Connect with us

Published

on

The entrepreneur Dale Vince has made a fresh approach to the owner of The Guardian in a bid to persuade it to open talks with him about The Observer, days after its sale was agreed to a digital start-up.

Sky News has seen an email sent at the weekend by Mr Vince to Ole Jacob Sunde in which he asks whether an interview given to a Sunday newspaper indicating that he was open to other talks about The Observer’s future represented “a change of position” from the left-wing newspaper publisher.

Mr Vince, who had held talks with the Guardian Media Group chair, Charles Gurassa, prior to last week’s confirmation of The Observer’s sale to Tortoise Media, wrote to Mr Sunde: “I am ready to engage with your team if you are serious.

“I don’t imagine you expect a blind bid, or would take one seriously, [and] a discussion on the numbers therefore would be the right starting place. Is that possible?”

“Broadly speaking my intentions for the Observer match your own; I’m a fan and a reader and a believer in media pluralism.

“I operate a group of companies that made £38m last year on roughly £500m of turnover – all operating in the green economy.

“The Observer clearly needs a digital presence in order to stand alone, I believe the print version is essential to maintain – and the Guardian subscriber model is I believe the right approach.”

More from Money

Mr Vince, who has founded a string of green energy businesses and owns Forest Green Rovers Football Club, is understood to have written to Mr Sunde after the Scott Trust chair was asked by The Sunday Times whether he would still consider selling to a rival to Tortoise Media.

“Of course, at any time in the process, you would listen to people coming to talk to you,” Mr Sunde told The Sunday Times.

“And we will listen, as we have done with all the different bidders that have come.”

However, his comments appeared to be at odds with a subsequent email sent by Mr Sunde in response to Mr Vince’s latest overture – which has also been seen by Sky News.

“Our position hasn’t changed and we are still not in a position to have discussions with other interested parties,” Mr Sunde told the entrepreneur.

“You are the only person who has addressed us, revealing your identity and intentions.”

Despite saying that the Scott Trust had no grounds to talk to rival bidders, Mr Sunde concluded his email: “May I suggest that any further queries are directed to [Charles Gurassa] at this point.”

A GMG spokeswoman confirmed on Monday that the company remained in exclusive discussions with Tortoise Media, having said last Thursday that it expected a formal sale agreement to be signed within days.

The Scott Trust has pledged to invest £5m into Tortoise Media in exchange for a stake and a board seat, in an attempt to placate furious Guardian and Observer journalists.

Last week, they went on strike for two days in protest at the sale.

On Friday, Mr Vince accused the newspapers’ owners of telling “a complete untruth” about his interest in The Observer.

“I don’t understand why my interest in the Observer continues to be mischaracterised by the Guardian/Scott Trust,” he told Sky News.

One source said that the apparent mixed messaging from GMG and the Scott Trust raised important questions about corporate governance at the two organisations, and said the “fiasco” would put serious pressure on the organisations’ leadership.

Paul Webster, who until last month was The Observer’s editor, accused Mr Sunde of failing to consult him or colleagues on the paper about the sale.

If the deal with Tortoise Media completes, it will see The Observer in new ownership for the first time since the early 1990s.

Founded in 1791, it is the oldest Sunday newspaper in the world.

Its takeover by a digital media startup will underline the shifting dynamics sweeping the global news media landscape.

GMG and the Scott Trust declined to comment beyond confirming the accuracy of Mr Sunde’s quotes in The Sunday Times.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump tariffs to knock growth but won’t cause global recession, says IMF

Published

on

By

Trump tariffs to knock growth but won't cause global recession, says IMF

The ripping up of the trade rule book caused by President Trump’s tariffs will slow economic growth in some countries, but not cause a global recession, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said.

There will be “notable” markdowns to growth forecasts, according to the financial organisation’s managing director Kristalina Georgieva in her curtain raiser speech at the IMF’s spring meeting in Washington.

Some nations will also see higher inflation as a result of the taxes Mr Trump has placed on imports to the US. At the same time, the European Central Bank said it anticipated less inflation from tariffs.

Money: Chef on a classic he’ll never order

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know

Earlier this month, a flat rate of 10% was placed on all imports, while additional levies from certain countries were paused for 90 days. Car parts, steel and aluminium are, however, still subject to a 25% tax when they arrive in the US.

This has meant the “reboot of the global trading system”, Ms Georgieva said. “Trade policy uncertainty is literally off the charts.”

The confusion over why nations were slapped with their specific tariffs, the stop-start nature of the taxes, and the rapid escalation of the tit-for-tat levies between the US and China sparked uncertainty and financial market turbulence.

More on Tariffs

“The longer uncertainty persists, the larger the cost,” Ms Georgieva cautioned.

“Unusual” activity in currency and government debt markets – as investors sold off dollars and US government debt – “should be taken as a warning”, she added.

“Everyone suffers if financial conditions worsen.”

Read more:
Sainsburys profits top £1bn after closing all cafes and cutting 3,000 jobs
Predators eye bargain deal for struggling discount retailer Poundland

These challenges are being borne out from a “weaker starting position” as public debt levels are much higher in recent years due to spending during the COVID-19 pandemic and higher interest rates, which increased the cost of borrowing.

