December to meet the minimum target.

Nio will also launch its Firefly brand on Dec. 21, CEO William Li said in the same call. Co-founder and president Qin Lihong confirmed to local media last month that the car would be purely electric, refuting local media claims of a potential hybrid model.

Nio’s full-year delivery target for 2024, derived from quarterly guidance, ranges from 218,000 to 227,000 deliveries. Per CNBC’s calculations, Nio has delivered a total of 190,832 cars year-to-date.

The company shared plans to double electric car deliveries next year in the earnings call, with a target of 20,000 Onvo cars per month by March 2025.

Li Auto, whose cars mostly come with a fuel tank to extend the battery’s driving range, delivered 48,740 cars in November, down 5.25% from October’s deliveries. As of end-November, the company delivered 441,995 cars out of its annual goal of 480,000.

The company previously aimed to deliver 800,000 cars for the full year, but cut its target in June.

Huawei-backed Aito did not disclose its November deliveries, but announced on Nov. 27 that it had delivered over 180,000 units of the M7.

And amid the intensifying price war in China, American automaker Tesla cut prices by 10,000 yuan for its Model Y through Dec. 31. With the discount, the Model Y now retails at 239,900 yuan.

Continue Reading

Environment

Gas prices fall to four-year lows as millions embark on holiday road trips

Published

on

By

Gas prices fall to four-year lows as millions embark on holiday road trips

Customers at the GasWay Xpress Mart at 1120 Erie Blvd. pump gas on Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2025, in Schenectady, N.Y.

Lori Van Buren | Albany Times Union | Hearst Newspapers | Getty Images

Holiday road-trippers are feeling some relief at the pump this year.

The average price of unleaded gasoline in the U.S. has been below $3 a gallon for most of the month — the lowest level since 2021, according to AAA. The association said it’s shaping up to be the cheapest December for drivers filling up their tanks going back to the pandemic year of 2020.

Fuel prices are down about 7% from a month ago, AAA data shows, and have tumbled roughly 43% from mid-2022 highs near $5 a gallon that followed runaway inflation in the wake of the pandemic.

The latest slide in prices comes as AAA forecasts a record of more than 122 million Americans will travel at least 50 miles from home in the 13 days between Dec. 20 and Jan. 1. AAA found nearly nine of 10 people on the move during the period — or close to 110 million — are expected to travel by car.

The drop in pump prices may help mitigate the impact of lingering inflation elsewhere during the holiday season.

Just over 40% of those polled said they planned to spend less at the holidays this year, a 6-point increase from a year ago, according to CNBC’s All-America Economic Survey. Of those who are pinching pennies, 46% blamed the high cost of goods.

The national average masks wide, regional variances, as Hawaii and California both recorded average gas prices above $4 on Monday. In Oklahoma, meanwhile, a gallon came in just below $2.30.

Get Morning Squawk directly to your inbox

Continue Reading

Environment

What a Russia-Ukraine peace deal could mean for Europe’s gas supplies

Published

on

By

What a Russia-Ukraine peace deal could mean for Europe's gas supplies

Europe is pressing ahead with plans to ban Russian gas imports by the end of 2027, effectively capping Moscow’s energy future in the region and leaving a bevy of stranded assets in its wake.

The dual Nord Stream 1 and 2 subsea pipelines were early casualties of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, with the infrastructure being sabotaged in late 2022 and the latter pipeline — costing $11 billion to build and aimed at doubling cheap Russian gas flows to Germany — never being certified for use.  

There had been speculation that the major energy infrastructure could eventually be resurrected if, or rather when, the war between Russia and Ukraine ends and there’s a peace agreement between the parties. 

However, talks to try to establish the grounds for a ceasefire have been moving at a snail’s pace with neither side willing to cross “red lines” regarding the permanent surrender of territory, be it sovereign or occupied. Speaking with British news website UnHerd, Vance said Monday that while the U.S. is going to “try to get this thing solved,” he “wouldn’t say with confidence that we’re going to get a peaceful resolution.”

Hopes of a deal have led to questions over what economic and energy links between Russia and the rest of the world could be re-established and, when it comes to Europe, whether a ceasefire could lead to a reintegration of Russian gas and the resurrection of the Nord Stream gas pipelines. 

