A couple have been found guilty of causing or allowing the death of their three-year-old son, whose body they buried in a shallow grave in their back garden.
Warning: This story contains details readers may find distressing
Tai and Naiyahmi Yasharahyalah, 42 and 43, were also convicted of child cruelty and perverting the course of justice.
Abiyah Yasharahyalah died after a respiratory illness while suffering from fractures, severe malnutrition, rickets, anaemia, stunted growth and severe dental decay.
Image: Abiyah’s remains weren’t found for more than two years. Pic: West Midlands Police
Jurors were told his parents shunned mainstream society as they set up their own “kingdom”, and were motivated by a belief system including a restrictive vegan diet.
Prosecutors said it would have been obvious Abiyah was in considerable pain and neither parent could explain why they didn’t get help.
The court heard they kept his body in their bed for eight days after he died at the start of the pandemic in early 2020.
They then “embalmed” him and put him in an 80cm-deep grave in their garden in Handsworth, Birmingham. He wasn’t found for more than two years.
Image: The boy was buried in a shallow grave in the garden. Pic: West Midlands Police
“Neither of them is stupid. They were zealous in their beliefs,” prosecutor Jonas Hankin KC told Coventry Crown Court.
He added: “One parent could not have secretly buried Abiyah’s body in the garden without the support of the other. Each played a part in burying Abiyah or agreeing to his being buried.”
Abiyah had six fractures to his arm, legs and ribs, according to examination of his skeletal remains.
However, his exact cause of death could not be identified due to the state of the body.
Image: A sign on the couple’s door in Handsworth before their eviction in March 2022
The couple were arrested on 9 December 2022 while living in a caravan in Glastonbury and Abiyah was finally found five days later.
A two-month trial heard London-born Tai, a medical genetics graduate, had carried out an “eight-day ritual” in the hope his dead son would “come back”.
Defence lawyers argued the couple buried Abiyah in the hope he might be “born again”, rather than to hide the death.
“They genuinely believed they were doing the right thing. They genuinely believed that their diet and the belief in natural and holistic medicines was the best way,” Bernard Tetlow KC told the trial.
Image: The kitchen of the couple’s house before they were evicted
The couple are said to have “invented” a belief system featuring aspects of Nigerian Igbo culture that Tai adapted to form a system he called “slick law”.
They told police they had renounced British citizenship and lived an “off-grid” existence – at one point even living in a shipping container.
The court heard officers visited the Birmingham house three times – in February 2018 when Abiyah was alive, in September 2021 after his death, and in March 2022 to help evict the pair.
On the second occasion, Tai became aggressive and was arrested for being disruptive after officers asked if a child lived at the property.
However, a welfare check did not identify Abiyah as being missing due to confusion over records related to the address.
A child safeguarding practice review is ongoing into the case.
Image: Naiyahmi and Tai Yasharahyalah arriving at court on 28 November Pic: PA
Tai and Naiyahmi Yasharahyalah denied the charges and claimed they thought their son would recover from his poor health.
Despite studying a medical-based degree, Tai also claimed to have been unaware of the risks of a strict unsupplemented vegan diet.
But after 21 hours of deliberations, the jury today unanimously convicted the pair. They will be sentenced next Thursday.
Speaking after the verdicts, Detective Inspector Joe Davenport said Tai was “a very arrogant man, a fantasist, and someone who looked to manipulate people”.
He said Naiyahmi “was incredibly weak-minded” to put her devotion to her husband ahead of her own child.
“Good luck, because it’s a shithole here,” a prisoner shouts as we walk around the grounds at HMP Foston Hall.
Other inmates described this women’s prison in Derbyshire as a “holiday camp”, even “rehab”.
There was no one homogenous view, but there is also not one type of prisoner here – it is home to both murderers and shoplifters.
We’ve come to talk to people ahead of the publication of the sentencing review in the coming days. It’s likely to recommend the scrapping of short sentences for some lower-level crimes, and suggest prison isn’t the best place to punish certain “vulnerable” groups of offenders, including women.
“My kind of theft, I nick chocolate from shops,” inmate Connie Parsons told us as we gathered in her cell.
She’s been convicted of shoplifting nine times and says she’s been in and out of prison since she was 15 years old.
“I normally only get four weeks, three weeks, two weeks. It’s a constant cycle of going out, committing crime,” she said.
Image: Connie has a teenage son but hasn’t seen him for years
At points, Parsons has been homeless and addicted to drugs.
“I used to just come to prison before to have a little lie down and get myself well… to keep myself safe,” she said. “But this prison, you’re not safe… I never self-harmed before I came to this prison. And now I self-harm quite a lot.”
She has a young teenage son on the outside. “I know this might sound harsh, but I think it’s got to the point now I don’t know what to miss about him. But I think about him every single day,” she said.