The trade tensions are “to a large extent” a result of “an erosion of trust”, Ms Georgieva said.

This erosion, coupled with jobs moving overseas, and concerns over national security and domestic production, has left us in a world where “industry gets more attention than the service sector” and “where national interests tower over global concerns,” she added.

Continue Reading

Business

Sainsburys profits top £1bn after closing all cafes and cutting 3,000 jobs

Published

on

By

Sainsburys profits top £1bn after closing all cafes and cutting 3,000 jobs

Annual profits at the UK’s second biggest supermarket, Sainsbury’s, have reached £1bn.

The supermarket chain reported that sales and profits grew over the year to March.

It also comes after Sainsbury’s announced in January plans to close of all of its in-store cafes and the loss of 3,000 jobs.

But the high profits are not expected to increase, according to Sainsbury’s, which warned of heightened competition as a supermarket price war heats up.

Tesco too warned of “intensification of competition” last week, as Asda’s executive chairman earlier this year committed to foregoing profits in favour of price cuts.

Sainsbury’s said it had spent £1bn lowering prices, leading to a “record-breaking year in grocery”, its highest market share gain in more than a decade, as more people chose Sainsbury’s for their main shop.

Money: Chef on a classic he’ll never order

It’s the second most popular supermarket with market share of ahead of Asda but below Tesco, according to latest industry figures from market research company Kantar.

In the same year, the supermarket announced plans to cut more than 3,000 jobs and the closure of its remaining 61 in-store cafes as well as hot food, patisserie, and pizza counters, to save money in a “challenging cost environment”.

This financial year, profits are forecast to be around £1bn again, in line with the £1.036bn in retail underlying operating profit announced today for the year ended in March.

The grocer has been a vocal critic of the government’s increase in employer national insurance contributions and said in January it would incur an additional £140m as a result of the hike.

Higher national insurance bills are not captured by the annual results published on Thursday, as they only took effect in April, outside of the 2024 to 2025 financial year.

Supermarkets gearing up for a price war and not bulking profits further could be good news for prices of shelves, according to online investment planner AJ Bell’s investment director Russ Mould.

“The main winners in a price war would ultimately be shoppers”, he said.

“Like Tesco, Sainsbury’s wants to equip itself to protect its competitive position, hence its guidance for flat profit in the coming year as it looks to offer customers value for money.”

There has been, however, a warning from Sainsbury’s that higher national insurance contributions will bring costs up for consumers.

News shops are planned in “key target locations”, Sainsbury’s results said, which, along with further openings, “provides a unique opportunity to drive further market share gains”.

Continue Reading

Business

US markets fall as AI chipmakers mourn new restrictions on China exports

Published

on

By

US markets fall as AI chipmakers mourn new restrictions on China exports

US stock markets suffered more significant losses on Wednesday, with stocks in leading AI chipmakers slumping after firms said new restrictions on exports to China would cost them billions.

Nvidia fell 6.87% – and was at one point down 10% – after revealing it would now need a US government licence to sell its H20 chip.

Rival chipmaker AMD slumped 7.35% after it predicted a $800m (£604m) charge due to its MI308 also needing a licence.

Dutch firm ASML, which makes hardware essential to chip manufacturing, fell more than 5% after it missed order expectations and said US tariffs created uncertainty.

The losses filtered into the tech-dominated Nasdaq index, which recovered slightly to end 3% down, while the larger S&P 500 fell 2.2%.

A board above the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange, shows the closing number for the Dow Jones industrial average Wednesday, April 16, 2025. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
Image:
Pic: AP

Such losses would have been among the worst in years were it not for the turmoil over recent weeks.

It comes as China remains the focus of Donald Trump’s tariff regime, with both countries imposing tit-for-tat charges of over 100% on imports.

The US commerce department said in a statement it was “committed to acting on the president’s directive to safeguard our national and economic security”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Could Trump make a trade deal with UK?

Nvidia’s bespoke China chip is already deliberately less powerful than products sold elsewhere after intervention from the previous Biden administration.

However, the Trump government is worried the H20 and others could still be used to build a supercomputer in China, threatening national security and US dominance in AI.

Nvidia said the move would cost it around $5.5bn (£4.1bn) and the licensing requirement would be in place for the “indefinite future”.

Nvidia’s recently announced a $500bn (£378bn) investment to build infrastructure in America – something Mr Trump heralded as a victory in his mission to boost US manufacturing.

However, it appears to have been too little to stave off the new restrictions.

Pressure has also come from the Democrats, with senator Elizabeth Warren writing to the commerce secretary and urging him to limit chip sales to China.

Meanwhile, the head of US central bank also warned on Wednesday that US tariffs could slow the economy and raise inflation more than expected.

Jerome Powell said the bank would need more time to decide on lowering interest rates.

“The level of the tariff increases announced so far is significantly larger than anticipated,” he said.

“The same is likely to be true of the economic effects, which will include higher inflation and slower growth.”

Predictions of a recession in the US have risen significantly since the president revealed details of the import taxes a few weeks ago.

However, he subsequently paused the higher rates for 90 days to allow for negotiations.

Continue Reading

Trending