Connect with us

Published

on

Richard Tice has been challenged for appearing to cast doubt on court documents that detailed how one of the party’s MPs was jailed for repeatedly kicking his girlfriend.

The Reform UK deputy leader defended James McMurdock, who was jailed 18 years ago for repeatedly kicking his girlfriend, saying the UK is a “Christian nation” that believes in “redemption”.

Speaking to the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge, Mr Tice said he did not believe Mr McMurdock, the party’s MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock, should be “doomed as a sinner forever”.

Mr McMurdock, a former investment banker, was convicted of assaulting his then girlfriend in 2006 while drunk outside a nightclub.

He spent 21 days in a young offenders’ institution after admitting to the attack.

Before he was elected as an MP, the investment banker had not publicly disclosed the conviction and when it emerged in July he had been jailed for attacking his girlfriend when he was 19 years old, he downplayed the incident as a “teenage indiscretion”.

Politics latest: No 10 defends crackdown on junk food adverts

More on Reform Uk

But further details of what happened during the incident emerged after The Times applied to the court for information from the official record, which showed he received the custodial sentence for “kicking” the victim “around four times”.

James McMurdock arrives at the House of Commons.
Pic: PA
Image:
James McMurdock. Pic: PA

Mr Tice said his colleague was an example of someone who “had a bad issue at a very young age but has gone full circle”.

He said the UK was a “great Christian nation” and added: “Are you seriously saying that if someone makes a bad mistake in life, aged 19, that there’s no redemption they are doomed as a sinner forever? No.”

He went on: “The whole point of Christianity is a sense of if you’ve done something wrong, you pay your price. And at the end of that sentence, whatever it is, then, in a sense you’ve done your bit, you served your punishment, whatever it is.

“Isn’t it remarkable that an individual had I, you know, had a bad issue at a very young age but has gone full circle.

“Doesn’t it show, actually, to other young people that bad stuff can happen – you can make bad judgements, you can get things badly wrong. But many years later, actually you can you can do really well.

“He had a great job and end up as a member of parliament. I think that’s a good thing.”

MPs do not have to disclose previous convictions to the public when standing, with only people in prison at the time of the election for a sentence of more than a year barred.

McMurdock’s victim’s mother brought the incident to light a week after his election, saying he “left marks on her body” and “it took two security guards to pull him off her”.

When the allegations were revealed, McMurdock said the pair had argued and he had pushed her.

Challenged on whether there had been a “major discrepancy” between Mr McMurdock’s version of events and what had been reported, Mr Tice replied that his “understanding” of the incident was “different” to what The Times said had happened.

Pressed on what he believed happened, Mr Tice replied: “It actually doesn’t matter.”

“I’m trusting James,” he said.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘He wasn’t vetted’, says Farage of MP

“He’s bang on the money and I think that what he says is right. He was there. The court wasn’t there. The Times weren’t there.

“The law is the law. The law ruled that he had transgressed and he was punished. He served his punishment.”

When the allegations emerged, Mr McMurdock told Sky News the incident was “the biggest regret of my life”.

He said: “While I absolutely deny the horrific details in this tale, there is one truth in it that I cannot, nor will not deny or hide from.

Read more:
Is Reform UK winning the ‘bro vote’?

‘Mind-boggling’ Brexit rules hit British food exports by £3bn a year

“A generous person might call it a teenage indiscretion but I do not expect everyone to be so kind.

“Nearly 20 years ago, at 19 years of age, at the end of a night out together, we argued and I pushed her. She fell over and she was hurt. Despite being 38 now and having lived a whole life again I still feel deeply ashamed and apologetic.

“Despite us both being very drunk, I handed myself into the police immediately and admitted my fault. I was charged for what I did, not for what has been claimed, and I faced the consequences then and paid for my action in full.

“This is the biggest regret of my life and I wish I could go back in time and fix things.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Farage accused of wanting to ‘take UK backwards’ – as Brexit blamed for small boats crisis

Published

on

By

Farage accused of wanting to 'take UK backwards' - as Brexit blamed for small boats crisis

Nigel Farage will be accused of wanting to “take Britain backwards” by vowing to scrap trade agreements between the UK and EU, as the government seeks a permanent deal to cut checks on food and drink.

The Reform leader wants to ditch the prime minister’s Brexit reset package, unveiled earlier this year, which covers areas including fishing, defence, a youth experience scheme, and passport e-gates.

Politics Hub: Follow latest updates

It also includes a temporary deal to reduce the red tape on imports and exports of some fruit and veg, meaning no border checks or fees are paid – and the government wants to make it permanent when it expires in 2027.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Is the UK-EU deal really that good?

The minister tasked by Sir Keir Starmer with improving UK-EU ties is Nick Thomas-Symonds, who will use a speech later today to say Mr Farage “wants Britain to fail”.

Writing in The Telegraph in May, the arch-Brexiteer said Labour’s deal takes the UK “back into the orbit of Brussels”, and vowed a Reform government “would undo all of this legislation”.

Speaking in central London, Mr Thomas-Symonds will say undoing it would slash “at least £9bn from the economy, bringing with it a risk to jobs and a risk of food prices going up”.

The Cabinet Office minister will accuse him of offering “easy answers, dividing communities and stoking anger”.

A Reform UK spokesperson has dismissed the incoming criticism, claiming “no one has done more damage to British businesses than this Labour government”, pointing to tax rises on firms and the unemployment rate.

Nick Thomas-Symonds is on Sky News Breakfast – watch live from 7.15am.

Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds
Image:
Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds

‘Farage’s Brexit caused the small boats’

The Labour minister’s criticism will come a day after Mr Farage revealed his controversial plans to stop small boat crossings, vowing any such arrivals – including women and children – would be detained and deported.

“If we do that, the boats will stop coming within days, because there will be no incentive to pay a trafficker to get into this country,” he told a news conference on Tuesday.

Reform would repeal the Human Rights Act and leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), saying they have allowed foreign offenders to challenge their own deportations through the courts and remain in the UK.

Mr Farage said such treaties are “outdated”, and that the British public were in a state of either “despair” or “anger” about illegal immigration.

Nigel Farage unveils his controversial deportation plans on Tuesday. Pic: PA
Image:
Nigel Farage unveils his controversial deportation plans on Tuesday. Pic: PA

Labour dismissed the proposals as “unworkable”, while the Tories said he’d stolen their ideas.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey was more personal, suggesting Mr Farage himself was responsible for the massive rise in small boat crossings.

“The truth is, it was Farage’s Brexit that caused the small boats,” Sir Ed said. “Before Brexit, we could send back any illegal immigrants coming over in a small boat.”

Read more:
Why Farage’s small boats plan is not really about policy
How Farage’s new ‘leave’ campaign could work and impact you

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Davey: Farage wants to ‘follow Putin’

Did Brexit make things harder?

Brexit ended UK participation in the so-called Dublin agreement which governs EU-wide asylum claims. It means people should be processed for asylum in the country at which they first entered the bloc.

Sky News previously revealed how former immigration minister Chris Philp, now shadow home secretary, admitted it made returning illegal immigrants harder.

But Britain’s membership of the EU did not stop all asylum arrivals. And many EU countries where people first arrive, including Italy, do not apply the Dublin rules.

Sir Ed said the government was now reduced to doing individual deals with countries to tackle the issue.

Labour are banking on a one in, out deal with the French, which will see the UK send asylum seekers to France in exchange for ones with links to the UK.

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Jr. joins Polymarket board as prediction market eyes US comeback

Published

on

By

Trump Jr. joins Polymarket board as prediction market eyes US comeback

Trump Jr. joins Polymarket board as prediction market eyes US comeback

Donald Trump Jr. has joined Polymarket’s advisory board as 1789 Capital invests in the platform, tying the prediction market more closely to US politics.

Continue Reading

Politics

Japan wrote the first stablecoin rulebook — so why is the US pulling ahead?

Published

on

By

Japan wrote the first stablecoin rulebook — so why is the US pulling ahead?

Japan wrote the first stablecoin rulebook — so why is the US pulling ahead?

“Japan prizes systemic stability above innovation speed, while the US is signaling a bigger market-opening play,” said Startale Group’s Takashi Tezuka.

Continue Reading

Trending