‘For lots of women, prison is the right place to be’
We put Parsons’ case to the prisons minister, Lord Timpson, who said it was “really sad to hear”, adding he sees “lots of people like Connie” in the prison system.
Pressed on how some will view Parsons as a repeat offender, perhaps deserving of prison, Lord Timpson said: “For lots of women, prison is the right place to be, but where there are certain circumstances, for example non-violent offences for women… you need to work out what is the right path to make sure they don’t commit further crime.”
Lord Timpson said for someone like Parsons, he’d like to see the use of an intensive supervision court or as he called it “problem-solving court”. These work by judges monitoring the progress of offenders on community sentences, offering “wraparound” support, including housing, help for addiction issues and mental health.
Image: Tilat Ajmal served less than three months
Prisoner leaves with jail on her CV
“I had a job, I ain’t got a job now,” said Tilat Ajmal.
Before she went to prison, Ajmal worked for the NHS as a cleaner for 18 years.
As we filmed, she was leaving jail after serving less than three months for smuggling an item into prison while visiting someone. It was her first offence.
Her bags were packed, and in them was a CV she’d prepared. But she didn’t seem hopeful.
“I think it’s a bit bad having a conviction, I’ve been working all my life,” she said.
“As soon as coming out of them gates, I think you just have hundreds and thousands of things going through your head.”
‘Just enough time to rip their lives apart’
After we filmed at the prison, Sky News joined a support session at a women’s centre in Nottingham. It offers mandatory services to people serving sentences in the community, and also those on probation or licence periods.
I asked a case worker to explain why certain women offenders should be considered unique in the criminal justice system.
“I think what happens when a man goes to prison is that there is usually a woman holding everything together,” said Rachel Strong.
“He will be released from prison, his home will still be there, his family. He may have lost his job but there will be someone there. He will come out to his support network in place.
“That woman is that support network – so when she goes to prison, there’s nobody holding that together. People will lose their homes, sometimes their children are taken into care.
“Usually when women are sent to prison it’s for short sentences. Not enough time for anything productive, just enough time to rip their lives apart.”
Image: Donna Pritchards
‘It’s like rehab’
“I don’t mind prison, it’s like rehab,” said Donna Pritchards, who has been to HMP Foston Hall three times.
“I know you get clean when you’re here, and I needed it.”
Drugs are ‘main issue’ in prison
Others told us it was “easy” to get hold of drugs inside jail, with one prisoner describing some leading a “life of luxury”, with jail being like a “holiday camp”.
Amanda Brewer, drug strategy lead, told us: “Illicit drugs are our main issue day to day in everything that we do.
“They’re the main drivers for violence, they can cause self-harm issues, they cause vulnerability.”
Prisoners are also “trading” prescription drugs between one another.
‘Prison is not a nice place to be’
As the government explores greater use of alternatives to custody and scrapping certain short prison sentences, I asked the prisons minister whether criminals might see their approach as a “soft touch”.
“Prison is not a nice place to be,” said Lord Timpson, “but they need to turn their lives around there.”
The government commissioned the sentencing review alongside the creation of the Women’s Justice Board because they have an overcrowding crisis across the prison estate. But they also fundamentally believe prison isn’t the best form of punishment for certain types of offenders.
Women offenders in England and Wales are likely to be disproportionately impacted by the recommendations made in the review.
That’s because we expect it to suggest the scrapping of certain short sentences. In 2022, the Prison Reform Trust found over half (58%) of terms given to women were for less than six months.
Women are also considered by ministers to be a “vulnerable” group, with prison having a knock-on impact on their lives and potential for reoffending. Many report being a victim of crimes like domestic abuse, and 55% of female prisoners are mothers.
After two days of rare and unique access to different parts of the criminal justice system, it’s clear many feel prison isn’t working for female offenders. But what exactly a greater use of alternatives to custody looks like will take some time to figure out.
New portraits of the King and Queen, commissioned to commemorate their coronation in 2023, have been unveiled.
The two separate full-length paintings of Charlesand Camilla were made by artists Peter Kuhfeld and Paul Benny, respectively.
Image: Pic: Reuters
The artists were personally chosen by the King and Queen, who were joined at the unveiling by Camilla’s daughter Laura Lopes.
Mr Kuhfeld, who has known the monarch for more than 40 years, added he hopes his depiction of Charles captured both “the man and the King”.
Mr Benny also said about the Queen: “She said nothing but wonderful things about it, more importantly Laura liked it – you know when the kids like it, you’re probably on the right track.”
Image: Pics: PA
Their portraits will be hung in the National Gallery until 5 June, before moving to their permanent home in Buckingham Palace’s Throne Room.
Acting Superintendent Chris Conway said: “This is an awful and tragic incident, and we offer our condolences to the family who are being supported by specialist officers.
More on Exeter
Related Topics:
“We would ask that the privacy of the family is respected as they come to terms with their devastating loss.”
Police said the teenager’s death is not being treated as suspicious.