Such a move would be highly contentious and divisive on the continent, given Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and attempts in the region to wean itself off cheaper Russian gas. 

Ukraine MP Oleksiy Goncharenko: Russia is not serious about negotiations

In 2021, before the war, Russian imports accounted for about 45% of the European gas consumption. This year, estimates expect imports of 13%. 

Ukraine would be outraged by any move that benefited its invader, and Poland has called for the pipelines — one of which has never been used — to be “dismantled.”  

That said, Ukraine itself benefited from an older pipeline that passes through the country as it collected transit fees. The Russia–Ukraine gas transit agreement expired at the end of 2024, with the two countries opting not to renew it given the war. The Nord Stream pipelines were specifically designed to circumvent Ukraine and avoid such fees, but the transit agreement could be one of many levers to use during negotiations if the tap is turned back on.  

The U.S. would likely baulk at the return of Nord Stream as it has hoped to muscle out Moscow and increase its market share of liquefied natural gas (LNG) sales to Europe. But Germany, which is directly connected to the pipeline and whose industries are struggling with high energy costs, might find the lure and return of Russian gas supplies hard to resist. 

The European Council and Parliament in December struck a provisional agreement on regulation to phase out imports of Russian gas. It is set to implement a full ban on liquefied natural gas (LNG) and pipeline gas imports from the end of 2026 and autumn 2027, respectively. 

Is Nord Stream salvageable? 

The Danish Energy Agency in January granted permission for Nord Stream 2 to carry out preservation work on its damaged pipelines that are located within Denmark’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the Baltic Sea.

“The purpose of the works is to prevent further gas blowout and the ingress of oxygenated seawater, that could potentially lead to corrosion,” the agency told CNBC, although the preservation works on Nord Stream 2 have not commenced yet. 

The permit has been granted on a number of conditions, the agency said, that are intended to ensure safe operation of the pipeline. It added that, among other conditions, the company must submit an annual plan for the pipeline facility “so that the Danish Energy Agency can continuously monitor the company’s plans for the facility’s future.” 

Goldman Sachs’ Samantha Dart on how the Russia-Ukraine war impacts the natural gas trade

“Furthermore, all conditions in such permits would have to be fulfilled before the pipelines can be put into operation. The Danish Energy Agency has not received any such applications,” it said. 

But are the Norstream pipelines even salvageable now? 

Sergey Vakulenko, senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center, told CNBC that the pipeline that was damaged in the sabotage incidents would need replacing in part, and the remaining undamaged one would not cost “much money at all” to resurrect. 

“I think they’re still repairable, salvageable. So you could have to cut a few miles of [the damaged] pipeline and replace it. But this could be done,” he told CNBC in October.  

“It could easily cost $1 billion or something like that, but there’s still one [pipeline] at operational strength so that could be used,” he said. Asked if the pipelines — which are filled with stagnant gas — are being looked after currently, Vakulenko said: “They’re not looked after at all.” 

Can Europe stomach Russian gas, again? 

Whether Europe could resume purchases from Russia again is the big question. 

“Each of the Nord Streams [pipelines] were 55 million cubic meters. So that one remaining is 27.5 million cubic meters … and that’s probably the top of what Europe would be prepared to buy from Russia,” Vakulenko said.

He said that if there was a change of government in Russia and Putin was no longer president, Europe would be “quite willing to buy some Russian gas,” but not if the same amounts it was buying before. 

“Then Nord Stream would come in handy. But that’s [a] very big ‘IF,'” he added.  

“On the one hand, Europe, or at least there are parties [countries] in Europe, who wouldn’t mind having at least some Russian gas in the European energy mix for a number of reasons, to not be too reliant on U.S. supply. Russia is the lowest cost supplier to Europe,” he said.  

The continent has not fully recovered from the energy crisis stemming from the full-scale invasion of its neighbour. The Dutch Title Transfer Facility, Europe’s main benchmark for natural gas prices, was double its pre-war prices in early 2025, per the IEA. Energy constraints are compounded further by the AI race, which has shifted public narratives from energy transition to energy addition

“So if you’re not too squeamish to buy Russian gas, if you don’t have to hold your nose too tight by buying it, then sure, there’s a lot of commercial and economic reasons as to why [to do it]. If it becomes politically, ethically palatable, then there will be quite a lot of stimuli to do so, but that’s again for the time when there is indeed some rapprochement between Russia and Europe, and that’s [a] big ‘if’,” Vakulenko said. 

