A reminder: in just under five months as PM, Sir Keir has made 10 overseas trips and spent 26 days out of the country.
To be fair, those trips have included five international summits: the UN, G7, G20, COP29 on climate change and the Commonwealth heads of government.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:05
When Lammy and Starmer met Trump
So it was no surprise that in the luxurious medieval splendour of the Guildhall in the City of London, Sir Keir made the case for clocking up the air miles.
In white tie and tails – unlike Labour predecessor Gordon Brown, who stubbornly refused to change out of his lounge suit – he was addressing the annual Lord Mayor’s Banquet, which dates back to 1502.
Image: Sir Keir looked dapper upon arrival. Pic: PA
US or Europe? Why not both?
As ever on these glittering occasions, when traditionally the PM addresses ambassadors, business chiefs and City grandees about international affairs, the PM’s speech was a world tour.
And, significantly, he began with a charm offensive aimed at Donald Trump – no mention of Joe Biden, incidentally – and rejected claims that the UK should choose between the US and Europe.
Clement Attlee didn’t choose and nor did Sir Winston Churchill, he said. Was he claiming to be the heir to Labour’s hero Attlee? No surprise about that. But Churchill, the Tories’ all-time hero? Really?
The national interest, Sir Keir said, demands that the UK works with the US and Europe – a clear reference to his ambition to secure trade deals with both.
Image: The PM was able to reflect on plenty of recent foreign trips. Pic: PA
The Trump love-in
But then came the attempt at a Trump love-in. First, he hailed the “special relationship”, which cynics always claim the UK clings to much more than Americans do.
And then he recalled how the president-elect had “graciously hosted me for dinner in Trump Tower”. So gracious that Foreign Secretary David Lammy has since admitted tucking into a second helping of chicken.
But then Sir Keir revealed this: “I told him that we will invest more deeply than ever in this transatlantic bond with our American friends in the years to come.”
After a ritual attack on the Conservatives, who “turned their back on the world” and left a “shocking legacy”, he vowed – provocatively quoting the Brexit slogan – to “take back control”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:02
Starmer on relationship with Trump
Yet on what looks like dithering by the government over committing to spending 2.5% of national income (GDP) on defence, there was no pledge or timetable – just a promise to “set out a clear pathway”, whatever that means.
On Ukraine, he pledged support “for as long as it takes… to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position for negotiations” – the first time he’s spoken publicly about talks with Russia to end the war.
Sir Keir ended by taking on his critics again, over his talks with China’s President Xi. “We can’t simply look the other way,” he said. “We need to engage.”
And his final words were emphatic. “Britain is back,” he declared.
Britain may be back. But so is Donald Trump. And Sir Keir left his audience of diplomats and dignitaries in no doubt that he wants to do business with him.
Thousands of savers face potential losses after a $2.7 million shortfall was discovered at Ziglu, a British crypto fintech that entered special administration.
Another hint that tax rises are coming in this autumn’s budget has been given by a senior minister.
Speaking to Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander was asked if Sir Keir Starmer and the rest of the cabinet had discussed hiking taxes in the wake of the government’s failed welfare reforms, which were shot down by their own MPs.
Trevor Phillips asked specifically if tax rises were discussed among the cabinet last week – including on an away day on Friday.
Tax increases were not discussed “directly”, Ms Alexander said, but ministers were “cognisant” of the challenges facing them.
Asked what this means, Ms Alexander added: “I think your viewers would be surprised if we didn’t recognise that at the budget, the chancellor will need to look at the OBR forecast that is given to her and will make decisions in line with the fiscal rules that she has set out.
“We made a commitment in our manifesto not to be putting up taxes on people on modest incomes, working people. We have stuck to that.”
Ms Alexander said she wouldn’t comment directly on taxes and the budget at this point, adding: “So, the chancellor will set her budget. I’m not going to sit in a TV studio today and speculate on what the contents of that budget might be.
“When it comes to taxation, fairness is going to be our guiding principle.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Afterwards, shadow home secretary Chris Philp told Phillips: “That sounds to me like a barely disguised reference to tax rises coming in the autumn.”
He then went on to repeat the Conservative attack lines that Labour are “crashing the economy”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:43
Chris Philp also criticsed the government’s migration deal with France
Mr Philp then attacked the prime minister as “weak” for being unable to get his welfare reforms through the Commons.
Discussions about potential tax rises have come to the fore after the government had to gut its welfare reforms.
Sir Keir had wanted to change Personal Independence Payments (PIP), but a large Labour rebellion forced him to axe the changes.
With the savings from these proposed changes – around £5bn – already worked into the government’s sums, they will now need to find the money somewhere else.
The general belief is that this will take the form of tax rises, rather than spending cuts, with more money needed for military spending commitments, as well as other areas of priority for the government, such as the NHS.