However, Tancrede Fulop, utilities and renewables analyst at Morningstar, told CNBC that it would be too difficult to reintegrate Russian gas, at least in the short term, because of the fresh European legislation. He noted, however, that the legislation does include some exceptions for Hungary and Slovakia in emergency situations.

The policy shift was also rooted in a drive for energy independence after Russia’s “weaponisation of gas supplies,” the EU said. As a result, member states are likely to stay clear of an overreliance on one state going forward and instead invest in boosting overall domestic capacity.

Does Russia want European business?

Whether Russia would want to sell its gas to Europe is another looming question.

Everybody thinks the energy crisis started with war in Ukraine, but it actually started in 2021,” Fulop said, noting several drivers of a cold winter, low wind speeds, and therefore high gas consumption.

Adding to the crisis was the fact that the EU was late to clear Nord Stream 2 for operations. “And so Russia started to reduce the flows of gas sent to the EU,” before the war started, he said. This suggests that the move from Russia may have been intended to add pressure on Europe to pick up the pace with Nord Stream 2.

On the other hand, “Russia is not in a very strong negotiating position,” according to Vakulenko. “For Russia, that gas is a stranded resource. So you could expect [that Europe] could negotiate a good deal.”

Russia has also looked to Asia as an alternative partner to Europe and has deepened ties with China via the Power of Siberia pipeline.  

Even if a peace deal with Ukraine is reached, “the message is quite alarming” around another potential conflict with Russia, Fulop said, given the flouting of European airspace in recent months.  

Ultimately, a renewed embrace of Russian gas “doesn’t seem like the most realistic scenario.”

It helps that gas prices have fallen lately, he added, perhaps with market watchers pricing in a peace deal. The EU will also benefit from the new export terminals in the U.S.  

“This is bearish for gas prices, positive for Europe, and that could offset the end of Russian gas imports,” Fulop said.  

Continue Reading

Environment

Maryland’s largest solar farm is now online on a former coal mine

Published

on

By

Maryland’s largest solar farm is now online on a former coal mine

A former coal mine in western Maryland is now generating solar power – and it’s the largest solar farm in the state. Competitive Power Ventures (CPV) has brought Maryland’s largest solar project online in Garrett County, turning reclaimed coal mine land into a source of clean electricity.

CPV Renewable Power, an affiliate of CPV, and investment partner Harrison Street Asset Management have started commercial operations at CPV Backbone Solar, a 160-megawatt solar project in western Maryland. The site sits on a reclaimed, decommissioned coal mine, turning previously disturbed land into a new source of clean power.

Construction of the project was handled by Vanguard Energy Partners, a solar engineering, procurement, and construction firm.

The project comprises approximately 324,000 solar panels and is expected to generate enough electricity to power around 30,000 homes. For Maryland, it adds new in‑state generation while giving former fossil fuel land a second life.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

CPV says that the project aims to demonstrate the role of brownfield redevelopment in the energy transition. The company’s CEO, Sherman Knight, said Backbone Solar shows “how brownfield redevelopment, innovative engineering, and strategic partnerships can meet complex project challenges and deliver new power generation in Maryland.”

Local officials have welcomed the project. Garrett County Board Chairman Paul Edwards said bringing the solar facility to the county helps protect the region’s natural landscape while also creating economic value for local residents.

CPV Backbone Solar also includes a community and environmental investment tied to the project. CPV has committed $100,000 over four years to the Deep Creek Watershed Foundation.

Backbone Solar becomes part of CPV’s growing renewable portfolio, which includes four operating wind and solar projects. The company also says it has a 4.8-gigawatt renewable development pipeline.

A second phase of the Backbone Solar project is already under construction. Once completed, it’s expected to increase the site’s total installed capacity from 160 MW to 175 MW.

Read more: Fast charge your EV while grabbing Royal Farms fried chicken


If you’re looking to replace your old HVAC equipment, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you’re finding a trusted, reliable HVAC installer near you that offers competitive pricing on heat pumps, check out EnergySage. EnergySage is a free service that makes it easy for you to get a heat pump. They have pre-vetted heat pump installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions. Plus, it’s free to use!

Your personalized heat pump quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – *ad

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending